12.540 Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 09 Prof. Thomas Herring Room 54-820A; 253-5941

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Near real time assessment of the Space Weather effect on navigation based on the DGPS technique S.Lejeune, R.Warnant, A. Barré, M. Bavier Royal Observatory.
Advertisements

GPS Theory and applications
Modern Navigation Thomas Herring MW 11:00-12:30 Room A
Track Short Course: Track Introduction and Commands Lecture 01 Thomas Herring, MIT Room A
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 19 Prof. Thomas Herring Room A;
04/22/02EGS G STABILITY OF GLOBAL GEODETIC RESULTS Prof. Thomas Herring Room ;
Jie Liu Microsoft Research Redmond, WA GPS Fundamentals Mobile Location Sensing Tutorial at MobiSys 2013.
A quick GPS Primer (assumed knowledge on the course!) Observables Error sources Analysis approaches Ambiguities If only it were this easy…
Distance observations
SURVEYING II UNIT IV PRESENTATION II.
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 06 Prof. Thomas Herring Room A;
Excess phase computation S. Casotto, A. Nardo, P. Zoccarato, M. Bardella CISAS, University of Padova.
Space Weather influence on satellite based navigation and precise positioning R. Warnant, S. Lejeune, M. Bavier Royal Observatory of Belgium Avenue Circulaire,
INTEGRALS 5. INTEGRALS We saw in Section 5.1 that a limit of the form arises when we compute an area.  We also saw that it arises when we try to find.
Per R. Bodin Global Posision System GPS. Per R. Bodin Litt historie 1960: nasA & DoD are Interested in developing a satellite based position system with.
8 TECHNIQUES OF INTEGRATION. There are two situations in which it is impossible to find the exact value of a definite integral. TECHNIQUES OF INTEGRATION.
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 14 Prof. Thomas Herring Room A;
03/18/05OSU GAMIT/GLOBK1 TRACK: GAMIT Kinematic GPS processing module
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 10 Prof. Thomas Herring Room A;
Ground-Based Altimetry Using a Single- Receiver Single-Frequency GNSS Phase Ambiguity Resolution Technique G. Stienne* S. Reboul J.-B. Choquel M. Benjelloun.
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 07 Prof. Thomas Herring Room A;
Modern Navigation Thomas Herring
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 16 Prof. Thomas Herring Room A;
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 13 Prof. Thomas Herring Room A;
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 11 Prof. Thomas Herring Room A;
LIAL HORNSBY SCHNEIDER
Modern Navigation Thomas Herring MW 11:00-12:30 Room
Modern Navigation Thomas Herring MW 11:00-12:30 Room
Computational Methods of Scientific Programming Lecturers Thomas A Herring, Room A, Chris Hill, Room ,
Modern Navigation Thomas Herring MW 11:00-12:30 Room A
Class 19 – NAVSTAR GPS, GLONASS and Galileo
GPS: Global Positioning System  The Geographer’s best friend!  You can say with confidence… “I’m not lost!, I’m never lost!”* *Of course, where everybody.
How Does GPS Work ?. Objectives To Describe: The 3 components of the Global Positioning System How position is obtaining from a radio timing signal Obtaining.
Modern Navigation Thomas Herring
Surveying with the Global Positioning System Phase Observable.
09/24/2008Unavco Track Intro1 TRACK: GAMIT Kinematic GPS processing module
A new Ad Hoc Positioning System 컴퓨터 공학과 오영준.
Modern Navigation Thomas Herring MW 11:00-12:30 Room
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 12 Prof. Thomas Herring Room ;
Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue | Cambridge MA V F
Global Positioning System Overview
Short-session Static and Kinematic Processing Short-session static: GAMIT processing, sessions 1-3 hours long Kinematic: TRACK processing, coordinates.
1 SVY 207: Lecture 12 Modes of GPS Positioning Aim of this lecture: –To review and compare methods of static positioning, and introduce methods for kinematic.
Pseudoranges to Four Satellites
Error Modeling Thomas Herring Room ;
INTEGRALS We saw in Section 5.1 that a limit of the form arises when we compute an area. We also saw that it arises when we try to find the distance traveled.
5 INTEGRALS.
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 08 Prof. Thomas Herring Room ;
SVY207: Lecture 10 Computation of Relative Position from Carrier Phase u Observation Equation u Linear dependence of observations u Baseline solution –Weighted.
Track Short Course: Track Examples Thomas Herring, MIT Room A
1 SVY 207: Lecture 5 The Pseudorange Observable u Aim of this lecture: –To understand how a receiver extracts a pseudorange measurement from a GPS signal.
Uncertainty2 Types of Uncertainties Random Uncertainties: result from the randomness of measuring instruments. They can be dealt with by making repeated.
Relative positioning with Galileo E5 AltBOC code measurements DEPREZ Cécile Dissertation submitted to the University of Liège in partial requirements for.
SVY207 Lecture 8: The Carrier Phase Observable
Astronomisches Institut der Universität Bern Global Navigation Satellite Systems for Positioning and Time Transfer T. Schildknecht, A. Jäggi R. Dach, G.
AXK/JPL SBAS Training at Stanford University, October 27-30, 2003 Satellite Based Augmentation Systems Brazilian Ionosphere Group Training at Stanford.
Track Introduction and Commands Lecture 03 Thomas Herring, MIT Room A
Track Introduction and Commands Lecture 07 Thomas Herring, MIT Room A
The Global Positioning System
09/24/2008Unavco Track Intro1 TRACK: GAMIT Kinematic GPS processing module R King overview from longer T Herring.
Miscellaneous Measurements
GPS: Global Positioning System
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 07
Tuning AUTCLN for editing
Kinematic Data Processing
Track Output Interpretation
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 14
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 11
Track Output Interpretation
Presentation transcript:

Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 09 Prof. Thomas Herring Room A;

03/06/ Lec 092 Summary Review: –Examined definitions of pseudorange and carrier phase –Looked at some actual raw measurements from a RINEX file Today we look at: –Combinations of range and phase measurements –Simple differences between observed and rough calculation of expected range and phase measurements –Sources of GPS data

03/06/ Lec 093 Range and phase data As we have seen, with real data there are drops out of data (missing data) and often associated with this cycle slips in the phase data. The difference between the L1 and L2 range measurements reflects noise and the ionospheric delay (grew by 5 meters in the hour of data we looked at) Difference between L1 and L2 phase, when converted to distance using standard frequencies and speed of light, also reflects noise (much smaller than range) and ionospheric delay but with opposite sign to range ionospheric delay. This difference can be used to check for cycles slips independent of ionosphere and movement of receivers. Called the Melbourne-Wubena Wide Lane

03/06/ Lec 094 Melbourne-Wubena Wide Lane The difference between L1 and L2 phase with the L2 phase scaled to the L1 wavelength is often called simply the widelane and used to detect cycle slips. However it is effected fluctuations in the ionospheric delay which in delay is inversely proportional to frequency squared. The lower frequency L2 has a larger contribution than the higher frequency L1 The MW-WL removes both the effects on the ionospheric delay and changes in range by using the range measurements to estimate the difference in phase between L1 and L2

03/06/ Lec 095 Melbourne-Wubena Wide Lane (MW-WL) Equation for the MW-WL. The term Rf/c are the range in cycles (notice the sum due to change of sign ionospheric delay) The  f/  f term for GPS is ~0.124 which means range noise is reduced by a about a factor of ten. Because of phase and biases range biases, the ML- WL should be integer (within noise) when data from different sites and satellites (double differences) are used. (Example shown later)

03/06/ Lec 096 Simple mathematical model We know examine as series of results based on the results you are generating for GPS station. How closely can the observed ranges and phases be matched with a simple calculation? Simplest calculation: At the time given in the rinex data files, compute the position of satellite and based on rinex header position compute the range. How accurate is this?

03/06/ Lec 097 Direct comparison

03/06/ Lec 098 Zoom of “jump” section

03/06/ Lec 099 C1 range to theory comparison Clearly the theoretical range and observed ranges are “sort-of” tracking each other but there are large differences. The “jump” with missing data seems to show the same jump for all satellites (difficult to tell at this scale) (Class notes have data files, so you can check). Pseudorange is difference of clock times, but we have not taken into account the clocks. Examine the difference between observed and theoretical range (omc).

03/06/ Lec 0910 Observed - Theory, Clock values from broadcast ephemeris Notice that omc is opposite to clock, Next plot satellite clock corrections added

03/06/ Lec 0911 Observed - theory + satellite clock

03/06/ Lec 0912 Zoom of last plot

03/06/ Lec 0913 Residuals After correcting for the satellites, the large fluctuations can be removed with the receiver clock. Once this is done the remaining residuals are meters. What needs to be corrected at this point?

03/06/ Lec 0914 Main model parts missing We already saw that L1-L2 range values change by up to 5m for the short span we looked at Monday (next page shows longer segment). Errors in station coordinates could add 5-10 m of error depending on quality Atmospheric delays (and 3-10 m, especially for low elevation satellites) Time the satellite position is calculated: We assumed the time tag on the rinex file but clearly in error by 0.1 msec due to receiver clock. A bigger error is the light propagation time (~7 msec). Satellites move in radial direction at ~1km/sec, therefore 7 ms translates to about 7 meters of range change. Later in course you will need to do this calculation

03/06/ Lec 0915 L1-L2 range for PRN 07

03/06/ Lec 0916 MW-WL (used for detecting cycle slips and resolving phase ambiguities)

03/06/ Lec 0917 MW-WL Last part of data (plus PRN 28)

03/06/ Lec 0918 MW-WL Characteristics In one-way form as shown the MW-WL does not need to be an integer or constant Slope in one-way is common, but notice that both satellites show the same slope. If same satellite-pair difference from another station (especially when same brand receiver and antenna) are subtracted from these results then would be an integer (even at this one station, difference is close to integer) The MW-WL tells you the difference between the L1 and L2 cycles. To get the individual cycles at L1 and L2 we need another technique. There is a formula that gives L1+L2 cycles but it has 10 times the noise of the range data (  f/  f) and generally is not used. Discuss more in the processing methods of the course

03/06/ Lec 0919 Results from BASE station Following figures show similar results to this already shown for the base station site that will be similar to those used in homework 2 and 3. Results shown here are for 15-seconds over an extended period of time. Homework data will be 1-sec samples over a short time interval.

03/06/ Lec 0920 Base

03/06/ Lec 0921 Base : Observed P1 – Range + satellite clock (m)

03/06/ Lec 0922 Base : P1 Observed – Range + SV clock – Site clock (m)

03/06/ Lec 0923 P1-P2 and L1-L2 (range difference converted to L1 cycles)

03/06/ Lec 0924 Melbourne-Webena Widelane (all, cycles)

03/06/ Lec 0925 MW-WL edited (points deleted)

03/06/ Lec 0926 GPS Data availability Over 1000 GPS sites from around the world are available with latencies of 1-hour to a few days. The remainder of the lecture we look at these archives starting from the following links: –SOPAC –CDDIS –NGS/CORS –UNAVCO There are more sites and many sites show results as well as have data available