Housing and Transportation Affordability Index Study MWCOG Transportation Planning Board September 9, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Performance Measures CTP 2040 Policy Advisory Committee August 19, 2014.
Advertisements

The National Context for Smart Mobility John V. Thomas, PhD US EPA Smart Growth Program.
Sustainable Transit as an Engine for Economic Growth Harriet Tregoning, Director of Office of Economic Resilience, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban.
GIS and Transportation Planning
Partnerships and Planning for Livable and Sustainable Communities and Corridors American Public Transportation Association August 2, 2011.
An AQ Assessment Tool for Local Land Use Decisio ns MnAPA Annual Conference September 28, 2011 St. Cloud, Minnesota Mark Filipi, AICP PTP.
Twin Cities Case Study: Northstar Corridor. ●By 2030, region expected to grow by nearly 1 million, with 91% to 95% of new growth forecast to be located.
Public Information Sessions November 30, 2010: City Center at Oyster Point December 1, 2010: HRT Norfolk.
Incorporating Greenhouse Gas Considerations in RTP Modeling Jerry Walters, Fehr & Peers CTC Work Group Meeting on RTP Guidelines June 28, 2007.
Suburban Food Deserts: Islands of Food Insecurity in Seas of Affluence A Case Study of Butler County, Ohio 2010 Ohio GIS Conference September 15-17, 2010.
 City of Mesa Council Presentation October 23, 2014.
Materials developed by K. Watkins, J. LaMondia and C. Brakewood TODs & Complete Streets Unit 6: Station Design & Access.
Transportation, Growth and Sustainability Economic Growth with Equity Open Classroom Stephanie Pollack April 1, 2009.
Lec 16, LU Part 2: Scenarios & Assessment of transportation impacts on the urban activity system Scenarios Envision Utah’s scenarios Assessment of transportation.
Module 6 BUILDING MIXED-INCOME COMMUNITIES NEAR TRANSIT.
UrbanFootprint Module 3: Analysis Modules Materials prepared with funding support from the California Governor’s Office of Planning and Research, and the.
1 Using Transit Market Analysis Tools to Evaluate Transit Service Improvements for a Regional Transportation Plan TRB Transportation Applications May 20,
2040 Long Range Transportation Plan for River to Sea TPO September 26, 2014.
Bus Rapid Transit: Chicago’s New Route to Opportunity Josh Ellis, BRT Project Manager Metropolitan Planning Council.
Transit Estimation and Mode Split CE 451/551 Source: NHI course on Travel Demand Forecasting (152054A) Session 7.
8th Mid-Atlantic Regional Planning Roundtable Arlington, VA March 30, 2012 PlanMaryland Maryland Department of Planning.
1 Module 8 STATION AREA PLANNING. 2 Module 8 Station Area Planning Key Concepts and Definitions Station Area Planning Process 1.Define the Station Area.
Transportation Planning Board: Background, Constrained Long- Range Plan, and Ongoing Work Presentation to the Board of Directors Metropolitan Washington.
TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference Houston, Texas May 2009 Ann Arbor Transportation Plan Update-- Connecting the Land Use & Transportation.
11. 2 Public Transportation’s Role in a Greenhouse Gas Reduction Strategy Kevin Desmond King County Metro Transit Division Seattle, WA On behalf of the.
ENVISION TOMORROW UPDATES AND INDICATORS. What is Envision Tomorrow?  Suite of planning tools:  GIS Analysis Tools  Prototype Builder  Return on Investment.
Sustainable Communities Project. Sustainable Communities Federal Agencies Shaun Donovan US Housing & Urban Dev. Ray LaHood US Dept. of Trans. Lisa Jackson.
Mark Phillips BSDA/Metro Long-Range Planner. The Foundation: Moving Transit Forward.
Greater Washington 2050 Planning Tools Task Force May 29 th 2009 Harriet Tregoning and Alan Imhoff Regional Targets & Indicators.
PTIS Project Update October 26 – 28, PTIS Project Objective Recommend transit investments and land use strategies for urban and rural Fresno County.
1 The Aggregate Rail Ridership Forecasting Model: Overview Dave Schmitt, AICP Southeast Florida Users Group November 14 th 2008.
NEIGHBORHOOD LOCATION EFFICIENCY AND HOUSEHOLD TRANSPORTATION COSTS The 15 th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference Innovative Tools.
Modeling in the “Real World” John Britting Wasatch Front Regional Council April 19, 2005.
Initial Vision Scenario South Alameda County Briefing March 19, 2011.
1 Transportation Policy and Performance: The challenges and opportunities of performance-based programs Deputy Administrator Therese McMillan Federal Transit.
Capturing the Effects of Smart Growth on Travel and Climate Change Jerry Walters, Fehr & Peers Modeling for Regional and Interregional Planning Caltrans.
West Phoenix / Central Glendale Transit Corridor Study Public Meetings May 2013.
Improving the Models, SACOG Perspectives Sustainable Communities Implementation Challenges and Opportunities UC Davis Policy Forum Gordon Garry March 5,
David B. Roden, Senior Consulting Manager Analysis of Transportation Projects in Northern Virginia TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference.
September 6, 2011 Summerville Chamber Public Policy Committee.
Greater Washington 2050 COG’s A Regional Action Plan for the 21 st Century.
On the Road to a New Metropolitan Transportation Plan Spokane Regional Health District Board of Health April 25, 2013.
VALUES WORKSHOP Anne Arundel County | April 26, 2010.
Challenges and Choices San Francisco Bay Area Long Range Plan Therese W. McMillan Deputy Executive Director, Policy Metropolitan Transportation Commission.
SB 375: CREATING GREAT COMMUNITIES IN CALIFORNIA.
Smart Growth Land Use and Transportation Infrastructure Paul Beyer – Director of Smart Growth, NYS Department of State.
Greater Washington 2050 COG’s A Regional Action Plan for the 21 st Century David Robertson Executive Director.
San Joaquin Valley Sustainable Communities Strategies (SCS) Update July 25,
WAHP Workforce Housing Briefing Loudoun County, Virginia April 19, 2006.
The Smart Growth Strategy/ Regional Livability Footprint Project… Policies Shape Reality Alex Amoroso Principal Planner Association of Bay Area Governments.
 Connect the activity of cores throughout the region with transit and have vast majority of new housing and office developments within these activity.
TPB CLRP Aspirations Scenario 2012 CLRP and Version 2.3 Travel Forecasting Model Update Initial Results Ron Kirby Department of Transportation Planning.
1. 2 Which attributes make a community successful?
Urban Design and Transportation Creating options and opportunities.
Railroad Ave eBART Station Area Specific Plan TOD MarketPlace, September 29, 2006 C I T Y O F P I T T S B U R G.
Sustainability, Community, Value 3. Criteria Transportation Development Walkability Resource Management Waste Management 41.
Jennifer Dill Marc Schlossberg Linda Cherrington Suzie Edrington Jonathan Brooks Donald Hayward Oana McKinney Neal Downing Martin Catala.
BUILDING MIXED-INCOME COMMUNITIES NEAR TRANSIT
Subgroup Recommendations on draft Housing Goals & Objectives September 29, 2004 Subgroup Members: Don Eggert, Marianne Morton, Phil Salkin, & Alex Saloutos.
An AQ Assessment Tool for Local Land Use Decisio ns 13 th TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference May 9, 2011 Reno, Nevada Mark Filipi, AICP.
COG Activity Center Update Climate, Energy, & Environment Policy Committee May 23 rd, 2012.
The Regional Mobility and Accessibility Study Initial Results of CLRP/CLRP+ Analysis with Round 6.4 Growth Forecasts and Five Alternative Land Use Scenarios.
TOD 101 BUILDING QUALITY COMMUNITIES AROUND TRANSIT 1.
Redefining Affordability: The Housing and Transportation Affordability Index Linda Young, Research Manager July 31, 2008.
Innovations in Affordable Housing: Defining Need, Finding Solutions Lisa Sturtevant, PhD Vice President of Research, National Housing Conference Executive.
Updated Subgroup Recommendations on draft Housing Goals & Objectives October 20, 2004 Subgroup Members: Don Eggert, Marianne Morton, Phil Salkin, & Alex.
Reducing GHG emissions from Transportation using Smart Growth
Tweet about this presentation #TransitGIS
A Vision for the District: Perspectives from the City
Presentation transcript:

Housing and Transportation Affordability Index Study MWCOG Transportation Planning Board September 9, 2011

Center for Neighborhood Technology Non-profit applied research “think and do tank” based in Chicago Develop and implement strategies that benefit the environment and the economy Bridge information gaps and asymmetries between supply & demand for essential public goods and services Work includes energy efficiency, transportation efficiency, green infrastructure

Expanding the Definition of Affordability Housing Costs < 30% of Income

Expanding the Definition of Affordability Transportation Costs?

Expanding the Definition of Affordability H+T Costs < 45% of Income

Expanding the Definition of Affordability Transportation costs are typically 18% of household budget H+T® Affordability Index calculates costs at the neighborhood level 337 metro areas at: 30% housing + 15% transportation = 45% H+T affordability benchmark Housing Costs + Transportation Costs Income H+T INDEX =

Applications Region Forward 2050 Goals: Transit-oriented mixed-use communities emerging in Regional Activity Centers that will capture new employment and household growth. A transportation system that maximizes community connectivity and walkability, and minimizes ecological harm to the region and world beyond. A variety of housing types and choices in diverse, vibrant, safe, healthy, and sustainable neighborhoods, affordable to persons at all income levels. A broad range of public and private transportation choices for our Region which maximizes accessibility and affordability to everyone and minimizes reliance upon single occupancy use of the automobile. Target: By 2020, the housing and transportation costs in Regional Activity Centers will not exceed 45 percent of area median income Target: Increase the share of walk, bike, and transit trips

Why Look at H+T? Source: zillow.com; US EIA

H + T Index: Expanding the Definition of Affordability

Transportation Costs Vary by Location

Customizing the H+T Index for DC Updated Data –Constant share method preserves 2000 Census block group level variation while updating to with the American Community Survey Market Rate Housing Costs –To capture housing market trends, Multiple Listing Service (MLS) data used for home ownership costs Local Data –Detailed datasets obtained from local agencies serve as independent variables refining the model calibration

Customizing the H+T Index for DC: Local Data Residential Density Standard model uses Census blocks to define residential acres

Customizing the H+T Index for DC: Local Data Residential Density Customized model tests the use of land use data in refining residential acreage calculation

Land Use Data Customizing the H+T Index for DC: Local Data + Land Use Diversity

Customizing the H+T Index for DC: Local Data Transit Access Standard model uses rail stations and bus routes to measure access

Customizing the H+T Index for DC: Local Data Transit Access Customized model incorporates all regional bus networks and frequency of service

Customizing the H+T Index for DC: Local Data Transit Access + OP’s Transit Network Analysis Customized model also incorporates OP’s Transit Network Analysis estimating area of land accessible in a given time by transit

Customizing the H+T Index for DC: Development of Two Models General Model, Full RegionRefined Model, Small Region

Model Findings: Autos per Household General Model, Full RegionRefined Model, Small Region

Model Findings: Autos per Household

Model Findings: Percent Transit for Journey to Work General Model, Full RegionRefined Model, Small Region

Model Findings: Percent Transit for Journey to Work

Model Findings: Vehicle Miles Traveled Massachusetts Model

Model Findings: Vehicle Miles Traveled

Model Findings: Differences Between the Two Models

Model Outputs and Results Avg. Monthly Housing Costs

Model Outputs and Results Avg. Monthly Transportation Costs

Model Outputs and Results Avg. Monthly H+T Costs

Model Outputs and Results Avg. Monthly H+T Costs as a Percent of AMI

Bringing It All Together: Redefining Affordability

Applying the H+T Scenario Tool Studying CHASE TAZ 8.0 Forecast 2,165 New Households 17,917 New Jobs Streetcar Line Results Autos/Household -61% VMT -42% % Transit Use +36% Transportation Cost -51%

Peter M. Haas, Ph.D Chief Research Scientist Stephanie Morse Research Coordinator Thank You! Questions?