Considering the Roles of Research and Evaluation in DR K-12 Projects December 3, 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Content Side of the ACPS Professional Learning Plan (PLP)
Advertisements

Progress Towards Reading Success: The Reading First Evaluation Prepared by: Amy Kemp, Ph.D. Research Associate and Patricia A. Muller, Ph.D. Associate.
Year 2 Formative Progress Review
PQF Induction: Small group delivery or 1-1 session.
Introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation
K-6 Science and Technology Consistent teaching – Assessing K-6 Science and Technology © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and.
District Mathematics Leadership Meeting October 28 th, 2014 Wireless: PSESD Guest Success for Each Child and Eliminate the Opportunity Gap.
What is moderation and why should we moderate?
S-1 SUPERVISION. S-2 Instructional Leadership Development Framework for Data-driven Systems QUALITY STUDENT PERFORMANCE ETHICS AND INTEGRITY Curriculum/Instruction/
Campus Improvement Plans
Title I Schoolwide Providing the Tools for Change Presented by Education Service Center Region XI February 2008.
Action Plan Mr. Ahmed Zaki Uddin Mathematics O-Level.
Decision Making Tools for Strategic Planning 2014 Nonprofit Capacity Conference Margo Bailey, PhD April 21, 2014 Clarify your strategic plan hierarchy.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
EEN [Canada] Forum Shelley Borys Director, Evaluation September 30, 2010 Developing Evaluation Capacity.
Chapter 3 Preparing and Evaluating a Research Plan Gay and Airasian
SMART Goals.
Student Assessment Inventory for School Districts Inventory Planning Training.
SMART Goals and Educator Plan Development
Milwaukee Math Partnership Year 1 External Evaluation Lizanne DeStefano, Director Dean Grosshandler, Project Coordinator University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2) Project
Jack C Richards Professional Development for Language Teachers: Strategies for Teacher Learning Jack C Richards & Thomas.
DEVELOPING ALGEBRA-READY STUDENTS FOR MIDDLE SCHOOL: EXPLORING THE IMPACT OF EARLY ALGEBRA PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS:Maria L. Blanton, University of Massachusetts.
Using formative assessment. Aims of the session This session is intended to help us to consider: the reasons for assessment; the differences between formative.
Overall Teacher Judgements
Argumentation in Middle & High School Science Victor Sampson Assistant Professor of Science Education School of Teacher Education and FSU-Teach Florida.
© Myra Young Assessment All rights reserved. Provided for the use of participants in AM circles in North Lanarkshire Council.
The New Studies of Religion Syllabus Implementation Package: Session Three.
Lecture 8A Designing and Conducting Formative Evaluations English Study Program FKIP _ UNSRI
2 The combination of three concepts constitutes the foundation for results: 1) meaningful teamwork; 2) clear, measurable goals; and 3) regular collection.
Module 4 Evaluating Services to Binational Migrant Students Designing an Implementation and Outcome Evaluation of State and Local Binational Services 1.
Module 3: Unit 1, Session 3 MODULE 3: ASSESSMENT Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development Unit 1, Session 3.
Implementing Formative Assessment Online Professional Development What Principals Need to know.
Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Disclaimer Leadership for the Common Core in Mathematics (CCLM^2)
Regional Seminar 2005 EVALUATING POLICY Are your policies working? How do you know? School Development Planning Initiative.
Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 4: Reflecting and Adjusting December 2013.
Ensuring that Professional Development Leads to Improved Mathematics Teaching & Learning Kristen Malzahn Horizon Research, Inc. TDG Leadership Seminar.
Laying the Foundation for Scaling Up During Development.
Workshops to support the implementation of the new languages syllabuses in Years 7-10.
Let’s Chat About Data Based Decision Making Melissa and Brian.
Introducing Unit Specifications and Unit Assessment Support Packs Philosophy National 5.
Suggested Components of a Schoolwide Reading Plan Part 1: Introduction Provides an overview of key components of reading plan. Part 2: Component details.
Cleveland State University Self Study 2010 North Central Association/Higher Learning Commission Accreditation.
Assessment Design. Four Professional Learning Modules 1.Unpacking the AC achievement standards 2.Validity and reliability of assessments 3. Confirming.
Data Analysis Processes: Cause and Effect Linking Data Analysis Processes to Teacher Evaluation Name of School.
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation AARPE Session 5 Virginia Department of Education Office of School Improvement.
© 2014, KDE and KLA. All rights reserved. PROFESSIONAL GROWTH AND SELF-REFLECTION.
Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics PROGRAM.
Mathematics Performance Tasks Applying a Program Logic Model to a Professional Development Series California Educational Research Association December.
Project Evaluation for MSP Targeted Partnerships Eric R. Banilower Horizon Research, Inc.
Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review Principal Evaluation: So far Revised resources Collect evidence from a “faculty meeting” Debrief Planning.
Moderation and Validation of Teacher Judgements in School.
© Crown copyright 2006 Renewing the Frameworks Driving Improvement.
Required Skills for Assessment Balance and Quality: 10 Competencies for Educational Leaders Assessment for Learning: An Action Guide for School Leaders.
Dr. Kathleen Haynie Haynie Research and Evaluation November 12, 2010.
Instructional Leadership and Application of the Standards Aligned System Act 45 Program Requirements and ITQ Content Review October 14, 2010.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
Kristen A Condella MCSD Mathematics Coordinator. Mathematics Formative Assessment System (MFAS) Formative assessment is a process used by teachers and.
DRAFT: Teacher Growth and Evaluation Default Model Thursday, November 15 th, 2012 Rose Hermodson, Greg Keith, and Tyler Livingston “Leading for educational.
Stages of Research and Development
Quality Assurance processes
What is moderation and why should we moderate?
Understanding by Design
Analyze Student Work Sample 2 Instructional Next Steps
Analyzing Student Work Sample 2 Instructional Next Steps
Using Data for Program Improvement
Using Data for Program Improvement
Providing feedback to learners
TLQAA STANDARDS & TOOLS
Technology Bob Dohrer, Technology Working Group Chair
Presentation transcript:

Considering the Roles of Research and Evaluation in DR K-12 Projects December 3, 2010

Discovery Research K-12 Program Solicitation All DR K-12 proposals must have a plan for formative and summative evaluation of project research and development work. The evaluation should focus on the validation of, fidelity to, and the usefulness of the development and research processes to achieve the targeted outcomes. Individually write down: One idea you are confident you know about evaluation of research in DR K-12 projects, and One question you have about evaluation of research in DR K-12 projects

Discuss: 10 minutes At your tables, share with your group the two things you wrote down As a group, identify one idea and one question to share with the room

Discovery Research K-12 Project Evaluation Projects focused at different stages in the DRL cycle of research and development will naturally choose different development and implementation strategies and different research and project evaluation methods. The research, development, implementation and evaluation activities need to be appropriately rigorous.

Discovery Research K-12 Project Evaluation The objectives of the evaluation include: (1) ensuring that the project is making satisfactory progress toward its goals; (2) recommending reasonable, evidence-based adjustments to project plans; (3) determining the value of the outcomes of the project; and (4) attesting to the integrity of outcomes reported by the project.

DR K-12 Project Evaluation Roles, by Project Component and Evaluation Purpose Project Component Evaluation Purpose Design Critique Critical Friend Documenting Processes Formative Feedback Summative Judgment Development of Materials/PD/ Instruments Int Evaluator Ext Evaluator Adv Board Int Evaluator Ext Evaluator Adv Board Int Evaluator Ext Evaluator Int Evaluator Ext Evaluator Adv Board (Quality of Process and Products) Implementation/ Impact of Materials/PD Int Evaluator Ext Evaluator Adv Board Int Evaluator Ext Evaluator Adv Board Int Evaluator Ext Evaluator Int Evaluator Ext Evaluator (Extent, Nature, and Conditions of Use and Effectiveness) Research Int Evaluator Ext Evaluator Adv Board Int Evaluator Ext Evaluator Adv Board Int Evaluator Ext Evaluator Int Evaluator Ext Evaluator Adv Board (Audit/Review of Research Quality)

An Example For two projects that are developing and testing mathematics teacher professional development programs, the evaluation: Works with the projects to devise logic models of the assumptions, activities, and intended outcomes of the PD Uses the logic model in Design Critique and Critical Friend roles to raise concerns and offer considerations about conceptual framing, sampling, instrumentation, data collection, analysis, and interpretation of findings

An Example For a project that is studying efficacy of a mathematics teacher professional development program in settings with large proportions of ELL students, the evaluation: Documents processes by which the project is preparing facilitators to use the PD program Documents processes in terms of the nature of implementation of the program in field sites, both in terms of fidelity to the PD program and adaptation to the particular opportunities and challenges of the local ELL contexts

An Example For a project that is studying impact of school-based mathematics coaches on teaching and learning in elementary schools, the evaluation: Audits the research by conducting standards of evidence reviews of the draft research report, and coordinating preliminary peer reviews by selected experts in the field

Evaluation of Research Components Task You will receive two handouts describing hypothetical DR K-12 projects, with an emphasis on the project’s research components Decide together to begin with one of the two examples

Evaluation of Research Components Task: 30 minutes Consider together the important evaluation purposes for the project’s research component Discuss the benefits/drawbacks of having different parties (internal, external, advisory board) serve each evaluation purpose you identify for the project Repeat for the other project

Wrap-Up What revisions or additions might you now suggest for the matrix of evaluation roles by project component and evaluation purpose? Remaining questions about evaluation of research components of DR K-12 projects.