US LHC Tier-2 Network Performance BCP Mar-3-08 LHC Community Network Performance Recommended BCP Eric Boyd Deputy Technology Officer Internet2.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TransPAC2 Update Brent Sweeny TransPAC2 Engineer 24 January 2008 APAN Honolulu.
Advertisements

CLARATEC – Lima - Perú July 2, 2012 Measurements WG (GT-Mediciones)
11 TROUBLESHOOTING Chapter 12. Chapter 12: TROUBLESHOOTING2 OVERVIEW  Determine whether a network communications problem is related to TCP/IP.  Understand.
Metrics and Monitoring Capabilities for Earth Science Data Systems ESDSWG Wilmington, Delaware October 20-22, 2009.
Connect. Communicate. Collaborate Click to edit Master title style MODULE 1: perfSONAR TECHNICAL OVERVIEW.
Connect. Communicate. Collaborate Towards Multi-domain Monitoring for the Research Networks Nicolas Simar, Dante TNC 2005, Poznan, June 2005.
Internet Measurement Initiatives in the Wisconsin Advanced Internet Lab Paul Barford Computer Science Department University of Wisconsin – Madison Spring,
Connect. Communicate. Collaborate WI5 – tools implementation Stephan Kraft October 2007, Sevilla.
Integrating Network and Transfer Metrics to Optimize Transfer Efficiency and Experiment Workflows Shawn McKee, Marian Babik for the WLCG Network and Transfer.
MAGGIE NIIT- SLAC On Going Projects Measurement & Analysis of Global Grid & Internet End to end performance.
PerfSONAR in ATLAS/WLCG Shawn McKee, Marian Babik ATLAS Jamboree / Network Section 3 rd December 2014.
Network Performance Measurement Atlas Tier 2 Meeting at BNL December Joe Metzger
Network Monitoring School of Electronics and Information Kyung Hee University. Choong Seon HONG Selected from ICAT 2003 Material of James W. K. Hong.
Performance Measurement Tools August 9 th 2011, OSG Site Admin Workshop Jason Zurawski – Internet2 Research Liaison.
Performance Measurement Tools March 10 th 2011, OSG All Hands Workshop - Network Performance Jason Zurawski, Internet2.
Reading Report 14 Yin Chen 14 Apr 2004 Reference: Internet Service Performance: Data Analysis and Visualization, Cross-Industry Working Team, July, 2000.
Hands-on Networking Fundamentals
1 ESnet Network Measurements ESCC Feb Joe Metzger
User-Perceived Performance Measurement on the Internet Bill Tice Thomas Hildebrandt CS 6255 November 6, 2003.
Module 10: Monitoring ISA Server Overview Monitoring Overview Configuring Alerts Configuring Session Monitoring Configuring Logging Configuring.
POSTECH DP&NM Lab. Internet Traffic Monitoring and Analysis: Methods and Applications (1) 4. Active Monitoring Techniques.
PerfSONAR Information Services Update Jason Zurawski Feb 2, 2009 Winter Joint Techs 2009, College Station Texas.
WG Goals and Workplan We have a charter, we have a group of interested people…what are our plans? goalsOur goals should reflect what we have listed in.
Discussion on IEEE metrics guidelines Document Number: IEEE R0 Date Submitted: Source: Antonio BovoVoice:
Network and Transfer WG Metrics Area Meeting Shawn McKee, Marian Babik Network and Transfer Metrics Kick-off Meeting 26 h November 2014.
Network Monitoring, WAN Performance Analysis, & Data Circuit Support at Fermilab Phil DeMar US-CMS Tier-3 Meeting Fermilab October 23, 2008.
EGEE-III INFSO-RI Enabling Grids for E-sciencE EGEE and gLite are registered trademarks perfSONAR deployment over Spanish LHC Tier.
Internet2 Performance Update Jeff W. Boote Senior Network Software Engineer Internet2.
Thoughts on Future LHCOPN Some ideas Artur Barczyk, Vancouver, 31/08/09.
Connect. Communicate. Collaborate Implementing Multi-Domain Monitoring Services for European Research Networks Szymon Trocha, PSNC A. Hanemann, L. Kudarimoti,
UNH network currently supports a 2.5 gbps network on campus. This network services thousands of users a day, and must be secure. These security measures.
ASCR/ESnet Network Requirements an Internet2 Perspective 2009 ASCR/ESnet Network Requirements Workshop April 15/16, 2009 Richard Carlson -- Internet2.
1 Network Measurement Summary ESCC, Feb Joe Metzger ESnet Engineering Group Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
MonIPÊ & SE-CIPÓ April/2012 Advances on End-to-End Network Monitoring and Provisioning Services on Global Scale Spring 2012 Internet2 Member Meeting Arlington,
Connect. Communicate. Collaborate perfSONAR MDM Service for LHC OPN Loukik Kudarimoti DANTE.
Wide Area Network Performance Analysis Methodology Wenji Wu, Phil DeMar, Mark Bowden Fermilab ESCC/Internet2 Joint Techs Workshop 2007
Introduction & Vision. Introduction MANTICORE provides a software implementation and tools for providing and managing routers and IP networks as services.
PerfSONAR-PS Functionality February 11 th 2010, APAN 29 – perfSONAR Workshop Jeff Boote, Assistant Director R&D.
BNL Service Challenge 3 Status Report Xin Zhao, Zhenping Liu, Wensheng Deng, Razvan Popescu, Dantong Yu and Bruce Gibbard USATLAS Computing Facility Brookhaven.
PanDA Status Report Kaushik De Univ. of Texas at Arlington ANSE Meeting, Nashville May 13, 2014.
Internet2 End-to-End Performance Initiative Eric L. Boyd Director of Performance Architecture and Technologies Internet2.
TeraPaths: A QoS Enabled Collaborative Data Sharing Infrastructure for Petascale Computing Research The TeraPaths Project Team Usatlas Tier 2 workshop.
Internet Connectivity and Performance for the HEP Community. Presented at HEPNT-HEPiX, October 6, 1999 by Warren Matthews Funded by DOE/MICS Internet End-to-end.
OSG Networking: Summarizing a New Area in OSG Shawn McKee/University of Michigan Network Planning Meeting Esnet/Internet2/OSG August 23 rd, 2012.
PerfSONAR-PS Working Group Aaron Brown/Jason Zurawski January 21, 2008 TIP 2008 – Honolulu, HI.
GEMINI: Active Network Measurements Martin Swany, Indiana University.
EGEE is a project funded by the European Union under contract IST Study of Performance Standards, kick off (Task 1.1.1) Robert Stoy DFN EGEE.
David Foster, CERN GDB Meeting April 2008 GDB Meeting April 2008 LHCOPN Status and Plans A lot more detail at:
Connect communicate collaborate perfSONAR MDM News Domenico Vicinanza DANTE (UK)
Connect communicate collaborate Performance Metrics & Basic Tools Robert Stoy, DFN EGI TF, Madrid September 2013.
Advanced Network Diagnostic Tools Richard Carlson EVN-NREN workshop.
Campana (CERN-IT/SDC), McKee (Michigan) 16 October 2013 Deployment of a WLCG network monitoring infrastructure based on the perfSONAR-PS technology.
1 Deploying Measurement Systems in ESnet Joint Techs, Feb Joseph Metzger ESnet Engineering Group Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
1 Network Measurement Challenges LHC E2E Network Research Meeting October 25 th 2006 Joe Metzger Version 1.1.
LHC Path Monitoring Tools Deployment Planning Jeff Boote Internet2/R&D May 27, 2008 US ATLAS T2/T3 Workshop at UM.
Wide Area Network Performance Analysis Methodology
Internet2 End-to-End Performance Initiative
Path Monitoring Tools Deployment Planning for U.S. T123
Report from WLCG Workshop 2017: WLCG Network Requirements GDB - CERN 12th of July 2017
Networking for the Future of Science
Monitoring Appliance Status
Network Monitoring and Troubleshooting with perfSONAR MDM
Internet2 Performance Update
(bandwidth control) Jeff Boote Internet2
Big-Data around the world
Network Performance Measurement
MAGGIE NIIT- SLAC On Going Projects
“Detective”: Integrating NDT and E2E piPEs
Internet2 E2E piPEs Project
Presentation transcript:

US LHC Tier-2 Network Performance BCP Mar-3-08 LHC Community Network Performance Recommended BCP Eric Boyd Deputy Technology Officer Internet2

US LHC Tier-2 Network Performance BCP Mar-3-08 Recap At November, 2007 LHC OPN meeting, the group asked Internet2 and ESnet to work on a straw man “Best Practices Guide” for deploying perfSONAR

US LHC Tier-2 Network Performance BCP Mar-3-08 What Straw Man Recommendation from US perfSONAR participants to US Atlas and US CMS Sites Working on a set of recommendations to help the US LHC community better react to network performance problems Plan to develop these recommendations with the Internet2 HENP-SIG, the US-Atlas, US- CMS community, participants from a BNL/FNAL sponsored workshop this spring, as well as anyone else interested in developing a best practices guide

US LHC Tier-2 Network Performance BCP Mar Characterize and track network connectivity and performance to important peer sites 2.Characterize and quantify network performance problems 3.Differentiate between application and network performance problems 4.Differentiate between local and remote network problems 5.Identify, understand and respond effectively to changes in the underlying network Recommended Goals

US LHC Tier-2 Network Performance BCP Mar-3-08 Recommended Primary Use Cases End scientist attempting to determine why data transfers to her lab are not fast enough Site validating/debugging transfers to/from other sites Site validating/debugging transfers to/from end scientist

US LHC Tier-2 Network Performance BCP Mar-3-08 Recommended Approach: Network Performance Troubleshooting End-to-End network performance analysis TCP transfer throughput (reported by application/end-user) Identify where transfer is limited Application related problems Network end system problems (NDT) Network path problems (perfSONAR OWAMP, perfSONAR BWCTL) Network Performance Analysis Methodology Problem identification Step-by-step remediation of the detected problems Packet trace analysis as last resort

US LHC Tier-2 Network Performance BCP Mar-3-08 Recommended Infrastructure Tools and archives will be made available with the perfSONAR infrastructure New deployments will be found using the perfSONAR Lookup Service New tools can be integrated into the infrastructure at any time

US LHC Tier-2 Network Performance BCP Mar-3-08 Basic Strategy Each site (T0, T1, T2, …) acting independently: Exposes active measurement targets to support/control other sites tests to them Performs active tests to other participants Collects and exposes passive metrics (SNMP, sFlow, etc..) using pS archives Collects results from active tests and exposes metrics using pS archives Any participant: Can then use analysis tools to interact with any available archives to examine performance problems

US LHC Tier-2 Network Performance BCP Mar-3-08 Analysis of Strategy Success of strategy scales with the degree of participation (Metcalf’s Law) New tools and analysis can be phased into the infrastructure as they become available Analysis that is specific to this community can be integrated into the infrastructure

US LHC Tier-2 Network Performance BCP Mar-3-08 Site Participation Levels No Participation (Or Worse): Hostile: firewalls (blocked ICMP) Non-cooperative: no tools, no data Limited Partner: Willing target: daemons installed Active Partner: Participant: daemons installed, active testing to peers Data Provider: passive/active test results shared RECOMMENDED: Limited participation (T3s) or active participation (T1s and T2s)

US LHC Tier-2 Network Performance BCP Mar-3-08 Site Involvement Levels Not interested Hands-off Delegate participation to a 3 rd Party Hands-on (any subset) Manage hardware Install software Manage software Manage data collection Decide testing strategy Decide data access policy

US LHC Tier-2 Network Performance BCP Mar-3-08 Site Deployment Options Target Options Knoppix install Tool installation –owampd/bwctld Very limited configuration necessary, once tools are installed very little maintenance is required Active Partner Options Knoppix install –Add perfSONAR Tool installation –owampd/bwctld perfSONAR (CPAN install) More extensive configuration Identify important services to your site, monitor to those sites

US LHC Tier-2 Network Performance BCP Mar-3-08 Initial Useful Metrics and Tools Network Path characteristics Round trip time (perfSONAR PingER) Routers along the paths (traceroute) Path utilization/capacity (perfSONAR SNMP- MA) One way delay, delay variance (perfSONAR owamp) One way packet drop rate (perfSONAR owamp) Packets reordering (perfSONAR owamp) Achievable throughput (perfSONAR bwctl)

US LHC Tier-2 Network Performance BCP Mar-3-08 Plan forward Specific analysis methodology will be developed with the community of users. (methods must match usage patterns) Specific metrics and tools will be recommended based on needs of methodology