Acetylcysteine for the prevention of Contrast- induced nephropaThy (ACT) Trial: The ACT Trial Investigators Presenter: Otavio Berwanger (MD; PhD) Chair.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Prevention of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy (CIN) Sepehr Khashaei, MD Assistant professor Department of Internal Medicine.
Advertisements

Horng H Chen MD on behalf of the NHLBI Heart Failure Clinical Research Network Renal Optimization Strategies Evaluation in Acute Heart Failure (ROSE AHF):
Diuretic Strategies in Patients with Acute Decompensated Heart Failure Diuretic Optimization Strategies Evaluation (DOSE) trial.
Analysis of the ADVANCE Trial Sapna N. Patel UCSF Pharm. D. Candidate 2008 Preceptor Dr. Craig S. Stern March 28, 2008.
REMEDIAL II Renal Insufficiency Following Contrast Media Administration Trial II (REMEDIAL II): RenalGuard™ System In High-Risk Patients for Contrast-Induced.
1 CAMELOT: Study Design A Morbidity and Mortality Study Patients with documented CAD on standard-of-care therapies* (n=1997) Clinical events (morbidity.
1. 2 The primary Objective of IDEAL LDL-C Simvastatin mg/d Atorvastatin 80 mg/d risk CHD In stable CHD patients IDEAL: The Incremental Decrease.
Sodium Bicarbonate for the Prevention of Contrast Induced Nephropathy: A Meta-analysis of Published Clinical Trials Vijayalakshmi Kunadian 1,2, Azfar Zaman.
K Fox, W Remme, C Daly, M Bertrand, R Ferrari, M Simoons On behalf of the EUROPA investigators. The diabetic sub study of.
Study by: Granger et al. NEJM, September 2011,Vol No. 11 Presented by: Amelia Crawford PA-S2 Apixaban versus Warfarin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.
The Long-Term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischemic Disease (LIPID) The LIPID Study Group N Engl J Med 1998;339:
The ONTARGET Trial Reference The ONTARGET investigators. Telmisartan, ramipril, or both in patients at high risk for vascular events. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:15.
Blood Pressure Reduction Among Acute Stroke Patients A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Jiang He, Yonghong Zhang, Tan Xu, Weijun Tong, Shaoyan Zhang,
Early high-dose Rosuvastatin for Contrast-Induced Nephropathy Prevention in Acute Coronary Syndrome The PRATO-ACS (Protective effect of Rosuvastatin and.
TRANSCEND: Telmisartan Randomized AssesmeNt Study in aCE iNtolerant Subjects with Cardiovascular Disease ONTARGET / TRANSCEND Investigators Koon K. Teo,
COURAGE: Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation Purpose To compare the efficacy of optimal medical therapy (OMT)
CHARM-Preserved: Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity - Preserved Purpose To determine whether the angiotensin.
BEAUTI f UL: morBidity-mortality EvAlUaTion of the I f inhibitor ivabradine in patients with coronary disease and left ventricULar dysfunction Purpose.
臨床藥事照護 年 09 月其他之用藥建議 疑問藥物問題內容後續追蹤 Actein qid 2 包非正常使用 dose FOR CKD 病人的腎臟 保護 2 文獻資料資料來源 Prophylactic oral administration of the antioxidant.
Randomized, double-blind, multicenter, controlled trial.
Clinical Outcomes with Newer Antihyperglycemic Agents
Acetylcysteine for the prevention of Contrast- induced nephropaThy (ACT) Trial: The ACT Trial Investigators Presenter: Otavio Berwanger (MD; PhD) Chair.
0902CZR01NL537SS0901 RENAAL Altering the Course of Renal Disease in Hypertensive Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy with the A II Antagonist.
Presenter: Otavio Berwanger (MD; PhD) on Behalf of the BRIDGE-ACS Steering Committe Sponsor: Ministry of Health-Brazil A Multifaceted Intervention to Narrow.
CPORT- E Trial Randomized trial comparing outcomes of non-primary PCI at hospitals with and without on-site cardiac surgery.
Prasugrel vs. Clopidogrel for Acute Coronary Syndromes Patients Managed without Revascularization — the TRILOGY ACS trial On behalf of the TRILOGY ACS.
Avoiding Cardiovascular Events through COMbination Therapy in Patients LIving with Systolic Hypertension The First Outcomes Trial of Initial Therapy With.
Laura Mucci, Pharm.D. Candidate Mercer University 2012 Preceptor: Dr. Rahimi February 2012.
André Lamy Population Health Research Institute Hamilton Health Sciences McMaster University Hamilton, CANADA on behalf of the CORONARY Investigators Disclosures.
Copyleft Clinical Trial Results. You Must Redistribute Slides HYVET Trial The Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial (HYVET)
Vascular events In noncardiac Surgery patIents cOhort evaluatioN study (NCT ) The Study Otavio Berwanger, Yannick Lemanach, Erica Aranha Suzumura,
ARMYDA-4 (Antiplatelet therapy for Reduction of MYocardial Damage during Angioplasty) study Prospective, multicenter, randomized, double blind trial investigating.
Critical Appraisal Did the study address a clearly focused question? Did the study address a clearly focused question? Was the assignment of patients.
AIRE: Acute Infarction Ramipril Efficacy study Purpose To determine whether the ACE inhibitor ramipril reduces mortality in patients with evidence of heart.
TRANSCEND: Telmisartan Randomized AssesmeNt Study in aCE iNtolerant Subjects with Cardiovascular Disease ONTARGET / TRANSCEND Investigators Koon K. Teo,
Vorapaxar for Secondary Prevention in Patients with Prior Myocardial Infarction Benjamin M. Scirica, MD, MPH On behalf of the TRA 2°P-TIMI 50 Steering.
HOPE: Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation study Purpose To evaluate whether the long-acting ACE inhibitor ramipril and/or vitamin E reduce the incidence.
The Ongoing Telmisartan Alone and in combination with Ramipril Global Endpoint Trial ONTARGET.
ALLHAT Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial JAMA 2002;288:
Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study CARDS Dr Sachin Kadoo.
Community Outreach to Reduce Disparities in Cardiovascular & Diabetes Morbidity & Mortality in the South Bronx Michael Alderman, MD Michelle Johnson, MD,
Baseline characteristics. Patient flow Completed Completed Perindopril Placebo Randomised Not randomised Registered.
Presented by Renato D. Lopes, MD, PhD, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, USA for the ARISTOTLE investigators. Efficacy and Safety of Apixaban.
Clinical Outcomes with Newer Antihyperglycemic Agents FDA-Mandated CV Safety Trials 1.
FRagmin® and Fast Revascularization during InStablity in Coronary artery disease FRISC II.
Long-term Cardiovascular Effects of 4.9 Years of Intensive Blood Pressure Control in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: The Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk.
CR-1 Candesartan in HF Benefit/Risk James B. Young, MD Cleveland Clinic Foundation.
Early Eplerenone Treatment in Patients with Acute ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction without Heart Failure REMINDER* Gilles Montalescot, Bertram Pitt,
From: PLOS Neglected Tropical DiseaseJanuary 2014 Presented by Pavitra Charoensrisakkul and Peeraya Permkarnjaroen 3 rd year medical cadet Phramongkutklao.
The JUPITER Trial Reference Ridker PM. Rosuvastatin to prevent vascular events in men and women with elevated C-reactive protein. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:2195–2207.
Ten Year Outcome of Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Versus Medical Therapy in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy Results of the Surgical Treatment.
Rivaroxaban versus Warfarin in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Manesh R. Patel, M.D., Kenneth W. Mahaffey, M.D., Jyotsna Garg, M.S., Guohua Pan, Ph.D.,
1 Effect of Ramipril on the Incidence of Diabetes The DREAM Trial Investigators N Engl J Med 2006;355 FM R1 윤나리.
Angela Aziz Donnelly April 5, 2016
1 Effect of rosiglitazone on the frequency of diabetes in patients with impaired glucose tolerance or impaired fasting glucose: a randomised controlled.
Clinical Outcomes with Newer Antihyperglycemic Agents
Digoxin And Mortality in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation With and Without Heart Failure: Does Serum Digoxin Concentration Matter? Renato D. Lopes, MD,
Clinical Outcomes with Newer Antihyperglycemic Agents
Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors / angiotensin receptor blockers and contrast induced nephropathy in patients receiving cardiac catheterization:
Early high-dose Rosuvastatin for
HOPE: Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation study
POISE-2 PeriOperative ISchemic Evaluation-2 Trial
EMPHASIS-HF Extended Follow-up
Avoiding Cardiovascular events through COMbination therapy in Patients LIving with Systolic Hypertension (ACCOMPLISH): Design Randomized, double-blind.
Digoxin And Mortality in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation With and Without Heart Failure: Does Serum Digoxin Concentration Matter? Renato D. Lopes, MD,
Hexabrix Key Clinical Review Mehran, 2009
Dabigatran in myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery
The Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial (HYVET)
Statins Evaluation in Coronary procedUres and REvascularization
MK-0954 PN948 NOT APPROVED FOR USE (date)
Presentation transcript:

Acetylcysteine for the prevention of Contrast- induced nephropaThy (ACT) Trial: The ACT Trial Investigators Presenter: Otavio Berwanger (MD; PhD) Chair - Steering Committe A Pragmatic Multicenter Randomized Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of Acetylcysteine for the Prevention of Renal Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Coronary and Vascular Angiography Sponsor: Ministry of Health-Brazil

Presenter Disclosure Information Presenter: Presenter: Otavio Berwanger Acetylcysteine for the Prevention of Contrast-Induced nephropaThy (ACT) Trial: a Pragmatic Multicenter Randomized Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of Acetylcysteine for the Prevention of Renal Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Coronary and Vascular Angiography FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: None to declare

Why do We Need a New Acetylcysteine Trial ? THE PROBLEM Contrast-induced nephropathy is associated with mortality and prolonged hospitalization. The incidence in patients with risk factors (such as renal failure, diabetes, age > 70 y) varies between 9% and 38%. ONE POTENTIAL SOLUTION Acetylcysteine (an antioxidant) represents a safe, non-expensive, easy to administer, and widely available drug THE EVIDENCE Low quality (few trials with allocation concealment, blinding, and ITT analysis) Low statistical power (median trial size = 80 patients) Uncertain effects on clinical endpoints Lack of standardization of acetylcysteine dose/scheme and co-interventions

Academic, Design: Academic, Pragmatic Randomized Multicenter Trial of Acetylcysteine versus Placebo for the Preventon of Renal Outcomes Prevention of Bias: Concealed allocation (central web-based randomization) and Intention-to-treat analysis Blinding of patients, investigators, caregivers, and outcome assessors Quality control: on-site monitoring + central statistical checking + e-CRF : Trial Size: 2,308* patients from 46 hospitals in Brazil recruited between September 2008 and July 2010 * Original Target Sample Size: 2300, considering incidence of CIN =15%, 30% relative risk reduction (RRR), with 90% statistical power, and two-tailed alpha of 5% The ACT Trial

Trial Organization Trial Steering Committe Otavio Berwanger Alexandre Biasi Cavalcanti Amanda Sousa Celso Amodeo J. Eduardo Sousa Leda D. Lotaif Project OfficeData Management/e-CRF Research Institute HCorCarlos Cardoso Alexandre Biasi CavalcantiAndre L.A. Firmino Anna Maria BuehlerDalmo Silva Mariana CarballoPaulo J. Soares Alessandra KodamaAdailton Mendes Eliana SantucciJose Lobato Centres Top Recruiting Sites: 46 Institutions in Brazil Hospital Bandeirantes (Sao Paulo ) Beneficiencia Portuguesa (Sao Paulo ) Hospital P.S. Mat. Santa Lucia (Minas Gerais) Instituto de Cardiologia (Sta Catarina)

2,308 Patients undergoing an angiographic procedure with at least one of the following risk factors: Age > 70 years; Chronic Renal Failure; Diabetes Mellitus; Heart Failure or LVEF <0.45; Shock ITT Concealed Randomization Acetylcysteine 1200mg Orally Twice Daily for 2 Doses Before and 2 Doses After Procedure ITT Matching Placebo Primary Endpoint: Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) (≥ 25% elevation of serum creatinine above baseline 48h-96h after angiography) Secondary Endpoints: Secondary Endpoints: Total mortality, CV mortality, Need for dialysis, Doubling of serum creatinine, Side effects

Flow of patients 1,153 (98.4%) Had data included in the primary outcome analysis 1,171 (99.9%) Had data included in secondary outcome analyses 19 (1.6%) lost to hour serum creatinine follow-up 4 (0.3%) died before hours 15 (1.3%) did not return 1 (0.1%) lost 30 th day follow-up 1,172 Allocated to N-acetylcysteine 17 (1.5%) lost to hour serum creatinine follow-up 3 (0.3%) died before hours 14 (1.2%) did not return to 1 (0.1%) Was lost to 30 th day FU 7 (0.6%) did not receive study drug before angiography 2,308 Underwent randomization 12 (1.0%) did not receive study drug before angiography 1,136 Allocated to placebo 1,119 (98.5%) Had data included in the primary outcome analysis 1,135 (99.9%) Had data included in secondary outcome analyses

Baseline Characteristics 86.1% 72 (63 to 82) 72 (63 to 81) 86.5% Age > 70 years 52.9% 51.3% History of hypertension 0.2% 0.3% Shock 9.2% 9.9% Known heart failure 68.1   10.4 Age – yr Patients fulfilling inclusion criteria 59.7% 61.2% Diabetes mellitus 16.0% 15.4% Serum creatinine >1.5mg/dL 39.3% 38.0% Female sex Placebo (1136) Acetylcysteine (1172) Weight - Kg 35.1% 35.8% Acute coronary syndrome

Acetylcysteine (1172) Placebo (1136) Previous Medication Use of NSAIDS > 7 days Use of ACE inhibitor Use of diuretics 5.4% Use of metformin 37.7% 30.9% 58.3% 29.6% 59.6% 35.4% 5.2% Glomerular filtration rate Serum creatinine – mg/dL 60.2 (45.4 to 84.5) 61.4 (45.2 to 83.3) 1.1 (0.9 to 1.4) Baseline Characteristics

Acetylcysteine (1172) Placebo (1136) Compliance with study protocol Adherence to study drug 1 st dose 2 nd dose 99.0% 4 th dose 3 rd dose 97.6% 96.4% 94.9% 96.1% 95.6% 97.3% 99.4%

Acetylcysteine (1172) Placebo (1136) NaCl 0.9% - any scheme NaCl or bicarbonate Hydration before procedure Hydration after procedure NaCl 0.9% - 1ml/Kg/h for 6 h 94.3% 47.5% 98.5% 71.2% 52.3% 54.8% 74.1% NaCl 0.9% - 1ml/Kg/h for 6 h NaCl 0.45% NaCl 0.9% - any scheme Bicarbonate 0.9% NaCl or bicarbonate NaCl 0.45% Bicarbonate 0.9% 4.6% 75.6% 0% 72.7% 0.1% 5.1% 47.1% 0.3% 97.9% 28.5% 28.8% 0% Compliance with study protocol

Acetylcysteine (1172) Placebo (1136) Characteristics of the angiography High osmolarity Contrast type 2.9% 22.0%22.9% 75.0% 3.0% 74.3% Iso- osmolar Low osmolarity Contrast volume* 100 (70 to 130) *Median (interquartile range) Procedure 67.1% 68.7% Percutaneous coronary intervention 30.1% 28.5% Peripheral vascular angiography Coronary diagnostic angiography 2.8% 2.9%

Results Primary Endpoint Acetylcysteine (N=1172) Placebo (N=1136)

Results Primary Endpoint Acetylcysteine (N=1172) Placebo (N=1136)

Clinical Outcomes at 30 days Mortality or need for dialysis Acetylcysteine (N=1172) Placebo (N=1136)

Clinical Outcomes at 30 days Mortality or need for dialysis Acetylcysteine (N=1172) Placebo (N=1136)

Acetylcysteine (n=1172) Placebo (n=1136) Relative Risk (95% CI) P Value Primary Outcome – 48h-96hNo. of events (% of patients) Elevation ≥ 0.5 mg/dL in serum creatinine 45 (3.9)42 (3.8)1.04 ( )0.85 Death7 (0.6)8 (0.7)0.85 ( )0.75 Need for dialysis2 (0.2)3 (0.3)0.65 ( )0.68 Death or CIN164 (14.2)163 (14.5)0.98 ( )0.81 Death or Need for dialysis or CIN152 (13.1)149 (13.3)0.99 ( )0.92 Death or Need for dialysis or duplication of serum creatinine 21 (1.8)26 (2.3)0.78 ( )0.40 Effects on Contrast-Induced Nephropathy

Acetylcysteine (n=1172) Placebo (n=1136) Relative Risk (95% CI) P Value Status in 30 daysNo. of events (% of patients) Death, need for dialysis or a doubling in serum creatinine in 30 days 45 (3.9)42 (3.8)0.90 ( )0.63 Deaths or need for dialysis in 30 days 26 (2.2)26 (2.3)0.97 ( )0.91 Deaths in 30 days23 (2.0)24 (2.1)0.93 ( )0.80 Need for dialysis in 30 days3 (0.3) 0.97 ( )0.97 Doubling in serum creatinine13 (1.1)17 (1.5)0.74 ( )0.41 Status after 30 daysNo. of events (% of patients) Cardiovascular deaths18 (1.5)18 (1.6)0.97 (0.51; 1.85)0.93 Other outcomes

Side Effects Acetylcysteine n (%) Placebo n (%) Nausea Vomiting 89 (7.6) 8 (0.7) 15 (1.3) 7 (0.6) 19 (1.6) 25 (2.1) 4 (0.3) 13 (1.1) 14 (1.2) 15 (1.2) 80 (7.0) Angina Fatigue Diarrhea Serious adverse events * 25 (2.2) 10 (0.9) Adverse events P value Includes: stroke, pneumonia, sepsis, acute pulmonary edema - (Less then 10 events per endpoint)

Subgroups

Meta-analysis

Main Conclusions Largest acetylcysteine randomized trial conducted to date. Acetylcysteine does not reduce the short-term risk of CIN nor other clinically relevant outcomes (30 days) even among the higher risk subgroups. These results are consistent with meta-analysis of previous smaller high quality trials (zero heterogeneity). These results may help to inform clinical practice and to update current guidelines.

Future Directions Cystatin C substudy Complete Updtated Systematic Review and Meta- Analysis and Meta-regression analysis Complete Updtated Systematic Review and Meta- Analysis and Meta-regression analysis Registries can document impact of ACT Trial Results in Clinical Practice