Benchmarking Production Jan Strube (CERN) for the SiD Production team.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SiD PFA Status and Calorimeter Performance Ron Cassell (SLAC) SiD Design Study Meeting 11/15/08.
Advertisements

Higgs branching ratios study Oct Hiroaki Ono (NDU) Oct ILC Physics WG general meeting.
3 Nov 2006News - Paul Dauncey1 The 2006 beam tests have finished! DESY in May, CERN in Jul-Oct Many tens of millions of events and many TBytes of data.
1 Benchmarking the SiD Tim Barklow SLAC Sep 27, 2005.
LHC’s Second Run Hyunseok Lee 1. 2 ■ Discovery of the Higgs particle.
1 Higgs Self-Coupling Analysis – How To Tim Barklow SLAC October 25, 2007.
Detector Benchmarking Norman Graf (SLAC) TILC08, ACFA Physics & Detector Workshop Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan March 4,2008.
Computing plans for the post DBD phase Akiya Miyamoto KEK ILD Session ECFA May 2013.
SiD Software Status. Framework Overview Pythia, WHIZARD, etc. Pythia, WHIZARD, etc. SLIC Tracking, PFA, etc. LCSim StdHep LCIO Events JAS3 (or any AIDA.
 k0k0 ++ -- -- p ILC Technical Design Report Physics and Detectors – Detailed Baseline Design Juan A. Fuster Verdú, IFIC-Valencia PAC Meeting, KEK.
Simulation of RPC avalanche signal for a Digital Hadron Calorimeter (DHCAL) Lei Xia ANL - HEP.
Software Common Task Group Report Akiya Miyamoto KEK ALCPG09 30 September 2009.
E. Devetak - LCWS t-tbar analysis at SiD Erik Devetak Oxford University LCWS /11/2008 Flavour tagging for ttbar Hadronic ttbar events ID.
ALCPG Software Tools Jeremy McCormick, SLAC LCWS 2012, UT Arlington October 23, 2012.
SiD Software and Computing: Status / Plans Jan Strube Tohoku University Thanks to Norman Graf (SLAC) for material.
ALCPG software: status and future plans LCWS UT Arlington October 23, 2012 Norman Graf (for the sim/reco group)
Implementing a dual readout calorimeter in SLIC and testing Geant4 Physics Hans Wenzel Fermilab Friday, 2 nd October 2009 ALCPG 2009.
CERN IT Department CH-1211 Genève 23 Switzerland t Internet Services Job Monitoring for the LHC experiments Irina Sidorova (CERN, JINR) on.
2004 Xmas MeetingSarah Allwood WW Scattering at ATLAS.
Precise Measurements of SM Higgs at the ILC Simulation and Analysis V.Saveliev, Obninsk State University, Russia /DESY, Hamburg ECFA Study Workshop, Valencia.
1 Realistic top Quark Reconstruction for Vertex Detector Optimisation Talini Pinto Jayawardena (RAL) Kristian Harder (RAL) LCFI Collaboration Meeting 23/09/08.
Lcsim: Simulation and Reconstruction ACFA ILC Meeting Daegu, Korea April 24, 2012 Norman Graf (for the sim/reco group)
November SC06 Tampa F.Fanzago CRAB a user-friendly tool for CMS distributed analysis Federica Fanzago INFN-PADOVA for CRAB team.
BeamCal Simulations with Mokka Madalina Stanescu-Bellu West University Timisoara, Romania Desy, Zeuthen 30 Jun 2009 – FCAL Meeting.
E. Devetak – CERN CLIC1 LCFI: vertexing and flavour-tagging Erik Devetak Oxford University CERN-CLIC Meeting 14/05/09 Vertexing Flavour Tagging Charge.
Sim/Recon DBD Editors Report Norman Graf (SLAC) Jan Strube (CERN) SiD Workshop SLAC, August 22, 2012.
Norman Graf (SLAC) Software Software KILC12, Daegu, Korea.
ILC DBD Common simulation and software tools Akiya Miyamoto KEK ILC PAC 14 December 2012 at KEK.
SiD performance for the DBD Jan Strube CERN. Overview Software Preparation (CERN, SLAC) Machine Environment (CERN, SLAC) Tracking Performance (C. Grefe)
1Frank Simon ALCPG11, 20/3/2011 ILD and SiD detectors for 1 TeV ILC some recommendations following experience from the CLIC detector study
SiD Simulation & Reconstruction Norman Graf (for the sim/reco team) LCWS 2010, Beijing March 28, 2010.
CLIC CDR in relation to SiD Lucie Linssen SiD discussion at IWLC CERN October 18 th LL, SiD meeting at IWLC, 18/10/2010.
Taikan Suehara, 16 th general meeting of ILC physics (Asia) wg., 2010/07/17 page 1 Model 500 GeV Taikan Suehara ICEPP, The Univ. of Tokyo.
Background Simulations for the LHCb Beam Condition Monitor Overview: ● The LHCb Beam Condition Monitor (BCM) – Purpose, Design and Function – Implementation.
Software Overview Akiya Miyamoto KEK JSPS Tokusui Workshop December-2012 Topics MC production Computing reousces GRID Future events Topics MC production.
Lcsim software: status and future plans ECFA-LC DESY May 28, 2013 Norman Graf (for the sim/reco group)
Monte-Carlo event generation for CEPC 1 Xin Mo Institute of High Energy Physics Oct. 19, 2015 Monte-Carlo event generation for the CEPC.
25 Oct 2007Jeremy McCormick, ALCPG MC1 ALCPG Monte Carlo Framework.
Software Common Task Group Report Norman Graf (SLAC) PAC, Vancouver May 10, 2009.
Summary of Software and tracking activities Tokusui Workshop December 2015 Akiya Miyamoto KEK.
Jet Tagging Studies at TeV LC Tomáš Laštovička, University of Oxford Linear Collider Physics/Detector Meeting 14/9/2009 CERN.
Software Common Task Group Report Akiya Miyamoto ILC PAC POSTECH 3 November 2009.
Tim Barklow (SLAC) Mar 23,  DBD Benchmarks with Baseline Detector  DBD Benchmark Event Generation  CLIC Benchmarking Participation by SiD 
1TeV study for DBD ILD analysis meeting Sep H. Ono (NDU) Sep ILD analysis meeting TeV study 1.
Computing Resources for ILD Akiya Miyamoto, KEK with a help by Vincent, Mark, Junping, Frank 9 September 2014 ILD Oshu City a report on work.
SiD LOI Benchmark Simulation and Reconstruction Norman Graf (SLAC) LCWA09, Albuquerque September 30, 2009.
Event Generation of Tim Barklow SLAC October 21, 2010.
LCWS11 – Tracking Performance at CLIC_ILD/SiD Michael Hauschild - CERN, 27-Sep-2011, page 1 Tracking Performance in CLIC_ILD and CLIC_SiD e + e –  H +
Questions from the CLIC accelerator team (D. Schulte, LCD “monthly” 25 Feb. 2013) -> a first attempt to answers 1 25 March 2013.
On the possibility of stop mass determination in photon-photon and e + e - collisions at ILC A.Bartl (Univ. of Vienna) W.Majerotto HEPHY (Vienna) K.Moenig.
Summary of MC requests for DBD benchmarks ILD Workshop, Kyushu University May 23,
Report from SB2009 Working Group Akiya Miyamoto 8-July-2010 DESY ILD Software and Integration Workshop.
Linear Colliders in the HSF Jan Strube (PNNL) 1. Introduction Large Data rates (comparable to Belle-II) ~ 18 PB / year raw data at nominal running at.
LumiCal background and systematics at CLIC energy I. Smiljanić, Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences.
09/06/06Predrag Krstonosic - CALOR061 Particle flow performance and detector optimization.
Lcsim software: status and future plans ECFA-LC DESY May 30, 2013 Norman Graf (for the sim/reco group)
Whizard2 test at KEK report of work in progress Akiya Miyamoto 27 October 2015 Contents: Comparison with DBD sample Recoil mass distribution of e + e -
Status of the ALCPG simulation & reconstruction Norman Graf (SLAC) TILC09, Tsukuba April 19, 2009.
Generator status Akiya Miyamoto KEK 23 February 2016.
Standard Monte Carlo Event Samples Norman Graf SLAC November 11, 2004.
SiD: Simulation and Reconstruction
Akiya Miyamoto KEK 1 June 2016
slicPandora: slic + pandoraPFANew
ILD Background WG Mark Thomson
Computing in ILC Contents: ILC Project Software for ILC
ILD Ichinoseki Meeting
ILD Optimisation: towards 2012 University of Cambridge
Using Single Photons for WIMP Searches at the ILC
Jupiter and Satellites
Monte-Carlo event generation for CEPC
Presentation transcript:

Benchmarking Production Jan Strube (CERN) for the SiD Production team

First and Foremost: People SLAC: Tim Barklow, Norman Graf, Jeremy McCormick PNNL: David Asner, David Cowley, Brock Erwin, Malachi Schram CERN: Christian Grefe, Stephane Poss, J. S. SiD Workshop January 2013

Overview Software Physics Processes / Backgrounds Grid Production Lessons Learned / Summary SiD Workshop January 2013

Workflow SLIC Whizard LCFIPlus Pandora PFA lcio Jet Finding lcio ROOT Analysis Common Software made possible through common event data model lcio SiD Workshop January 2013

Physics Processes 1 TeV (1000 fb -1 ) ννH signal (m H = 125 GeV) ttH signal (m H = 125 GeV) WW signal 1f - 8f SM background (m H = 2 TeV) γγ → hadrons Incoherent pairs 500 GeV (500 fb -1 ) Top pairs, m top = GeV Top pairs, m top = GeV 6f SM background γγ → hadrons Samples provided by Common Generators Group (Barklow, Berggren, Miyamoto): all with the correct beamstrahlung spectrum at each energy SiD Workshop January

Beam-Induced Background Pair background 1 event per BX 450k particles Generated by GuineaPig ascii → hepevt → stdhep γγ interactions 4.1 events per 1 TeV 1.7 events per BX at 500 GeV Generated by Whizard Merged with each “physics” event MCParticles that don’t make hits are dropped 4 SiD Workshop January 2013

Luminous Region Finite extension:σ z = 225 μm o conservative compromise Events from beam-beam interactions (γγ→ hadrons, incoherent pairs) are distributed randomly over the luminous region Physics events always at z = 0 Fitted width: 214 μm Reconstructed primary vertex position for γγ→ hadrons, pairs 5 SiD Workshop January 2013

Sample Mixing (T. Barklow) Generated samples provided 100% polarized Samples for SiD grouped by processes and luminosity - weighted o Loss of fraction of files does not cause analysis bias Mixed to correspond to correct polarization o 1 TeV (1 ab -1 ): ± 80% electron, ∓ 20% positron o 500 GeV (500 fb -1 ): ± 80% electron, ∓ 30% positron 6 SiD Workshop January 2013

A Timeline of Events 20-Oct-2011 Start 10-Feb-2012 Beam Parameters chosen 15-Mar-2012 MC Integration complete 12-Apr-2012 MC Generation done 26-Jul-2012 Simulation Budget 7-Aug-2012 Production Start 3-Sep-2012 Z smearing chosen 22-Oct-2012 LCWS Oct-2012 Second Iteration Start 19-Nov-2012 Production Done 21-Jan-2013 Current Deadline half-way through original deadline original deadline SiD Workshop January 2013

Production in Numbers Production summaryProduction summary on SLAC confluenceSLAC confluence 50,746,683 events at 1 TeV (+ 4.7 million gghadrons) 6,550,022 events at 500 GeV (+ 4.4 million gghadrons) Country Total CPU Time (years) UK100.2 CH68.2 FR15.0 US28.2 SiD Workshop January 2013

SiD on the Grid Open Science Grid (OSG) resources are new addition to the SiD resource pool Worldwide LHC Computing Grid (WLCG) resources have been established during LOI and CLIC CDR efforts dedicated resources: PNNL, SLAC, CERN temporary quota increase: FNAL, RAL Tier 1 opportunistic use: all others PNNL SLAC CERN FNAL RAL Tier 1 SiD Workshop January 2013

US colleagues: Open Science Grid ILC VO managed at Fermilab ILC Virtual Organization Virtual Organizations have been merged Actively exchanging computing and storage resources Both, OSG and WLCG sites supported in DIRAC through gLite European / Asian colleagues: Worldwide LHC Computing Grid ILC VO managed at DESY Before Summer 2012: Grid authorization prevents data exchange Now: 12 SiD Workshop January 2013

ILCDIRAC Dirac system used in LHCb in Production, consists of o File catalog (First used in CLIC CDR)  Supports meta data (file ancestry, detector model,...) o Job submission, monitoring and bookkeeping ILCDIRAC (S. Poss et al.) developed for CLIC CDR production o Support for the plethora of ILC software Developed and maintained at CERN 8 SiD Workshop January 2013

Even though jobs start failing, CPU time lost remains small Fire at RAL

Production is done! not... SimulationReconstruction Validation and bug fixing Reconstruction Production Timeline SiD Workshop January 2013

Performance Summary Number of Jobs CPU Time SiD Workshop January 2013

Main Reasons of Lost Time ProblemAnalysisResulting Damage Fraction of events had single muon as "physics event" Bad Default Behavior Changing software versions in production setting w/o validation ~ 4 million events to be reproduced (simulation and reconstruction) ECAL hits have wrong energy Advertised Software version is buggy, although fix exists Changing software versions in production setting w/o validation Event mixing and reconstruction of all events was re-done Installation of OSG resources at PNNL / FNAL Trying to break new ground while running a major production Large number of failed jobs / drain of resources for support Fire in UPS room at RALLack of redundancy3 days lost SiD Workshop January 2013

Conclusions / Lessons Learned CPU time is not wall time. Faster processing does not necessarily mean faster time to finish. Every time software gets changed without validation, somewhere a kitten dies A large part of the production was run under high pressure. Combined with lack of experience, this led to some loss of time. On the other hand, mistakes were spotted because of hard work and diligence of individuals Even with the best tools, running a production is a manpower- intensive task SiD Production LCWS

Summary More than 57 million events have been processed in about 6 weeks o Re-processing stage took a bit under 4 weeks (3 estimated) The Fermilab and DESY ILC VOs have been merged o ILCDIRAC supports sites in OSG and in WLCG o FNAL quota back to pre-DBD, but significant resources now available at PNNL Development of ILCDIRAC, event mixing tools and grid experience developed at CERN during CLIC CDR was invaluable This was not a smooth experience. We need to establish (and follow) procedures for how to treat our software and our data with more respect. The DBD production got done by the effort of dedicated individuals SiD Production LCWS

Backup

Angular distribution of background Incoherent pairs affect mostly occupancies and tracking efficiencies Hadrons have enough energy to reach the calorimeter hadronsincoherent pairs

Supported Software Software is modularized in Dirac Sets the context of the program (env vars, dependencies) Allows to chain different modules together Currently supported Physics applications: Whizard, Pythia, Mokka, Marlin, PandoraPFA, SLIC, slicPandora, lcsim, etc. Mix and match, supply your own steering files SiD Production LCWS