Mamoun A. Rahman Surgical SHO Mr Osborne’s team. Introduction Blood transfusion: -Preoperative ( elective) -Intra/postoperative ( urgent) Blood transfusion.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Implementing NICE guidance
Advertisements

Adjuvant chemotherapy in resectable liver-limited metastasis colorectal cancer 指導VS: 鄧豪偉 財團法人台灣癌症臨床研究發展基金會.
CHEMOTHERAPY AND BLADDER CANCER Walter Stadler, MD, FACP University of Chicago.
 DISCUSSION Number of resected lymph nodes in esophageal surgery has been previously discussed as for its probable impact on patients’ survival [4]. The.
Impact of the Type and Modalities of Preoperative Chemotherapy on the Outcome of Liver Resection for Colorectal Metastases R. Adam, E. Barroso, C. Laurent,
By AMGAD FOUAD Professor Of Surgery Gastroenterology Center Gastroenterology Center Mansoura University. Factors Affecting survival after pancreatico.
Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Melanoma
62 years old man Main complaint: Back pain at night but not during the day Loss of appettite Weight loss.
CRITICAL READING OF THE LITERATURE RELEVANT POINTS: - End points (including the one used for sample size) - Surrogate end points - Quality of the performed.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration Notice: Archived Document The content in this document is provided on the FDA’s website for reference purposes only.
Management of Colorectal Liver Metastasis
Synovial sarcoma- which patients don’t need adjuvant treatment? Khan M, Rankin KS, Beckingsale TB, Todd R, Gerrand CH North of England Bone and Soft Tissue.
Clinical Relevance of HER2 Overexpression/Amplification in Patients with Small Tumor Size and Node-Negative Breast Cancer Curigliano G et al. J Clin Oncol.
Dr. LP Si Tseung Kwan O Hospital. Introduction CA stomach is the 4 th most commonly diagnosed malignancy worldwide 2 nd most common cause of cancer-related.
Management of early rectal carcinoma Joint Hospital Surgical Grand Round Jeren Lim United Christian Hospital.
Outcome Following Limb Salvage Surgery and External Beam Radiotherapy for High Grade Soft Tissue Sarcomas of the Groin and Axilla Rapin Phimolsarnti M.D.
THE SIGNIFICANCE OF HISTOLOGICAL SUBSTAGING IN CURATIVE RESECTED T3 COLORECTAL CANCER Karl Mrak & Jörg Tschmelitsch Department of Surgery, Barmherzige.
NORCCAG audit report 2011: mortality, survival and reconstructive rectal surgery David W Borowski for the members of the Northern Region Colorectal Cancer.
G.Liguori,G.Pirozzi^, I. Forte, G.Botti, R.Franco, A.La Rocca*, G.Rocco* Istituto Nazionale Tumori Napoli Dip.Anatomia Patologica; Dip.Onc.Sperimentale^;
Long-term follow-up of a prospective trial of pre-operative external-beam radiation and post-operative brachytherapy for retroperitoneal sarcoma LA Mikula,
Surrogate End point for Prostate Cancer- Specific Mortality After RP or EBRT A D’Amico J Nat Ca Inst 95,
Specialist surgery “Some surgeons perform less than optimal surgery. Some are less competent technically than their colleagues; and some fail to supervise.
Treatment strategies for colon cancer at TNM stage IV Gunnar Arbman Department of Surgery Norrköping, Sweden Bergen June 2011.
 Earliest possible diagnosis of the recurrence  Curative second-look surgery  Improved overall survival Follow-up The purpose of tumor markers.
Insert Program or Hospital Logo Introduction Melanoma is notoriously resistant to chemotherapy. While surgical resection and adjuvant chemotherapy can.
Clinical Trials Evaluating the Role of Sentinel Node Resection in Patients with Early-Stage Breast Cancer Krag DN et al. Proc ASCO 2010;Abstract LBA505.
The Colorectal Cancer Center Jena Gharbi A, Settmacher U. Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena
Validity of more than 30Gy radiation therapy for long-surviving patients with painful bone metastases E.Katayama 1,2, H.Okada 1, I.Asakawa 2, T.Tamamoto.
Adductor Compartment STS - Does method of treatment affect outcome? Anup Pradhan, Yiu-Chung Cheung Birmingham Medical School, UK Supervisors: Mr Robert.
SYNCHRONOUS COLORECTAL AND LIVER RESECTION J Peter A Lodge MD FRCS HPB and Transplant Unit St James’s University Hospital Leeds LS9 7TF 2006 Association.
Guanylyl Cyclase C (GCC) Lymph Nodes (LN) Classification as a Prognostic Marker in Patients with Stage II Colon Cancer: A Pooled Analysis Daniel J. Sargent,
Transanal Endoscopic Operation Indication – Technique – Results M. Sailer Department of Surgery Bethesda Hospital – Hamburg, Germany.
Delivering clinical research to make patients, and the NHS, better OG neoadjuvant therapy Brachytherapy Stephen Falk dd/mm/yyyy.
Thyroid Debate (Papillary Thyroid Cancer: Extent of Thyroidectomy) 30 Aug 2007 Surgery-OMMC JGGuerra, MD HCruz, MD.
T Andre, E Quinaux, C Louvet, E Gamelin, O Bouche, E Achille, P Piedbois, N Tubiana-Mathieu, M Buyse and A de Gramont. Updated results at 6 year of the.
The significance of extracapsular lymph node involvement in node- positive patients with adenocarcinoma of the distal oesophagus or gastro-oesophageal.
Prognosis of colon cancer compared with rectal cancer. Where lies the difference? Bjørn S. Nedrebø Stavanger University Hospital.
Enhanced biomedical scientist cut-up role in colonic carcinoma; preliminary performance data and comparison with departmental performance. E. J. V. Simmons*
A comparison of open vs laparoscopic emergency colonic surgery; short term results from a district general hospital. D Vijayanand, A Haq, D Roberts, &
Evidence for a Survival Benefit Conferred by Adjuvant Radiotherapy in a Cohort of 608 Women with Early-stage Endometrial Cancer O. Kenneth Macdonald 1,
Management of the primary in Stage IV colorectal cancer Erin Kennedy, MD, PhD, FRCSC Colorectal Surgery Mount Sinai Hospital University of Toronto.
Interesting case. OD yo man with irretrievable rectal TVA on screening colonoscopy, prior transanal excision 8 cm from anal verge Pmhx: hypothyroidism,
The Royal Marsden Solitary fibrous tumours The outcomes of 106 patients illustrating the unpredictable biological behaviour N Alexander, K Thway, JM Thomas,
Mamoun A. Rahman Mr Osborne’s team January 2009 Paper of the Week.
Definition Signs & symptoms Treatment Root of the disease.
Dr Mark Saunders Christie Hospital and Paterson Institute of Cancer Research “ Rectal cancer radiotherapy – why do we give it and how do we do it?”
Identification of localized rectal cancer (RC) patients (pts) who may NOT require preoperative (preop) chemoradiation (CRT). D. Roda 1, M. Frasson 2, E.
Important questions As good or better ? Cost effective ? Overall, safer? Is it safe as a cancer operation? Can all surgeons do it? Compare to open surgery.
Date of download: 5/31/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: Outcome of Salvage Total Laryngectomy Following Organ.
Radical Prostatectomy versus Watchful Waiting in Early Prostate Cancer Anna Bill-Axelson, M.D., Lars Holmberg, M.D., Ph.D., Mirja Ruutu, M.D., Ph.D., Michael.
Association of Family History with Cancer Recurrence and Survival in Patients with Gastric Cancer Journal of Clinical Oncology : R2 Hwang.
ABSTRACT Purpose This retrospective review was conducted to determine if delay in the start of radiotherapy after conservative breast surgery had any detrimental.
RECTAL CARCINOMA AND PREOPERATIVE MRI: USING A NATIONAL DATASET FOR REGIONAL AUDIT South West Cancer Intelligence Service J Weeks
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of NSCLC Department of Thoracic Oncology, University Hospital Ghent, Belgium Current Opinion in Oncology 2007,
PANCREATODUODENECTOMY + MULTIVISCERAL RESECTION YES/NO
Brain imaging prior to lung cancer resection
Short-term outcome of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy
Lako S, Daka A, Nurka T, Dedej T, Memishaj S
Stage I Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): single centre comparison of outcome by treatment with surgery, conventional radiotherapy and stereotactic ablative.
Cancer Hospital & Institute, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
Treatment With Continuous, Hyperfractionated, Accelerated Radiotherapy (CHART) For Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): The Weston Park Hospital Experience.
Prognosis of younger patients in non-small cell lung cancer
EMT inducing transcription factor SIP1: a predictive biomarker of colorectal cancer survival and recurrence? A Patel, R Sreekumar, R Bhome, KA Moutasim,
Laparoscopic vs Open Colonic Surgery: Long Term Survival
Improved survival outcomes after resection of ductal adenocarcinoma in the body and tail of the pancreas: A single center 10 years’ experience Seong.
Dr Jessica Jenkins Consultant Oncologist
The role of simultaneous resection of synchronous liver metastasis and primary colorectal cancer Samuel Lo Department of Surgery.
Published online September 20, 2017 by JAMA Surgery
Adjuvant chemotherapy after potentially curative resection of metastases from colorectal cancer. A meta-analysis of two randomized trials E Mitry, A Fields,
Nursing care of patients operated-on for CRC
Presentation transcript:

Mamoun A. Rahman Surgical SHO Mr Osborne’s team

Introduction Blood transfusion: -Preoperative ( elective) -Intra/postoperative ( urgent) Blood transfusion and prognosis has been a topic of debate in colorectal cancer surgery Over 100 retrospective and at least 3 prospective RT have been published in the literature Vamvakas et al, Deleterious clinical effects of transfusion-associated immunomodulation: fact or fiction? Blood 2001 ? Immuno- suppressive effects of blood transfusion might adversely affect prognosis : - Enhancement of tumour growth -Recurrence and metastasis -Increased susceptibility to postoperative infection Circumstances that necessitate transfusion may be responsible for the adverse outcome

Large Bowel Cancer Project is a collaborative prospective study involving 94 surgeons and 38 pathologists in 23 hospitals in the United Kingdom in the period 1976 to1980 Objective: To establish the effect of blood transfusion on outcome of patients underwent curative resection for large bowel cancer Results: 961 patients studied 591 (61%) received a blood transfusion 370(39%) did not Age, sex, presence of bowel obstruction or perforation and tumour differentiation were equal variables Tumour site, Dukes’ stage and tumour fixity were unequaly distributed Not transfused n=370(%) Transfused n=591 (%) Statistical comparison Local recurrence Present Absent 58 (16) 312 (84) 113 (19) 478 (81) x2= 1.8 P=NS Distant metastasis Present Absent 63 (17) 307 (83) 98 (17) 493 (83) x2=0.o3 P=NS

Results ( cont..): survival Small difference in survival between the two groups Statistically not significant

This study showed No overall effect of blood transfusion on large bowel cancer patient survival

Blood transfusion and survival in colorectal cancer D. M. Sibbering, A. P. Locker 1, J. D. Hardcastle 1 and N. C. Armitage 1 Department of Surgery, University Hospital, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, UK Department of Surgery, City Hospital, NG5 1PB Nottingham, UK April, 1994

Purpose: To examine the effect of blood transfusion on the prognosis of patients undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer Methods: 266 patients Potentially curative resections for colorectal cancer Prospective study Minimum follow-up: 41 months. Transfused (n=121) and nontransfused (n=145) Results: Conclusion: No statistically significant effect of perioperative blood transfusion on the prognosis of colorectal cancer patients VariablesX2dfP Rectal tumours : more in transfused Fixed tumours : more in transfused Recurrence-free survival : no significant difference Overall survival: no significant difference

Background: Indications for preoperative and intra/postoperative transfusion are different but they were usually pooled together Objective Compared outcome of patients who received preoperative blood with patients who did not receive any transfusion Methods: January 1980 and December 1995 Retrospective study Sample size was 333, 61 transfused & 272 were not Mean follow-up period: 58.6 months

Results: Preoperative Transfusion (n=61) No transfusionP Total complications (n=316)13/55 (23.6%)81/261 (31.0%)0.275 Wound infection1 (1.9%)37 (14.2%)0.011 Postoperative death (n=315)3/54 (5.6%)11/261 (4.2%)0.441 Loco-regional recurrence (n =175) 4/26 (15.4%)23/149 (15.4%)0.630 Distant metastasis (n=183)7/30 (23.3%)31/153 (20.3%)0.716 Death on follow-up (n=265)17/43 (39.5%)59/222 (26.6%)0.085 Disease-free survival was not significantly different between the groups (p=0.134)

Conclusion: Preoperative blood transfusion in this series: -Did not increase postoperative complications -Did not affect local or distant recurrence -Did not affect disease-free survival rate

Diseases of the COLON & RECTUM, 2006

Purpose: To determine whether type or number of blood units transfused affected short and long-term outcome in patients undergoing surgery for rectal cancer Methods: Between January 1984 and July patients Results for type (autologous or allogenic) and number of units transfused were recorded Follow-up ended February 2005

Type of bloodMultivariate Analysis of Overall Survival Multivariate Analysis of Disease-Free Survival Autologous transfusionP= P= Allogenic transfusionP= P= Autologous and allogenic transfusion P= P= No transfusion-- Results Number of units transfusedMultivariate Analysis of Overall Survival Multivariate Analysis of Disease-Free Survival 1–3 transfusionsP= >3 transfusionsP= No transfusion--

In this study Type or number of perioperative blood transfusions did not influence local recurrence, distant metastases, or disease-free survival in rectal cancer patients Tumour-related factors and adjuvant therapy determined oncologic outcome

Background: Blood transfusions have been indicated as having an adverse effect on the prognosis of colorecatal cancer Objective: Is autologous better than allogeneic blood transfusion Methods: Randomized, multicenter trial 420 patients who underwent curative operations for colorectal cancer Follow-up period of was 2.3 years

Results: 143 patients :no transfusion 277 transfused (134 allogeneic, 101 autologus & 42 both) Disease-free survival was better in untransfused group

Results ( cont..) Dukes’ A Dukes’ B Dukes’ C 2% 23% 49% < % 10% 27% Well differentiated Moderately differ. Poorly differ. 20% 249% 25% % 14% 4% NS MetastasesLog Rank p Value Local Recurrence Log Rank p Value Randomization: Allogeneic group Autologous group 27% 25% NS11% 17% NS No transfusion Transfusion 25% 27% NS3% 20% Blood loss (mL) <500 >500 and <1000 > % 28% NS 4% 14% 24% 0.001

The current study shows Both types of blood transfusion are associated with increased risk of local recurrences but not of metastatic disease Circumstances that necessitate transfusions lead to the development of local recurrences

Conclusion It’s has been suggested that blood transfusion adversely affect prognosis in colorectal cancer Immunologic factors believed to be implicated Presented evidence showed: - No overall effect of blood transfusion on prognosis - No difference between allogenic and autologus blood on prognostic effect - Immunogenic effect has been eliminated - Circumstances that necessitate transfusions lead to the development of local recurrences: Extent of the disease Experience of the surgeon Specialized units improve prognosis