FRPA Data Management/Reporting System (Data Collection and Reporting) Building Your New System: Business Requirements Suggestions and Questions RSM Pilot.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ASYCUDA Overview … a summary of the objectives of ASYCUDA implementation projects and features of the software for the Customs computer system.
Advertisements

WASH Cluster – Emergency Training NA NA4 1 NEEDS ASSESSMENT Session 4 Proposal Development.
FRPA Data Collection, Management and Reporting Defining the Business Requirements RSM Pilot Review Workshop February 2005.
Process and Procedure Documentation. Agenda Why document processes and procedures? What is process and procedure documentation? Who creates and uses this.
Use of digital imagery in FPRA Effectiveness Evaluation Program: A Case Study Stéphane Dubé, NIFR Soil Scientist Fred Berekoff, PG District Stewardship.
© 2005 by Prentice Hall Appendix 2 Automated Tools for Systems Development Modern Systems Analysis and Design Fourth Edition Jeffrey A. Hoffer Joey F.
Administrative Update - Free Growing Standards & Appendix 9 Dave Weaver Resource Practices Branch SISCO Feb 2014.
Small Scale Salvage Program Application Process. Purpose To establish an application and approval process for small scale timber salvage that is efficient,
Copyright 2004 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Essentials of Systems Analysis and Design Second Edition Joseph S. Valacich Joey F. George Jeffrey A. Hoffer Chapter.
Fundamentals of Information Systems, Second Edition
Copyright 2006 Prentice-Hall, Inc. Essentials of Systems Analysis and Design Third Edition Joseph S. Valacich Joey F. George Jeffrey A. Hoffer Chapter.
Streamlining Project August 2005 Greg Goss, Project Manager Team Proposal Summary Creating a streamlined forest information management model…
Visual Resources Visual Resources Effectiveness Evaluation Progress Report Good Visual Stewardship Poor Visual Stewardship.
By, David Anderson.  Determine team members to collaborate on assessment.  Create a written AT assessment plan:  Determine assessment questions  Expected.
MNR’s Role in Public Safety Around Dams –An Overview
District Operational Monitoring Initiative By the DOMI Team A presentation at the PFIT Post FSP Workshop by Brian Westgate on the MoFR’s DOMI monitoring.
1 Our Expertise and Commitment – Driving your Success An Introduction to Transformation Offering November 18, 2013 Offices in Boston, New York and Northern.
Introduction to SDLC: System Development Life Cycle Dr. Dania Bilal IS 582 Spring 2009.
Welcome To the Objectives Pillar Workshop Introduction Business need Target Audience - technical and professional staff who support decision maker.
Module 4: Systems Development Chapter 13: Investigation and Analysis.
Toolkit Series from the Office of Migrant Education Webinar: Program Evaluation Toolkit August 9, 2012.
M. Reimeris, The Ministry of Finance of Lithuania (Managing Authority)
Streamlining Project July 7, 2005 Susan Elo, EDGE -- Consultant to the Project Update to the Kootenay Spatial Data Partnership: Summary of recommendations.
ITEC224 Database Programming
1PBI_SAS_08_Exec_ShullSeptember 2008MAC-T IVV Dr. Forrest Shull, FCMD Kurt Woodham, L-3 Communications OSMA SAS 08 Infusion of Perspective-Based.
Forest and Range Evaluation Program Five Year Strategic Plan Agathe Bernard Kevin Kilpatrick Jack Sweeten Michael Pelchat Peter Bradford.
Community Assessment Process WHY?? To identify and document the opportunities, challenges, strengths, and needs of a specific geographic community and.
An Online Knowledge Base for Sustainable Military Facilities & Infrastructure Dr. Annie R. Pearce, Branch Head Sustainable Facilities & Infrastructure.
Results of Implementation and Testing Soils and Riparian – What Did We Learn?
Provincial FRPA Implementation Team Post Forest Stewardship Plan Workshop BC Timber Sales Strait of Georgia Presentation March 7, 2007 A presentation at.
Implementing QI Projects Title I HIV Quality Management Program Case Management Providers Meeting May 26, 2005 Presented by Lynda A. O’Hanlon Title I HIV.
Streamlining Project Final Version August 2005 Graham Hawkins, Information Access Team Lead, Marg Shamlock, Business Process Alignment Team Lead Information.
Campus Quality Survey 1998, 1999, & 2001 Comparison Office of Institutional Research & Planning July 5, 2001.
Streamlining Project Final Version August 2005 Cutblock Integration Team Proposals Creating a streamlined forest information management model…
1 Ministry of Forests and Range C&E and FRPA Cassandra Mann Legislation & Policy Forester Compliance & Enforcement Branch Ministry of Forests & Range A.
M&E requirements for grant signing: M&E Plan Workshop on effective Global Fund Grant negotiation and implementation planning January 2008 Manila,
Fundamentals of Information Systems, Second Edition 1 Systems Development.
1 PFIT Post FSP Workshop Mar. 7-8, 2007 Session Review Larry Hanlon Harry Jennings.
Implementation and follow up Critically important but relatively neglected stages of EIA process Surveillance, monitoring, auditing, evaluation and other.
MINISTRY OF SUSTAINABLE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT 1 MSRM Vegetation Update Resource Information Business Area.
Energy Policy Act - BLM Cadastral Support Strategy 1 CADASTRAL PLANNING CADASTRAL SERVICES Consultation for Effective and Efficient Land Management: National.
Measuring benefits of European Territorial Cooperation Programmes – Piloting of Typology 22 February 2011.
Kootenay Lake Forest District Post FSP approval -experiences from a tenures perspective 1 A presentation at the PFIT Post FSP Workshop by Curt Nixon/Rob.
Forestry Information Mall September, 2005 Greg Goss, Project Manager Project Overview Presentation One stop shopping for links to the information government.
FREP Vision: Sustainability through science and stewardship.
Technology Needs Assessments under GEF Enabling Activities “Top Ups” UNFCCC/UNDP Expert Meeting on Methodologies for Technology Needs Assessments
Information and Communication Technology Literacy III Grade 8 Ms. Green The key to unlocking your future.
Use of digital imagery in FPRA Effectiveness Evaluation Program: A Case Study Stéphane Dubé, NIFR Soil Scientist Fred Berekoff, PG District Stewardship.
Methodologies and SSADM Models, Tools and Techniques.
Implement Projects Data collection Analysis Interpretation Recommendations FREWG, RSMT and RVTs Review and make recommendations (Policy and regulation.
Project Life Presented by Chuck Ray, PMP ITS Project Manager.
RESULTS: A New Integrated Tool for Forest Stewardship John Gallimore, RPF Information Management Group Ministry of Forests ESF User Meeting December 9th,
Road Systems Rationalization Project Presented By: Dona Stapley, Resource Tenures and Engineering Branch February 24, 2009.
EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)1 II. Scoping. EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)2 Scoping Definition: is a process of interaction between the interested public,
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS organizations in Papua New Guinea Day 4. Session 10. Evaluation.
Paul Blomberg, Stuart-Nechako Timber Sales Office Dona Stapley, Resource Tenures and Engineering Branch Safe Roads with Information Management.
Good practices abroad / Cyprus case The OiRA implementation
Chapter 5 Determining System Requirements
Supporting Improvement of Local Child Outcomes Measurement Systems
Chapter 5 Determining System Requirements
Chapter 5 Determining System Requirements
Essentials of Systems Analysis and Design Fourth Edition
Small Scale Salvage Program
A Snapshot in Time Prepared for: Prince George FREP Overview
Supporting Improvement of Local Child Outcomes Measurement Systems
Chapter 7 Determining System Requirements
Chapter 4 Determining System Requirements
District Operational Monitoring Initiative
Process and Procedure Documentation
Week 10 Systems Development
Presentation transcript:

FRPA Data Management/Reporting System (Data Collection and Reporting) Building Your New System: Business Requirements Suggestions and Questions RSM Pilot Review Workshop February 2005

Why do we need a system? Data collection : §To assist in the collection of checklist-based data in the field by: l speeding up the data-entry process (possibly through hand-held technology, and pre-populated checklists) l providing online “checklist” tools and completion guidelines l where appropriate and available, provide risk assessment summaries on the checklist(s) for the value being examined

Why do we need a system? Reporting/Analysis/Planning: §To make it easy to transfer data collected in the field to a database accessible by multiple users §To facilitate analysis through the use of both “canned” and custom reports §To facilitate reporting to multiple stakeholders §To facilitate planning of collection activities

Who will use the system? District field staff: §To collect and store field data for Resource Stewardship monitoring, other district monitoring initiatives and effectiveness evaluation purposes §To analyze information collected in the field, specific to a district BA2 initiative (e.g. a specific value in an FSP) §To help plan their workload

Who will use the system? District management: §To analyze information collected in the field, specific to their district BA2 initiatives, or to a particular FSP §To document planning priorities for data collection by field staff §To monitor data collection activities by field staff

Who will use the system? Regional staff: §To analyze information collected in the field, from a regional perspective Branch staff: §To analyze information collected in the field, from a provincial perspective §To determine where more intensive research is required §To collect and store field data §To help plan future research requirements §Work with Regional/District staff to focus stewardship monitoring priorities

Potential System Features §System could have two components: l a hand-held (or tablet) component, where the checklist data is collected and, where appropriate, partially analyzed l a PC-based component to assist in viewing and editing the data, as well as planning and reporting activities §Basic site information could be drawn from existing databases for pre-population of checklists §Hand-helds could store and display supporting information that would assist field officers during collection §Data could be saved as a “layer” in the LRDW for display in a spatial context

General System Requirements §Support the needs of both Effectiveness Evaluation and Resource Stewardship monitoring (including FSPs) §Facilitate planning, collection and reporting activities §Facilitate comparison of data over time §Easy to use tool both in the office and in the field §Facilitate data exchange with other ministry systems, as required

Possible Process Flow Is this too detailed?

PLANCOLLECT REPORT/ ANALYZE §Branch staff l Working with Districts, set EE priorities for province §District Mgmt l Working with Branch and Regions, set district EE/RSM priorities §District staff l Given district priorities, plan work activities §District staff l Routine/ extensive eval. §Branch staff l intensive evaluations §Branch staff l focus on cross- province issues §Regional staff l focus on regional issues §District Mgmt l focus on district issues around EE and RSM l monitor workload §District Staff l district issues/ workload mgmt

Assumptions-Reality check §Check lists for resource values will form the basis of the collection methodology for the Regional/District RSM Program §The new system will support the needs of both Effectiveness Evaluation and Resource Stewardship monitoring §Districts, Regions, Branch, Industry and the Public will require (varying) access to the data collected §Forest Practices Branch will be the data custodian (owner) of the information collected in the new system

Some questions §What is the area that will be examined in a field evaluation? l a cut block l a silviculture opening l a range or pasture l a road l could include all of the above?

More questions §What is the focus of an evaluation: l tenure, licensee l an FSP (strategies, objectives, practices) l a specific resource value l Some other BA2 initiative l could include all of the above?

More questions §Who is responsible for documenting the procedures and process the system needs to support?

Next Steps §Determine who will participate in requirements gathering and testing §Set up district meetings to flesh out requirements §Finalize requirements documentation §Obtain sign off of requirements §Publish Request for Proposals §Begin development cycle

Proposed Timeline