1 The Italian “National Rural Network” Workshop on Successful Work of Managing Authorities Budapest – 15th April 2008 Riccardo Passero

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Jean-Michel Courades, DG AGRI Rural Development Networking and Cooperation
Advertisements

Territorial cohesion: what scales for policy intervention? Bruxelles Jean Peyrony DG REGIO, Unit C2 (Urban development, territorial cohesion)
Technical meeting with the Regional representative offices in Brussels Brussels, 17 March 2009 The INTERACT II Programme – Knowledge Management and Capitalisation.
Community Strategic Guidelines DG AGRI, July 2005 Rural Development.
LEADER Conference, Przemysl October 2007 Romanian National Rural Development Network Proposed structure Professor Michael Dower.
Cyprus Project Management Society
Community Strategic Guidelines DG AGRI, November 2005 Rural Development.
Presentation of the workshop results to the plenary session A) Strengthening rural entrepreneurship by connecting the local production with other economic.
EU Wetland conservation policy. Communication on the Wise Use and Conservation of Wetlands (1995) => first European document dedicated exclusively.
Leader as a part of the new CAP
S3 Project aim The main goal, thus expected result, of the S3 project would be to strengthen tools used for Structural Fund policies (SF), through the.
1 MINISTRY OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTORATE GENERAL PROGRAMMING OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT Operational Programme Regional Development.
Ⓒ Olof S. Leader as part of “community-led local development” under the CSF; networking aspects.
Rural Development policy
1 MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND FOOD Rural Development Policy
EUROPEAN COHESION POLICY AT A GLANCE Introduction to the EU Structural Funds Ctibor Kostal Sergej Muravjov.
1 Integration between regional and rural development policies in the Italian National Strategic Regional Framework Bruxelles, 1st October 2009 Sabrina.
04/2007 European Funds in Bulgaria Supported by the European Commission (DG ENV)
Urban-Nexus – Integrated Urban Management David Ludlow and Michael Buser UWE Sofia November 2011.
The implementation of the rural development policy and its impacts on innovation and modernisation of rural economy Christian Vincentini, European Commission.
A project implemented by the HTSPE consortium This project is funded by the European Union SUSTAINABLE GROWTH LIFE
1 MINISTRY OF LABOUR, SOCIAL SOLIDARITY AND FAMILY ESF HEAD OF MISSION MANAGING AUTHORITY FOR SECTORAL OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME FOR HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT.
Aldona Kowalczyk-Rębiś Agnieszka Kowalska
Strasbourg 05/06/07 Strasbourg 31/07/07 EUROPEAID Non-State Actors and Local Authorities in Development WTD: WORKING TOGETHER FOR DEVELOPMENT.
CAPACITIES OVER 50S AS RURAL DEVELOPMENT TOOL CAPACITIES OVER 50S AS RURAL DEVELOPMENT TOOL Grundtvig Project DINAMICA TEACHING TOOLS, METHODS AND CURRICULA.
European Commission Directorate General for Agriculture and Rural Development EU rural development policy.
European Union Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region - flagship project “Sustainable rural development” Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development Department.
Innovation in the Rural Development Networks Directorate General for Agriculture and Rural Development Matthias Langemeyer & Iman Boot.
1 LEADER and TNC implementation including aspect of networking Kasia Panfil, ENRD Contact Point 25 May 2012, Lithuania.
The Eastern Partnership Panel on Agriculture and Rural Development Dominik Olewinski European Commission Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum: Working.
European Union | European Regional Development Fund From INTERREG IVC to Interreg Europe Info day in Tullamore Akos Szabo| Project Officer Interreg Europe.
ESPON Seminar 15 November 2006 in Espoo, Finland Review of the ESPON 2006 and lessons learned for the ESPON 2013 Programme Thiemo W. Eser, ESPON Managing.
The LEADER approach to integrated rural development in the EU UNDP International Conference, Kosice, 5 October 2009 Jean-Michel COURADES AGRI G1 - Consistency.
Cooperation in the mainstream programmes / article 37-6b example of Limousin (France) inhabitants inhabitants 43 inhabitant / km2 43 inhabitant.
European Commission Introduction to the Community Programme for Employment and Social Solidarity PROGRESS
EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND RECOMMEND Final Event, 11 September 2014, Varna EU Interregional Cooperation State of play and perspectives Jason Martinez.
European Commission - Directorate General for Agriculture 1 EU rural development policy Nikiforos SIVENAS European Commission Directorate General.
INSTITUTION BUILDING FOR LEADER FROM LOCAL TO NATIONAL AND FROM NATIONAL TO LOCAL IN SLOVENIA Tihany, november 2006 Slovenian Rural Development Network,
National Rural Network Poland. Main Objectives  The aim of the National Network of Rural Areas is to support the implementation and evaluation of the.
1 European Union Regional Policy – Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion Community-led local development Articles of the Common Provisions Regulation.
Conference on regional governance in a global context The experience of Emilia Romagna Morena Diazzi Managing Authority ERDF ROP
Wageningen International Introduction agri environment measures Pleven Agri environment in the Netherlands Background Natura 2000 and agricultere Common.
1 LIFE+ COUNCIL WORKING GROUP 4 OCTOBER Discussion Points 1. LIFE+ in Context: Environment funding under the Financial Perspectives.
Jean-Michel Courades, DG AGRI F3 European Rural Development Network
– C OMMUNITY - LED LOCAL DEVELOPMENT Ministry of Agriculture of Latvia.
Guidelines for LDS preparation for Croatian LAG’s Estonian Leader Union Kadri Tillemann and Kristiina Timmo 28 th of September, Zagreb.
DESCRIPTION OF THE MONITORING AND EVALUATION SYSTEM IN POLAND Monitoring indicators.
The CLLD/Leader and the Leader Cooperation Participatory Local Development Strategies: + LEADER for Madrid, 29 October 2015 Christian Vincentini.
Loretta Dormal Marino Deputy Director General DG for Agriculture and Rural Development, European Commission IFAJ Congress 2010 – Brussels, 22 April 2010.
DESCRIPTION OF THE MONITORING AND EVALUATION SYSTEM IN POLAND Action Plan and the Two-year NRN Operational Plans.
1 EUROPEAN FUNDS IN HALF-TIME NEW CHALLENGES Jack Engwegen Head of the Czech Unit European Commission, Directorate General for Regional Policy Prague,
REGIONAL POLICY EUROPEAN COMMISSION The contribution of EU Regional/Cohesion programmes Corinne Hermant-de Callataÿ European Commission,
TEN-T Executive Agency and Project Management Anna LIVIERATOU-TOLL TEN-T Executive Agency Senior Programme and Policy Coordinator European Economic and.
Leader+ Observatory Seminar ‘The Legacy of Leader+ at local level: Building the future of rural areas’ April 2007 Cap Corse, Nebbiù è Custera, Corse,
Jela Tvrdonova, The EU priorities:  Use the Leader approach for introducing innovation in the thematic axis  better governance at the local level.
Landscape of social innovation in Poland Brussels, May 2014.
Polish National Rural Network Bureau of Technical Assistance Responsible for: -Technical Assistance in Programs of Rural Development for period.
The delivery of rural development policies: Some reflections on problems and perspectives in EU countries INEA conference: The territorial approach in.
European Commission Directorate General Environment Page 1 Regulation (EC) No 2152/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning monitoring.
Why to become a partner of URBACT August Title of presentation I Sunday, 06 March 2016 I Page 2 What is URBACT URBACT is a European exchange and.
The 7th Framework Programme for Research: Strategy of international cooperation activities Robert Burmanjer Head of Unit, “International Scientific Cooperation.
TAIEX Workshop on Agricultural Advisory Services in the EU Kiev, Ukraine February 2016 Organisational structure and practice activities of agricultural.
"The role of Rural Networks as effective tools to promote rural development" TAIEX/Local Administration Facility Seminar on Rural Development Brussels,
Implementation of Leader program in Estonia Kristiina Tammets.
Structural Funds Programming Predeal, Romania
Leader as a part of the new CAP
Directorate General for Agriculture and Rural Development
Technical Working Group meeting 21 March 2012 Brussels
How the proposed new delivery model for the CAP will provide the ground for the further development of Smart Villages’ approaches? Beata Adamczyk European.
Directorate General for Agriculture and Rural Development
Presentation transcript:

1 The Italian “National Rural Network” Workshop on Successful Work of Managing Authorities Budapest – 15th April 2008 Riccardo Passero

2 In this presentation: 2007 – 2013 programming period The role of Italian National Rural Network (financed within 4 % Technical Assistance; art 66 EC Reg. 1698/2005)

3 Italian Programming system Need for strategy and governance Regions RDP programming  within national strategy (NSP) In some Regions: Provinces are entitled to set some programming choices (delegation of competences)  within Regional strategy (RDP) Subsidiarity in the implementation How RDP measures have to be implemented ?  Starting from the administrative level closer to the farmer (21 Regions; in some cases Provinces) The use of T.A (human resources and training) supports such approach

4 Italian Programming system 1 national strategy (Ministry) NSP  21 RDPs managed by Regions Further decentralization in some Regions, i.e: Tuscany Emilia Romagna Lombardy Campania  Involvement of local authorities (Provinces; Mountain Communities)  RDP programming possibility to add “second class” priorities to Regional “first class priorities” set in RDPs  Implementation of some RDP measures (depending from delegated competences at Regional level) Concerning RDPs management, Italy experienced 100% financial efficiency on resources allocated on whole programming period (4.624 Billions of Euro).

5 21Rural Development Programmes 1National Programme RURAL NETWORK 1National Programme RURAL NETWORK 16RDP « Competitiveness»: 4,110Billions of € 5PSR « Convergence »: 4,141Billions of € 5PSR « Convergence »: 4,141Billions of € 1National Rural Network: 0,041 Billions of € 1National Rural Network: 0,041 Billions of €_______________ Total EAFRD quota 8,292Billions of € National Resources 8,395Billions of € (*) _______________ 16,687Billions of € Total resources 16,687Billions of € (*)of which 1,487 Billions of € (8,9% of the total) come from REGIONAL RESOURCES The 2007 – 2013 scenario CompetitivenessConvergence Phasing out Phasing in NATIONAL balance among axis (21 RDPs) Axis 1: 39,0%Axis 2: 43,2%Axis 3: 14,7%Leader 6,7% Technical Assistance: 3,1% (of which National Network 0,5%)

6 Resources allocation per axis in Italian RDPs

7 NATIONAL RURAL NETWORK Art 67 EC Reg. 1698/2005 establishes the European Rural Network Art 68 EC Reg. 1698/2005 establishes National Rural Networks Art 66 (3 par) : MS with regionalized programming system  NRN as a single Programme ITALIAN NATIONAL RURAL NETWORK good timing Decision of Approval C(2007) n. 3824, 14th August 2007  BEFORE ALL ITALIAN RDPs  ability to start activities in 2008  FIRST “NRN Programme” approval in EU  BUDGET 83 millions of EURO (50% EAFRD)

8 NATIONAL RURAL NETWORK Programme (Decision of Approval C(2007) n. 3824, 14th August 2007) Action Plan (implementing document for 2007 – 2013) approved by Monitoring Committee on March 2008 Annual Plans (list of activities for the year; related organization, implementation and costs)

9 NATIONAL RURAL NETWORK NRN Key element of national policy defined in NATIONAL STRATEGIC PLAN (NSP) MAIN CHALLENGES Widening the participation in Rural development Policies (RDPs address and NRN activities) Overcoming national differences ( human resources’ skills, RDP management, procedures, monitoring & evaluation) International dimension (exchange of experiences, good practises, innovations) NRN ADDED VALUE TO ENHANCE NSP and RDP : PERFORMACES, IMPACTS, FINANCIAL EFFICIENCY (N+2) rule, INTEGRATION AMONG POLICIES Better Knowledge and Visibility of Rural Development Policies’ role and impacts

10 NATIONAL RURAL NETWORK WHICH MEMBERS ? OPEN and INCLUSIVE approach According to art. 68 (1) National Partners: –ALL administrations engaged in RD (national, regional, GAL, etc.) –ALL organizations engaged in RD (professional, environmental, technical, cultural, chambers of industry-commerce, cooperatives, other networks; NGO’s) European Rural Network and every relevant international partners (international organizations, Think Thanks, NGO’s, other NRN) LIST of 15 Networks having a role to play in rural areas (i.e Consumers, Universities, Euro Info Centres, National contact points of VI- VII° EU Research Programme, European Business and Innovations Centres (BIC), Interact, EUROPE DIRECT centres, etc…. )

11 HOW TO MAKE NRN? INCLUDING “Key actors” as NRN MEMBERS and organizing the competences they can give  participation to NRN activities through THEMATIC TASK FORCES THEMATIC WORKING GROUPS set by Italian NRN:  LEADER Approach,  MONITORING and EVALUATION  FARM COMPETITIVENESS  ENVIRONMENT and CROSS COMPLIANCE (soil, water resources, climatic changes, agro-energies, biodiversity)  FORESTS  LANDSCAPE CHANGE,  INTEGRATED PROGRAMMING (among measures, food chains)  INTEGRATION among RD and OTHER POLICIES  YOUNG FARMERS and equal opportunities INTEGRATING NRN with other NETWORKS (national / international; official and not)  IN ORDER TO EXPAND NRN activity results

12 NRN members: formal institution  Art. 41 (4) EC Reg. 1974/2006 : 31/12/2008 deadline for establishing the Network National procedure: through NATIONAL STANDING FORUM (action 1.2.1)  formal Ministry Act (related publicity) Possibility to widen this list at Regional Level (Regions can formally identify further members, relevant at regional level, by 31/12/2008) Open approach: other / further members can be part of NRN “Ministry” ad “National Unit for Animation and Coordination” classify such members in thematic tasks forces in order to provide best efficiency in action implementation

13 Italian NRN organization

14 Italian NRN organization

15 Italian NRN organization

16 Italian NRN organization The Regional Sites  Independence and demarcation from proper RDP Technical Assistance (concerning activities and human resources)  BUT strong coordination with RDP Managing Authorities  Regional Sites have to implement at least art 68 mandatory actions and national strategic actions (targeting NSP objectives)  Free choice in implementing actions at requests (R)  Bilateral agreements Ministry – Regions on Regional sites organization in terms of human resources and structures involved (3 options: full; partial; minimal implementation of Regional Sites)

17 Human resources involved in NRN activities Ministry and Regional officials: involved in specific activities (TTF) Human resources coming from Ministry’s Technical Assistance Institutes For specific know-how  further national and international human resources Outsourcing of some actions or activities (calls) : when special support is needed

18 NATIONAL RURAL NETWORK Art. 68 EC Reg. 1698/ Art 41 EC Reg. 1974/2006 Mandatory elements of the Network (a) structures needed to run the network (max. 25% art 41 EC Reg. 1974/2006); (b) action plan containing at least : identification and analysis of good transferable practices and the provision of information about them, network management, the organisation of exchanges of experience and know-how, the preparation of training programmes for local action groups in the process of formation, technical assistance for inter-territorial and transnational cooperation. ITALIAN NRN ACTION PLAN MANDATORY ACTIONS + further ACTIONS necessary for fully reaching the 3 global objectives and National Strategic Plan targets Some actions are at Regional Request (R)

19 NATIONAL RURAL NETWORK GLOBAL OBJECTIVES 1)IMPROVEMENT OF GOVERNANCE 2)STRENGTHENING OF THE MANAGERIAL AND PLANNING CAPACITIES 3)DIFFUSION OF GOOD PRACTISES AND KNOWLEDGE

20 NRN ACTIONS 1) IMPROVEMENT OF GOVERNANCE Horizontal support to Administrations engaged in the Rural Development Programme implementation Support to the establishment of the “National monitoring and evaluation system” A national standing forum on partnership Inter-regional workshops for development (R)

21 NRN ACTIONS 2) STRENGTHENING OF THE MANAGERIAL AND PLANNING CAPACITIES Preparation of training programmes for Local Action Groups in the process of formation Organisation of exchanges of experience and know- how Workshops on pilot ideas and integrated projects (R) Technical assistance to inter-territorial and trans- national cooperation Technical assistance to cooperation among institutions (R)

22 NRN ACTIONS 3) DIFFUSION OF GOOD PRACTISES AND KNOWLEDGE Identification and analysis of transferable good practices/innovations and relevant information Transfer of good practices and innovations and relevant placement into different contexts (R) Supporting the promotion of services in favour of farmers (some actions R) Information on contents and results achieved by CAP and Rural Development Policies

23 NRN ACTIONS NETWORK MANAGEMENT (12,6%) Implementation, management and operation of Network’s structures Network’s Communication Plan and publicity of interventions Monitoring and evaluation of the Network

24 NRN FINANCIAL PLAN

25 NATIONAL RURAL NETWORK EU RURAL DEVELOPMENT POLICY  MAKING EUROPEAN AGRICULTURE MORE COMPETITIVE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT More DIVERSIFICATION & better QUALITY of LIFE Interaction among National Rural Networks  tool for Enhancing Rural Development Policy performances and impacts

26 NATIONAL RURAL NETWORK WHAT THE ITALIAN RURAL MODEL CAN OFFER ? 21 administrative models from which it is possible to get several administrative and managing solutions; RDPs implementation in a wide range of “agricultural and environmental systems”  possibility to transfer experiences in other contexts Agriculture based on “quality products”, “diversification”, “organic and integrated agriculture”, “strong cooperative association of farmers” CONCERNING THE NETWORK (use of Technical Assistance) “More NRN action plans in the Member States will be similar and compatible, bigger will be the effects and results of the networking activity; this will allow to create synergies for tackling common problems and improving public policies effectiveness”

27 Thank you for attention