Supporting team communication and coordination in visual analytics Narges Mahyar University of Victoria April 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 14: Usability testing and field studies
Advertisements

1 Technology in the Common Core State Standards Perri Applegate, Ph.D. Tulsa Public Schools
Project-Based vs. Text-Based
Introduction Lesson 1 Microsoft Office 2010 and the Internet
Perri Applegate, Ph.D. Tulsa Public Schools
Core Competencies Student Focus Group, Nov. 20, 2008.
Educators Evaluating Quality Instructional Products (EQuIP) Using the Tri-State Quality Rubric for Mathematics.
Chapter 14: Usability testing and field studies. 2 FJK User-Centered Design and Development Instructor: Franz J. Kurfess Computer Science Dept.
1 Designing Group Annotations and Process Visualizations for Role-Based Collaboration Gregorio Convertino, Anna Wu, Xiaolong (Luke) Zhang, Craig H. Ganoe,
Sensemaking and Ground Truth Ontology Development Chinua Umoja William M. Pottenger Jason Perry Christopher Janneck.
Rationale for CI 2300 Teaching and Learning in the Digital Age.
© 2011 Pearson Prentice Hall, Salkind. Nonexperimental Research: Qualitative Methods.
Science Inquiry Minds-on Hands-on.
Classroom Action Research Overview What is Action Research? What do Teacher Researchers Do? Guidelines and Ideas for Research.
User Centered Design April 1-3, 2009 Joshua Ganderson Laura Baalman Jay Trimble.
1.
2011 SIGnetwork Regional Meetings Guidance in Structuring a Communities of Practice.
Module 3: Business Information Systems
Chapter 10 Conducting & Reading Research Baumgartner et al Chapter 10 Qualitative Research.
The Four-phase Lesson Plan
Rediscovering Research: A Path to Standards Based Learning Authentic Learning that Motivates, Constructs Meaning, and Boosts Success.
TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATION & INSTRUCTION FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY LEARNER JUNE 15-17, 2009 HOPE BROWN, HIGH SCHOOL SCIENCE, ST. EDMOND, FORT DODGE VALERIE JERGENS,
Visualizing Cyber Security: Usable Workspaces Glenn A. Fink, Christopher L. North, Alex Endert, Stuart Rose.
Which type of pet would be best for you?
Human Resource Management Gaining a Competitive Advantage
Teaching with Multimedia and Hypermedia
Samantha Reid Part-Time Instructor - 8 th Floor Technology Integration Specialist Tulsa Public Schools.
Educator Effectiveness Academy STEM Follow-Up Webinar December 2011.
W ELCOME M IDDLE S CHOOL M ATHEMATICS E DUCATORS & P RINCIPALS Day 2 Educator Effectiveness Academy Summer 2011.
Presented by Abirami Poonkundran.  Introduction  Current Work  Current Tools  Solution  Tesseract  Tesseract Usage Scenarios  Information Flow.
Research methods for HCI, HCC Judy Kay CHAI: Computer Human Adapted Interaction School of Information Technologies.
What is Science?.  Science = Latin “to know” Inquiry is at the heart of science.  Inquiry: search for information and explanation Two main processes:
PAPER PRESENTATION: EMPIRICAL ASSESSMENT OF MDE IN INDUSTRY Erik Wang CAS 703.
Lessons Learned Integrating Technology at the Preschool Level Dr. Roxanne Wilson Kathy McKechnie MS CCC-SLP Timberlane Learning Center Timberlane School.
Copyright©2007 Education Service Center Region XIII Mineral Wells ISD 5E CSCOPE Overview.
CHAPTER TEN AUTHORING.
1 Code User: Breaking the Code SESSION 3 Thinking about Thinking: Setting the Stage for Independent Reading.
Lecture 7. The Questions: What is the role of alternative assessment in language learning? What are the Reasons.
Measuring What Matters: Technology & the Assessment of all Students Jim Pellegrino.
Research on the effects of technology use on the teaching and learning of mathematics.
Standard 1: Teachers demonstrate leadership s. Element a: Teachers lead in their classrooms. What does Globally Competitive mean in your classroom? How.
Chapter 4 Developing and Sustaining a Knowledge Culture
User Modeling Lecture # 7 Gabriel Spitz 1. User Interface Design Process Gabriel Spitz 2 Needs Assessment Competitive Analysis Persona Develop Task Analysis/
Learning from Model-Produced Graphs in a Climate Change Science Class Catherine Gautier Geography Department UC Santa Barbara.
27/3/2008 1/16 A FRAMEWORK FOR REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERING PROCESS DEVELOPMENT (FRERE) Dr. Li Jiang School of Computer Science The.
Computer Buying Project
Theme 2: Data & Models One of the central processes of science is the interplay between models and data Data informs model generation and selection Models.
Session 2.1.3: Using competencies in staff recruitment Learning objectives: By the end of the session, participants will be able to: Apply the Core Humanitarian.
The Learning Cycle as a Model for Science Teaching Reading Assignment Chapter 5 in Teaching Science to Every Child: Using Culture as a Starting Point.
1. Question An ecosystem is a complex set of relationships among living and non-living things. The living, once living, and non-living factors of an area.
Strategic Research. Holiday Inn Express Stays Smart What research results led to an upgrade of all Holiday Inn Express bathrooms? How did their agency,
Project Based Learning “If I can learn the way you teach, why can’t you teach the way I learn”
 “I have to teach the same information skills each year because students do not learn them.”  “I don’t have time to give tests so I do not assess student.
Colby Smart, E-Learning Specialist Humboldt County Office of Education
CREATING A POWERPOINT 4 th Grade Technology Benchmarks for 4 th grade that will be covered in this Lesson:  Log onto district computers using individual.
1 Far West Teacher Center Network - NYS Teaching Standards: Your Path to Highly Effective Teaching 2013 Far West Teacher Center Network Teaching is the.
4:00 – 4:05pm Welcome and Introductions 4:05 – 4:20pm Ice Breaker 4:20-4:30 pm Norms 4:30 – 5:00pm Journaling 5:00 – 5:30 pm Enquiry activity stations.
Teaching and Learning Cycle and Differentiated Instruction A Perfect Fit Rigor Relevance Quality Learning Environment Differentiation.
1 Using DLESE: Finding Resources to Enhance Teaching Shelley Olds Holly Devaul 11 July 2004.
Generating data with enacted methods
CHAPTER OVERVIEW The Case Study Ethnographic Research
Animals use their senses for survival
What is Science?.
What is Science?.
What is Science?.
VISION AND CHANGE IN UNDERGRADUATE BIOLOGY EDUCATION: A Call to Action
What is Science?.
CHAPTER OVERVIEW The Case Study Ethnographic Research
Presentation transcript:

Supporting team communication and coordination in visual analytics Narges Mahyar University of Victoria April 2014

Research Focus My PhD research focuses on collaborative visualization, visual analytics and collocated collaboration around large interactive displays. 2

Role of Collaboration Taking advantage of diverse backgrounds and expertise to solve complex problems Increasing the quality of work Team members could discuss, negotiate, argue interpretations of data Reducing individual bias Sharing task load 3

Role of Visual Analytics Visuallyrepresenting complex information Visually representing complex information Interactively explore relationships in large datasets 4

Research Problem How to best support sensemaking in collaborative visual analytics? 5

Sensemaking (Pirolli & Card) 6 Information foraging loop Sensemaking loop

Sensemaking is hard Limited memory capacity – challenging to remember all the hypotheses and evidence Collaborative activities add additional challenges – e.g., what evidence and hypotheses have been found by others? 7

Beginning of the Story 8

Tabletop Design Issues Territoriality Fluid Interaction Orientation Shared Access Supporting changes in collaboration style 9

Research Goal Phase1: Conduct an observational study of collaborative visualization on large displays (existing visualization tools) To develop theories about which features will be important to include in future tools and why Phase2: Develop and evaluate a support tool that integrates those features To develop guidelines for designers of collaborative visualization tools 10

Phase1:Observational Study Mahyar, Sarvghad, and Tory, “Note Taking in Co-located Collaborative Visual analytics: Analysis of an Observational Study”, Information Visualization, vol. 11, no. 3, pp , July Mahyar, Sarvghad, and Tory, “A closer look at note taking in the co-located collaborative visual analytics process,” IEEE VAST

User Study Tasks Task 1: focused questions Task 2: competitive business case Participants 27 (9 groups of 3), primarily Business students Data : Collected video of sessions & interviews, live observer notes, participants’ notes Analysis : qualitative coding based on grounded theory 12

SAP Explorer 13

Objectives Initial goal: Identify challenges in the process of visual data analysis by co-located groups, in the business domain Emergent goal: Characterize record keeping activities as part of the collaborative analysis process Develop guidelines to better support record keeping 14

Results: Process of Collaborative Analysis Problem Definition Parse instructions Pose question Visualization Map data Create visual artifact Filter Dissemination Create report Search Mine visual artifact Calculate value Compare Analysis Record keeping Phase Activity Legend 15

Characterization of Note Taking Activities Notes’ Content FindingsCues Notes’ Scope Group note Personal note Notes’ Usage Further analysis Facilitate problem solving Create report ValidateReminder 27% higher sales in New YorkLook into sales of t-shirts 16

Note taking impacts awareness Notetaker lost track of what others were doing Suggests: integrate notes within the application 17

Lessons Learned Note taking and recordkeeping are really critical! Not well supported by visualization tools 18

Phase2: CoSpaces Narges Mahyar, Ali Sarvghad, and Melanie Tory, “Observations of Record-Keeping in Co- located Collaborative Analysis”, HICSS Narges Mahyar, Ali Sarvghad, Melanie Tory and Tyler Weeres “CoSpaces: Workspaces to Support Co-located Collaborative Visual Analytics,” DEXIS 2011, Nov

Design Objectives Integrating Record-keeping into visualization Providing a channel for ad-hoc awareness Incorporating design guidelines & provide support for: Changes in collaboration style Fluid Interaction Territoriality 20

CoSpaces 21

CoSpaces:Video 22

Most Important Results Groups found chart saving and note functions very useful Worksheet flexibility facilitated analysis Tabs were not used as much as we expected Use of tabs did not result in noticeable closer collaboration 23

Motivations for Phase 3 How to build an awareness providing channel that leads to closer collaboration? Would tool support for “discovery” and “notifying” of related findings improve collaboration? 24

Sensemaking (Pirolli & Card) 25 Information foraging loop Sensemaking loop ?

Design Objectives Build a “ Collaborative visual thinking space ” to support: Recording Recording Organizing Organizing Sharing their questions, findings, hypotheses, and evidence Sharing their questions, findings, hypotheses, and evidence Core feature: Increasing awareness with automatic discovery and linking of common works (LCW) 26

Target Domain: Intelligence Analysis e.g., solving a police mystery task Focus on this domain because of the availability of ground truth data sets VAST 2006 Challenge dataset 27

Phase3: CLIP Narges Mahyar, and Melanie Tory, “CLIP: A visual thinking space to support collaborative sensemaking and reasoning”, Graphics, Animation and New Media (“GRAND”) NCE AGM, (to appear). 28

29 CLIP:Video

16 groups of 3, 8 groups in each condition Worked for 90 minutes on the VAST 2006 challenge 30

Evaluation Experimental comparison of CLIP to a baseline tool Baseline tool: CLIP with LCW features removed Users can see each other’s workspaces, but cannot merge other’s work with their own view Scoring scheme (from previous research): Positive points for finding and connecting relevant facts Negative points for incorrect hypotheses Conducted an in-depth qualitative analysis of group coordination and communication 31

Performance 32 Hypothesis: CLIP groups will have better performance than BT; higher task score Hypothesis: CLIP groups will have better performance than BT; higher task score.

Discussion 33 Hypothesis: CLIP groups will have more instances of related discussion than BT groups.

Coordination 34 Hypothesis: CLIP groups will have more instances of coordination than BT groups.

CLIP Contributions & Future Work Explored design of a collaborative thinking space Demonstrated that LCW supports the sensemaking loop, improved awareness, communication and coordination Future work: Scalability to larger problems Extension to different data types and domain problems 35

Most Important Research Contributions Phase1: Critical role of record-keeping in collaborative VA Characterization of notes Phase2: Integrated record-keeping into a VA tool Investigated an ad-hoc awareness providing mechanism Phase3: Explored benefits of LCW for collaborative sensemaking Better performance Improved communication Improved Coordination 36

BACK UP SLIDES 37

Backup1-communication coding 38

Backup2-Results 39

Backup3-Collaboration Model 40

Competencies My PhD research fits very well in this project Developed a strong suite of research skills Designed, developed and evaluation of prototype tools Designed and conducted user studies Familiarity with various data gathering methods Quantitative and Qualitative data analysis skill Collaboration with industry Co-supervised undergrads and developers 41