Dynamics of Perceptual Bistability J Rinzel, NYU w/ N Rubin, A Shpiro, R Curtu, R Moreno Alternations in perception of ambiguous stimulus – irregular…

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The dynamic range of bursting in a network of respiratory pacemaker cells Alla Borisyuk Universityof Utah.
Advertisements

Quasi-Continuous Decision States in the Leaky Competing Accumulator Model Jay McClelland Stanford University With Joel Lachter, Greg Corrado, and Jim Johnston.
Synchrony in Neural Systems: a very brief, biased, basic view Tim Lewis UC Davis NIMBIOS Workshop on Synchrony April 11, 2011.
Impact of Correlated inputs on Spiking Neural Models Baktash Babadi Baktash Babadi School of Cognitive Sciences PM, Tehran, Iran PM, Tehran, Iran.
Leech Heart Half- Center Oscillator: Control of Burst Duration by Low- Voltage Activated Calcium Current Math 723: Mathematical Neuroscience Khaldoun Hamade.
Why are cortical spike trains irregular? How Arun P Sripati & Kenneth O Johnson Johns Hopkins University.
Part II: Population Models BOOK: Spiking Neuron Models, W. Gerstner and W. Kistler Cambridge University Press, 2002 Chapters 6-9 Laboratory of Computational.
Marseille, Jan 2010 Alfonso Renart (Rutgers) Jaime de la Rocha (NYU, Rutgers) Peter Bartho (Rutgers) Liad Hollender (Rutgers) Néstor Parga (UA Madrid)
Jochen Triesch, UC San Diego, 1 Local Stability Analysis Step One: find stationary point(s) Step Two: linearize around.
Dynamics of perceptual bistability. Alternating perceptions of ambiguous scenes J Rinzel, NYU NIST, 2011 w/ N Rubin, A Shpiro, R Curtu, R Moreno, E Montbrio,
Decision Dynamics and Decision States: the Leaky Competing Accumulator Model Psychology 209 March 4, 2013.
Reading population codes: a neural implementation of ideal observers Sophie Deneve, Peter Latham, and Alexandre Pouget.
For stimulus s, have estimated s est Bias: Cramer-Rao bound: Mean square error: Variance: Fisher information How good is our estimate? (ML is unbiased:
CH12: Neural Synchrony James Sulzer Background Stability and steady states of neural firing, phase plane analysis (CH6) Firing Dynamics (CH7)
Correlations (part I). 1.Mechanistic/biophysical plane: - What is the impact of correlations on the output rate, CV,... Bernarder et al ‘94, Murphy &
Neuronal excitability from a dynamical systems perspective Mike Famulare CSE/NEUBEH 528 Lecture April 14, 2009.
A synaptic memory trace for cortical receptive field plasticity Robert Froemke, Michael Merzenich & Christoph Schreiner Andrew Lysaght HST.723 April 22,
How facilitation influences an attractor model of decision making Larissa Albantakis.
Basic Models in Theoretical Neuroscience Oren Shriki 2010 Integrate and Fire and Conductance Based Neurons 1.
Basal Ganglia. Involved in the control of movement Dysfunction associated with Parkinson’s and Huntington’s disease Site of surgical procedures -- Deep.
Introduction to Mathematical Methods in Neurobiology: Dynamical Systems Oren Shriki 2009 Neural Excitability.
Conditioned Inhibition CS B CS C clicks Conditioned inhibition is an internal state that prevents an organism from making some response, like salivation.
Dynamical Encoding by Networks of Competing Neuron Groups : Winnerless Competition M. Rabinovich 1, A. Volkovskii 1, P. Lecanda 2,3, R. Huerta 1,2, H.D.I.
Lecture 10: Mean Field theory with fluctuations and correlations Reference: A Lerchner et al, Response Variability in Balanced Cortical Networks, q-bio.NC/ ,
Biological Modeling of Neural Networks Week 8 – Noisy input models: Barrage of spike arrivals Wulfram Gerstner EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland 8.1 Variation.
 Graph of a set of data points  Used to evaluate the correlation between two variables.
SCC Afferents Kim McArthur Vestibular Classics November 3, 2006.
Xiao-Jing Wang Department of Neurobiology Yale University School of Medicine The Concept of a Decision Threshold in Sensory-Motor Processes.
Biological Modeling of Neural Networks Week 8 – Noisy output models: Escape rate and soft threshold Wulfram Gerstner EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland 8.1 Variation.
Simplified Models of Single Neuron Baktash Babadi Fall 2004, IPM, SCS, Tehran, Iran
Neuronal Adaptation to Visual Motion in Area MT of the Macaque -Kohn & Movshon 지각 심리 전공 박정애.
TEMPLATE DESIGN © In analyzing the trajectory as time passes, I find that: The trajectory is trying to follow the moving.
Biological Modeling of Neural Networks: Week 12 – Decision models: Competitive dynamics Wulfram Gerstner EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland 12.1 Review: Population.
Study on synchronization of coupled oscillators using the Fokker-Planck equation H.Sakaguchi Kyushu University, Japan Fokker-Planck equation: important.
Lecture 21 Neural Modeling II Martin Giese. Aim of this Class Account for experimentally observed effects in motion perception with the simple neuronal.
BME 6938 Neurodynamics Instructor: Dr Sachin S Talathi.
Neural Networks with Short-Term Synaptic Dynamics (Leiden, May ) Misha Tsodyks, Weizmann Institute Mathematical Models of Short-Term Synaptic plasticity.
Zoltán Somogyvári Hungarian Academy of Sciences, KFKI Research Institute for Particle and Nuclear Physics Department of Biophysics A model-based approach.
Biological Modeling of Neural Networks Week 4 – Reducing detail - Adding detail Wulfram Gerstner EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland 3.1 From Hodgkin-Huxley to.
Ch 9. Rhythms and Synchrony 9.7 Adaptive Cooperative Systems, Martin Beckerman, Summarized by M.-O. Heo Biointelligence Laboratory, Seoul National.
Biological Modeling of Neural Networks: Week 15 – Fast Transients and Rate models Wulfram Gerstner EPFL, Lausanne, Switzerland 15.1 Review Populations.
Keeping the neurons cool Homeostatic Plasticity Processes in the Brain.
From LIF to HH Equivalent circuit for passive membrane The Hodgkin-Huxley model for active membrane Analysis of excitability and refractoriness using the.
1 Heart rate variability: challenge for both experiment and modelling I. Khovanov, N. Khovanova, P. McClintock, A. Stefanovska Physics Department, Lancaster.
Alternating and Synchronous Rhythms in Reciprocally Inhibitory Model Neurons Xiao-Jing Wang, John Rinzel Neural computation (1992). 4: Ubong Ime.
Response dynamics and phase oscillators in the brainstem
Network Models (2) LECTURE 7. I.Introduction − Basic concepts of neural networks II.Realistic neural networks − Homogeneous excitatory and inhibitory.
Does the brain compute confidence estimates about decisions?
Introduction to mathematical modeling … in immunology
What weakly coupled oscillators can tell us about networks and cells
Biointelligence Laboratory, Seoul National University
Bistability and hysteresis
Jay McClelland Stanford University
Dynamical Models of Decision Making Optimality, human performance, and principles of neural information processing Jay McClelland Department of Psychology.
Linking neural dynamics and coding
A Classical Model of Decision Making: The Drift Diffusion Model of Choice Between Two Alternatives At each time step a small sample of noisy information.
Sample vs Population comparing mean and standard deviations
Volume 88, Issue 2, Pages (October 2015)
Underlying mechanisms.
Dynamical Models of Decision Making Optimality, human performance, and principles of neural information processing Jay McClelland Department of Psychology.
Using Time-Varying Motion Stimuli to Explore Decision Dynamics
Brendan K. Murphy, Kenneth D. Miller  Neuron 
Volume 36, Issue 5, Pages (December 2002)
Adaptation without Plasticity
H.Sebastian Seung, Daniel D. Lee, Ben Y. Reis, David W. Tank  Neuron 
Information Processing by Neuronal Populations Chapter 5 Measuring distributed properties of neural representations beyond the decoding of local variables:
Adaptation without Plasticity
Shaping the Default Activity Pattern of the Cortical Network
Rapid Neocortical Dynamics: Cellular and Network Mechanisms
Dependence of the STN–GPe subcircuit behavior on the interconnection efficacies between the STN and GPe and the background inputs. Dependence of the STN–GPe.
Presentation transcript:

Dynamics of Perceptual Bistability J Rinzel, NYU w/ N Rubin, A Shpiro, R Curtu, R Moreno Alternations in perception of ambiguous stimulus – irregular… Oscillator models – mutual inhibition, switches due to adaptation -- noise gives randomness to period Attractor models – noise driven, no alternation w/o noise Constraints from data:, CV Which model is favored?

Mutual inhibition with slow adaptation  alternating dominance and suppression IV: Levelt, 1968

Oscillator Models for Directly Competing Populations w/ N Rubin, A Shpiro, R Curtu Two mutually inhibitory populations, corresponding to each percept. Firing rate model: r 1 (t), r 2 (t) Slow negative feedback: adaptation or synaptic depression. Wilson 2003; Laing and Chow 2003 r1r1 Slow adaptation, a 1 (t) r1r1 r2r2 r2r2 r1r1 No recurrent excitation …half-center oscillator τ dr 1 /dt = -r 1 + f(-βr 2 - g a 1 + I 1 ) τ a da 1 /dt = -a 1 + r 1 τ dr 2 /dt = -r 2 + f(-βr 1 - g a 2 + I 2 ) τ a da 2 /dt = -a 2 + r 2 τ a >> τ, f(u)=1/(1+exp[(θ-u)/k]) u f f Shpiro et al, J Neurophys 2007

Alternating firing ratesAdaptation slowly grows/decays IV adaptation LC model WTA or ATT regime

Fast-Slow dissection: r 1, r 2 fast variables a 1, a 2 slow variables r 1 - nullcline r 2 - nullcline r 1 = f(-βr 2 - g a 1 + I 1 ) r 2 = f(-βr 1 - g a 2 + I 2 ) Analysis of Dynamics a 1, a 2 frozen r1r1 r2r2

r 1 -r 2 phase plane, slowly drifting nullclines a1a1 a2a2 Switching occurs when a 1 -a 2 traj reaches a curve of SNs (knees) At a switch: saddle-node in fast dynamics. dominant r is high while system rides near “threshold” of suppressed populn’s nullcline  ESCAPE. β =0.9, I 1 =I 2 =1.4 r 1 - nullcline r 2 - nullcline r1r1 r2r2

input f θ net input Dominant, a ↑ I – g a Suppressed, a ↓ I – g a - β Small I, “release” Switching due to adaptation: release or escape mechanism θ net input Large I, “escape” Recurrent excitation, secures “escape” I + α a – g a

Noise leads to random dominance durations and eliminates WTA behavior. Added to stimulus I 1,2 s.d., σ = 0.03, τ n = 10 Model with synaptic depression τ dr i /dt = -r i + f(-βr j - g a i + I i + n i ) τ a da i /dt = -a i + r i

Noise-Driven Attractor Models w/ R Moreno, N Rubin J Neurophys, 2007 No oscillations if noise is absent. Kramers 1940

LP-IV in an attractor model

g A = g B activity r A =r B WTA OSC Compare dynamical skeletons: “oscillator” and attractor-based models

Noise-free Observed variability and mean duration constrain the model. 1 sec < mean T < 10 sec 0.4 < CV < 0.6 With noise Difficult to arrange low CV and high in OSC regime.

With noise Favored: noise-driven attractor with weak adaptation – but not far from oscillator regime.

Best fit distribution depends on parameter values. I 1, I 2 = 0.6 Noise dominated Adaptation dominated

SUMMARY Experimentally: Monotonic vs I and CV as constraints No correlation between successive cycles Models, one framework – vary params. Mutual, direct inhibition; w/o recurrent excitation Non-monotonic dominance duration vs I 1, I 2 Attractor regime, noise dominated Better match w/ data. Balance between noise level and adaptation strength. Oscillator regime, adaptation dominated Relatively smaller CV. Relatively greater correlation between successive cycles. Moreno model (J Neurophys 2007): local inhibition, strong recurrent excitation: monotonic vs I. Swartz Foundation and NIH. w/ N Rubin, A Shpiro, R Curtu, R Moreno