Towards An Attractive Fusion Power Plant Farrokh Najmabadi Forum on Next Step Device April 27, May 1, 1998 U. Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Comments on Progress Toward and Opportunities for Attractive Magnetic Fusion Power Plants Farrokh Najmabadi FPA workshop Jan 23-25, 1999 Marina Del Rey,
Advertisements

Who will save the tokamak – Harry Potter, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Shaquille O’Neal or Donald Trump? J. P. Freidberg, F. Mangiarotti, J. Minervini MIT Plasma.
Fusion Power Plants: Visions and Development Pathway Farrokh Najmabadi UC San Diego 15 th ICENES May 15 – 19, 2011 San Francisco, CA You can download a.
Overview of the ARIES “Pathways” Program Farrokh Najmabadi UC San Diego 8 th International Symposium on Fusion Nuclear Technology Heidelberg, Germany 01–
ARIES-AT: An Advanced Tokamak, Advanced Technology Fusion Power Plant Farrokh Najmabadi University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.
Steps Toward a Compact Stellarator Reactor Hutch Neilson Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory ARIES Team Meeting October 3, 2002.
Overview of the ARIES Program Farrokh Najmabadi University of California San Diego Presentation to: ARIES Program Peer Review August 18, 2000 UC San Diego.
Impact of Advanced Technologies on Fusion Power Plant Characteristics: The ARIES-AT Study Farrokh Najmabadi University of California, San Diego, La Jolla,
Summary and Closing Remarks Farrokh Najmabadi University of California San Diego Presentation to: ARIES Program Peer Review August 18, 2000 UC San Diego.
ARIES-AT: Evolution of Vision for Advanced Tokamak Power Plants Farrokh Najmabadi University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States of America.
Fusion Development Path: A Roll-Back Approach Based on Conceptual Power Plant Studies Farrokh Najmabadi UC San Diego Fusion Power Associates Annual Meeting.
Perspectives on Fusion Electric Power Plants Farrokh Najmabadi University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA FPA Annual Meeting December 13, 2004 Washington,
National Fusion Power Plant Studies Program Achievements and Recent Results Prepared for Bill Dove OFES Headquarters June, 1999.
Overview of the ARIES Fusion Power Plant Studies Farrokh Najmabadi IAEA Technical Committee Meeting on Fusion Power Plant Studies March 24-28, 1998 Culham,
National Fusion Power Plant Studies Program Achievements and Recent Results Farrokh Najmabadi University of California, San Diego FESAC Meeting March 4-5,
Towards Attractive Fusion Power Plants Farrokh Najmabadi University of California San Diego Presented at Korean National Fusion Research Center Daejon,
December 10-12, 2008/ARR 1 International HHFC Workshop on Readiness to Proceed from Near Term Fusion Systems to Power Plants ARIES Workshop UCSD, La Jolla,
Advanced Design Program Performs Integrated Analysis Detailed and in-depth analysis is necessary to make scientific progress and impact the R&D program:
RECENT RESULTS FROM USA MAGNETIC FUSION POWER PLANTS Farrokh Najmabadi University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States of America German.
Characteristics of an Economically Attractive Fusion Power Plant Farrokh Najmabadi University of California San Diego Fusion: Energy Source for the Future?
Contributions of Burning Plasma Physics Experiment to Fusion Energy Goals Farrokh Najmabadi Dept. of Electrical & Computer Eng. And Center for Energy Research.
Page 1 of 14 Reflections on the energy mission and goals of a fusion test reactor ARIES Design Brainstorming Workshop April 2005 M. S. Tillack.
System Studies Activities (FY 1999 & Beyond) Farrokh Najmabadi VLT PAC Meeting June 8 & 9, 1999 UC San Diego Electronic copy:
Overview of the ARIES Program Farrokh Najmabadi University of California San Diego Presentation to: ARIES Program Peer Review August 18, 2000 UC San Diego.
Goals of the “Town Meeting” Mark Tillack ARIES Tritium Town Meeting March 6-7, 2001 Livermore, CA.
Development of the New ARIES Tokamak Systems Code Zoran Dragojlovic, Rene Raffray, Farrokh Najmabadi, Charles Kessel, Lester Waganer US-Japan Workshop.
Impact of Liquid Wall on Fusion Systems Farrokh Najmabadi University of California, San Diego NRC Fusion Science Assessment Committee November 17, 1999.
Overview of the ARIES Program Mark Tillack IAP Short Course A Modern View of Fusion Power Plants: Progress and Prospects January 22, 2001 Massachusetts.
Status of Advanced Design Studies and Overview of ARIES-AT Study Farrokh Najmabadi US/Japan Workshop on Fusion Power Plant Studies & Advanced Technologies.
Characteristics of Commercial Fusion Power Plants Results from ARIES-AT Study Farrokh Najmabadi Fusion Power Associates Annual Meeting & Symposium July.
Optimization of a Steady-State Tokamak-Based Power Plant Farrokh Najmabadi University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA IEA Workshop 59 “Shape and.
Prospect for Attractive Fusion Power (Focus on tokamaks) Farrokh Najmabadi University of California San Diego Mini-Conference on Nuclear Renaissance 48th.
Environmental, Safety, and Economics Studies of Magnetic Fusion, Including Power Plant Design Studies Robert W. Conn Farrokh Najmabadi University of California.
Overview of Advanced Design White Paper Farrokh Najmabadi Virtual Laboratory for Technology Meeting June 23, 1998 OFES Headquarters, Germantown.
The Future Prospects of Fusion Power Plants Farrokh Najmabadi University of California San Diego MIT IAP January 10, 2006 Electronic copy:
Summary of Research in the Advanced Energy Technology Group at UC San Diego Farrokh Najmabadi and Mark Tillack March 2004
Overview of the ARIES-ST Study Farrokh Najmabadi University of California, San Diego Japan/US Workshop on Fusion Power Plants & Related Technologies with.
Summary Report of the Energy Issues Working Group Organizer: Farrokh Najmabadi Covenors:Jeffrey Freidberg, Wayne Meier, Gerald Navaratil, Bill Nevins,
Physics Issues and Trade-offs in Magnetic Fusion Power Plants Farrokh Najmabadi University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA APS April 2002 Meeting.
Proposed Research for the ARIES Team for Farrokh Najmabadi, Mark Tillack for the ARIES Team Virtual Laboratory for Technology Meeting June 23,
Magnetic Fusion Power Plants Farrokh Najmabadi MFE-IFE Workshop Sept 14-16, 1998 Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory.
Fusion Development Path: A Roll-Back Approach Based on Conceptual Power Plant Studies Farrokh Najmabadi UC San Diego 9 th International Symposium on Fusion.
Advanced Design Activities Farrokh Najmabadi Virtual Laboratory for Technology Meeting Dec. 10, 1998 VLT PAC Meeting, UCSD.
Thoughts on Fusion Nuclear Technology Development and the Role of ITER TBM Farrokh Najmabadi Prof. of Electrical Engineering Director of Center for Energy.
Highlights of ARIES-AT Study Farrokh Najmabadi For the ARIES Team VLT Conference call July 12, 2000 ARIES Web Site:
Requirements and Designs for IFE and MFE First Wall and Blankets Farrokh Najmabadi UC San Diego 2nd Japan/US Workshop on Laser-driven Inertial Fusion Energy.
Role of ITER in Fusion Development Farrokh Najmabadi University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA FPA Annual Meeting September 27-28, 2006 Washington,
Contributions of Advanced Design Activities to Fusion Research Farrokh Najmabadi University of California San Diego Presentation to: VLT PAC Meeting February.
Prospects for Attractive Fusion Power Plants Farrokh Najmabadi University of California San Diego 18 th KAIF/KNS Workshop Seoul, Korea April 21, 2006 Electronic.
Magnetic Fusion Power Plants -- Tritium Systems and Requirements Farrokh Najmabadi, Director, Center for Energy Research University of California, San.
US Fusion Power Plant Studies: Current Projects & Planned Activities Farrokh Najmabadi IEA ESE Executive Committee Meeting March 14, 2001 Gaithersburg.
Overview of the ARIES Program Farrokh Najmabadi UC San Diego Presentation to ARIES Program Peer Review August 29, 2013, Washington, DC Mission: Perform.
Progress in ARIES-ACT Study Farrokh Najmabadi UC San Diego Japan/US Workshop on Power Plant Studies and Related Advanced Technologies 8-9 March 2012 US.
A new approach for exploration of tokamak power plant design space Farrokh Najmabadi, Lane Carlson, and the ARIES Team UC San Diego 4 th IAEA Technical.
Fusion: Bringing star power to earth Farrokh Najmabadi Prof. of Electrical Engineering Director of Center for Energy Research UC San Diego NES Grand Challenges.
Page 1 of 11 An approach for the analysis of R&D needs and facilities for fusion energy ARIES “Next Step” Planning Meeting 3 April 2007 M. S. Tillack ?
An Expanded View of RAMI Issues 02 March 2009 RAMI Panel Members: Mohamed Abdou (UCLA), Tom Burgess (ORNL), Lee Cadwallader (INL), Wayne Reiersen (PPPL),
ARIES “Pathways” Program Farrokh Najmabadi University of California San Diego ARIES brainstorming meeting UC San Diego April 3-4, 2007 Electronic copy:
Page 1 of 11 Progress developing an evaluation methodology for fusion R&D ARIES Project Meeting March 4, 2008 M. S. Tillack.
Summary and Closing Remarks Farrokh Najmabadi UC San Diego Presentation to ARIES Program Peer Review August 29, 2013, Washington, DC.
Compact Stellarator Approach to DEMO J.F. Lyon for the US stellarator community FESAC Subcommittee Aug. 7, 2007.
Assessment of Fusion Development Path: Initial Results of the ARIES “Pathways” Program Farrokh Najmabadi UC San Diego ANS 18 th Topical Meeting on the.
Advanced Design Activities in US Farrokh Najmabadi University of California, San Diego Japan/US Workshop on Fusion Power Plants & Related Technologies.
Energy Challenge Farrokh Najmabadi Prof. of Electrical Engineering Director of Center for Energy Research UC San Diego UC President Board of Science and.
Compact Stellarators as Reactors J. F. Lyon, ORNL NCSX PAC meeting June 4, 1999.
EVOLUTION OF VISIONS FOR TOKAMAK FUSION POWER PLANTS
Historical Perspectives and Pathways to an Attractive Power Plant
Advanced Design Activities in US
US/Japan Workshop on Fusion Power Plant Studies
TWG goals, approach and outputs
Presentation transcript:

Towards An Attractive Fusion Power Plant Farrokh Najmabadi Forum on Next Step Device April 27, May 1, 1998 U. Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin

The ARIES Team Has Examined Several Tokamak and non-Tokamak Power Plants in the Past 10 Years TITAN reversed-field pinch (1988) ARIES-I first-stability tokamak (1990) ARIES-III D- 3 He-fueled tokamak (1991) ARIES-II and -IV second-stability tokamaks (1992) Pulsar pulsed-plasma tokamak (1993) SPPS stellarator (1994) Starlite study (1995) ARIES-RS reversed-shear tokamak (1996) ARIES-ST spherical tokamak (in progress)

Top-Level Requirements for Commercial Power Plant Were Developed through Interaction with Representatives from US Electric Utilities & Industry 1) No public evacuation plan required: Total does < 1 rem at site boundary 2) No radioactive material generated with waste category greater than Class C 3) No disturbance of public’s day-to-day activities 4) No exposure of workers to a higher risk than other power plants 5) Closed tritium fuel cycle 6) Ability to operate at partial load condition (50%) 7) Ability to maintain power core 8) Ability to operate reliably with < 0.1 major unscheduled shut- down/year

Our Vision of Tokamaks Has Improved Drastically in the Last Decade

Direction for Improvement of Product Push the concepts to the limit For example, for ARIES-RS reduce COE by about 10%: assume perfect bootstrap alignment, and operation at the maximum theoretical  This is a trade-off of credibility with performance

More Efficient Confinement System  No superconducting TF coils –Spherical tokamaks (ARIES-ST): Potential for high performance and small size devices for fusion research but requires high beta and perfect bootstrap alignment. Center-post is a challenge. –RFP (TITAN): Simple magnets and potential for high performance. Steady-state operation requires resolution of the conflict between current-drive and confinement.  No current-drive: –Stellarators (SPPS): recent advances bring the size in-line with advanced tokamaks. Needs coils and components with complicated geometry.

High-Performance Technology  ARIES-I design explored improved performance through higher- performance technologies: –Cheap, high-field magnets. Note  2 B 4 scaling, –A “coal-like” fusion core, i.e., no nuclear-stamped components.  Higher performance and/or cheaper fusion core components results in dramatic improvement in our products:  It requires extensive fusion engineering sciences R&D.

Summary  Fusion has an attractive product at this stage of its development.  History of fusion research shows improvement of our product through coordinated R&D.  Problem: How to communicate this to outside.  We have to continuously strive to improve our products by –Pursuing “better tokamks” or alternatives –Pursuing higher performance and cheaper technologies.  Detailed integrated conceptual design help define the trade-off and point to directions for high-leverage R&D.