1 Advisory Committee for Principal Selection Overview and Preparation Principal Selection Process.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Board Governance: A Key to Quality Organizations
Advertisements

ALAMEDA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Superintendent Search.
Report to the KSD Board June 9, Provide Kent School District the necessary guidance and assistance to create an equitable, academically enriching,
What is District Wide Accreditation? Ensure Desired Results Improve Teaching & Learning Foster a Culture of Improvement A powerful systems approach to.
Local Control Funding Formula & Local Control Accountability Plan Stakeholders Meeting February 26, 2014.
Scaling-Up Early Childhood Intervention Literacy Learning Practices Maurice McInerney, Ph.D. American Institutes for Research Presentation prepared for.
Parents as Partners in Education
Arts in Basic Curriculum 20-Year Anniversary Evaluation the Improve Group.
Working with the Teachers’ Standards in the context of ITE. Some key issues for ITE Partnerships to explore.
JEFFERSON COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS LEADERSHIP PROFILE REPORT March 19, 2015.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Project Team MSBA – local school board members MASA – local school superintendents and other stakeholders MSBA/MASA.
Knows and performs Illinois Professional Teaching Standards including working with diverse learners Demonstrates basic competency in planning, instruction,
Magnet Program Audit for Baltimore County Public Schools Presentation of Key Findings and Recommendations November 19, 2013 Marilyn Zlotnik, Vice President.
February 8, 2012 Session 4: Educational Leadership Policy Standards 1 Council of Chief School Officers April 2008.
Practicing the Art of Leadership: A Problem Based Approach to Implementing the ISLLC Standards, 4e © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All.
COLLEGE-READY LEARNER CRITICAL THINKER ADAPTABLE & PRODUCTIVE LEADERRESPONSIBLE DECISION MAKER SKILLED COMMUNICATOR HISD.
DRAFT Building Our Future 2017 Fulton County Schools Strategic Plan Name of Meeting Date.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Shared Decision Making: Moving Forward Together
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Administrative Evaluation Committee – Orientation Meeting Dr. Christine Carver, Associate Superintendent of Human Capital Development Mr. Stephen Foresi,
Webinar: Leadership Teams October 2013: Idaho RTI.
Learner-Ready Teachers  More specifically, learner-ready teachers have deep knowledge of their content and how to teach it;  they understand the differing.
1 Executive Limitation 12: Curriculum and Instruction Darlene Westbrook Chief Academic Officer Denise Collier Executive Director for Curriculum Monitoring.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
This series of five presentations has the following goals: Presentation III A Discussion with School Boards: Raising the Graduation Rate, High School Improvement,
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
INSTRUCTIONAL EXCELLENCE INVENTORIES: A PROCESS OF MONITORING FOR CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT Dr. Maria Pitre-Martin Superintendent of Schools.
Mission The faculty and staff of Pittman Elementary School are committed to providing every student with adequate time, effective teaching, and a positive.
Successful K–12 STEM Education Identifying Effective Approaches in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Committee on Highly Successful Schools.
Inspiring Oregonians… to do what it takes to make our schools among the nation’s best.
RAPID DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT Academy of Pacesetting States July 20, 2009 Brett Lane Technical Advisor to the Center on Innovation & Improvement.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Professional Development Academy Patricia Hughes (251) Brenda Haskew (251) MOBILE COUNTY PUBLIC.
Policy for Results: How Policy Meets Preparation to Lead the Way to Improved Outcomes: H325A
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
Ready to Raise PowerPoint Resource The Work of Early Years Community Developers Please feel free to adapt these PowerPoint slides to your needs. Credit.
Solano County Office of Education Jay Speck Solano County Superintendent of Schools.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation AUTEC School 4-8 March 2012.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Learning-Centered Leadership Joseph Murphy Peabody College, Vanderbilt University.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
Superintendent’s Entry & Learning Plan Jeremy Ray.
Presented at the OSPA Summit 2012 January 9, 2012.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Office of Service Quality
Dr. Derrica Davis Prospective Principal Candidate: Fairington Elementary School.
Office of Service Quality
Helping Teachers Help All Students: The Imperative for High-Quality Professional Development Report of the Maryland Teacher Professional Development Advisory.
Strategic Plan Proposal The Challenge This strategic plan identifies what must be done, pre- school through grade 12, over the next three.
Coffee County School System Sept A Vision for Public Education in Georgia.
Advisory Committee for Principal Selection Overview and Preparation.
[School] School Principal Selection Welcome! [Date]
Minnesota’s Promise World-Class Schools, World-Class State.
School Improvement Needs Assessment – © Iowa Association of School Boards Assessment Conducted by the Iowa Association of School Boards.
Education.state.mn.us Principal Evaluation Components in Legislation Work Plan for Meeting Rose Assistant Commissioner Minnesota Department of Education.
Collecting Skills and Characteristics for Our Next School Leader.
CSC Meeting School Leader Selection Process. Welcome Overview of school leader selection process Activities and timeline Roles & responsibilities Q&A.
 Plan for K-12 Program Assessment Elizabeth Duncan EDUC 665 Week 5 Assignment March 9, 2015.
STRATEGIC PLANNING Tony Arasi Director of Professional Development.
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.
DO PRINCIPAL SUPERVISORS MATTER? BUILDING THE CAPACITY OF AREA SUPERINTENDENTS National Principal Supervisor Summit May 2016.
Clinical Practice evaluations and Performance Review
Principal Selection Process
CSC Meeting School Leader Selection Process
Advisory Committee for Principal Selection Overview and Preparation
Presentation transcript:

1 Advisory Committee for Principal Selection Overview and Preparation Principal Selection Process

Agenda Overview of the Principal Selection Process Introduction to the Principal Selection Process The Framework for Effective School Leadership – Key Indicators for Principal Selection The Role of the Advisory Committee for Principal Selection Advisory Committee Discussion – Principal Selection Priorities School Life Cycle School Size School Programs/Student Needs School Context Wrap-up and Next Steps Summary of key priorities Interview Questions 2

Introduction to the Principal Selection Process: DPS School Leadership Framework Denver Public Schools has developed a School Leadership Framework that is being used both as a common definition for effective school leadership and as a tool to select, evaluate and provide professional learning opportunities for principals This Framework guides all of the district’s work in selecting, supporting, and evaluating school leaders. The Expectations, Indicators and Behaviors identified in this Framework define the types of skills, abilities and aptitudes that future and current DPS Principals need to be able to demonstrate. 3

4

5

6 Principal Selection Process Lead in Denver Pre- Screen Applicant Screening for Qualified Principal Candidate Pool Advisory Committee for Principal Selection Finalist Engagement Learning Walk Community Forum Superintendent Interview and Offer

Introduction to the Principal Selection Process: Advisory Committee for Principal Selection Process The school committee’s role is to provide advisory input to the Instructional Superintendent as they recommend finalist candidates to the superintendent for hire. The committee will meet with the Instructional Superintendent to review the selection process and talk through the schools’ characteristics, priorities, and needs as related to what the committee seeks in a new school leader. Once this meeting is complete, the I.S. or E.D. will work with the committee to add questions to the select interview questions from the question bank. The committee will receive training in interviewing and effective/ethical practices in interviewing by a Human Resources Partner. The committee will conduct the interview process, collecting evidence on the interview rubric form. The Instructional Superintendent will develop a summary of the Framework- based strengths and needs of each candidate and provide this summary to the Superintendent for review and selection of Finalist candidates. 7

Membership of the Advisory Committee The Committee will be composed of nine to eleven members as follows: The Instructional Superintendent/Executive Director will provide for approval of the Advisory Committee membership and will serve as co-chair The remaining eight to ten members must be representative of the diversity of the school population and will be selected by the school’s CSC with the following level of representation: – Five building staff members. This must include three teaching staff members and one non-teaching staff member; the fifth may be any member of the school staff. The current principal is not eligible to serve on the committee. – Three to five parent/guardian and community members. The members must include one parent or guardian of a student currently enrolled in the school and one CSC representative. – The IS/ED reserves the right to refer the composition of the proposed Advisory Committee back to the CSC to ensure adequate representation of the whole community. 8

9 Principal Selection Priorities 1. School Life Cycle 2. School Size 3. School Programs/ Student Needs 4. School Context

Group Discussion 10 Section 1: School Life Cycle Which are we? HIGH ACHIEVINGSTEADYIN FLUXNEWTURNAROUND  School that consistently exceeds district student achievement standards, with” Distinguished” accreditation ratings  Not in need of significant change to maintain high student achievement  School consistently meets district standards, with consistent “Meets Expectations” or “Accredited on Watch” accreditation ratings  School has not recently had significant increases in student achievement  School curricular focus, student or community demographic is undergoing rapid change  Starting a school “from scratch” either in a new or existing building  School consistently receives “Accredited on Priority Watch” or “Accredited on Probation” ratings  Student achievement has been low and stagnant or decreasing for several years in a row  School is in need of a significant change in direction to improve student achievement

What Activities Will be Most Critical for Our Principal? 11 Some Examples: HIGH ACHIEVINGSTEADY  Maintain strong culture of high achievement  Consistently develop a pipeline of great staff  Successfully manage relationships with parents and staff  Focus on continuous improvement  Identify opportunities for instructional improvement and create a sense of urgency to move student achievement  Develop a new vision and counsel staff to improve instructional outcomes  Ensure accountability at all levels IN FLUXNEWTURNAROUND  Maintain focus on rigorous instruction through change  Help others adapt to change  Personally adapt to change  Anticipate and make necessary changes to school facility, staff or instruction  Select and place a high quality staff  Create and inspire others towards new vision  Establish processes and policies that lead to safe, student-centered and efficient building  Build a school community focused on building a college and career going culture  Ensure the best quality staff  Intense focus on improving instruction  Set challenging goals and make sure they are achieved  Use resources creatively  Use personal impact rather than organizational “mandate” to effect change in school

Group Discussion 12 Section 2: School Size Where do we fall? SMALLLARGE Definition  <500 (E.S./M.S.); < 700 (H.S.)  >500 (E.S./M.S.); >700 (H.S.) Context  Principal can personally know each student and family  Principal is often personally engaging with individual staff members  Principal may take care of most administrative activities  May be difficult to personally know each student and their family  Principal may have limited interaction with all staff members; need to maintain accountability  Principal may need to get work done through others; staff members may take on administrative responsibilities  Facilities may be large and physically spread- out What would we add or change about the context description for our school?

Group Discussion 13 Section 3: School Programs/Student Needs What specific school programs or student needs will be important for our new principal to understand and manage effectively? SampleszDefinitions Magnet and Specific programmatic focus  School has a specific programmatic or curricular focus, including American Indian, Arts, Dual-Language, Expeditionary Learning, International Baccalaureate, International, Montessori and Science, High AP participation, Career and Technical Education, etc. Innovation  School implements innovative practices to improve student outcomes.  School may petition to waive district policies for increased flexibility. Highly Gifted and Talented Programs  School has a high percentage of students designated as highly gifted and talented  Students participate in screening to receive the designation and to be admitted into a Highly Gifted Program English Language Acquisition Program  High percentage of students are learning English as a second language High Special Education Population  High special needs population, or significant Special Education compliance issues within the school Early Childhood Focus  School may be limited to Pre-K to 3, or may have a specific early childhood program as a core school focus

Group Discussion 14 Section 4: School Context What is happening in the school community that will affect our new school leader? SamplesDefinition Sustaining Success  High degree of satisfaction among stakeholders  Consensus that school has done well over the years and priority is to maintain status quo  Previous leadership highly regarded; leadership change is regretted by school community Internally Focused  General distrust of “outsiders” or central office involvement in school decisions  Staff has long tenure and is protective of current school culture Politically Charged  Recent turmoil in the school has led to mistrust among staff and/or community members  High need for relationship building and realignment of stakeholders

Group Discussion: Which areas of focus will be most critical for our school in the next one to five years? School Life Cycle 2. School Size 3. School Programs/Student Needs 4. School Context

Group Discussion: Which Framework Indicators will be most important for our school? 16 EXPECTATIONKEY INDICATORDESCRIPTION CULTURAL AND EQUITY LEADERSHIP CEL1: Leads for equity toward college and career readiness Leader is aware of issues of diversity and equity in achievement engages all stakeholders in conversations around these topics. INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP IL1: Leads for high-quality, data-driven instruction by building the capacity of teachers to lead and perfect their craft Leader uses data to make instructional decisions and knows how to work with stakeholders to ensure data-driven instruction takes place across the school. Leader has deep knowledge of high quality instruction and can work with teachers to implement these practices for all students. HUMAN RESOURCE LEADERSHIP HRL1: Applies teacher and staff performance management systems in a way that ensures a culture of continuous improvement, support, and accountability Leader is well-acquainted with and uses the district performance management system to support teachers and promote student achievement. STRATEGIC LEADERSHIP SL1: Leads the school’s vision, mission, and strategic goals to support college readiness for all students Leader has a clear strategic plan and engages all stakeholders in the development of the school vision/mission. COMMUNITY LEADERSHIP CL: Actively advocates for members of the school community and effectively engages family and community Leader communicates effectively with school stakeholders and community members, including second language families and those from different cultural backgrounds. Leader ensures that all members of the school community have a strong voice in regard to concerns, ideas, and interests.

Group Discussion: What work experience or credentials will we want to look for in potential principal candidates? School Life Cycle 2. School Size 3. School Programs/Student Needs 4. School Context