1 ICIS 2.0 Status and FY2007 Plan Senior Enforcement Managers Meeting Denver October 11, 2006 David Hindin Michael Stahl Office of Compliance, OECA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DC Responses Received WA OR ID MT WY CA NV UT CO AZ NM AK HI TX ND SD NE KS OK MN IA MO AR LA WI IL MI IN OH KY TN MS AL GA FL SC NC VA WV PA NY VT NH.
Advertisements

National Core Indicators Overview for the State of Washington Lisa A. Weber, Ph.D. Division of Developmental Disabilities.
AASHTOWare Program Benefits Standing Committee on Highways October 18, 2013 Tom Cole, Idaho DOT AASHTO Special Committee on Joint Development.
MTAC Update November 6, 2002 Larry Goodman USPS Co-Chair Dan Minnick Industry Co-Chair.

Mobility Update as of February 15, WA OR CA NV ID MT ND SD WY UT CO AZ NM AK HI TX OK KS NE MN IA MO AR LA MS ALGA FL WI IL MI IN KY TN SC NC VA.
Step Therapy State Legislation Update AK HI CA AZ NV OR MT MN NE SD ND ID WY OK KS CO UT TX NM SC FL GAALMS LA AR MO IA VA NC TN IN KY IL MI.
National TIM Responder Training Program Implementation Progress - As of November 2, 2015 Train-the-Trainer Sessions 193 sessions with 7,115 participants.
Compliance Monitoring and the Integrated Compliance Information System Getting the most out of ICIS 2/2007 NPDES Inspector Workshop.
1 Electronic DMRs: Key to Burden Reduction and Improved NPDES Program Management David Hindin, Director, Enforcement Targeting and Data Division Office.
Meeting Data Needs of CWA NPDES Program Through a Modernized PCS Michael Stahl, Director Office of Compliance Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance.
1 Quick Update for NOB On ICIS-NPDES and Possible NOB Role NOB Conference Call September 13, 2006 David Hindin Office of Compliance, OECA.
1 Quick Update on ICIS-NPDES (PCS Modernization) David Hindin, U.S. EPA Director, Enforcement Targeting and Data Division August 30/31, 2005 State EPA.
AFS Overview, the Universal Interface, and AFS Modernization Plans Network Operations Board (NOB) Meeting October 25, 2006 David Hindin, Director Enforcement.
1 The National Environmental Information Exchange Network History and Overview Office of Water National STORET/WQX User Meeting November 27, 2007.
Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) and the Exchange Network David A. Hindin, Director Enforcement Targeting and Data Division Office of Compliance.
National TIM Responder Training Program Implementation Progress - As of February 8, 2016 Train-the-Trainer Sessions 203 sessions with 7,306 participants.
1 Brief Update on ICIS-NPDES (PCS Modernization) David Hindin, U.S. EPA Director, Enforcement Targeting and Data Division October 26, 2005 SHORTER VERSION.
ICIS-NPDES: PCS Modernization Background Briefing for Granta Nakayama October 7, 2005.
HRC Identity Text Questions to HRC Members & Supporters.
Agencies’ Participation in PBMS January 20, 2015 PA IL TX AZ CA Trained, Partial Data Entry (17) Required Characteristics & 75% of Key Indicators (8) OH.
NCWE Presentation: Student Career Solutions
Essential Health Benefits Benchmark Plan Selection, as of October 2012
House Price
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 240 sessions with 8,187 participants
House price index for AK
/ March 2015 Net Metering Note: Net Metering rules are being actively discussed in over a dozen state public service & utility commissions.
The State of the States Cindy Mann Center for Children and Families
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 384 sessions with 11,279 participants
Current Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Current Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 379 sessions with 11,183 participants
LRFD Scoreboard LRFD Scoreboard LRFD Scoreboard
Expansion states with Republican governors outnumber expansion states with Democratic governors, January WY WI WV◊ WA VA VT UT TX TN SD SC RI PA.
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 386 sessions with 11,336 participants
Non-Citizen Population, by State, 2011
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Executive Activity on the Medicaid Expansion Decision, May 9, 2013
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN1 SD SC RI PA1 OR OK OH ND NC NY NM NJ NH2
WY WI WV WA VA VT UT TX TN1 SD SC RI PA OR OK OH1 ND NC NY NM NJ NH NV
Mobility Update and Discussion as of March 25, 2008
Current Status of the Medicaid Expansion Decision, as of May 30, 2013
IAH CONVERSION: ELIGIBLE BENEFICIARIES BY STATE
619 Involvement in State SSIPs
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 362 sessions with 10,873 participants
HHGM CASE WEIGHTS Early/Late Mix (Weighted Average)
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 386 sessions with 11,336 participants
Status of State Participation in Medicaid Expansion, as of March 2014
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 394 sessions with 11,460 participants
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 392 sessions with 11,432 participants
States including governance in their SSIP improvement strategies for Part C FFY 2013 ( ) States including governance in their SSIP improvement.
S Co-Sponsors by State – May 23, 2014
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 396 sessions with 11,504 participants
Average annual growth rate
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 250 sessions with 8,352 participants
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 402 sessions with 11,649 participants
Executive Activity on the Medicaid Expansion Decision, May 9, 2013
Current Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 402 sessions with 11,649 participants
States’ selected SIMRs for Part C FFY 2013 ( )
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 401 sessions with 11,639 participants
States including quality standards in their SSIP improvement strategies for Part C FFY 2013 ( ) States including quality standards in their SSIP.
States including their fiscal systems in their SSIP improvement strategies for Part C FFY 2013 ( ) States including their fiscal systems in their.
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 416 sessions with 11,878 participants
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions
The Future of the NBCP Nurse Aide Registry (Presentation and Roundtable) Allison (Dudziak) Wallace, Senior Consultant, Improving-Atlanta (Innovative.
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 429 sessions with 12,141 participants
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 436 sessions with 12,254 participants
Train-the-Trainer Sessions 386 sessions with 11,336 participants
Presentation transcript:

1 ICIS 2.0 Status and FY2007 Plan Senior Enforcement Managers Meeting Denver October 11, 2006 David Hindin Michael Stahl Office of Compliance, OECA

2 Outline of Presentation A.Overview of ICIS 2.0 and PCS modernization B.ICIS 2.0 Goals for FY2007 C.PCS Modernization Current operations FY2007 Plan for DMR Batch D.Federal Enforcement and Compliance Current status for EOY Reporting Plans for FY2007 E. ICIS Training and Communications F.AFS Plan for FY2007 and FY2008

3 Overview: ICIS Phases and Delivery Time Frames Overview: ICIS Phases and Delivery Time Frames Modernized Permit Compliance System (PCS) Direct user release implemented June/August 2006 Air Facility System (AFS) Interface with Facility Registry System (FRS) Federal Enforcement Docket System Phase I Phase II Phase III / Regional Tracking Systems Completed and Launched June 2002 Interface with Data Integration Tools (e.g., IDEA )

4 PCS Modernization Direct User Release Completed in FY2006  On June 23, 2006, the new system, the Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS 2.0) was released. ICIS is one system, but has two components:  ICIS-NPDES –supports the implementation and management of the NPDES permitting and compliance enforcement program in EPA and states. Direct Users: 21 States, 2 Tribes, and 9 territories are now using ICIS-NPDES instead of PCS.  ICIS-FE&C - supports the Federal Enforcement and Compliance component of EPA’s civil enforcement and compliance program.

5 Major Goals in FY2007 for ICIS 2.0  Improve stability and performance of system.  Implement quarterly interim releases to fix problems and enhance the system. Interim release planned for Nov 20 should include performance fixes and quicker NPDES DMR data entry path.  Implement ICIS-NPDES batch DMR release by Sept  Issue ICIS-NPDES Policy Statement  Update/revise governance structure(s)  Training

6 ICIS-NPDES Batch Release Approach  3-Part Batch Release Approach: Part 1: DMR flows from state systems to ICIS-NPDES from hybrid states. Part 2: DMR flows from facilities in direct user states (NetDMR) to ICIS- NPDES. Part 3: All other flows for all remaining states.

7 State Status in the PCS Modernization Process States Directly Using ICIS-NPDES States Still in PCS Hybrid Batch Full Batch States States Region 1RI, MA*, NH*, CT, MEVT Region 2PR, VI*, NY, AT, SRNJ Region 3MD, DC, PAVA, DE, WV Region 4GATNAL, KY, MS, NC, SC, FL Region 5INIL, MI, WIMN, OH Region 6NM, GMAR, OK^, TX, Gulf of Mexico LA Region 7NEIA, KS, MO Region 8UT, MT, SDCOND, WY Region 9HI, NV, NN, AS, CZ, CM, TT, GU CAAZ Region 10ID*, AK*WA, OR *State government not approved for the NPDES program; implemented by EPA Region. Italics – Tribe or Territory ^ State may really become direct users since do DMR batch via PCS desktop utility.

8 ICIS-NPDES Batch Part 1 Key Milestones ICIS-NPDES Selected Batch Milestones for Part 1Date Initiate Integrated Project Team (IPT) for Batch Release with states, regions, OEI and contractors October 2006 Restart data migration and PCS cleanup workgroup with hybrid states for the Batch: Part 1 release (DMR from state systems) October 2006 Finalize ICIS-NPDES XML schemas and associated documents for DMR flows. October 31, 2006 Commence testing of DMR flows for pilot statesSpring 2007 Part 1 implementation for Pilot States: Migrate several states from PCS to ICIS-NPDES, with batch DMR flows in operation. September 2007 Part 1 implementation for ALL remaining Hybrid States: Migrate remaining hybrid states to ICIS-NPDES, with batch DMR flows in operation. March 2008

9 ICIS FE&C Status Today  50 reports are needed for Annual Accomplishment Reporting As of October 6th, 38 reports have been completed. The rest are very close to being done. Thanks to all the Regions for testing the reports.  ICIS had major problems with reporting and system stability, primarily from August 21 to Sept 8.  ICIS performance in Sept/Oct has been slow.  We have increased ICIS performance monitoring in an effort to identify and remedy problems quicker.  ICIS is a new, complex system and there will be some bumps in the first year. We are working hard to anticipate bumps so we can prevent them, and/or minimize their impact on our users.

10 ICIS FE&C Plans for FY2007  FTSS/NCDB data entry and tracking for federal toxic, pesticide and EPCRA 313 enforcement and compliance activities in FY2007 and beyond move to ICIS by November 20 th.  Develop prioritized list of fixes and enhancements to try to roll out in 3 rd and/or 4 th quarter of FY2007. This depends on FY2007 budget Need Regional input, perhaps through ICIS POB, to identify and prioritize, and to help develop requirements.  Revise the FY2005 ICIS Monthly Management Reports Revise to work with ICIS 2.0. Revise to better meet Regional management needs Need group of regional managers to help us develop requirements for these reports

11 Training Plans for FY2007  During 2006 we provided 22 training sessions. ICIS-FE&C, all 10 Regions were trained over a 2 day period. ICIS-NPDES, all Regions and directs user States were trained over a 5 day period.  2007 plans include a variety of trainings to meet diverse needs Tailored trainings for specific audiences Focused Reports Training  face to face  Web technology  On-line training software

12 Continued Communication in FY2007  ICIS 2.0 Monthly Newsletter  EPA Production Operation Board (POB)  Monthly ICIS-FE&C User Calls  Monthly ICIS-NPDES User Calls  ICIS 2.0 User Support 8:00 – 5:30 Monday – Friday  or

13 AFS Modernization Timelines  FY 2007 Start AFS Business Requirements Define the business, functionality and data needs for a modernized AFS.  Identify limitations of AFS that should be addressed by modernized system.  Identify functions in AFS that might not be necessary to include in modernized system. Obtain input from CAA enforcement and compliance program staff and managers in HQ, Regions and States.  FY2008 Start Alternatives and Cost Benefit Analyses Given our business requirements, what are at least 3 options for developing an information system to meet these needs. ICIS is the leading option, but other options will be considered.