C A L I F O R N I A E N E R G Y C O M M I S S I O N Overview of California’s Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Planning and Investment December 7, 2015 December 7, 2015 Leslie Baroody Zero-Emission Vehicle and Infrastructure Office Fuels and Transportation Division

C A L I F O R N I A E N E R G Y C O M M I S S I O N California’s Key ZEV-Related Policies and Regulations 2 Policy ObjectivesPolicy OriginGoals and Milestones Greenhouse Gas Reduction AB 32, Executive Order S-3-05 and Executive Order B Reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 1990 levels by 2020, 40% below 1990 levels by 2030 and 80% below 1990 levels by 2050 in California Petroleum Reduction Governor’s Executive Order B Governor’s new target of 50% reduction for cars and trucks by 2030 and creation of Sustainable Freight Action Plan by July 2016 Low Carbon Fuel Standard AB 32, California Global Warming Solutions Act 10% reduction in carbon intensity of transportation fuels in California by 2020 Air QualityClean Air Act80% reduction in NOx from current levels by 2023 Renewables Portfolio Standard Executive Order S and SB X1-2, and SB 350 Goal of 33% renewable electricity generation by 2020 and 50% by 2030 ZEV Mandate California Executive Order B Accommodate 1 million ZEVs by 2020 and 1.5 million by 2025 in California Integrated Energy Policy Report SB 1389 (2002) 2014 IEPR: Chapter 3 recommendations for EV infrastructure deployment

C A L I F O R N I A E N E R G Y C O M M I S S I O N The Alternative and Renewable Fuel and Vehicle Technology Program (ARFVTP)  Created by AB 118 and extended by AB 8 through January 1,  ARFVTP provides funds of $100 million per year, allocated via an annual Investment Plan  Projects funded that will “transform California’s fuel and vehicle types to help attain the state’s climate change policies”.  Projects should “develop and deploy technology and alternative and renewable fuels in the marketplace without adopting any one preferred fuel or technology. 3

C A L I F O R N I A E N E R G Y C O M M I S S I O N October 2015 PEV Sales 4

C A L I F O R N I A E N E R G Y C O M M I S S I O N Alternative Fuels Data Center (DOE) California’s Existing Public Charging Infrastructure (Outlets) Level 1: 667 Level 2: 6,975 DC Fast Charge: 722 Level 2: Dedicated 220V Level 1: Standard Outlet DC Fast Charging: High voltage public charging 5

C A L I F O R N I A E N E R G Y C O M M I S S I O N 6

Regional PEV Readiness and Planning Federal, State and Locally Funded Charging Infrastructure NRG eVgo Settlement, NEDO, and potential IOU Proposals Residential, workplace, commercial, Tesla and others  How do all the pieces fit together?  What is the role of publicly funded charging infrastructure?  How are sites determined?  What is the role of CEC Regional PEV Readiness Plans? 7 Planning Private Public Other State Actions

C A L I F O R N I A E N E R G Y C O M M I S S I O N FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL INVESTMENTS IN EV CHARGING STATIONS (EVCS) PUBLIC 8

C A L I F O R N I A E N E R G Y C O M M I S S I O N CEC Electric Vehicle Support Residential Multi-unit Dwelling CommercialWorkplace DC Fast Chargers Total Installed3, , ,049 Planned-961, ,466 Total3, , ,515 Plus 34 Regional Readiness Planning Grants = $7.6 M CPCFA Loan-Loss Reserve Program = $2 M 9 Charging Infrastructure Grants= $38.7 M

C A L I F O R N I A E N E R G Y C O M M I S S I O N California’s EVCS Planning Process CA EV Charging Station Goals NREL PEV Charging Infrastructure Assessment and AESC Plans CEC Regional Infrastructure Plans Academia and National Labs PEV Collaborative, stakeholder input, workshops 10

C A L I F O R N I A E N E R G Y C O M M I S S I O N NREL Statewide PEV EVCS Assessment First statewide EVCS needs assessment Establishes framework for how to achieve the ZEV Action Plan using two scenarios Goal of EVSE Deployment Sufficient to support 1.0 Million ZEVs by 2020 Estimates quantities, levels and geographic distribution of chargers needed in 2020 across 2 scenarios: HOME DOMINANT and HIGH PUBLIC ACCESS 11

C A L I F O R N I A E N E R G Y C O M M I S S I O N Role of Public Funding for Charging Infrastructure  Identify and fill gaps while complementing other efforts (Example: North-South Highway Corridors)  Invest in locations and sites with  1) high benefit to current/future PEV drivers,  2) installation barriers (e.g. electricity service lacking)  3) challenging business cases ( remote areas with low PEV use, public service sites such as hospitals and schools)  Invest in new technology and charging models 12

C A L I F O R N I A E N E R G Y C O M M I S S I O N 13

C A L I F O R N I A E N E R G Y C O M M I S S I O N ARFVTP Funding for State Parks in Partnership with “Adopt-A-Charger” 14

C A L I F O R N I A E N E R G Y C O M M I S S I O N City of Burbank 8 Curbside Level 2 Chargers 15 New Charging Model

C A L I F O R N I A E N E R G Y C O M M I S S I O N The Los Angeles Good Samaritan Hospital EVCS Project 16

C A L I F O R N I A E N E R G Y C O M M I S S I O N CEC PEV Investment Update  DC Fast Charger Solicitation Applications in Review  $10 million for north-south corridor fast chargers  Upcoming EV Solicitations and Agreements: $15.6 million  Regional Readiness: $1.9 million  CA Pollution Control Financing Authority - CalCAP EV Charging Station Financing Program: $2 million  ARFVTP Draft Investment Plan proposed allocation for EV charging infrastructure is $17 M and $2 M for Regional Readiness 17

C A L I F O R N I A E N E R G Y C O M M I S S I O N Public Entity Investment in Charging Infrastructure Examples Publicly-Owned Utilities –SMUD –LADWP Air Districts –South Coast Air Quality Management District –Bay Area Air Quality Management District Cities and Counties 18

C A L I F O R N I A E N E R G Y C O M M I S S I O N RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL, WORKPLACE, TESLA AND OTHERS PRIVATE 19

C A L I F O R N I A E N E R G Y C O M M I S S I O N Tesla Supercharger Stations  California has a network of 36 Tesla Supercharger Stations with multiple connectors.  Strategic placement to minimize stops on long distance travel and located near restaurants, shopping centers and WiFi hot spots.  Free for owners of the Model S with Supercharger option enabled. 20

C A L I F O R N I A E N E R G Y C O M M I S S I O N CPUC SETTLEMENT-NRG EVGO, NEDO, IOU PROPOSALS, CALGREEN BUILDING STANDARDS OTHER STATE ACTIONS 21

C A L I F O R N I A E N E R G Y C O M M I S S I O N NRG eVgo Settlement  200 DC Fast Charger “Freedom Stations” in 4 metro areas (97 energized and 44 in progress)  10,000 Make-Readies or stubs at no less than 1,000 sites (1,188 at 187 sites installed)  Technology Demonstrations (eg. V2G, battery storage ) 22

C A L I F O R N I A E N E R G Y C O M M I S S I O N NEDO and Go-Biz MOU signing September 2015 DC Fast Charger Project :  $10 M to $20 M for fast chargers between Monterey and Lake Tahoe.  In partnership with GoBiz, Nissan and Kanematsu-- will collect and analyze data on EV driving patterns in California. 23

C A L I F O R N I A E N E R G Y C O M M I S S I O N Investor-Owned Utility Proposals SDG&ESCEPG&E Charge Points5,550 L1/L2 550 facilities with average of 10 L1/L2 chargers (VGI enabled) at each site 30,000 L1/L2 Phase 1: One year pilot for 1,500 chargers followed by second phase over 4 years for 30,000 total. 10 charger minimum/site 25,000 L2 and 100 DC fast chargers (original proposal) Timelines Targeted Areas MUDs and workplaces Long dwell-time locations Public facilities, workplaces and MUDs Cost$103 M$355 M$653 M 24

C A L I F O R N I A E N E R G Y C O M M I S S I O N 25 Requirements: Install infrastructure (raceway and panel capacity) to support future installation of Level 2 charging stations Voluntary “Reach” Standards: Tiers are more progressive than requirements Cities and counties can adopt as mandatory Building Standards Commission (BSC) & ARB: Expanding EV Infrastructure in CALGreen Code

C A L I F O R N I A E N E R G Y C O M M I S S I O N DOE/CEC REGIONAL READINESS GRANTS REGIONAL PEV READINESS AND PLANNING 26

C A L I F O R N I A E N E R G Y C O M M I S S I O N Need for Regional PEV Infrastructure Plans  California is complex: 482 Municipalities 58 Counties 170,000 miles of roadways  Regions have unique EV micro- climates and topography that require region-specific infrastructure plans  Regions have varied land-uses, unique driver characteristics, travel patterns, and objectives for PEV policies 27

C A L I F O R N I A E N E R G Y C O M M I S S I O N 28

C A L I F O R N I A E N E R G Y C O M M I S S I O N DOE/CEC’s PEV Regional Readiness Grants: Phase I Update Zoning and Parking policiesUpdate Building Codes Streamline permitting and inspection processes Participate in local official training and education programs Reach out to local businesses and residents 29

C A L I F O R N I A E N E R G Y C O M M I S S I O N CEC’s PEV Regional Readiness Grants Additional Actions: Phase II Develop regional charging station site selection plan Encourage workplace charging Develop and implement solutions for multi-unit dwellings Incorporate PEVs and charging into local fleets Create local incentives to encourage PEV sales 30

C A L I F O R N I A E N E R G Y C O M M I S S I O N CEC’s PEV Regional Readiness Implementation--Phase III Implement Streamlining of Permitting and Inspection Processes EVCS Siting and Installation ProcessEV “Trailblazer” SignageEducation, Outreach and MarketingLocal Government Code Adoption and Training 31

C A L I F O R N I A E N E R G Y C O M M I S S I O N Conclusion 32 California has made progress but more strategically placed charging infrastructure needed More research and data to inform EVCS strategies and deployment Better coordination in planning and sharing lessons learned