Teacher Incentive Fund U.S. Department of Education.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Improving Teacher Quality State Grants
Advertisements

Before IDEA One in five children with disabilities was educated. One in five children with disabilities was educated. More than 1 million children with.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER Overview of Federal Requirements August 2, 2012 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
TEACHER QUALITY AND DISTRIBUTION Principals and Teachers Effectiveness and Evaluation NSBA’s Federal Relations Network Conference February
Dr. Kathleen M. Smith Director, Office of School Improvement (804) (804) (Cell) Dr. Dorothea Shannon.
AMERICAN COMPETITIVENESS INITIATIVE U.S. Department of Education.
OVERVIEW OF CHANGES TO EDUCATORS’ EVALUATION IN THE COMMONWEALTH Compiled by the MOU Evaluation Subcommittee September, 2011 The DESE oversees the educators’
2011 OSEP Leadership Mega Conference Collaboration to Achieve Success from Cradle to Career 2.0 Federal Initiatives Update Investing in Innovation (i3)
Shelda Hale, Title III, ELL and Immigrant Education Kentucky Department of Education.
Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Improvement Act of 2006.
Presented by CCSSO and Penn Hill Group December 4, 2014
ESEA FLEXIBILITY RENEWAL PROCESS: FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS January29, 2015.
Module 1: PERA Illinois Administrative Code Part 50
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
Student Learning Objectives 1 Implementing High Quality Student Learning Objectives: The Promise and the Challenge Maryland Association of Secondary School.
Student Learning Objectives 1 Phase 3 Regional Training April 2013.
LOUISIANA STATE SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION JOHN WHITE Tracking Readiness: Measuring High School Effectiveness in Louisiana National Conference on Student.
Provided by Education Service Center Region XI 1 Title I, Part A Overview Provided by Education Service Center Region XI
DRAFT – Not for Circulation Investing in Innovation (i3) 2012 Development Competition Summary Document February 2012 Note: These slides are intended as.
This series of five presentations has the following goals: Presentation III A Discussion with School Boards: Raising the Graduation Rate, High School Improvement,
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
“Current systems support current practices, which yield current outcomes. Revised systems are needed to support new practices to generate improved outcomes.”
Title II, Part A(3) Competitive Grant Program for Improving Teacher Quality Technical Assistance March 17, 2011 Webinar and Meeting.
Georgia Association of School Personnel Administrators May 30,
Developing Talent Enhancing Careers Improving Student Learning REIL “Update” Rewarding Excellence in Instruction and Leadership Education Service Agency.
School Improvement Grant Update Fall Grant Purpose School Improvement Grants (SIG), authorized under section 1003(g) of Title I of the Elementary.
What Does Supplement, Not Supplant Mean?. 2 Fiscal Requirements Supplement, not Supplant –
Mathematics and Science Education U.S. Department of Education.
Overview of Title I Part A Farwell ISD. The Intent of Title I Part A The intent is to help all children to have the opportunity to obtain a high quality.
© 2009 American Institutes for Research ® State-wide Systems of Support: Integrating High School Redesign Efforts Joseph Harris, Project Director Jenny.
WW Why Evaluation?. Evaluation formalizes the shared responsibility of state and LEAs to improve student achievement and close the achievement gap in.
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
Teacher Effectiveness Pilot II Presented by PDE. Project Development - Goal  To develop a teacher effectiveness model that will reform the way we evaluate.
Title I Schoolwide Program Proposal for Change. What is Title I  Title I — A Federal Program with the goal of Improving The Academic Achievement Of the.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Special Education Advisory Committee Virginia Department of Education.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Virginia Association of School Superintendents Annual Conference Patty.
The Improving Teacher Quality State Grants Program California Postsecondary Education Commission California Mathematics & Science Partnership 2011 Spring.
Geelong High School Performance Development & Review Process in 2014.
STAR3 Project for WS/FCS. STAR3 All students deserve and thrive under a great teacher that cares for their well being. Our responsibility is to provide.
Overview of Title I Part A Prepared by: Title I Staff - Office of Superintendent of Instruction OSPI Dr. Bill Wadlington, Superintendent/Principal and.
Governor Christie’s Educator Effectiveness Task Force Report March 1, 2011.
Building World-Class Schools for Iowa Iowa Department of Education.
0 Universal Pre-Kindergarten (UPK) FY13 February 2012.
ESEA, TAP, and Charter handouts-- 3 per page with notes and cover of one page.
Learning More About Oregon’s ESEA Waiver Plan January 23, 2013.
Rowland Unified School District District Local Education Agency (LEA)Plan Update Principals Meeting November 16, 2015.
1 46th Annual PAFPC Conference May 5, 2015 MARIA GARCIA Schoolwide Program Manager DIVISION OF FEDERAL PROGRAMS Title I Schoolwide Programs.
TARGETED ASSISTANCE SCHOOLS 2010 Title I Administrative Meeting Maryland State Department of Education Julia B. Keleher, Ed. D, PMP April 13, 2010.
February 2016 Overview of the Every Student Succeeds Act.
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education September 2010.
The Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice Board of Education Presentation May 26, 2011.
Educator Effectiveness Process Introduction to the Grant and Guide to the Unit Meeting.
Teacher Incentive Fund to 2012: approx. $1.8 billion awarded for 131 TIF grants (4 cohorts) LEAs, SEAs*, non-profits* (*partnering with LEAs) Purpose:
UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
1 Rose Hermodson Assistant Commissioner Minnesota Department of Education December 13, 2011 Teacher Evaluation Components in Legislation.
Overview: Every Student Succeeds Act April ESEA in Ohio In 2012, our state applied for and received a waiver from provisions of No Child Left Behind.
Program Information for Applicants School Leadership Program U.S. Department of Education 2005.
Educator Effectiveness Liaison Network Informational Webinar October 17, 2014.
CLASS Project Inspiring Oregonians… to do what it takes to make our schools among the nation’s best. CLASS Project.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA 2004 Highly Qualified Teachers (HQT)
Selection Criteria and Invitational Priorities School Leadership Program U.S. Department of Education 2005.
No Child Left Behind Application Title VI, Part B, Subpart 2 Virginia Department of Education March 2011.
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act
Investing in Innovation (i3) Fund
ANNUAL TITLE I MEETING NOBLE ACADEMY COLUMBUS.
Title II Preparing, Training, and Recruiting High Quality Teachers and Principals Ismail Ardahanli.
Developing and Revising Schoolwide Plans
State Examples and Follow-up Data Requests for SOQ Proposals
Presentation transcript:

Teacher Incentive Fund U.S. Department of Education

Current Portfolio of TIF Grantees Cohort 1 and 2 –32 projects Cohort projects FY11 Request $800 million. 2

TIF Program Purpose Purpose of Program: The purpose of the TIF program is to support projects that develop and implement PBCSs for teachers, principals, and other personnel in order to increase educator effectiveness and student achievement, measured in significant part by student growth, in high-need schools. 3

Definition of student achievement (a) For tested grades and subjects--(1) A student’s score on the State’s assessments under the ESEA; and (2) As appropriate, other measures of student learning, such as those described in paragraph (b) of this definition, provided that they are rigorous and comparable across schools; and (b) For non-tested grades and subjects, alternative measures of student learning and performance, such as student scores on pre- tests and end-of-course tests; student performance on English language proficiency assessments; and other measures of student achievement that are rigorous and comparable across schools. 4

Definition of Student Growth 5 The Notice defines “student growth” as: The change in student achievement for an individual student between two or more points in time. A State or LEA may also include other measures that are rigorous and comparable across schools.

Definition of a high-need school The Notice defines a “high-need school” as: A school with 50 percent or more of its enrollment from low-income families, based on eligibility for free or reduced-price lunch subsidies under the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act, or other poverty measures that LEAs use (see section 1113(a)(5) of the ESEA (20 U.S.C. 6313(a)(5)). For middle and high schools, eligibility may be calculated on the basis of comparable data from feeder schools. Eligibility as a high-need school under this definition is determined on the basis of the most currently available data. 6

Absolute Priority 1 Differentiated Levels of Compensation for Effective Teachers and Principals Develop and implement a PBCS that rewards, at differentiated levels, teachers and principals who demonstrate their effectiveness by improving student achievement as part of the coherent and integrated approach of the local educational agency (LEA) to strengthening the educator workforce. In determining teacher and principal effectiveness as part of the PBCS, 7

Absolute Priority 1, cont. the LEA— (a) Must give significant weight to student growth based on objective data on student performance; (b) Must include observation-based assessments of teacher and principal performance at multiple points in the year, carried out by evaluators trained in using objective evidence-based rubrics for observation, aligned with professional teaching standards; and, if applicable, as part of the LEA’s coherent and integrated approach to strengthening the educator workforce; and (c) May include other measures, such as evidence of leadership roles (as defined in the notice), that increase the effectiveness of other teachers in the school or LEA. 8

In determining principal effectiveness as part of a PBCS, the LEA must give significant weight to student growth and may include supplemental measures such as high school graduation and college enrollment rates. In addition, the applicant must demonstrate that the differentiated effectiveness incentive payments will provide incentive amounts that are substantial and provide justification for the level of incentive amounts chosen. 9 Absolute Priority 1, cont.

Fiscal Sustainability of the Performance-Based Compensation System (PBCS) (a) Projected costs associated with the development and implementation of the PBCS, during the project period and beyond, and responsibility to provide such performance-based compensation to teachers, principals, and other personnel beyond the grant period. 10 Absolute Priority 2

Absolute Priority 2, cont. (b) Provide from non-TIF funds over the course of the five-year project period an increasing share of performance-based compensation paid to teachers, principals, and other personnel. 11

Absolute Priority 3 Comprehensive Approaches to the Performance- Based Compensation System (PBCS). The PBCS is aligned with a coherent and integrated strategy for strengthening the educator workforce, including the use of data and evaluations for professional development and retention and tenure decisions in the LEA or LEAs participating in the project during and after the end of the TIF project period. 12

Competitive Priority 4 Use of Value-Added Measures of Student Achievement The PBCS for teachers, principals, and other personnel will use a value-added measure of the impact on student growth as a significant factor in calculating differentiated levels of compensation provided to teachers, principals, and others. 13

Competitive Priority 5 Increased Recruitment and Retention of Effective Teachers to Serve High-Need Students and in Hard-to-Staff Subjects and Specialty Areas in High-Need Schools Program is designed to assist high-need schools to (1) serve high-need students, (2) retain effective teachers in teaching positions in hard-to-staff subjects and specialty areas, such as mathematics, science, special education, and English language acquisition, and (3) fill vacancies with teachers of those subjects or specialty areas who are effective or likely to be effective. 14

Core Elements (1) A plan for effectively communicating to teachers, administrators, other school personnel, and the community at-large the components of its PBCS; (AND) (2) The involvement and support of teachers, principals, and other personnel (including input from teachers, principals, and other personnel in the schools and LEAs to be served by the grant) and the involvement and support of unions in participating LEAs (where they are the designated exclusive representatives for the purpose of collective bargaining) that is needed to carry out the grant; (AND) 15

Core Elements, cont. (3) Rigorous, transparent, and fair evaluation systems for teachers and principals that differentiate effectiveness using multiple rating categories that take into account student growth (as defined in the notice) as a significant factor, as well as classroom observations conducted at least twice during the school year. The evaluation process must: (1) use an objective, evidence-based rubric aligned with professional teaching or leadership standards and the LEA’s coherent and integrated approach to strengthening the educator workforce; (2) provide for observations of each teacher or principal at least twice during the school year by individuals (who may include peer reviewers) who are provided specialized training; (3) incorporate the collection and evaluation of additional forms of evidence; and (4) ensure a high degree of inter-rater reliability (i.e., agreement among two or more raters who score approximately the same); (AND) 16

Core Elements, cont. (4) A data-management system* that can link student achievement (as defined in the notice) data to teacher and principal payroll and human resources systems; and (5) A plan for ensuring that teachers and principals understand the specific measures of teacher and principal effectiveness included in the PBCS, and receive professional development that enables them to use data generated by these measures to improve their practice. 17

Professional Development The PBCS will include a high-quality professional development component for teachers and principals consistent with the definition of the term professional development in section 9101(34) of the ESEA. (AND) The PBCS has a professional development component in place, or a specific plan for developing one, that is directly linked to the specific measures of teacher and principal effectiveness included in the PBCS. 18

Professional Development, cont. The professional development component of the PBCS must— (1) Be based on needs assessed either at the high-need schools participating in the applicant’s proposed PBCS or LEA-wide; (2) Be targeted to individual teachers’ and principals’ needs as identified in the evaluation process; (3) Provide-- (a) Those teachers and principals in participating TIF schools who do not receive differentiated compensation based on effectiveness under the PBCS with the tools and skills they need to improve their effectiveness in the classroom or school and be able to raise student achievement; and (b) Those teachers and principals who are deemed to be effective and who, therefore, receive differentiated compensation under the PBCS, with the tools and skills they need to (1) continue effective practices in the classroom or school and raise student achievement, and (2) successfully assume additional responsibilities and leadership roles 19

Professional Development, cont. (4) Support teachers and principals to better understand and use the measures of effectiveness in the PBCS to improve practice and student achievement; and (5) Include a process for regularly assessing the effectiveness of this professional development in improving teacher and leadership practice to increase student achievement (as defined in the notice) and making modifications necessary to improve its effectiveness. 20

Contact Us Website: