KCS and RDR 10 Hz Operation Chris Adolphsen BAW2, SLAC 1/20/2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Breakdown Rate Dependence on Gradient and Pulse Heating in Single Cell Cavities and TD18 Faya Wang, Chris Nantista and Chris Adolphsen May 1, 2010.
Advertisements

11/27/2007ILC Power and Cooling VM Workshop Mike Neubauer 1 RF Power and Cooling Requirements Overview from “Main Linac Power and Cooling Information”
KCS Ongoing R&D Christopher Nantista SLAC LCWS11 Granada, Spain September 29, …… …… …… … ….
X-band Structures Test Results at NLCTA Faya Wang Chris Adolphsen, Christopher Nantista 9-Feb-11.
Baseline Configuration - Highlights Barry Barish ILCSC 9-Feb-06.
1 X-band Single Cell and T18_SLAC_2 Test Results at NLCTA Faya Wang Chris Adolphsen Jul
Christopher Nantista ML-SCRF Technology Meeting July 28, 2010 REPORT.
Global Design Effort - CFS Baseline Assessment Workshop 2 - SLAC Reduced Bunch Number 1 BASELINE ASSESSMENT WORKSHOP 2 CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.
Christopher Nantista ILC 2 nd Baseline Assessment Workshop (BAW-2) SLAC January 18, …… …… …… … ….
Christopher Nantista 2011 Linear Collider Workshop of the Americas (ALCPG11) University of Oregon, Eugene March 20, …… …… …… … ….
KCS Operational Issues Chris Adolphsen, Chris Nantista and Faya Wang GDE PAC Review at KEK 12/12/12.
RF Distribution Alternatives R.A.Yogi & FREIA group Uppsala University.
Cost Impacts of two e- ML cycles at sqrt(s) < 250 GeV purpose: not to generate a new ILC estimate, but to facilitate SB2009 decisions Peter H. Garbincius,
Global Design Effort - CFS Baseline Assessment Workshop 2 - SLAC Positron Source Relocation 1 BASELINE ASSESSMENT WORKSHOP 2 CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES.
1 C-Band Linac Development Satoshi Ohsawa 2004.Feb.19LCPAC.
Linac Marx Modulator Update Trevor Butler 5/20/2015.
Chris Adolphsen 10/03/09 MLI and HLRF Summary. Vladimir Kashikhin.
Proposed machine parameters Andrei Seryi July 23, 2010.
Klystron Modulator for Proton Driver
Christopher Nantista ARD R&D Status Meeting SLAC February 3, …… …… …… … ….
XFEL SRF Accelerating Module Prototypes Tests at DESY Fermilab Seminar, July 21st Denis Kostin, MHF-SL, DESY.
Clustered Surface RF Production Scheme Chris Adolphsen Chris Nantista SLAC.
Baseline Workshop Preparation At the close of each BAW, we would like to write down a summary that is based on our common understanding of the issues.
Klystron Cluster RF Distribution Scheme Chris Adolphsen Chris Nantista SLAC.
Vladimir Kashikhin. FLASH Cavity Gradient Stability Comparison of beam-off measurements of pulse-to-pulse cavity gradient jitter during the flattop.
Klystron Cluster RF Distribution Scheme Chris Adolphsen Chris Nantista SLAC.
CLIC meeting, Prospects for developing new tubes I. Syratchev, CERN.
Accelerator Laboratory 1 CFS Review of Asian Region (S. Fukuda) June 1/ Hz Operation in DRFS HLRF System KEK S. Fukuda.
Marc Ross Nick Walker Akira Yamamoto ‘Overhead and Margin’ – an attempt to set standard terminology 10 Sept 2010 Overhead and Margin 1.
L-band (1.3 GHz) 5-Cell SW Cavity High Power Test Results Faya Wang, Chris Adolphsen SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory
KSC Operation Control of Cavity Gradients Failure Analysis Near and Long Term R&D Effect on Beam Emittance Chris Adolphsen SLAC 9/7/2010 Going Native in.
Christopher Nantista ILC10 Beijing, China March 27, 2010.
Proton Driver Main Linac Parameter Optimization G. W. Foster Proton Driver General Meeting Jan 19, 2005.
Linac RF Source Recommendations for Items 22,23,24,46,47 Chris Adolphsen.
RF scheme of electron linear accelerator with energy MeV Levichev A.E. Budker Institute of Nuclear Physics SB RAS.
Development of The Klystrons for J-PARC Project
Aug 23, 2006 Half Current Option: Impact on Linac Cost Chris Adolphsen With input from Mike Neubauer, Chris Nantista and Tom Peterson.
John Carwardine 21 st October 2010 TTF/FLASH 9mA studies: Main studies objectives for January 2011.
L-band test stations in End Station B Richard Swent.
How CLIC-Zero can become less expensive A.Grudiev, D. Schulte 16/06/09.
Comparison of Fermilab Proton Driver to Suggested Energy Amplifier Linac Bob Webber April 13, 2007.
ESS Linac Modifications for ESSnuSB Dave McGinnis Chief Engineer / Accelerator Division August 27, 2014.
Global Design Effort - CFS Oct IWLC ML Single Tunnel Cross Section GDE Asian Regional Team KEK A. Enomoto.
KCS Main Waveguide Testing Chris Adolphsen Chris Nantista and Faya Wang LCWS12 Arlington, Texas October 25, 2012.
Jan Low Energy 10 Hz Operation in DRFS (Fukuda) (Fukuda) 1 Low Energy 10Hz Operation in DRFS S. Fukuda KEK.
GDE meeting Beijing (Mar.27, 2010) 1 DRFS LLRF system configuration Shin MICHIZONO KEK LLRF lack layout for DRFS DRFS cavity grouping HLRF requirements.
1 LLRF requirements/issues for DRFS Shin MICHIZONO (KEK) BAW1 (Sep.8, 2010)
Main Linac Issues for RDR 1/20/2006 Area group H. Hayano From Linac Area discussion posted on the web:
Cost Impacts of Reduced # Bunches per Train purpose: not to generate a new ILC estimate, but to facilitate SB2009 decisions Peter H. Garbincius, Fermilab.
HLRF R&D Towards the TDR Christopher Nantista ML-SCRF Webex meeting June 29, 2011.
1 Tuner performance with LLRF control at KEK Shin MICHIZONO (KEK) Dec.07 TTC Beijing (Michizono) S1G (RDR configuration) - Detuning monitor - Tuner control.
High-efficiency L-band klystron development for the CLIC Drive Beam High-efficiency L-band klystron development for the CLIC Drive Beam CLIC workshop,
ESS Linac Upgrade Dave McGinnis Chief Engineer / Accelerator Division May 27, 2014.
A CW Linac scheme for CLIC drive beam acceleration. Hao Zha, Alexej Grudiev 07/06/2016.
1 DR 10 Hz Repetition Rate S. Guiducci (LNF) AD&I webex, 23 June 2010.
HLRF Post-TTC Meeting (Fukuda)
ILC Power and Cooling VM Workshop
ILC High Power Distribution
KEK Marx-Modulator R&D
High efficiency work and MBK development for accelerators
A 6 GeV Compact X-ray FEL (CXFEL) Driven by an X-Band Linac
Q &A for the questions from CFS of April 29,2011
RF operation with fixed Pks
A frequency choice for the SPL machine: Impact on hardware
Water Cooling issue (Klystron Cooling)
Chris Adolphsen Sergei Nagaitsev
DRFS and Low Energy 10 Hz Option
ATF project meeting, Feb KEK, Junji Urakawa Contents :
Jiquan Guo, Haipeng Wang
Presentation transcript:

KCS and RDR 10 Hz Operation Chris Adolphsen BAW2, SLAC 1/20/2011

Assumptions At lower gradients, reduce modulator voltage and increase pulse rate so nominal average modulator input power not exceeded - thus the charging power supplies would see the same or smaller load (which is roughly constant), and the AC power capacity would not have to be increased. Time Modulator Cell Voltage Same Slope Discharge Level Differs Every Other Pulse Additional line ripple introduced by alternating discharge levels would need to be reduced in the site electrical distribution system. 5 Hz10 Hz

SLAC/KEK Toshiba 10 MW MBK Efficiency and Output Power Versus Beam Voltage

Cases Considered 250 GeV, 5 Hz –Modulator Voltage = 117 kV, Klystron Power = 10 MW, Kly Eff = 68% 150 GeV, 5 Hz –Cavity QL = (150/250) times that at 250 GeV – fill time shortened by the same factor –Modulator Voltage = 99.5 kV, Klystron Power = 6 MW, Kly Eff = 60% 125 GeV, 5 Hz –Assume same QL as for 150 GeV (cannot switch between pulses) –Required rf power = 6 MW * ¼ * ( /150)^2 = 5.04 MW, just slightly more as if QL were optimized for 125 GeV –Reflected power during beam = 6 MW * ¼ * ( /150)^2 =.04 MW –Also the fill time is (150/125)*log( /150)/log(2) = 1.05 times longer than if QL were optimized for 125 GeV –Modulator Voltage = same as 150 GeV case (although may be able to run at a lower modulator voltage every other pulse). To lower the RF power for KCS, reduce number of ‘on’ klystrons by 1 – (5.04/6)^0.5 = 8%, while for the RDR case, reduce the rf drive power.

Results 10 Hz

Summary The half current case clearly exceeds the RDR average modulator input power limit when running at 150 GeV (5 Hz) GeV (5 Hz), but this added capacity is needed anyway run at 250 GeV (5 Hz) with half current. The full current case is marginal at 10 Hz although if can alternate the modulator voltages, only 4% more AC power would be required. The half bunches, same rf pulse case for 150 GeV (5 Hz) GeV (5 Hz) would work and does not require any increased capacity (AC, cooling or cryo)

Klystron Cluster Scheme Tests Resonantly power a 0.5 m diameter, pressurized (1 atm N2), 10 m long aluminum pipe to 300 MW TE01 mode field equivalent in 1 ms pulses

Time of Position 2 markers (T1,T2) are ~ 1 ms later than those from Position 1, which suggest events are much closer to Position 1 (5 m / 5100 m/s ~ 1 ms) T1 T2 Acoustic Sensor Breakdown Localization CTO KW input power yields 300 MW equivalent surface fields in the pipe - see bkd every ~ 15 hours, maybe from CTO or upstream – rate seems very pressure dependent ‘Big Pipe’ Operation

Next: 160 m Resonate Ring