Ecological Site Descriptions Foundation for Resource Management Decisions George Peacock Grazing Lands Technology Institute USDA-NRCS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Proposed Indicators for Ecological Health & Diversity of Rangelands Rod Heitschmidt, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Miles City, MT and Linda Joyce,
Advertisements

SITE ANALYSIS ARE 202 Architectural Design-I SITE ANALYSIS ARE 202 Architectural Design-I Site Analysis Introduction to Architectural Design By Sabeer.
Soil and Ecological Site Identification Exercise Jeff Herrick USDA-ARS Jornada Experimental Range
ECOLOGICAL SITES EXPANDING the CONCEPTS and APPLICATIONS of ECOLOGICAL SITES Joel Brown USDA NRCS Jornada Experimental Range Las Cruces NM.
The Downscaled Climate Projection Has Arrived – NOW WHAT?
Land Classification and Use Chapter 8 Land is more than soil n Natural and artificial characteristics of an area to be used for agricultural or other.
Ecological Sites and their Relationship to Soil Mapping Steve Campbell Soil Scientist USDA – Natural Resources Conservation Service West National Technology.
Improving soils data for better vegetation modeling Wendy Peterman, Dominique Bachelet Conservation Biology Institute  Abstract Over.
1 William P. Cunningham University of Minnesota Mary Ann Cunningham Vassar College Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for.
BIOL 585 – Fall Schedule: Week 1: Figure set activity (LAB) Week 2: Field sampling at Prophetstown State Park (FIELD) Week 3: Data analysis & interpretation.
Robert Dobos National Soil Survey Center 12 October 2011.
Relationship to E-Flows Riparian Areas Influences groundwater/surface water relationships Provides filters to improve water quality Provides habitat for.
World Forests Forests cover 30% of the world’s land surface.
Introduction to Vegetation Classification and the Biogeoclimatic Ecosystem Classification System FRST 211: Forest Classification and Silvics.
Long-term changes in Mediterranean vegetation in Israel and California Yohay Carmel Faculty of Agricultural Engineering The Technion -- Israel Institute.
Three Aspects of Sustainability 1.Inter-generational equity “The goal of sustainability is to meet the needs of the present without compromising the ability.
Some Major Problems In Managing Watersheds Of The Border Region Dr. M. Karl Wood, Director Water Resources Research Institute New Mexico State University.
Fundamentals of River Restoration and Salmonid Fisheries OWEB, 1999, Fundamentals of River Restoration and Salmonid Fisheries OWEB, 1999, Fundamentals.
Hydrology in Land Surface Models Jessie Cherry International Arctic Research Center & Institute of Northern Engineering.
Overview of Watershed Systems
Most Common Conservation Practices Forestry Illinois.
Theories of Vegetation Change Mort Kothmann Texas A&M University.
Heartland Network Heartland Network Natural Resource Monitoring Program.
The Soil Resource: Foundation of Terrestrial Ecosystems.
NRCS National Ecological Site Handbook Webinar April 18, 2013 George Peacock, Team Leader National Grazing Lands Team Central National Technology Support.
RANGELAND HYDROLOGY BASIC CONCEPTS Lamar Smith Cascabel Ranch and Consulting Carta Valley, Texas.
ECOLOGICAL SITES: DEVELOPMENT AND DESCRIPTION ESD Workshop Winnemuca NV 5 June 2012 Joel Brown USDA NRCS National Soil Survey Center /Jornada Experimental.
Blending Science with Traditional Ecological Knowledge  Frank K. Lake  Environmental Science, Graduate Ph.D program  US Forest Service- Redwood Sciences.
Soil Productivity and Conservation THE GMIS. Importance of Soil As the key resource in crop production It supports the physical, chemical, and biological.
Measuring Habitat and Biodiversity Outcomes Sara Vickerman and Frank Casey September 26, 2013 Defenders of Wildlife.
NRCS Ecological Site Handbook Webinar April 16, 2013 Susan Andrews, National Leader Soil Quality and Ecosystems Branch National Soil Survey Center and.
FireBGCv2: A research simulation platform for exploring fire, vegetation, and climate dynamics Robert Keane Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory Rocky Mountain.
Rangeland Health Assessment and Monitoring (Framework for Ecological Site-Based Assessment and Monitoring in Mongolia) 7 July 2007 Ulan Bator, Mongolia.
Biomes FIELD BIOLOGY & METHODOLOGY Fall 2014 Althoff Lecture 04.
Watershed Assessment and Planning. Review Watershed Hydrology Watershed Hydrology Watershed Characteristics and Processes Watershed Characteristics and.
Wayne A. Robbie, Supervisory Soil Scientist USDA Forest Service, Southwestern Region Albuquerque, NM Common Elements: Ecological Sites Descriptions and.
STRATIFICATION PLOT PLACEMENT CONTROLS Strategy for Monitoring Post-fire Rehabilitation Treatments Troy Wirth and David Pyke USGS – Biological Resources.
Dr Richard Johnson, Mountain Environments, UK.  Lead Partner: Germany: Research Institute of Forest Ecology and Forestry  Partner countries: Germany,
Ecological Sites and the MLRA SSO Leader George Peacock, Team Leader Grazing Lands Technology Development Team Central National Technology Support Center.
Homes on the Range An Introduction to California Rangelands Photo Credit: Bureau of Land Management.
Interpreting Ecological Sites for Grazing Management.
Authors - Kim Goodwin, Project Specialist Roger Sheley, Associate Professor Janet Clark, Director, Center for Invasive Plant Management Department Editor.
Soil Quality Measurement Unit: Soil Science Lesson 7.
What questions are researchers asking in order to understand fire ecology? Landscape perspectiveSpecies perspective How does the ecosystem, topography.
Understanding How Soils Affect Grazing Bob Hendershot State Grassland Conservationist USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service.
1 What this Broadcast Will Cover Day One Indicators and Attributes Changes from Version 3 to Version 4 Ecological Sites, State and Transition Models, and.
SHRUBLANDS OR GRASSLANDS TO NOVEL ECOSYSTEMS Deb Peters, Jin Yao.
Fire Effects on Water. The Watershed Concept What is a watershed? Area of land that drains into a common outlet Watershed condition- health or status.
What’s the Reference?. Applying the Technique: 6 Steps 1. Identify the Evaluation Area 2. Obtain or develop Reference Worksheet 3. Obtain or develop Evaluation.
Ecological Sites on Rangeland
Global Change and Southern California Ecosystems Rebecca Aicher UCI GK-12 March 7, 2009.
Integrating Ecosystem Services and Biodiversity Conservation Dick Cameron Senior Conservation Planner The Nature Conservancy, California Program 1.
National Forest System Grazing Objectives 1.Manage range vegetation to protect basic soil and water resources, provide for ecological diversity, improve.
George Peacock, Team Leader Grazing Lands Technology Development Team Central National Technology Support Center 2010 Southern Regional Cooperative Soil.
Ecological Sites on Rangeland. A0po&list=PL7CD3CD7A9350A858.
Soil Quality Assessment and the Plant Materials Program Susan S. Andrews, Arlene J. Tugel, Ann Lewandowski, and Mike Hubbs, NRCS Soil Quality Institute.
The Effect of Fuel Treatments on the Invasion of Nonnative Plants Kyle E. Merriam 1, Jon E. Keeley 1, and Jan L. Beyers 2. [1] USGS Western Ecological.
Hydrology for Nutrient Management Joshua W. Faulkner, PhD WVU-Extension Fundamentals of Nutrient Management Training Course December 16-17, 2009 *Portions.
RACC High School Training June 26, 2012 Jody Stryker University of Vermont Introduction to Watershed Hydrology.
What are Rangelands? Presentation (ppt.)
Rangeland NRI: 2002 and Beyond Presentation given to NRCS State Conservationists NRI Exec. Committee Northwest Watershed Research Center, Boise.
Forest Management Service Center Providing Biometric Services to the National Forest System Program Emphasis: We provide products and technical support.
An Introduction to California Rangelands
Fundamentals of River Restoration and Salmonid Fisheries OWEB, 1999, Fundamentals of River Restoration and Salmonid Fisheries Dylan Castle.
Tom Parker and Sarah Flynn Geum Environmental Consulting, Inc.
Prairie Restorations, Inc.
Rangeland Principles (Rem 151)
Figure 1. Spatial distribution of pinyon-juniper and ponderosa pine forests is shown for the southwestern United States. Red dots indicate location of.
Watersheds in Austin Area
Describing and Monitoring Rangelands:
Presentation transcript:

Ecological Site Descriptions Foundation for Resource Management Decisions George Peacock Grazing Lands Technology Institute USDA-NRCS

Looking across any landscape it is not difficult to recognize that some parts are different from other parts in the kinds and amount of vegetation

Information on native plant communities for Ecological Restoration

Information for predicting change in plant communities due to disturbances

Information on hydrologic changes as plant community composition changes  Infiltration rates  Aquifer recharge  Surface runoff  Downstream flooding  Infiltration rates  Aquifer recharge  Surface runoff  Downstream flooding

Ecological Site Descriptions

From an ecological perspective: From an ecological perspective: Understand the past Understand present ecological dynamics Discuss future possibilities Understand the past Understand present ecological dynamics Discuss future possibilities

RELEASE OF NATIONAL FORESTRY MANUAL (1997) AND NATIONAL RANGE AND PASTURE HANDBOOK (1997) RANGE SITES TO ECOLOGICAL SITES WOODLAND SUITABILITY GROUPS TO ECOLOGICAL SITES RANGE SITES TO ECOLOGICAL SITES WOODLAND SUITABILITY GROUPS TO ECOLOGICAL SITES

ECOLOGICAL SITE DEFINITION: A distinctive kind of land with specific physical characteristics that differs from other kinds of land in its ability to produce a distinctive kind and amount of vegetation.

ECOLOGICAL SITE Product of all environmental factors Soils Topography Climate Natural Disturbances Herbivory Fire Drought Soils Topography Climate Natural Disturbances Herbivory Fire Drought

ECOLOGICAL SITE WHAT HAS CHANGED?

RANGE SITE DESCRIPTIONS ADAPTATION OF CLIMATIC CLIMAX THEORYADAPTATION OF CLIMATIC CLIMAX THEORY GRAZING INTERPRETATIONSGRAZING INTERPRETATIONS PLANT COMMUNITY SCALEPLANT COMMUNITY SCALE SOIL MAP UNIT COMPONENTSSOIL MAP UNIT COMPONENTS

ECOLOGICAL SITE DESCRIPTIONS STATE AND TRANSITION MODELSTATE AND TRANSITION MODEL MULTIPLE BENEFIT INTERPRETATIONSMULTIPLE BENEFIT INTERPRETATIONS PLANT COMMUNITY SCALEPLANT COMMUNITY SCALE SOIL MAP UNIT COMPONENTSSOIL MAP UNIT COMPONENTS

ECOLOGICAL SITE DESCRIPTION PHYSIOGRAPHIC FEATURES CLIMATE FEATURES WATER FEATURES SOIL FEATURES PLANT COMMUNITIES SITE INTERPRETATIONS SUPPORTING INFORMATION PHYSIOGRAPHIC FEATURES CLIMATE FEATURES WATER FEATURES SOIL FEATURES PLANT COMMUNITIES SITE INTERPRETATIONS SUPPORTING INFORMATION

ECOLOGICAL SITE DESCRIPTION PHYSIOGRAPHIC FEATURES LANDFORM ASPECT ELEVATION SLOPE WATER TABLE DEPTH FLOODING (frequency and duration) PONDING (duration and depth) RUNOFF CLASS LANDFORM ASPECT ELEVATION SLOPE WATER TABLE DEPTH FLOODING (frequency and duration) PONDING (duration and depth) RUNOFF CLASS

ECOLOGICAL SITE DESCRIPTION CLIMATE FEATURES FROST FREE PERIOD FREEZE FREE PERIOD MEAN ANNUAL PRECIPITATION MONTHLY PRECIPITATION MONTHLY TEMPERATURE FROST FREE PERIOD FREEZE FREE PERIOD MEAN ANNUAL PRECIPITATION MONTHLY PRECIPITATION MONTHLY TEMPERATURE

ECOLOGICAL SITE DESCRIPTION WATER FEATURES COWARDIN WETLAND CLASSIFICATION ROSGEN STREAM CLASSIFICATION COWARDIN WETLAND CLASSIFICATION ROSGEN STREAM CLASSIFICATION

ECOLOGICAL SITE DESCRIPTION SOIL FEATURES PARENT MATERIAL (kind and origin) SURFACE TEXTURE AND MODIFIERS SURFACE FRAGMENTS SUBSURFACE FRAGMENTS DRAINAGE CLASS PERMEABILITY CLASS SOIL DEPTH PARENT MATERIAL (kind and origin) SURFACE TEXTURE AND MODIFIERS SURFACE FRAGMENTS SUBSURFACE FRAGMENTS DRAINAGE CLASS PERMEABILITY CLASS SOIL DEPTH

ECOLOGICAL SITE DESCRIPTION SOIL FEATURES - continued ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY SODIUM ADSORPTION RATIO SOIL REACTION (pH) AVAILABLE WATER HOLDING CAPACITY CALCIUM CARBONATE EQUIVALENT ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY SODIUM ADSORPTION RATIO SOIL REACTION (pH) AVAILABLE WATER HOLDING CAPACITY CALCIUM CARBONATE EQUIVALENT

ECOLOGICAL SITE DESCRIPTION PLANT COMMUNITIES ECOLOGICAL DYNAMICS OF SITE STATE AND TRANSITION DIAGRAM PLANT COMMUNITIES – COMMUNITY NARRATIVE – ANNUAL PRODUCTION – SPECIES COMPOSITION – GROWTH CURVES – COVER AND STRUCTURE – PHOTO ECOLOGICAL DYNAMICS OF SITE STATE AND TRANSITION DIAGRAM PLANT COMMUNITIES – COMMUNITY NARRATIVE – ANNUAL PRODUCTION – SPECIES COMPOSITION – GROWTH CURVES – COVER AND STRUCTURE – PHOTO

Deep Redland Ecological Site - Draft MLRA 81C OAK SAVANNA

OAK / GRASSLAND

Deep Redland Ecological Site - Draft MLRA 81C

OAK / JUNIPER/GRASSLAND

Deep Redland Ecological Site - Draft MLRA 81C

OAK / JUNIPER COMPLEX

Deep Redland Ecological Site - Draft MLRA 81C

Deep Redland Ecological Site - Draft MLRA 81C Legend BM - Brush ManagementPB - Prescribed Burning INV - InvasionPG - Prescribed Grazing NF - No FireS - Seeding Oak Savanna Oak/Juniper Complex 20 ft + Ashe juniper 20 + Year old stand 30% + Canopy NF-INV BM-S-PB-PG

Deep Redland Ecological Site - Draft MLRA 81C Legend BM - Brush ManagementPB - Prescribed Burning INV - InvasionPG - Prescribed Grazing NF - No FireS - Seeding Oak/Juniper Complex 20 ft + Ashe juniper 20 + Year old stand 30% + Canopy NF-INV BM-S-PB-PG Oak Savanna PB-PG Oak/Grassland <3 ft + Ashe juniper <5% Canopy NF-INV

Deep Redland Ecological Site - Draft MLRA 81C Legend BM - Brush ManagementPB - Prescribed Burning INV - InvasionPG - Prescribed Grazing NF - No FireS - Seeding Oak/Juniper Complex 20 ft + Ashe juniper 20 + Year old stand 30% + Canopy BM-S-PB-PG Oak/Juniper/ Grassland 8-12 ft Ashe juniper 5-20 Year old stand 10-20% Canopy BM-PB-PG NF-INV Oak Savanna PB-PG Oak/Grassland <3 ft + Ashe juniper <5% Canopy NF-INV

Deep Redland Ecological Site - Draft MLRA 81C Legend BM - Brush ManagementPB - Prescribed Burning INV - InvasionPG - Prescribed Grazing NF - No FireS - Seeding Oak Savanna PB-PGNF-INV Oak/Juniper Complex 20 ft + Ashe juniper 20 + Year old stand 30% + Canopy BM-S-PB-PG Oak/Juniper/ Grassland 8-12 ft Ashe juniper 5-20 Year old stand 10-20% Canopy BM-PB-PG NF-INV Open Grassland BM-S-PG Oak/Grassland <3 ft + Ashe juniper <5% Canopy NF-INV

Deep Redland Ecological Site - Draft MLRA 81C Legend BM - Brush ManagementPB - Prescribed Burning INV - InvasionPG - Prescribed Grazing NF - No FireS - Seeding Oak Savanna PB-PGNF-INV Oak/Juniper Complex 20 ft + Ashe juniper 20 + Year old stand 30% + Canopy BM-S-PB-PG Oak/Juniper/ Grassland 8-12 ft Ashe juniper 5-20 Year old stand 10-20% Canopy BM-PB-PG NF-INV Open Grassland NF-INV BM-S-PG Open Grassland Juniper Invasion PB-PG BM-S-PG Oak/Grassland <3 ft + Ashe juniper <5% Canopy NF-INV

ECOLOGICAL SITE DESCRIPTION PLANT COMMUNITIES ECOLOGICAL DYNAMICS OF SITE STATE AND TRANSITION DIAGRAM PLANT COMMUNITIES – COMMUNITY NARRATIVE – ANNUAL PRODUCTION – SPECIES COMPOSITION – GROWTH CURVES – COVER AND STRUCTURE – PHOTO ECOLOGICAL DYNAMICS OF SITE STATE AND TRANSITION DIAGRAM PLANT COMMUNITIES – COMMUNITY NARRATIVE – ANNUAL PRODUCTION – SPECIES COMPOSITION – GROWTH CURVES – COVER AND STRUCTURE – PHOTO

ECOLOGICAL SITE DESCRIPTION SITE INTERPRETATIONS ANIMAL COMMUNITY HYDROLOGY RECREATIONAL USES WOOD PRODUCTS OTHER PRODUCTS OTHER INFORMATION SPECIES PREFERENCES FOREST SITE PRODUCTIVITY ANIMAL COMMUNITY HYDROLOGY RECREATIONAL USES WOOD PRODUCTS OTHER PRODUCTS OTHER INFORMATION SPECIES PREFERENCES FOREST SITE PRODUCTIVITY

ECOLOGICAL SITE DESCRIPTION HYDROLOGY INFORMATION PLANT COMMUNITY III Kentucky bluegrass - 25% Smooth bromegrass - 75% PLANT COMMUNITY III Kentucky bluegrass - 25% Smooth bromegrass - 75% LOAMY SITE MLRA 102ANebraska and Kansas Loess-Drift Hills LOAMY SITE MLRA 102ANebraska and Kansas Loess-Drift Hills PLANT COMMUNITY I Mixture of native grasses PLANT COMMUNITY I Mixture of native grasses PLANT COMMUNITY II Kentucky bluegrass - 75% Smooth bromegrass - 25% PLANT COMMUNITY II Kentucky bluegrass - 75% Smooth bromegrass - 25%

ECOLOGICAL SITE DESCRIPTION HYDROLOGY INFORMATION LOAMY SITE MLRA 102ANebraska and Kansas Loess-Drift Hills LOAMY SITE MLRA 102ANebraska and Kansas Loess-Drift Hills I IIIII Precipitation 25” 25”25” Interception Surface Runoff Infiltration Deep Percolation I IIIII Precipitation 25” 25”25” Interception Surface Runoff Infiltration Deep Percolation

ECOLOGICAL SITE DESCRIPTION SUPPORTING INFORMATION ASSOCIATED SITES SIMILAR SITES INVENTORY DATA REFERENCES STATE CORRELATION TYPE LOCALITY RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER CLASSIFICATIONS OTHER REFERENCES SITE DESCRIPTION APPROVAL ASSOCIATED SITES SIMILAR SITES INVENTORY DATA REFERENCES STATE CORRELATION TYPE LOCALITY RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER CLASSIFICATIONS OTHER REFERENCES SITE DESCRIPTION APPROVAL

ECOLOGICAL SITE DESCRIPTIONS ECOLOGICAL SITE DESCRIPTIONS How do we utilize in conservation planning process?

X X X 12 3 Sandy Sandy Loam Loamy

DESIRED PLANT COMMUNITY Plant community that has been identified to provide uses and values desired for the site. Must provide adequate protection for the site.

Deep Redland Ecological Site - Draft MLRA 81C Legend BM - Brush ManagementPB - Prescribed Burning INV - InvasionPG - Prescribed Grazing NF - No FireS - Seeding Oak Savanna PB-PGNF-INV Oak/Juniper Complex 20 ft + Ashe juniper 20 + Year old stand 30% + Canopy BM-S-PB-PG Oak/Juniper/ Grassland 8-12 ft Ashe juniper 5-20 Year old stand 10-20% Canopy BM-PB-PG NF-INV Open Grassland NF-INV BM-S-PG Open Grassland Juniper Invasion PB-PG BM-S-PG Oak/Grassland <3 ft + Ashe juniper <5% Canopy NF-INV

MEETING MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES Similarity Index Rangeland Health Trend Rating indicating how nearly the present vegetation resembles desired plant community. Rating indicating how nearly the present vegetation resembles desired plant community. Indicates direction of plant community change. Range trend Planned trend Indicates direction of plant community change. Range trend Planned trend Indicator of how the ecological processes of the site are functioning. Indicator of how the ecological processes of the site are functioning.

Ecological Site Descriptions Provide: A common framework for communication of resource information among disciplines, agencies, and organizations. Information describing the interactions among soils, vegetation, and land management. A foundation to assess the condition of current resources and monitor changes. A framework to assess management opportunities and predict the outcome of management decisions. A framework for transferring experience and knowledge.

Thanks!?!