1 Internet Assisted Review Review User Group April 22, 2002.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Performance Appraisals
Advertisements

Baldrige National Quality Program 2003 Baldrige National Quality Program The Site Visit Process and Evaluating Site Visit Issue Worksheets.
Archived File The file below has been archived for historical reference purposes only. The content and links are no longer maintained and may be outdated.
FP6 IT System 1 ELECTRONIC PROPOSAL SUBMISSION SYSTEM.
A university wide electronic research ethics review system?
Easy DCR Development Control Regulation Online Building Permission System.
Archived File The file below has been archived for historical reference purposes only. The content and links are no longer maintained and may be outdated.
IT Tools OEET Online Expert Evaluation Tool.
1 Samples The following slides are provided as samples and references for the Quarterly Reviews Additional slides will be added.
IS 421 Information Systems Management James Nowotarski 16 September 2002.
QM Systems Overview: A 360° Perspective 2011 © MarylandOnline, Inc., All rights reserved.
THE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY ENVIRONMENTAL AND ENERGY CENTER (ATEEC) Summative External Evaluation July 1, 2013 – June 30, 2014 PRELIMINARY OUTLINE.
Office of Information Technology (OIT) PROJECT INITIATION DOCUMENTS - BUSINESS CASE, ALTERNATIVE ANALYSIS AND STATEMENT OF WORK (SOW)
An agency of the European Union Get started with EudraCT to prepare and post results Noémie Manent Compliance and Inspection.
GeMS Grant Applicant Information Registering Initiating an application.
1 Internet Assisted Review Focus Group April 15, 2002.
Komen Grants eManagement System GeMS. Why Online Grants  Reduce the amount of administrative paperwork being completed by applicants and grantees. 
Komen Grants eManagement System GeMS. Why Online Grants  Reduce the amount of administrative paperwork being completed by applicants and grantees. 
2 Session S105 FISAP On The Web n eCB’s FISAP On The Web
1 Our Expertise and Commitment – Driving your Success An Introduction to Transformation Offering November 18, 2013 Offices in Boston, New York and Northern.
CTRP User Call April 3, 2013 Gene Kraus CTRP Program Director.
Slide 1. Slide 2 XBRL at NZX Slide 3 Presentation Overview 1.NZX overview –Team and Resources –Motivation 2.MAP (Market Announcement Platform) –Origin.
1 Process for a Research Grant National Institutes of Health IMPAC II Center for Scientific Review Study Section Institute Advisory Councils & Boards Assign.
1 ITSS This overview contains three main sections How to Register for ITSS Application Access Contains guidance on how to create your profile and access.
California Integrated Waste Management Board 1 Waste Tire Manifest System.
1 Internet Assisted Review Focus Group March 14, 2002.
Open Campus Meetings January 14-16, 2015 RESEARCH ADMINISTRATION SYSTEM (RAS) Internal Approval Process & Budget Development.
Boston University Project Management Association Website Development Group 3 Team3 CS632 Dr. Vijay Kanabar Team Members Mario Soto Emily Ziegler Kevin.
Tips on Routing and Contracts: An Intro for the Campus Research Coordinator Michelle Artmeier Director of Award Services Ron.
 Overview  Online Report Process ◦ Report process for Grantees/Look-Alike Site Visits ◦ Report Process for Look-Alike Applicant Site Visits  Report.
Using the HRSA EHB to Report 2009 Uniform Data System (UDS) Data “New Start” Grantee Technical Assistance Call December 15, 2009.
NIH eRA COMMONS Principal Investigator Lab Regional Seminar Albuquerque April 2005.
An agency of the European Union Get started with EudraCT to prepare and post results Noémie Manent Compliance and Inspection.
NIH eRA Internet Assisted Review August 19, 2005.
Why Proposed TC Procedures? Define how TC reaches “completion” of what OASIS calls “Committee Specifications” TC procedures lead up to the OASIS process:
NIH Mentored Career Development Awards (K Series) Part 5 Thomas Mitchell, MPH Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics University of California San Francisco.
1 IAR Prototype Demonstration June 21, 2002 Screens and System Navigation.
Welcome To INSPIR Training Please be sure Please be sure to sign- in to sign- in Please be sure you try to log – on to INSPIR before you leave Please be.
Orange County Redistricting Submittal Processes Redistricting Committee Orange County, California April 1, 2011 Deborah Diep, Director Center for.
Susan G. Komen Central Wisconsin Affiliate Komen Grants eManagement System GeMS Community Grants Application Training October 2015.
Scarlett Gibb NIH Office of Extramural Research Office of Electronic Research and Reports Management Interim Chief, eRA User Support, Training & Documentation.
Archived File The file below has been archived for historical reference purposes only. The content and links are no longer maintained and may be outdated.
Komen Grants eManagement System GeMS. Why Online Grants  Reduce the amount of administrative paperwork being completed by applicants and grantees. 
Components of a Successful AREA (R15) Grant Rebecca J. Sommer Bates College.
Update on Internet Budgeting Solution (IBS) December 2004 Presented to EPMG 12/04 tm.
FP6 IT System 1 ELECTRONIC PROPOSAL SUBMISSION SYSTEM.
CTI Technical Committee Convener Call 11 May
Archived File The file below has been archived for historical reference purposes only. The content and links are no longer maintained and may be outdated.
Phoenix Campus Faculty Refresher Training. This workshop will provide faculty with updated knowledge and tools necessary to be effective in the classroom.
NIH is divided into two sections 1) Center for Scientific Review (CSR) 2) Institutes (eg., NIDDK, NCI, NHLBI) What is the difference? CSR organizes the.
OData Technical Committee Convener Call June 5, 2012.
Archived File The file below has been archived for historical reference purposes only. The content and links are no longer maintained and may be outdated.
ANALYSIS PHASE OF BUSINESS SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT METHODOLOGY.
NCI Clinical Trials Reporting Program CTRP User Meeting June 6, 2012 Gene Kraus CTRP Program Director.
Komen Grants eManagement System GeMS. Why Online Grants  Reduce the amount of administrative paperwork being completed by applicants and grantees. 
NATA Foundation General Grants Program Process RC Chair identifies 3 RC members to review Pre-Proposal & information is sent for review (within 2 weeks.
Rare Diseases Clinical Research Network Data Management and Coordinating Center (RDCRN DMCC) Rosalie Holland LDN Investigator Meeting at WORLDSymposium.
Introduction Review and proper registration of Human Gene Transfer protocols is very complex. A protocol goes through rigorous review by multiple Committees.
Declaring intent in leo
NATA Foundation Student Grants Process
Teacher Evaluation Timeline
ELECTRONIC PROPOSAL SUBMISSION SYSTEM
NATA Foundation General Grants Program Process
Conducting the performance appraisal
Conducting the performance appraisal
Preparing for NCPDP Joint Technical Work Group Meetings
Course Evaluation Ad-Hoc Committee Recommendations
THE TRIAL DATABASE AND ONLINE DATA QUERIES
U.S. CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTECTION OFFICE OF TRADE
NATA Foundation General Grants Program Process
Presentation transcript:

1 Internet Assisted Review Review User Group April 22, 2002

2 Overview Internet Assisted Review will allow Reviewers to: electronically submit critiques and preliminary scores prior to the meeting review the critiques submitted by others online permit more efficient and effective use of reviewers’ time at meetings modify their critiques after the meeting

3 Overall Process Flow How does Internet Assisted Review fit into the existing Peer Review process?

4 1. SRA Prepares Meeting/ Reviewers for IAR: SRA finalizes meeting assignments, selects meeting for IAR and specifies critique submission and other deadlines. 2. Reviewer Registers for IAR: Reviewer account creation and registration via Submit Phase: Reviewers log in and submit critiques and preliminary priority scores for their applications. 4. Read-Only Phase: After submission deadline, Reviewers “may” read other Reviewer’s critiques. If a reviewer has not submitted, the SRA “may” block the Reviewer from reading. 5. Optional Edit Phase: After the meeting, Reviewers “may” modify their critiques. 6. Generate Summary Statements: draft bodies are built from critiques.

5 IAR Focus Group Members Chair, Eileen Bradley (CSR) Roberta Binder (NIAID) Tracey David (CSR) Cynthia Lassnoff (NIAID) Neal Musto (NIDDK) Ev Sinnett (CSR) Roy White (NHLBI) Brian Wojcik (NCI) OER Staff: Tracy Soto, Scarlett Gibb, Sherry Zucker, Mark Siegert, Sandy Seppala NGIT Staff: Daniel Fox, Adam Levy, Andy Greenleaf

6 What have we done? Architecture decision made: J2EE and Commons database Security evaluation of User Registration and Account Management Held seven focus group meetings: Group approved overall business flow Reviewed two systems: NIAID Electronic Review NCI Clinical Trials Evaluation Program (used for both internal and external reviewer evaluation of proposed clinical protocols)

7 What have we done? Documented and validated requirements for: SRA/GTA Control Center Registration and Account Management Post phase Reviewer view SRA view

8 What do we still need to do? Requirements gathering and validation for: Read-only phase Streamlining Edit Phase Summary Statement generation Meeting data purge Define scope of versions to be delivered

9 Deployment Version 1 Pilot tentatively scheduled for Fall 2002 Schedule will be finalized after Focus Group finishes requirements gathering and validation and defines scope of first version (June 2002)

10 This presentation and materials from the IAR Focus Group Meetings (minutes, Scope document and Presentations) are posted on the eRA site at

11 Any questions?