1 Civil Systems Planning Benefit/Cost Analysis Scott Matthews 12-706/19-702 / 73-359 Lecture 9.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Pricing To Capture Surplus Value. Capturing Surplus: By applying the price discrimination. Price discrimination: the practice of charging consumers different.
Advertisements

Monopolistic Competition
Market Structure and Equilibrium We will consider the two extreme cases Perfect Competition Monopoly.
Part 7 Monopoly Many markets are dominated by a single seller with market power The economic model of “pure monopoly” deals with an idealized case of a.
Review of Economic Concepts AGEC Spring 2010.
Monopoly Outline: Outline: Characteristics of a monopoly Characteristics of a monopoly Why monopolies arise? Why monopolies arise? Production and pricing.
1 Civil Systems Planning Benefit/Cost Analysis Scott Matthews / / Lecture 7.
1 Civil Systems Planning Benefit/Cost Analysis Chapter 4 Scott Matthews Courses: and Lecture 7 - 9/22/2004.
1 Civil Systems Planning Benefit/Cost Analysis Scott Matthews /
1 Civil Systems Planning Benefit/Cost Analysis Chapters 3 and 4 Scott Matthews Courses: and Lecture 5 - 9/15/2004.
Possible Barriers to Entry “a market served by a single firm” 14 Monopoly.
15 Monopoly.
1 Civil Systems Planning Benefit/Cost Analysis Scott Matthews / / Lecture 9.
Monopolistic Competiton. Assumptions Many sellers and many buyers Slightly different products Easy entry and exit (low barriers)
1 Civil Systems Planning Benefit/Cost Analysis Scott Matthews /
1 Civil Systems Planning Benefit/Cost Analysis Chapters 3 and 4 Scott Matthews Courses: and Lecture 4 - 9/10/2003.
Departures from perfect competition
Principles of Microeconomics - Chapter 1
1 Civil Systems Planning Benefit/Cost Analysis Chapter 4 Scott Matthews Courses: and Lecture 6 - 9/20/2004.
1 Civil Systems Planning Benefit/Cost Analysis Scott Matthews / / Lecture 7.
Eco 101 Principles of Microeconomics Consumer Choice Production & Costs Market Structures Resource Markets
12 MONOPOLY CHAPTER.
1 Civil Systems Planning Benefit/Cost Analysis Chapters 3 and 4 Scott Matthews Courses: and Lecture 4 - 9/9/2002.
1 Compare Monopoly to Competition. 2 Compare monopoly with competition The main results here are the ideas that ----1) a monopoly firm will charge a higher.
Monopoly vs Perfect Competition. Allocative efficiency Society can maximize its net benefit by allocating just enough resources to produce the quantity.
Chapter 8 Perfect Competition © 2009 South-Western/ Cengage Learning.
Market Equilibrium We will consider the two extreme cases Perfect Competition Monopoly.
 relatively small economies of scale  many firms  product differentiation  close but not perfect substitutes  product characteristics, location, services.
0 Introduction  A monopoly is a firm that is the sole seller of a product without close substitutes.  The key difference: A monopoly firm has market.
Which curve is the demand curve? –Curve 1 Which curve is the marginal revenue curve? –Curve 2 Why? –For a monopoly to sell more, they must decrease price,
John R. Swinton, Ph.D. Center for Economic Education Georgia College & State University.
 Firm that is sole seller of product without close substitutes  Price Maker not a Price Taker  There are barriers to entry thru: Monopoly Resources,
The Four Market Models How do businesses decide what price to charge and how much to produce? It depends on the character of its industry.
Comparing Equilibrium situations for Monopoly and perfect Competition.
Market Power: Monopoly
Chapter 10 Monopoly. Chapter 102 Review of Perfect Competition P = LMC = LRAC Normal profits or zero economic profits in the long run Large number of.
Discussion Session 4 - Review 07/15/2015. Supply and Demand through a Labor Lens In the labor market, demand comes from firms who “consume” labor to produce.
Lecture Notes. Monopoly Market environment where there is only one firm in the market Firm faces ALL of demand So monopoly profit = p(y)y – c(y) Where.
MONOPOLY Why do monopolies arise? Why is MR < P for a monopolist?
Persaingan Monopolistik versus Persaingan Sempurna.
Monopoly Chapter 15.
LIPSEY & CHRYSTAL ECONOMICS 12e
PowerPoint Slides prepared by: Andreea CHIRITESCU Eastern Illinois University Monopoly 1 © 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied,
AP Microeconomics. Supply and Demand At the Margin To market we go Price taker, heart breaker Factor This!
Chapter 10 Monopoly. ©2005 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 102 Topics to be Discussed Monopoly and Monopoly Power Sources of Monopoly Power The Social.
PPA 723: Managerial Economics Lecture 15: Monopoly The Maxwell School, Syracuse University Professor John Yinger.
Monopolistic Competition Ch. 17. Characteristics Many firms selling similar (not identical) products Not price taker, face downward demand curve Free.
 Many small firms  Standardized product  No need to advertise  “Price takers”  Free entry and exit  Perfectly elastic demand  Average revenue.
Unit 3: Costs of Production and Perfect Competition
1.  exists when a single firm is the sole producer of a product for which there are no close substitutes. 2.
And Unit 3 – Theory of the Firm. 1. single seller in the market. 2. a price searcher -- ability to set price 3. significant barriers to entry 4. possibility.
Firms in Perfectly Competitive Markets. A. Many buyers and sellers B. The goods are the same C. Buyers and sellers have a negligible impact on the market.
© 2010 Pearson Education Canada Monopoly ECON103 Microeconomics Cheryl Fu.
Chapter Monopoly 15. In economic terms, why are monopolies bad? Explain. 2.
Monopoly 1. Why Monopolies Arise Monopoly –Firm that is the sole seller of a product without close substitutes –Price maker Barriers to entry –Monopoly.
University of Papua New Guinea Principles of Microeconomics Lecture 11: Monopoly.
Micro Review Day 3 and 4. Perfect Competition 14 A Perfectly Competitive Market For a market to be perfectly competitive, six conditions must be met:
Monopoly.
Market Structures Mods 61-63: Monopolies. Market Structure: Monopoly Intro to Monopolies Monopoly is exact opposite of perfect competition Monopoly –
Comparing Equilibrium situations for Monopoly and perfect Competition.
1 Civil Systems Planning Benefit/Cost Analysis Scott Matthews / / Lecture 8.
Perfect (or pure) Competition
Chapter 15 Monopoly.
(normal profit= zero econ. profit)
Monopoly versus Perfect Competition
Mr. Bernstein Module 61: Introduction to Monopoly November 2017
Perfect Competition part II
LIPSEY & CHRYSTAL ECONOMICS 12e
Monopoly versus Perfect Competition
Monopoly (Part 2) Chapter 21.
Presentation transcript:

1 Civil Systems Planning Benefit/Cost Analysis Scott Matthews / / Lecture 9

and Revisiting HW 2, Question 2 (Dam)  Thanks to Ryan and Jenny..  Their argument “should stop doing the project when the yearly PV goes negative”; year 45 instead of 66  This is a “social cash flow” problem  Should use continuous discounting, but that’s not concern here  Part a (no concerns) show to keep adding rows until NPV (cumulative) goes to 0  Use cumulative NPV to automate/avoid doing 25 separate NPV worksheets  But in reality, what the cumulative says is what NPV “up to year n” would have been had we done a separate worksheet  Our rule is “select project as long as NPV > 0”

and HW 2, Q2 (cont)  Part b just has different discount rates.. (no big deal)  Still - same basic framework applies. Finding NPVs to use our “rule”, but using cumulative NPV to help see when it would have gone to zero (if had done separate worksheets)

and Revisiting old problem.. I changed At cash streams to be non-uniform, and decreasing Would we do this project with information above? Eg 5 years? Does the fact that PV “goes negative” in year 4 matter?

and Last thoughts  Had we done separate worksheets to test NPV for each year 25 to 66, we would have found a positive NPV.  That is our decision rule for accepting projects.

and Monopoly - the real game  One producer of good w/o substitute  Not example of perfect comp!  Deviation that results in DWL  There tend to be barriers to entry  Monopolist is a price setter not taker  Monopolist is only firm in market  Thus it can set prices based on output

and Monopoly - the real game (2)  Could have shown that in perf. comp. Profit maximized where p=MR=MC (why?)  Same is true for a monopolist -> she can make the most money where additional revenue = added cost  But unlike perf comp, p not equal to MR

and Monopoly Analysis MR D MC Qc Pc In perfect competition, Equilibrium was at (Pc,Qc) - where S=D. But a monopolist has a Function of MR that Does not equal Demand So where does he supply?

and Monopoly Analysis (cont.) MR D MC Qc Pc Monopolist supplies where MR=MC for quantity to max. profits (at Qm) But at Qm, consumers are willing to pay Pm! What is social surplus, Is it maximized? Qm Pm

and Monopoly Analysis (cont.) MR D MC Qc Pc What is social surplus? Orange = CS Yellow = PS (bigger!) Grey = DWL (from not Producing at Pc,Qc) thus Soc. Surplus is not maximized Breaking monopoly Would transfer DWL to Social Surplus Qm Pm

and Natural Monopoly  Fixed costs very large relative to variable costs  Ex: public utilities (gas, power, water)  Average costs high at low output  AC usually higher than MC  One firm can provide good or service cheaper than 2+ firms  In this case, government allows monopoly but usually regulates it

and Natural Monopoly MR D Q* P* Faced with these curves Normal monop would Produce at Qm and Charge Pm. We would have same Social surplus. But natural monopolies Are regulated. What are options? Qm Pm MC AC a b c d e

and Natural Monopoly MR D Q* P* Forcing the price P* Means that the social surplus is increased. DWL decreases from abc to dec Society gains adeb Qm Pm MC AC a b c d e Q0

and Monopoly  Other options - set P = MC  But then the firm loses money  Subsidies needed to keep in business  Give away good for free (e.g. road)  Free rider problems  Also new deadweight loss from cost exceeding WTP