Policy Definitions, Achievement Level Descriptors, and Math Achievement Standards.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
C OMMON C ORE S TATE S TANDARDS I NITIATIVE March 2010.
Advertisements

1 Common Core State Standards What they are! & How they came to be! Implications for New Jersey New Jersey State Board of Education May 4, 2011 Dorothy.
STUDENT ASSESSMENT IN OREGON MOVING TO SMARTER BALANCED TESTS IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS AND MATH.
Common Core State Standards OVERVIEW CESA #9 - September 2010 Presented by: CESA #9 School Improvement Services Jayne Werner and Yvonne Vandenberg.
Why move to Common Core?  Preparation: The standards are college- and career-ready. They will help prepare students with the knowledge and skills they.
Governing Board & Advisory Committee on College Readiness Special Joint Session College- and Career-Ready Determination Policy and Policy-Level Performance.
The State of the State TOTOM Conference September 10, 2010 Jim Leigh Office of Assessment and Information Services Oregon Department of Education.
 Here’s What... › The State Board of Education has adopted the Common Core State Standards (July 2010)  So what... › Implications and Impact in NH ›
Career and College Readiness (CCR) NGSS, CCSS ELA/Literacy, CCSS Mathematics, MMC K-12 Science Framework and NGSS Review in Terms of CCR 1.
Alaska School Leaders Institute Moving Toward Implementation of Alaska’s ELA & Math Standards.
Educator Effectiveness Academy Day 1, Session 2. Participants will: review STEM Standards of Practice student proficiencies. analyze the STEM Standards.
DMUSD TRANSITION TO COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS. COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS  Common Core State Standards Initiative is a state-led effort coordinated.
Philomath School District Board of Directors Work Session May 10, 2012.
College-Ready Determination Policy and Performance Level Descriptors July
SOCIAL SCIENCES STANDARDS REVIEW AND REVISION February 2009-June 2011 PRESENTATION TO THE STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION.
Common Core State Standards in Connecticut ELMS PTA Presentation October 16, 2012 Dr. Judy DeLeeuw, Principal Jason Bitgood, Assistant Principal Jennifer.
Common Core Georgia Performance Standards (CCGPS) Toombs Central Elementary
9/19/20151 Common Core State Standards: Overview.
Why is Georgia Making the change to CCGPS? Why do we need common standards? Why now? Disparate standards Different skills Global competition Preparation.
Policy Definitions, Achievement Level Descriptors, Science Achievement Standards (Cut Scores) for General Education and for Alternate Assessment 1.
Setting Performance Standards for the Hawaii State Alternate Assessments: Reading, Mathematics, and Science Presentation for the Hawaii State Board of.
Essential Skills Transition Planning Derek Brown Manager, Assessment of Essential Skills Oregon Department of Education.
The Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) Higher Education Update State Higher Education Executive Officers (SHEEO) Annual.
COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS INITIATIVE March 2011.
Launching the Common Core State Standards. Partnership for 21Century Learning presents: Above and Beyond MM387HNQk.
Curriculum Update Curriculum and Instructional Leaders Meeting July 19,
Oregon’s New Diploma Requirements: Oregon’s New Diploma Requirements: What You’ll Need to Know 2008 Superintendent’s Summer Institute August 4-6, 2008.
Destination--- Common Core Staff Meeting/SSC February 2013.
Common Core and Essential Standards Implementation Plan.
November 2006 Copyright © 2006 Mississippi Department of Education 1 Where are We? Where do we want to be?
Achievethecore.org 1 Setting the Context for the Common Core State Standards Sandra Alberti Student Achievement Partners.
  “The Common Core State Standards are an example of states recognizing a problem, then working together, sharing what works and what doesn’t.” - Former.
PREPARING [DISTRICT NAME] STUDENTS FOR COLLEGE & CAREER Setting a New Baseline for Success.
Raising the Bar for Oregon. Adopt New Math Cut Scores and Final Math Achievement Level Descriptors and Policy Definitions Adopt High School Math Achievement.
Oregon’s Core Standards and Assessment Standards & Assessment Task Force March 20, 2008.
Common Core State Standards Initiative Common Core State Standards Initiative State Board of Education January 28, 2010.
Standard Setting Results for the Oklahoma Alternate Assessment Program Dr. Michael Clark Research Scientist Psychometric & Research Services Pearson State.
Next Generation of Assessments June 25, >
0 PARCC Performance Level Setting Place your logo here.
Common Core State Standards Initiative Common Core State Standards Initiative State Board of Education March 11, 2010.
Common Core Standards English Language Arts 1. Overview of the Initiative o State-led and developed Common Core Standards for K-12 in English Language.
STUDENT ASSESSMENT IN OREGON MOVING TO SMARTER BALANCED TESTS IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS AND MATH.
Bridge Year (Interim Adoption) Instructional Materials Criteria Facilitator:
Fall Preview for District Leaders Angela Chamness, Division Administrator, Illinois State Board of Education Jeff Nellhaus, Parcc Inc.’s Chief of Assessment.
2012 Parent Engagement Summit. Common Core State Standards in Mathematics.
Credit for Proficiency Taskforce Oregon Department of Education February 5, 2008 Engagement, Achievement & Transition Oregon Diploma–Getting Students Ready.
1 Draft Content Standards for High School Mathematics Helen Maguire for Paul Hibbard Office of Educational Improvement and Innovation Oregon Department.
What is the Common Core State Standards Initiative? A state-led effort to establish a single set of clear standards for ELA and math Informed by the best.
Professional Learning and Collaboration Burlington Edison School District April 7 th, 2014.
Using the Standards for Mastery Learning September 7, 2010 Math & ELA.
Dr. Derrica Davis Prospective Principal Candidate: Fairington Elementary School.
A Resource Guide for Parents. play&list=UUF0pa3nE3aZAfBMT8pqM5PA&playnext=1
Smarter Balanced assessment. What is the Smarter Balanced assessment?  The new state assessment, based on state standards in English language arts and.
1 Oregon’s Content Standards Revision Process Oregon State Board of Education October 2008.
Dr. Leslie David Burns, Associate Professor Department of Curriculum and Instruction UK College of Education
How was LAA 2 developed?  Committee of Louisiana educators (general ed and special ed) Two meetings (July and August 2005) Facilitated by contractor.
Proposed End-of-Course (EOC) Cut Scores for the Spring 2015 Test Administration Presentation to the Nevada State Board of Education March 17, 2016.
CSDCDecember 8, “More questions than answers.” CSDC December 8, 2010.
↗ Smarter Balanced Scales, Strands, and Scores Megan Kim, Lake Oswego School District Leigh Anne Scherer, North Clackamas School District.
2011 MEAP Results Board of Education Presentation | 07 May 2012 Romeo Community Schools | Office of Curriculum and Instruction.
Understanding the Common Core Standards Adopted by Nevada in 2010 Our State. Our Students. Our Success.
High School Proficiency Exam Nevada Department of Education.
Ohio’s Learning Standards Standards Revision Discussion Group.
Policy Definitions, Achievement Level Descriptors, and Math Standards.
Facilitator: Drew Hinds, ODE (503)
Updates on the Next-Generation MCAS
OREGON’S STANDARDS SETTING PROCESS
Essential Skills Last updated: 09/19/09.
Presentation transcript:

Policy Definitions, Achievement Level Descriptors, and Math Achievement Standards

 Review the Standards Setting Timeline  Hear from Stakeholders ◦ Development process ◦ Stakeholder Engagement and Survey Results  Adopt the General and Math Policy Definitions  Review the High School Math Achievement Level Descriptors

 Policy Definitions are general statements that describe rigor across grade levels and content areas and provide an overarching definition for each achievement level. They are used for all subjects  Achievement Level Descriptors explain a students’ knowledge and skills at a specific Achievement Level by grade and subject. They are a key element in the establishment of cut scores.  Following national best practice, ODE will focus the Standards Setting panelists’ attention on a reasonable cut score given data on national and international benchmarks.

 General Policy Definitions (provide consistency across subjects and grades)  Math Policy Definitions (provide consistency within math across grades)  Math Achievement Level Descriptors by grade  Differentiate levels of achievement needed for university, community college, workforce development, etc.

 Developed by group of math education experts after: ◦ Review of Oregon’s 2006 ALDs ◦ Review of national best practice ◦ Review of ALDs from other states with high performance and high standards  Developed in preparation for summer Math Standards Setting  Reviewed by math and education stakeholders

 The following groups have provided feedback on these statements in three rounds of surveys: ◦ Content Panels (Math, English, Science, Social Sciences, ELPA) ◦ Assessment Advisory Committee ◦ OMEC (Oregon Mathematics Education Council) ◦ OCTM Board (Oregon Council of Teachers of Mathematics) ◦ TOSA (Teachers on Special Assignment) ◦ TOTM (Teachers of Teachers of Mathematics) ◦ Career and Technical Ed Deans ◦ Community College Math Chairs ◦ Council of Instructional Administrators ◦ Higher Education Partners ◦ PTA Partners ◦

 Level 1: Students do not demonstrate mastery of grade-level knowledge and skills required for proficiency.  Level 2: Students demonstrate partial mastery of grade-level knowledge and skills required for proficiency.  Level 3: Students demonstrate mastery of the grade-level knowledge and skills required for proficiency.  Level 4: Students demonstrate mastery of grade- level knowledge and skills exceeding the requirement for proficiency.

 Level 1: Students demonstrate limited mastery of mathematical knowledge and skills through the direct application of a concept or procedure in simplified and familiar situations with occasional success.  Level 2: Students demonstrate partial mastery of mathematical knowledge and skills through the direct application of concepts and procedures in familiar situations with regular success. They are able to explain some of their steps.

 Level 3: Students demonstrate mastery of mathematical knowledge and skills through selecting from an assortment of strategies and integrating concepts and procedures in a variety of situations with consistent success. They are able to explain steps and procedures.  Level 4: Students demonstrate mastery of mathematical knowledge and skills through the use of multiple reasoning strategies and apply them in new and complex situations with consistent success. They are able to analyze their strategies and solutions.

 73% of Math Content Panel Respondents thought that the Math Policy Level Definitions were “Clear” or “Very Clear.”  61.5% of general respondents thought that the Math Policy Level Definitions were “Clear” or “Very Clear.”  Only 9% of recent respondents thought that the Math Policy Level Definitions were “Unclear.”  76.5% of recent respondents agreed with the rigor of the Math Policy Level Definitions

 March 2010 ◦ State Board Review  April 2010 ◦ Proposed State Board Adoption

 Initial Adoption of the General and Math Policy Definitions  Review of the High School Achievement Level Descriptors  State Board adoption of the High School Achievement Level Descriptors is expected in April  The grade 3-8 Achievement Level Descriptors will be presented for review in April