STREAM MONITORING CASE STUDY. Agenda  Monitoring Requirements  TMDL Requirements  OCEA Initial Monitoring Program  Selection of Parameters  Data.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2005 Stream Phosphorus TMDLs to be proposed in July 5th NJR The NJDEPs Division of Watershed Management is seeking stakeholder input on proposed phosphorus.
Advertisements

What are TMDLs? and What Might They Mean to MS4 Permittees?
To response to litigation, thirty Minnesota Cities were directed to perform antidegradation reviews or Loading Assessments for two time periods: (1) (1)
O Adopted in 1972, the CWA is known mostly to the public by its mandate for “swimmable and fishable” waterways. o With the CWA, states evaluate all of.
TMDL Development Mainstem Monongahela River Watershed May 14, 2014.
TMDL Development for the Floyds Fork Watershed Louisville, KY August 30, 2011.
Approach for Including Nutrient Limitations within NDPDES Permits Dallas Grossman Division of Water Quality
Pathogen and Turbidity TMDLs and OKR04 Richard Smith, INCOG Oklahoma MS4 Conference Oklahoma City Zoo Education Center November 7-8, 2012.
Los Angeles County MS4 Permit Reissuance: New Directions & Strategy Presented by LA Regional Water Quality Control Board Southern California Water Dialogue.
Public Workshop Implementation and Enforcement of Nutrient TMDLs for Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake CA Regional Water Quality Control Board (Regional Water.
Bureau of Water Overview Wastewater issues Drinking water issues Wrap up topics.
2009 Water Quality Monitoring Report – Fish Creek Vaughn Hauser, B.Sc. Naomi Parker, B.Sc., BIT, CEPIT.
Legislative Changes Affecting Water Quality at a Local Level October 2011 Robert Kollinger, P.E. Water Resources Manager Polk County Parks and Natural.
Nelly Smith EPA Region 6. - Develop or revise bacteria reduction program for consistency with new TMDL requirements and allocations - Develop or revise.
TMDL Implementation in the Calleguas Creek Watershed Ashli Desai Larry Walker Associates.
RIPDES Storm Water Program: Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4s)
Stream Monitoring in Loudoun County David Ward, Water Resources Engineer Department of Building and Development, Department of Building and Development,
Overview of TMDL Plans TMDL Plan Workshop April 24, 2015 Karl Berger, COG staff Outline: Details Schedule Plan Elements Issues 1.
Bureau of Water Program Overview Local Government Interest.
IDEM TMDL 101 Everything you wanted to know about Total Maximum Daily Loads.
Imperial River: Water Quality Status and Basin Management Action Plan.
April 22, 2005Chester Creek Watershed TMDL Total Maximum Daily Load Chester Creek University Lake & Westchester Lagoon Alaska Department of Environmental.
Greg Stabach and Kim Adams Rogue Valley Council of Governments January 21 st, 2015 Rogue TMDL Meeting.
Impaired and TMDL Waterbody Listings Impacts on DoD Facilities Bill Melville, Regional TMDL Coordinator
Department of the Environment Overview of Water Quality Data Used by MDE and Water Quality Parameters Timothy Fox MDE, Science Service Administration Wednesday.
1. DWS NPDES Permit Enrollment   Who is required to enroll Water Purveyors that are Community Drinking Water Systems (CDWS) with 1000 connections or.
Total Maximum Daily Loads in MS4 Storm Water Programs.
Oxon Run and C&O Canal TMDLs
VIRGINIA’S TMDL PROCESS.
1 “ Understanding the Local Role of Improving Water Quality” Virginia Association of Counties November 14, 2011 Virginia Association of Counties November.
Elaine Snouwaert – WA Department of Ecology Walt Edelen – Spokane Conservation District Spokane River DO Advisory Group Meeting January 19, 2012.
Floyds Fork Bacteria TMDL Andrea M. Fredenburg Kentucky Division of Water TMDL Section November 28, 2012.
The Non-tidal Water Quality Monitoring Network: past, present and future opportunities Katie Foreman Water Quality Analyst, UMCES-CBPO MASC Non-tidal Water.
Teresa Marks Director 1. o The Clean Water Act of 1972 requires states to establish water quality standards (WQS) for all waterbodies within the state.
Orange Creek Basin Management Action Plan Alachua County Commission December 11, 2007 Fred Calder, FL DEP (850)
Presentation to the Chesapeake Bay and Water Resources Policy Committee July 30, 2010.
Restoring VA Waters the TMDL Way Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Regional Administrator U.S. EPA Region 3.
Ric Lawson Watershed Planner Huron River Watershed Council MiCorps Staff.
Summary of Water Quality Data Analysis from the Storm Water Management Ponds of Central Park Fredericksburg, VA Dr. Michael L. Bass Miña Recta, Diana Gutierrez.
STORET 1001 and the State of Utah Monitoring Strategy Today you will see: –What kind of attributes are available in STORET –How results, stations, and.
Deep River-Portage Burns Watershed TMDL Stakeholder Meeting March 13, 2013.
KWWOA Annual Conference April 2014 Development of a Kentucky Nutrient Strategy Paulette Akers Kentucky Division of Water Frankfort, KY.
Adem.alabama.gov ADEM’s Monitoring Summary Reports Alabama – Tombigbee CWP Stakeholders Meeting Montgomery, Alabama 3 February 2010 Lisa Huff – ADEM Field.
West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection August 6, 2014 Moorefield City Hall South Branch Potomac & Shenandoah Hardy Watersheds TMDL Status.
Nutrient and Sediment Loading in Sougahatchee Creek and the Impacts on Aquatic Biota Report submitted to West Point Stevens and the Cities of Auburn and.
Preliminary Scoping Effort. Presentation Objectives Identify need for additional sources of future funding Provide background on how elements were identified.
District of Columbia TMDL Schedule and Update D.C. Department of Health Water Quality Division March 2004.
A quantification of groundwater seepage during drought and its importance for water quality modeling in the St. Vrain watershed Hannah Chapin Thomas Gerber.
Water Resources Workshop Standards, Use Attainability, Impairments and TMDLS Richard Eskin Maryland Department of the Environment February 20, 2004.
Floyds Fork Bacteria TMDL Andrea M. Fredenburg Kentucky Division of Water TMDL Section February 19, 2013.
Modeling Fecal Bacteria Fate and Transport to Address Pathogen Impairments in the United States Brian Benham Extension Specialist and Associate Professor,
BMAP Forward & Septic Tanks 2012 Environmental Symposium John P. Pappas, P.E. Department of Public Works.
CLEAN WATER ACT AND MUNICIPAL STORMWATER CALIFORNIA STORMWATER WORKSHOP David W. Smith, Manager NPDES Permits Section EPA/Region 9.
Commonwealth of Virginia Fecal Coliform Bacteria TMDLs Four Mile Run Public Meeting #1 June 14, 2001.
Watershed Management Plan Summary of 2014 Activities/Progress Presented by: Matthew Bennett, MS December 2014.
New York’s Chesapeake Bay WIP
Arkansas Dept. of Environmental Quality Regulation No
MS4 and Trading Considerations
Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Permit
NH MS4 Stormwater Permit -- Guidance for NHDES related provisions
Total Maximum Daily Load Program
Clark Fork River Metals TMDL Development
Sacramento County Stormwater Quality Program
John Tinger U.S. EPA Region IX
So I have a TMDL Wasteload Allocation
High Rock Lake TMDL Development
Marco island water quality monitoring
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section
EPA’S ROLE IN APPROVING BASIN PLAN AMENDMENTS
Sacramento County Stormwater Quality Program
Presentation transcript:

STREAM MONITORING CASE STUDY

Agenda  Monitoring Requirements  TMDL Requirements  OCEA Initial Monitoring Program  Selection of Parameters  Data Collection and Usage  Q & A

Monitoring Requirements  Submit MS4 program monitoring plan to the Division of Water for approval before the end of the permit period  Once approved, the MS4 program monitoring plan must be implemented in the following permit period

Monitoring Plan  An effective MS4 program monitoring plan should include:  Effluent monitoring of pollutants  Monitoring of pollutants and conditions  In-stream biological monitoring  Monitoring of other parameters or conditions

TMDL Requirements  If a TMDL is approved for an impaired waterbody into which the permitted MS4 discharges and for which the MS4 causes or contributes to water quality impairment(s), the Division of Water will:  Review the TMDL and applicable WLAs  Notify the permittee if current discharges from the MS4 are not meeting TMDL allocations  Require a modified SWQMP  Require the MS4 to obtain an individual MS4 permit in order to meet TMDL requirements

TMDL Requirements  After establishment of an approved TMDL for a pollutant of concern in the permitee’s stormwater discharges during this permit term the permitee should:  Identify the impaired stream segment(s) and/or tributaries to those impaired stream segments and the location of all known MS4 major outfalls discharging a pollutant of concern under the TMDL to those segments or occurring within those segments.  Evaluate the discharge load associated with the identified MS4 major outfalls  Prior to any reopening of this permit under Part III.C., the permittee shall consider and propose to the maximum extent practicable applicable and appropriate best management practices guided by the wasteload goal of the TMDL, and a schedule of implementation for those Best Management Practices.  Pursue a variance or exceptions based upon a use attainability analysis or the criteria for exceptions set forth in 401 KAR 10:031.  Applicable limitations, conditions and requirements contained in the TMDL are also to be addressed in the SWQMP

TMDL Requirements  Impaired waters lacking a TMDL, the permittee shall evaluate its Best Management Practices in the SWQMP with respect to any new or expanded MS4 discharges for pollutants of concern to ensure effectiveness of post construction control requirements to achieve the MEP standard.

OCEA Initial Monitoring Program  Initial monitoring points based on:  Urbanized area locations  Current TMDL streams  Additional impaired streams in the county

OCEA Initial Monitoring Program  Streams with TMDLs and/or impairments included two runs of Harrod’s Creek  Pond Creek is impaired and may have a TMDL at some point  Huckleberry Creek had failing septic system discharging  Recent Floyd’s Fork TMDL proposed for bacteria; a second TMDL is currently under development for nutrients  North Fork Curry’s Fork, South Fork Curry’s Fork, Curry’s Fork, and Asher’s Run all flow to Floyd’s Fork

Adding a New Co-permitee  City of La Grange became a co-permitee with Oldham County in 2010  Sample Locations expanded to include points within La Grange

TMDL Requirements  The permittee shall develop and implement an appropriate monitoring program that evaluates the effectiveness of the BMPs to address the TMDL. An effective monitoring program could include:   a. Effluent monitoring at selected outfalls that are representative of particular land uses or geographical areas that contribute to pollutant loading before and after implementation of stormwater control measures; or   b. Monitoring of pollutants of concern in receiving waterbodies, both upstream and downstream of MS4 discharges, over an extended period of time; or   c. In-stream biological monitoring at appropriate locations to demonstrate the recovery of biological communities after implementation of stormwater control measures.   The program including monitoring strategies, locations, frequencies, and methods shall be submitted to the Division of Water for approval within 12 months of the approval date of the TMDL. Details of the monitoring plan and monitoring data should be included in the annual report required by the MS4 permit.

Selection of Parameters  Field Parameters  Conventional Parameters  Bacteria  Nutrients  Metals  Other Parameters

Field Parameters  Ph  Specific Conductivity  Dissolved Oxygen  Temperature Conventional Parameters  BOD  Total Suspended Solids

Bacteria  E-coli  Fecal Coliform  Enterococci Nutrients  Nitrate/Nitrite  Ammonia Nitrogen  Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen  Phosphorus, Total

Metals  Cadmium  Copper  Lead  Zinc

Other Parameters  Total Dissolved Solids  Oil/Grease  Phenols  COD  The Above Parameters Can Be Used As Indicators In An IDDE Program

OCEA Stream Monitoring Data

Data Use  Establish Background Levels  Determine Potential Pollutant Sources (IDDE)  Incorporate Into GIS Database  Public Education/Website Public Education/Website  Formal Permit- Required Reporting i.e. TMDL

Q & A