Principal Supervision and Support Hosted By: John Nori Associate Director of Program Development, NASSP.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Succession Planning November 3, 2006 Presented By: Lou Ann Carlson.
Advertisements

STATE ACTION FOR EDUCATION LEADERSHIP PROJECT SUCCESSION PLANNING Jacquelyn O. Wilson, Ed.D Coordinator of Graduate Education Wilmington College SAELP.
The Role of the Principal Going Forward. What Leon School District is Required to Do Florida Department of Educations Supports that might impact you What.
Teacher Education for the Global Age The Imperative for Change LONGVIEW FOUNDATION for Education in World Affairs and International Understanding, Inc.
Education Committee Meeting Professional Development Plan November 3, 2014.
The Anatomy of Systemic Support for Immersion Programs.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Section 4 Coursework Requirements 1.State federal laws, regulations and case law affecting Illinois public schools; 2. State and federal laws, regulations.
Network for College Success The School of Social Service Administration at The University of Chicago A community of Chicago public high school leaders.
Project Team MSBA – local school board members MASA – local school superintendents and other stakeholders MSBA/MASA.
Knows and performs Illinois Professional Teaching Standards including working with diverse learners Demonstrates basic competency in planning, instruction,
Education Commission of the States Working Together to Address a Common Need: Partnerships for Teacher Quality Bruce Vandal Director, Postsecondary Education.
1 Presentation to USED Review Panel August 10, 2010 North Carolina Race to the Top Proposal R e d a c t e d.
Hosted By: Pete Reed Associate Director, Program Services, NASSP Standards for School Leaders ISLLC 2015.
Transforming Education in Kentucky EPSB and TEK 1.
Education Leadership How districts can grow and support a pipeline of highly effective leaders Presentation to: SREB Leadership Forum Jody Spiro Senior.
1. KCS Strategic Goals: Focus on the student to ensure they excel academically and are prepared for life beyond the classroom. Recruit, select, induct,
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
CONNECTICUT ACCOUNTABILTY FOR LEARNING INITIATIVE Executive Coaching.
1 Council of the Great City Schools October 27, 2012 Succession Planning and Leadership Development.
Succession Planning Hosted By: John Nori NASSP Consultant.
Hosted By: John Nori NASSP Consultant Empowering APs to Become Principals.
Milwaukee Partnership Academy An Urban P-16 Council for Quality Teaching and Learning.
Shared Decision Making: Moving Forward Together
Strategic Human Resource Alignment: The Context for Changing Teacher Compensation Herb Heneman & Tony Milanowski Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
Effective Principals in Our Schools Takes Commitment and Focus American Association of School Administrators Ann Clark, Deputy Superintendent March 29,
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
Special SCEE Webinar Districts and States Work to Develop and Support an Effective Principal Pipeline 1.
Education Leadership Lessons Learned by The Wallace Foundation Presentation to: CCSSO National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Jody Spiro Senior Program.
Effective Teachers Core Initiative of the Houston Independent School District Council for the Great City Schools Fall Conference October 21, 2010 Presenters:
MPS and Minnesota State University, Mankato at Edina Aspiring Transformational Principal Academy Lead the change you want to see in urban schools.
Sandy Adair. During my internship I addressed this competency in a variety of ways. I was able to develop a positive rapport with the staff early on by.
INSTRUCTIONAL EXCELLENCE INVENTORIES: A PROCESS OF MONITORING FOR CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT Dr. Maria Pitre-Martin Superintendent of Schools.
SMHC Talent Development around Instruction To Increase Student Learning Carl Cohn.
Maryland’s Journey— Focus Schools Where We’ve Been, Where We Are, and Where We’re Going Presented by: Maria E. Lamb, Director Nola Cromer, Specialist Program.
Using Intermediary Organizations to Gain Access to Quality Internships Presented by: Deanna Hanson, California Director, NAF.
Job-Embedded Principal Preparation. Project Goals  January June 2014  Collaboration between USF and 4 partner districts Manatee Pasco Pinellas.
University of Virginia School Turnaround Program.
Learning Together to Develop More Effective Principal Supervisors Will Miller President, The Wallace Foundation Principal Supervisor Initiative Bidders’
The Evaluation of IMPACT V Jeni Corn, Friday Institute for Educational Innovation NC State University College of Education.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
RHODE ISLAND’S RACE TO THE TOP PRESENTATION TO THE RACE TO THE TOP REVIEW PANEL MARCH 17, 2010 Honorable Donald L. Carcieri, Governor Deborah A. Gist,
Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools: Novice Principals Hired SY Hiring and Placement 2. Pre-Service 4.Evaluation and Professional Development Supports.
AdvancED District Accreditation Process © 2010 AdvancED.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
1 Components Preparation  Traditional higher education  Alternative certification  District-based preparation Sourcing  Marketing  Recruitment  Screening.
LESSONS LEARNED IN PROMOTING EXCELLENCE IN TEACHING AND LEADERSHIP for CHSI 2 ND National High School Leadership Summit Archived Information.
Pre-Supervisory Development Programs. Our Nation’s future and the future success of our individual organizations depends on the leaders we develop today.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Sugar Grove Elementary September 29, 2010.
The Big Rocks: TLC, MTSS, ELI, C4K, and the Iowa Core School Administrators of Iowa July 2014 IOWA Department of Education.
Superintendent Formative Evaluation April 26, 2015.
SEA Strategies for Promoting Equity: SEA/IHE Collaboration on Teacher Preparation Lynn Holdheide, Center on Great Teachers and Leaders & Collaboration.
Education.state.mn.us Principal Evaluation Components in Legislation Work Plan for Meeting Rose Assistant Commissioner Minnesota Department of Education.
Identifying and Developing Future Principal Supervisors September 29, 2015 Ben Fenton Gina Ikemoto.
National Summit for Principal Supervisors Building an Effective Evaluation System May 11-13, 2016 Jackie O. Wilson, Interim Director, Professional Development.
High Potential Leader Program Brevard Public School District Nancy Rehbine Zentis, Ph.D.
DO PRINCIPAL SUPERVISORS MATTER? BUILDING THE CAPACITY OF AREA SUPERINTENDENTS National Principal Supervisor Summit May 2016.
Successful University-District partnerships to Prepare School Principals: September 13, :30 p.m. EST Rod will introduce participants and provide.
San Diego Unified School District San Diego Education Association
Nancy Burstein Sue Sears California State University, Northridge
Agenda What is Opportunity Culture?
Principal Selection Process
Teacher Leadership & Collaboration
Effective Principals in Our Schools Take Commitment and Focus
The Wallace Foundation July 2012
CSC Meeting School Leader Selection Process
Louisiana Department of Education
Russ Brock Coordinator of Programs
STRATEGIC PLAN UPDATE Board of Education May 2018
Brian Robinson, Deputy HR Director
Presentation transcript:

Principal Supervision and Support Hosted By: John Nori Associate Director of Program Development, NASSP

A few details… Technical problems: Call Rich or text to Use hashtag facebook.com/principals

#nasspwebinar Website: Follow NASSP: facebook.com/principals

Principal Supervision and Support Today’s Presenter : Ann B. Clark Deputy Superintendent Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools (NC)

Wallace PPI Initiative COMPONENTS I. Leader Standards II. Pre- Service Training III. Selective Hiring IV. Evaluation/ Support 1.Leader standards, to which CMS aligns job descriptions, training, hiring requirements, evaluations, and professional development 2.High-quality training, including recruitment, selective admissions and pre-service experiences aligned with expectations for school leaders 3.Selective hiring of the most qualified applicants, and placement based on a match between the candidate and the school 4.On-the-job evaluation and support: evaluation that addresses the capacity to improve teaching and learning, and support that includes mentoring and professional development addressing the needs that evaluation has identified The fifth component, Alignment, capacity and quality assurance, addresses integration of the four components above so as to create a coherent and highly effective system of principal development and support

Leader Standards

Principal Preparation PARTNER PROGRAMS CMS has formed partnership with 4 local universities to provide effective training for aspiring school leaders: Leaders for Tomorrow, Winthrop University, 2-Year Program, MA Ed Leadership, develops leaders for various settings, and target cohort size is School Executive Leadership Academy, Queens University, 14-Month Program, credits towards MBA, MSA, or MS in OD, develops leaders for various settings, and target cohort size is 15 Aspiring High School Principals Program, UNC-Charlotte, 2-Year/1-Year/5-Week, MA Ed Leadership, develops leaders for high school, and target cohort size is 15 Educational Leadership Program, Wingate University, 3-Year/1-Year, MA Ed Leadership, develops leaders for various settings, and target cohort size is 15 In order to apply to these programs, you must be nominated by your principal. The nomination window will open in early fall The district is involved in internship and residency placement for all programs.

All candidates for principal/AP positions must go through a centralized rigorous screening and section process to be placed be in the talent pool Process designed by community superintendents based on identified competencies, skills and beliefs Centralized process: Application and virtual interview followed by activities including role play, in basket exercise, school data review and teacher observation School based process: Recommendation from community superintendent based on input from school selection committee; final decision from superintendent Selective Hiring

CMS Principal Induction Capstone Project 360 Feedback Year 5 Year 4 Year 3 Yrs 1 & 2

FIRST YEAR APs: Monthly meetings led by ED and/or Development Teams SECOND YEAR APs: AP Academy at Queens University 6-day program at Queens University to support APs as they develop an understanding of leadership and develop their own leadership philosophy SAM Data Collection Opportunity to shadow a principal for 2 days to gain perspective on the day-to-day role of principal and experience how other schools and/or grade levels operate CMS AP Induction

LTS Vision The LTS will enable and support data-driven decision making throughout multiple components of our principal pipeline: pre-service training, selective hiring, on-the-job support, and evaluation. Strategic Plan Alignment The LTS aligns with Strategic Plan 2018 in the following areas: Goal 2: Recruit, develop, retain and reward a premier workforce Goal 5: Optimize district performance and accountability by strengthening data use, processes and systems LTS Will Not Replace MyAPP or be used as a system directly linked to the hiring process. Leader Tracking System

Redefined the job description for principal supervisor Reduced ratio of principal supervisor: principal ratio  Added 3 new principal supervisors for Provided tailored executive coaching for principal supervisors through Queens University Provided instructional monitoring training through The New Teacher Project Schedule weekly meetings with principal supervisors Principal Supervisor Focus

As we move forward, we will continue to focus on strengthening our internal capacity to build strong principals and a sustainable initiative. Evaluate impact of principal preparation and induction programs Improve recruiting, selection and hiring processes Collaborate with other district initiatives (i.e. Project Lift, Success by Design, Beacon, etc.) Leverage LTS to strengthen the districts ability to use data to inform decisions Continue to reduce the principal supervisor: principal ratio Next Steps

The Wallace Foundation Recommended Reading Rethinking Leadership: The Changing Role of Principal Supervisors (2013) practice/Documents/Rethinking-Leadership-The-Changing-Role-of-Principal- Supervisors.pdf The School Principal as Leader: Guiding Schools to Better Teaching and Learning (2013) leadership/effective-principal-leadership/Documents/The-School- Principal-as-Leader-Guiding-Schools-to-Better-Teaching-and- Learning-2nd-Ed.pdf Districts Matter: Cultivating the Principals Urban School Needs (2013) policy-and-practice/Documents/Districts-Matter-Cultivating-the-Principals-Urban- Schools-Need.pdf Stories from the Field: Making Room for the Principal Supervisors (2013) center/school-leadership/district-policy-and- practice/Documents/Make-Room-for-the- Principal-Supervisors.pdf

NASSP invites you to join us in San Diego, CA Feb ,