Quality Work Group Report Report to: Member Services Committee January 21, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What Every Principal Needs to Know About Special Education
Advertisements

The Role of the IRB An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a review committee established to help protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects.
Independent External Review of Health Care Decisions in Vermont Department of Banking, Insurance, Securities and Health Care Administration.
Internal and External Appeals of Health Care Coverage Denials: One States Experience Conference Call Health Assistance Partnership August 12, 2004 Presenters:
August 28, 2009 Federal Emergency Management Agency Public Assistance Arbitration Process.
Procedural Safeguards
The Allegation An allegation may be submitted by : Any Person. An allegation may be filed with the PLSB through: The Department of Education A Public.
BIE SPECIAL EDUCATION ACADEMY PRESENTERS: JUDY WILEY AND NARCY KAWON I ntroduction to Procedural Safeguards Bureau of Indian Education.
Grievances & Appeals CPAC Brown Bag 15 May 2001 Jim Baugh & Steve Rayle.
10/09/01 Overview Purpose of this presentation:
THE COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH FOR CENTRAL MICHIGAN CONSUMER GRIEVANCE SYSTEM.
MMAI: Illinois Unified Medicare-Medicaid Appeals Process
Faculty Grievance Committee Training October 26, 2012.
Staff Development Emergency Operations 1. Identify 5 purposes of the offender/student grievance process Identify 5 grievable issues Identify 12 non-grievable.
DIFFERENCES BETWEEN Old and New A & P Grievance Procedures.
Faculty Forum: March 5, 2008 Shall the Collected Rules and Regulations be revised to adopt the revised Pilot Faculty Grievance Procedure recommended by.
Medicaid Non-Emergency Transportation Complaints, Grievances, Appeals and Medicaid Fair Hearings July 13, th Annual Transportation Disadvantaged.
Managed MaineCare Initiative Stakeholder Advisory Committee & Specialized Services Committee Meeting January 28, 2011.
Preparing for Compliance Monitoring Reviews Understanding CMS Protocols Used by Review Organizations January 14, 2009 Presented by: Margaret deHesse, RN,
EMPLOYMENT LAW & MANAGING STAFF. What’s new? Repeal of statutory disciplinary and grievance procedures New ACAS Code of Practice Extension of flexible.
Being More Appealing Bobbi Buell ION October, 2008.
Goddard Space Flight Center Office of Human Capital Management Christina LaFountain, Employee Relations Program Manager Code 115
2012 CMS Fall Conference Part D Coverage Determinations, Appeals & Grievances (CDAG) Jennifer Smith, Director Division of Appeals Policy Medicare Enrollment.
Member “Grievance” and “Appeals” Process Venture Behavioral Health Member Services Department.
Medicaid Managed Care Regulations Silvia Rodriguez-Sánchez Erika Cristo.
Presentation before the Missouri Bar’s Health and Hospital Law Committee November 18, 2011 Markus P. Cicka, J.D., L.L.M. (Health Law) Director – Missouri.
DUE PROCESS DEVELOPMENTS IN TERMINATION AND GRIEVANCES.
Third Party Liability & Act 62 COORDINATION OF BENEFITS DGS ANNEX COMPLEX 116 EAST AZALEA DRIVE PETRY BUILDING #17 HARRISBURG, PA
Marketplace Eligibility Appeals
JUVENILE COURT: CONTEXT AND OVERVIEW Janet Mason March 8, 2006 Institute of Government UNC at Chapel Hill.
Telemedicine Credentialing and Privileging October 16, 2014.
Surrogate Parent Training Presenter: Title: District: Date: Presented by:
SEMINAR NAIC/ASSAL/SVS REGULATION & SUPERVISION OF MARKET CONDUCT © 2014 National Association of Insurance Commissioners Complaint Handling.
Regional Center Fair Hearing Process Presented by Katie Casada Hornberger Office of Clients’ Rights Advocacy.
Health Insurance in New York Laura Dillon, Principal Examiner New York Insurance Department Consumer Services Bureau One Commerce Plaza Albany NY
The Education Act 2002 & School Staffing Regulations 2009 (as amended 2012 and 2013) Responsibilities for Governors in respect of Staff.
Serious Deficiencies for Providers. What is Seriously Deficient? “The status of an institution or day care home that has been determined to be non-compliant.
1 Supplemental Regulations to 34 CFR Part 300 Assistance to States for the Education of Children with Disabilities and Preschool Grants for Children with.
SUMMARY OF INFORMAL COMMENTS Temporary Waiver of Terms Regulations May 2006.
Child & Adult Care Food Program Serious Deficiency Process & Provider Appeals.
Presented by: Yolanda Chavez, RN, BSN Policy Rules and Curriculum Development Unit DADS Regulatory Services 1 DADS REGULATORY UPDATE March 2013.
Be an Expert! Using and Explaining ESIT's New Procedural Safeguards Forms Joicey Hurth, Kathi Gillaspy, Anne Lucas Cathy Buchanan & Rene’ Denman 1.
Bilingual Students and the Law n Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 n Title VII of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act - The Bilingual Education.
Procedural Safeguards. Purpose Guarantee parents both an opportunity for meaningful input into all decisions affecting their child’s education and the.
August 28, 2009 Federal Emergency Management Agency Public Assistance Arbitration Process.
1 Federal Sector Discrimination Complaints Process for Individuals Incident/Alleged Discrimination (1) Employee Contacts EO Counselor (Rights & Responsibilities)
EDSE 539 Special Education Leadership in Schools Parent Rights and Relationships Dispute Resolution Remedies.
What are Parent’s Rights in Georgia Special Education? Parents and students over age eighteen have the right … To Participate You have the right to refer.
LEAST RESTRICTIVE ENVIRONMENT LEAST RESTRICTIVE ENVIRONMENT ©PACER Center, Inc., 2005.
Grier Revised Consent Decree Daniels vs. White TennCare Grier Revised Consent Decree.
Rabbanai T. Morgan Current as of 26 January 2006 Protests.
Revoking Consent for Special Education Services COSA Fall Special Education Conference October 2009 Rae Ann Ray Office of Student Learning & Partnerships.
Regulations That Protect Employees.. Discrimination Laws Workplace discrimination laws are designed to give every person an equal opportunity in any company.
AMENDMENTS TO THE PROGRAM COMPLIANCE REVIEW GUIDE July 2006 IFTA Annual Business Meeting.
I ntroduction to Procedural Safeguards Produced by NICHCY, 2007.
Your Rights! An overview of Special Education Laws Presented by: The Individual Needs Department.
© 2007 NSCLC 1 LAAC Armchair Training Medicare Part D: Accessing Drugs Coverage Determinations, Exceptions, Appeals and Grievances March 8, 2007 Georgia.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Discipline.
HIPAA Training Workshop #3 Individual Rights Kaye L. Rankin Rankin Healthcare Consultants, Inc.
Procedural Safeguards
AHCCCS/ALTCS Service Appeal Process Flow Chart
Understanding the Section 504 Process
Psychiatric Advance Directives
SCSEP Grievance Policies & Procedures
Understanding the Section 504 Process
ENROLLEE DUE PROCESS for Medicaid Managed CARE 42 CFR § 438 et seq.
SSA Adverse Decisions and Administrative Finality
E. Planning and Preparing to Manage a Small Business
Title IX Proposed Regulations
Presentation transcript:

Quality Work Group Report Report to: Member Services Committee January 21, 2011

1 Grievances Definitions High level overview of process Expedited review MCO internal review process Role of DHHS

2 Many different definitions Federal and Maine laws use the term to describe: – Adverse actions (termination/reduction of services) – Complaints – Right violations In this process, we want to clarify our language because the process differs depending on what we are talking about. What is a Grievance?

3 Federal term used to describe the following events:  Denial or limited authorization of a requested service  Reduction, suspension or termination of a previously authorized service  Denial of a payment for a service  Failure to provide services in a timely manner as defined by the state Action

4  An appeal is a response by a member to an ACTION  Federal regulations govern what states must do when a member appeals an action.  A state must respond to an appeal within a specified time frame established by the federal government.  An MCO will be part of Maine’s reviews of appeals Appeal of an Action

5 For All MaineCare Members  Law guarantees a fair hearing process for all ACTIONS  A Member has 60 days in which to request hearing from the Notice of Action – CMS allows for up to 90 days  Member may have continuation of services or eligibility during appeal process ME Law and Procedures- ACTIONS

6  CMS uses the term GRIEVANCE to describe dissatisfaction with any matter other than ACTION.  GRIEVANCE subjects: quality of care or services complaints about a provider  The timeframe and process for handling GRIEVANCES is different than ACTIONS and APPEALS. Grievances – Non Actions

7 Rights of Recipients of Mental Health Services- Adults  Rights derive from both Maine law and the terms of the Consent Agreement, Bates v. Duby Ch.1  Focus on violation of patient rights as well as any other state regulations  Process has 3 levels of review with time limited response at each level by provider and Member Maine - Rights Violations

8 Rights of Recipients of Mental Health Services- Children Children recipients are offered choice of mediation or administrative hearing Quick turnaround – Hearing with 5 days of request; decision within one week Filing for hearing stays any action to reduce terminate or suspend services Maine - Rights Violations

9  Broad definition of grievance includes any action or inaction of DHHS per Consent Decree, denial of services relating to Person Centered Plan.  Three level review – informal, regional team leader, and then fair hearing  Short time frame for requests and response (5-10 days) for each level  Services continue during grievance  Member may elect mediation at any point Maine - Grievance by Recipients of Services OCDPD, MR, Autism

10  Confusing! A management headache all around.  Grievance process is not necessarily tied to level of severity of problem  For general population, no intermediate level of resolution other than fair hearing.  Opportunities for quality complaints (for general population) not part of current regulatory process? Current Process -Observations

11 1. Simplify. 2. Make MCO accountable while preserving existing member rights. 3. Reduce burden on member whenever possible. Goals for MCO Grievance System

12 Overview of Proposed Grievance Process INSERT STUART GRAPH

13  Initial content of notice - includes actions, reasons for action, Member’s right to file appeal, procedure, circumstances for expedited resolution, time frame for notice (generally 10 days prior to action), right to request benefits while appeal pending  Members may file an appeal orally or in writing but unless expedited request, must follow an oral filing with a written appeal  Resolution of regular appeal within 45 days from receipt of appeal to MCO MCO Req’mts - Appeal Process

14 MCO Req’mts - Expedited Appeal Process MCO must establish an expedited review process for appeals (of adverse actions) when Member or Provider (on members’ behalf) requests expedited review because taking time for standard review would jeopardize the member’s life or health or ability to attain, maintain or regain maximum function

15 MCO Req’mts - Expedited Appeal Process Two responses to the Member’s request for an expedited appeal : 1. MCO accepts the appeal as meeting criteria of expedited  MCO must have completed review within 3 working days after receiving appeal. MCO provides both written and oral notice of results to Member.  If result of expedited appeal is adverse to the interests of the Member, MCO must notify State agency immediately and agency must provide access to Fair Hearing within 3 days. 2.MCO rejects the appeal as meeting expedited criteria  MCO transfers appeal to standard process and make reasonable efforts to give Member prompt oral notice of denial followed up by written notice