Upflow correction method EWEA Power Curve Working Group London, 2015 December.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Boulder,March 11 st 2010 Proposal for a site assessment IEC standard IEC/TC88 Boulder meeting Millán Esteban - SC88 Spanish mirror committee.
Advertisements

Thursday. 22 April 2010 Wind Lidar measurement optimization in complex terrain Matthieu Boquet, Laurent Sauvage, Rémy Parmentier, Jean-Pierre Cariou -
Wind Resource Assessment
ALBERTA WIND POWER VARIABILITY STUDY Represented by Tommi Pensas.
PCWG 9 th Meeting: 12 December Glasgow Introduction, Agenda and Review of Actions.
Inflow angle and Energy Production Jørgen Højstrup Wind Solutions / Højstrup Wind Energy Power Curve Working Group, Louisville 6 October 2014.
2 nd September 2014 REWS – using ANSYS CFX (CFD).
Predicting the yield of small wind turbines in the roof-top urban environment S J Watson, D G Infield and M R Harding Centre for Renewable Energy Systems.
Wake model benchmarking using LiDAR wake measurements of multi MW turbines Stefan Kern, Clarissa Belloni, Christian Aalburg GE Global Research, Munich.
Challenge the future Delft University of Technology Blade Load Estimations by a Load Database for an Implementation in SCADA Systems Master Thesis.
Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011 Muhammad Ali, Jovica V. Milanović Muhammad Ali – United Kingdom – RIF Session 4 – 0528 Probabilistic Assessment Of Wind.
A Methodology for a Decision Support Tool for a Tidal Stream Device
Assessing Avian-Wind Turbine Collision Risk: A Novel Approach to Account For Site-specific Variability Lars A. Holmstrom, Delphin Ruché, Erin M. Colclazier,
Signal, Instruments and Systems Project 5: Sensor accuracy in environmental sensor networks.
Parameterised turbine performance Power Curve Working Group – Glasgow, 16 December 2014 Stuart Baylis, Matthew Colls, Przemek Marek, Alex Head.
PCWG meeting Louisville CO USA October 2014 Maintenance team MT12-1 Revision of IEC : Wind Turbines – Part 12-1: Power performance measurements.
1 PCWG Peter Stuart 02 September Agenda (1) 2 Morning Session: 10am-1pm – “Welcome” Peter Stuart (RES) – “Review of Actions.
LiDAR analysis at a site with simple terrain Alex Clerc, Lee Cameron Tuesday 2 nd September
The generics of wind turbine nacelle anemometry
Validated adjustment of remote sensing bias in complex terrain using CFD Michael Harris, Ian Locker, Neil Douglas, Romain Girault, Claude Abiven, Oisin.
Can wind lidars measure turbulence? A. Sathe J. Mann J. Gottschall M. Courtney Acknowledgements – 1.EU FP6 Upwind Project 2.EU FP7 SafeWind Project.
Power Generation from Renewable Energy Sources Fall 2013 Instructor: Xiaodong Chu : Office Tel.:
Uncertainty in Wind Energy
The Remote Sensing of Winds Student: Paul Behrens Placement and monitoring of wind turbines Supervisor: Stuart Bradley.
SODAR: Uses and Acceptance Laura Tabor Wind Engineering Intern EAPC Wind Energy Services August 7, 2009.
Centre for Wind Energy and Atmospheric Flows Centro de Estudos de Energia Eólica e Escoamentos Atmosféricos 1 VALIDATION OF COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS.
Wind Power Analysis Using Non-Standard Statistical Models
Dynamic thermal rating of power transmission lines related to renewable resources Jiri Hosek Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Prague, Czech Rep.
Nikolaos Stefanatos Laboratory for WT Testing (LWTT) EWEC Athens VERIFICATION OF POWER PERFORMANCE OF ACTIVE POWER CONTROL WIND TURBINES IN COMPLEX.
1 Predicting and Understanding the Breakdown of Linear Flow Models P. Stuart, I. Hunter, R. Chevallaz-Perrier, G. Habenicht 19 March 2009.
UNCERTAINTY The Classical Approach ALAN DERRICK SENIOR TECHNICAL MANAGER September
3D Power Deviation Matrix PCWG Meeting – New Orleans, LA. September 14, 2015 Alex Head.
1 IRENA – M ARTINIQUE C ONFERENCE ON ISLAND ENERGY TRANSITIONS Workshop C : Wind resources and technologies for islands W IND MEASUREMENTS ON I SLANDS.
Improving WAsP predictions in (too) complex terrain
Accounting for tree growth in resource assessment: A case study using the VENTOS code on Kyle wind farm Presenter: Oisin BRADY (VENTEC) Contributors: Anabel.
Extrapolation of Extreme Response for Wind Turbines based on Field Measurements Authors: Henrik Stensgaard Toft, Aalborg University, Denmark John Dalsgaard.
Problems related to the use of the existing noise measurement standards when predicting noise from wind turbines and wind farms. Erik Sloth Vestas Niels.
Revision of IEC PT Power performance measurements on electricity producing wind turbines TC88 meeting March 2010 Troels Friis Pedersen.
Influence of wind characteristics on turbine performance Ioannis Antoniou (1), Rozenn Wagner (1), Søren M. Pedersen (1), Uwe Paulsen (1), Helge A. Madsen.
A METHODOLOGY FOR ESTIMATING WIND FARM PRODUCTION THROUGH CFD CODES. DESCRIPTION AND VALIDATION Daniel Cabezón, Ignacio Martí CENER, National Renewable.
A New Theoretical Basis for Describing Low Turbulence Wind Turbine Performance Peter Stuart PCWG Meeting – 26 June 2015.
EWEC06 ( , Athens) Numerical Site Calibration on a Complex Terrain and its Application for Wind Turbine Performance Measurements Toshiyuki SANADA.
Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine Systems: Optimization Using Genetic Algorithms J. Y. Grandidier, Valorem, 180 Rue du Marechal Leclerc, F B ´ Begles,
Experience of Modelling Forested Complex Terrain Peter Stuart, Ian Hunter & Nicola Atkinson 30 th October 2009.
1 The Solar Wind - Magnetosphere Coupling Function and Nowcasting of Geomagnetic Activity Leif Svalgaard Stanford University AMS-93, Austin, Jan
Applied Measurement Technologies State-of-the-art case studies Mike Courtney, Kurt Hansen, Rozenn Wagner, Guillaume Léa DTU Wind Energy Carsten Thomsen,
Date of download: 5/31/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Aerodynamic Performance of a Small Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine J. Sol. Energy.
Understanding the Power Curve Interpolation Issue Power Curve Working Group, , Hamburg Axel Albers.
An evaluation of power performance for a small wind turbine in turbulent wind regimes Nicholas J. Ward Ph.D. Student, Energy Engineering Advisor: Dr. Susan.
Arc scan wind measurements for power curve tests Peter Clive
IEC FDIS 2016 Worked Example Industrial Project
IEC FDIS 2016 Consensus Analysis Project
Performance verification
PCWG Intelligence Sharing Initiative Update
PCWG Intelligence Sharing Initiative Update 13 December 2016
Upflow correction method
Contents Cumulating of uncertainties across site calibration and power curve test Cumulating of uncertainties across wind speed bins Order of uncertainty.
Alternative Turbulence Correction Methods
TERRAINS Terrain, or land relief, is the vertical and horizontal dimension of land surface. Terrain is used as a general term in physical geography, referring.
Cost effective power performance testing with nacelle mounted Lidars
Results from the Offshore Wind Accelerator (OWA) Power Curve Validation using LiDAR Project Lee Cameron, Alex Clerc, Peter Stuart, Simon Feeney, Ian Couchman.
Turbulence and Heterogeneous Wind
Blade Design for Modern Wind Turbines
Rotors in Complex Inflow, AVATAR, WP2
TI measurement techniques for pulsed Lidars – the Current Status
Wind-Farm-Scale Measurements Using Mobile-Based LiDAR
5-beam Avent demonstrator
Lidar Measurement Accuracy under Complex Wind Flow in Use for Wind Farm Projects Matthieu Boquet, Mehdi Machta, Jean-Marc Thevenoud
Validation of mesoscale generalisation procedure for the WRF model
CFARS - Science Working Group Update
Presentation transcript:

Upflow correction method EWEA Power Curve Working Group London, 2015 December

2 Presentation Gamesa 2014 Index oIntroduction oUpflow angle definition oUpflow angle properties oSite calibration oPower curve measurement oExample (power curve measurement) oSite resources assessment oConclusions

3 Presentation Gamesa 2014 The upflow correction method tries to compensate the disorientation caused by a tilted rotor in a wind stream that is not perfectly horizontal Upflow correction method Introduction Flat terrains do not create a great variation of upflow angles, but it is very common in complex terrains to work under very different upflow angles depending on current wind direction This correction tries to unify the wind speed input conditions to the rotor the same way the density correction method does This method can be applied to the power curve verification at each 10min data record or to a reference power curve for resource assessment The method is based on geometry and vector projections instead of energy assumption methods

4 Presentation Gamesa 2014 Upflow correction method Upflow angle definition

5 Presentation Gamesa 2014 Upflow correction method Upflow angle properties Upflow angle is closely related to o Surrounding terrain slopes o Atmospheric stability In a given site, the previous factors can be modeled roughly after o Wind directionSurrounding terrain slopes o Wind speed Atmospheric stability

6 Presentation Gamesa 2014 Upflow correction method Upflow angle properties Upflow angle at the reference met mast and the turbine location met mast, binned by wind direction Result seems to be very dependent of wind direction and location

7 Presentation Gamesa 2014 Upflow correction method Upflow angle properties Upflow angle at the reference met mast and the turbine location met mast, binned by wind speed Result seems to be somehow dependent of wind speed, but this may be a proxy of atmospheric stability and difficulty to establish the angle at low in speeds (worse angle precision)

8 Presentation Gamesa 2014 Upflow correction method Site calibration During site calibration, upflow angle must be calibrated also (as wind speed) from the reference mast to the turbine position mast. The proposed calibration method is an offset application to the measured upflow at the reference mast position This offset can be calculated binning the difference between upflow measured at the calibration position minus upflow measured at the reference mast position at each wind direction bin To estimate upflow angle at the turbine position during power curve measurement, the previous correction is applied for each 10min data to the upflow recorded at the reference position (depending on wind direction bin)

9 Presentation Gamesa 2014 Upflow correction method Power curve measurement The perpendicular to the rotor wind speed can be calculated from the horizontal wind speed with a factor: This correction can be applied: o After upflow at turbine position has been estimated o Before or after the density normalization o Before or after the site calibration o With or without REWS calculation

10 Presentation Gamesa 2014 No corrections applied Two sets with different alpha limits Each alpha set has its own calibration Turbulence renormalization applied Each alpha set is supposed to have equal density and turbulence inputs Turbulence renormalization applied Upflow correction applied Each alpha set is supposed to have equal density, turbulence and upflow inputs Upflow correction method Example (power curve measurement)

11 Presentation Gamesa 2014 Another example from a different site with the same post-processes This terrain is more complex than the previous one Upflow correction method Example (power curve measurement)

12 Presentation Gamesa 2014 Upflow correction method Site resources assessment In order to use this correction to establish a modified power curve corrected by upflow angle: o A reference power curve with no tilt and no upflow included (a reference power curve for perpendicular to the rotor wind speed reference is needed) o Upflow measurements or estimations (through CFD) o The corrected power curve can be created interpolating in the reference power curve with the perpendicular wind speed and referring the result to the wind speed bin center o Spline interpolation is preferred o Cons: little overshoot at startup and nominal wind speed o Pros: better correlation in all the wind speeds in between

13 Presentation Gamesa 2014 Upflow correction method Site resources assessment

14 Presentation Gamesa 2014 Upflow correction method Conclusions Upflow angle is a key driver in power performance for complex and very complex terrain In flat terrain, wind shear and veer are more important than upflow angle for the machine’s performance The geometric upflow correction seems to work to predict power performance o Results of BEM simulations o Little empirical evidence

15 Presentation Gamesa 2014 Thank you

16 Presentation Gamesa 2014 Q & A