Developing a Shared Understanding: Consistency, Conversations, and Calibration Educator Evaluation Spring Convening May 28 & 29, 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Continuous Improvement
Advertisements

District-Determined Measures Using DDMs as a Lever for Change Educator Evaluation Spring Convening May 28 th and 29 th 2014.
POSTER TEMPLATE BY: Increasing Student Growth and Achievement A Systems Approach: Improving Our Teacher Evaluation System Dawn.
Thank you!. At the end of this session, participants will be able to:  Understand the big picture of our new evaluation system  Create evidence-based.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
TPEP Teacher and Principal Evaluation Process Bellevue Chamber of Commerce Presentation January 15, 2015 Presented by: Dr. Patty Siegwarth: Bellevue School.
Muscogee County School District Division of Academics (DOA) District Accreditation Module 4: Quality Assurance.
Leader Evaluation and Professional Growth (LEPG) Model Module 3: Reflection, Rating, and Planning 1.
Demonstrating Flexibility and Responsiveness
Learning Walk High Levels of Learning for All Students Quality Instruction in Every Classroom Skillful Leadership Throughout the School and District.
The Massachusetts Framework for Educator Evaluation: An Orientation for Teachers and Staff October 2014 (updated) Facilitator Note: This presentation was.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Conducting High-Quality Self-Assessments.
Differentiated Supervision
© 2013, KDE and KASA. All rights reserved. TEACHER PROFESSIONAL GROWTH AND EFFECTIVENESS SYSTEM What the year holds.
REGIONAL PEER REVIEW PANELS (PRP) August Peer Review Panel: Background  As a requirement of the ESEA waiver, ODE must establish a process to ensure.
Looking at Student work to Improve Learning
Session Materials  Wiki
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
1 Let’s Meet! October 13,  All four people have to run.  The baton has to be held and passed by all participants.  You can have world class speed.
Welcome – Please sign-in and sit with your Mentor Professional Growth Planning Process.
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
Assessing Teachers’ Performance in Newport News, VA Presenters: Saundra C. Boatwright & Susan A. Piland National Conference on New Directions in Teacher.
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Online Community and Teambuilding. What is our definition of “learning community”? Definition of “Community”
Rhode Island Model Academy for Personnel Evaluating Teachers Day One Professional Practice.
Student Growth 2.0 Fall,  Face-to-Face Sessions  Student Growth 2.0  Rater Agreement Practices  TPEP/ Washington State Learning Standards.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 1.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing Educators for Rater Agreement and Sustainability: Planning for Professional Learning.
DISTRICT CFASST MEETING #2
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
LITERACY PROFESSIONAL LEARNING RESOURCE Primary Schools Program Session 4: Professional Learning.
Assess the effectiveness of strategies Analyze that evidence/data Identify the most powerful teaching strategies Identify and gather evidence/data of student.
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
Evaluator Workshop for Personnel Evaluating Teachers Rhode Island Model The contents of this training were developed under a Race to the Top grant from.
Maria LeFort 1 M. LeFort - Teaching Reading Across the Curriculum - Part 2.
Day 3. Agenda What have you been up to? Sharing what we’ve done related to this work as a new year began. Beginning of the Year Meeting (continued)
Ongoing Training Day 3. Welcome Back! [re]Orientation Lead Evaluator Training Background Agenda Review.
Ongoing Training Day 2. Welcome Back! [re]Orientation Lead Evaluator Training Agenda Review.
Medicine Hat School District #76 PLC’s Building Capability Through Collaborative Learning Developing tomorrow’s citizens through improved learning, living.
Lesson Study Opening Activities (Movement Activity) Grouping Subgroup Article Sharing –Subgroup Reporting.
Session Materials  Wiki
March Madness Professional Development Goals/Data Workshop.
 I can examine the benefits of peer observation.  I can demonstrate understanding of the PGES protocols for the peer observation process.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
Education Unit The Practicum Experience Session Two.
Idaho Principal Evaluation Process Tyson Carter Educator Effectiveness Coordinator Idaho State Department of Education
Writing Policy for SBDM Councils. Goals of this Session provide an overview of Senate Bill 1 requirements related to writing provide guidance in reviewing.
Th e Heart of TPEP: Learning Centered Conferencing Michelle Lewis John Hellwich TPEP.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 4: Professional Growth Plan Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
Educator Evaluation and Support System Basics. Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems Alignment of State and Federal.
Access to Resources to Attain Goals Strategic Expectations for Integration Authentic Professional Development & Reliable Technical Support.
WELCOME & INTRODUCTIONS Principal Partnership Program.
Candidate Assessment of Performance Using the CAP Rubric Workshop for Program Supervisors and Supervising Practitioners.
13.1 WELCOME TO COMMON CORE HIGH SCHOOL MATHEMATICS LEADERSHIP SCHOOL YEAR SESSION APR 2015 MARGINS: GREAT FOR ERRORS, NOT SO GOOD FOR.
Goal Setting in Educator Evaluation Sept. 11 th,
Consortium for Educational Research and Evaluation– North Carolina Building LEA and Regional Professional Development Capacity First Annual Evaluation.
© 2013, KDE and KASA. All rights reserved. FOUNDATIONS OF STUDENT GROWTH GOAL SETTING: DETERMINING STUDENT NEEDS SETTING A BASELINE What do my students.
Focused Evaluation. Who?  Teachers who completed the Comprehensive cycle  Proficient or distinguished.
Using Student Assessment Data in Your Teacher Observation and Feedback Process Renee Ringold & Eileen Weber Minnesota Assessment Conference August 5, 2015.
1 OBSERVATION CYCLE: CONNECTING DOMAINS 1, 2, AND 3.
Springfield Public Schools SEEDS: Collecting Evidence for Educators Winter 2013.
DECEMBER 7, 2015 Educator Effectiveness: Charter School Webinar.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.
Educator Effectiveness Regional Workshop: Round 2
Component 4 Effective and Reflective Practitioner
Closing Thoughts and Reflection
Goal: The Watertown Unified School District expects all teachers and administrators to be well versed in the best practices in their professional assignment.
Presentation transcript:

Developing a Shared Understanding: Consistency, Conversations, and Calibration Educator Evaluation Spring Convening May 28 & 29, 2014

Objectives District team members will  use a broad definition of calibration to reflect on opportunities for consistency and collaboration across the 5-Step Cycle  learn about the strategies and resources that presenters used to address issues of calibration in their districts  develop some next steps to support district calibration work in

Agenda 10 minutesWelcome, Overview, and Reflection 20 minutesMini-Presentation #1 20 minutesMini-Presentation #2 20 minutesTeam Time 5 minutesWrap-Up 3

What is Calibration? Ongoing, frequent collaboration that brings a group of people to a common understanding that helps to ensure consistency and fairness. 4

Consistency and Collaboration  What does “proficient practice” look like?  What elements of effective teaching practice are prioritized during observations?  How is evidence collected and shared?  How are artifacts connected to goals and standards?  How do evaluators provide high quality feedback to teachers?  How are formative and summative evaluations written? 5

Learn from Others  Team members will each attend different ”mini-presentations”  10 minutes: Learn about the process and strategies these districts are using  10 minutes: Open Q&A time  Use the packet of one page summaries and the graphic organizer to make notes on each presentation to share with other team members 6

PRESENTATIONS FALMOUTH PUBLIC SCHOOLS FITCHBURG PUBLIC SCHOOLS REVERE PUBLIC SCHOOLS SPRINGFIELD PUBLIC SCHOOLS 7

PRESENTATIONS AMHERST- PELHAM REGIONAL PUBLIC SCHOOLS GREATER LAWRENCE TECHNICAL HIGH SCHOOL NEWTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS WATERTOWN PUBLIC SCHOOLS 8

PRESENTATIONS FALMOUTH PUBLIC SCHOOLS BOSTON COLLEGIATE CHARTER SCHOOL WALTHAM PUBLIC SCHOOLS SPRINGFIELD PUBLIC SCHOOLS 9

PRESENTATIONS AMHERST- PELHAM REGIONAL PUBLIC SCHOOLS GREATER LAWRENCE TECHNICAL HIGH SCHOOL NEWTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS MATCH PUBLIC CHARTER HIGH SCHOOL 10

Team Time  As a team, use the graphic organizer to share ideas from the presentations and to develop a plan The goal is for your team to leave today with a simple, actionable plan for the calibration work in a specific area of need for your district. 11

Session Evaluations  Please take a few minutes to complete the evaluations. We value your feedback! 12