1 Electronics Status Trigger and DAQ run successfully in RUN2006 for the first time Trigger communication to DRS boards via trigger bus Trigger firmware.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Kondo GNANVO Florida Institute of Technology, Melbourne FL.
Advertisements

A scalable DAQ system using the DRS4 sampling chip H.Friederich 1, G.Davatz 1, U.Hartmann 2, A.Howard 1, H.Meyer 1, D.Murer 1, S.Ritt 2, N.Schlumpf 2 1.
PSI - Jun. 27th, Status of the electronics systems of the MEG experiment.
Tracker DAQ Makoto Yoshida (Osaka Univ.) MICE Frascati 2005/6/27.
Alice EMCAL Meeting, July 2nd EMCAL global trigger status: STU design progress Olivier BOURRION LPSC, Grenoble.
28 August 2002Paul Dauncey1 Readout electronics for the CALICE ECAL and tile HCAL Paul Dauncey Imperial College, University of London, UK For the CALICE-UK.
VC Sept 2005Jean-Sébastien Graulich Report on DAQ Workshop Jean-Sebastien Graulich, Univ. Genève o Introduction o Monitoring and Control o Detector DAQ.
CFT Calibration Calibration Workshop Calibration Requirements Calibration Scheme Online Calibration databases.
July 16/17, 2002 MUEGAMMA review PSI1 Slow Control.
1 DAQ Update. 2 DAQ Status DAQ was running successfully and stably in ’07 beam time Trigger bus scheme has proven to be very flexible – Added additional.
Straw electronics Straw Readout Board (SRB). Full SRB - IO Handling 16 covers – Input 16*2 links 400(320eff) Mbits/s Control – TTC – LEMO – VME Output.
Lecce - 23 Sep The Trigger System of the MEG Experiment Marco Grassi INFN - Pisa On behalf of D. Nicolò F. Morsani S. Galeotti M. Grassi.
1 S. E. Tzamarias Hellenic Open University N eutrino E xtended S ubmarine T elescope with O ceanographic R esearch Readout Electronics DAQ & Calibration.
The Trigger Prototype Board Status Marco Grassi INFN - Pisa On behalf of trigger group D. Nicolò F. Morsani S. Galeotti M. Grassi.
UCN-nEDM DAQ DAQ and Slow Control L.Lee 1 July 3, 2013.
2 1/March/2015 日本物理学会大70回年次大会@早稲田大学 東大ICEPP 内山雄祐 他 MEG II collaboration.
14/02/2007 Paolo Walter Cattaneo 1 1.Trigger analysis 2.Muon rate 3.Q distribution 4.Baseline 5.Pulse shape 6.Z measurement 7.Att measurement OUTLINE.
AHCAL electronics. Status and Outlook Peter Göttlicher for the AHCAL developers CALICE meeting UT Arlington, March 11th, 2010.
C.Schrader; Oct 2008, CBM Collaboration Meeting, Dubna, Russia R/O concept of the MVD demonstrator C.Schrader, S. Amar-Youcef, A. Büdenbender, M. Deveaux,
Status of the Beam Phase and Intensity Monitor for LHCb Richard Jacobsson Zbigniew Guzik Federico Alessio TFC Team: Motivation Aims Overview of the board.
14 February 2007Fabrizio Cei1 INFN and University of Pisa PSI Review Meeting PSI, 14 February 2007 Status of MEG Software.
DAQ+trigger operation during 2008 run D. Nicolò University of Pisa & INFN, Pisa.
ATLAS Liquid Argon Calorimeter Monitoring & Data Quality Jessica Levêque Centre de Physique des Particules de Marseille ATLAS Liquid Argon Calorimeter.
Prediction W. Buchmueller (DESY) arXiv:hep-ph/ (1999)
Clara Gaspar, March 2005 LHCb Online & the Conditions DB.
March 6, INST02, Novosibirsk1 Electronics for the  e  experiment at PSI Short introduction Trigger electronics DAQ electronics Slow Control For the.
06/09/2011TIPP Introduction Observational study of supernova explosion (SN) is important for understanding the mechanism of SN in detail. – Observation.
The DRS2 Chip: A 4.5 GHz Waveform Digitizing Chip for the MEG Experiment Stefan Ritt Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland.
Dec.11, 2008 ECL parallel session, Super B1 Results of the run with the new electronics A.Kuzmin, Yu.Usov, V.Shebalin, B.Shwartz 1.New electronics configuration.
PSI - Jul. 18th, Status of the electronics and DAQ systems of the MEG experiment.
NUMI Off Axis NUMI Off Axis Workshop Workshop Argonne Meeting Electronics for RPCs Gary Drake, Charlie Nelson Apr. 25, 2003 p. 1.
1 DAQ Update MEG Review Meeting, Feb. 17 th 2010.
January 31, MICE DAQ MICE and ISIS Introduction MICE Detector Front End Electronics Software and MICE DAQ Architecture MICE Triggers Status and Schedule.
12GeV Trigger Workshop Christopher Newport University 8 July 2009 R. Chris Cuevas Welcome! Workshop goals: 1.Review  Trigger requirements  Present hardware.
Update on final LAV front-end M. Raggi, T. Spadaro, P. Valente & G. Corradi, C. Paglia, D. Tagnani.
1 07/10/07 Forward Vertex Detector Technical Design – Electronics DAQ Readout electronics split into two parts – Near the detector (ROC) – Compresses and.
IPHC - DRS Gilles CLAUS 04/04/20061/20 EUDET JRA1 Meeting, April 2006 MAPS Test & DAQ Strasbourg OUTLINE Summary of MimoStar 2 Workshop CCMOS DAQ Status.
Sep. 17, 2002BESIII Review Meeting BESIII DAQ System BESIII Review Meeting IHEP · Beijing · China Sep , 2002.
All Experimenters MeetingDmitri Denisov Week of July 7 to July 15 Summary  Delivered luminosity and operating efficiency u Delivered: 1.4pb -1 u Recorded:
1 April 2009 NA62 DAQ meeting1 LKr calorimeter readout project H.Boterenbrood, A.Ceccucci, B.Hallgren, M.Piccini, H. Wendler.
NTOF DAQ status D. Macina (EN-STI-EET) Acknowledgements: EN-STI-ECE section: A. Masi, A. Almeida Paiva, M. Donze, M. Fantuzzi, A. Giraud, F. Marazita,
1 Calorimeters LED control LHCb CALO meeting Anatoli Konoplyannikov /ITEP/ Status of the calorimeters LV power supply and ECS control Status of.
PSI - 11 Feb Status of the electronic systems of the MEG Experiment.
D. Attié, P. Baron, D. Calvet, P. Colas, C. Coquelet, E. Delagnes, R. Joannes, A. Le Coguie, S. Lhenoret, I. Mandjavidze, M. Riallot, E. Zonca TPC Electronics:
Pisa - Apr. 28th, The Trigger System Marco Grassi INFN - Pisa.
DHCAL Jan Blaha R&D is in framework of the CALICE collaboration CLIC08 Workshop CERN, 14 – 17 October 2008.
A. Tsirigotis Hellenic Open University N eutrino E xtended S ubmarine T elescope with O ceanographic R esearch Reconstruction, Background Rejection Tools.
THE WaveDAQ SYSTEM FOR THE MEG II UPGRADE … read out by MIDAS Stefan Ritt, Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland 15 July 2015MIDAS Workshop, TRIUMF Paul.
DAQ ELECTRONICS 18 March 2015MEG Collaboration Meeting, Tokyo Stefan Ritt.
Upgrade of the MEG liquid xenon calorimeter with VUV-light sensitive large area SiPMs Kei Ieki for the MEG-II collaboration 1 II.
DAQ 1000 Tonko Ljubicic, Mike LeVine, Bob Scheetz, John Hammond, Danny Padrazo, Fred Bieser, Jeff Landgraf.
Sumary of the LKr WG R. Fantechi 31/8/2012. SLM readout restart First goal – Test the same configuration as in 2010 (rack TS) – All old power supplies.
VC98 March 07Jean-Sébastien GraulichSlide 1 DDAQ Status o DAQ Software o Front-End and Trigger o What will happen soon o Schedule Milestones Jean-Sebastien.
Proposal for the after-pulse effect suppression  Observation of pulses and after-pulses  Shape measurement  Algorithm  Results  Efficiencies for after-pulse.
Eric Hazen1 Ethernet Readout With: E. Kearns, J. Raaf, S.X. Wu, others... Eric Hazen Boston University.
M. Tiemens, M. Kavatsyuk KVI, University of Groningen EMC Front-End Electronics for the Preassembly.
Front-end Electronic for a neutrino telescope : a new ASIC SCOTT
Marcin Chrząszcz Cracow University of Technology Itamar Levy
ALICE – First paper.
The WaveDAQ System for the MEG II Upgrade
Run experience Cover FW SRB FW DAQ and monitoring
Hellenic Open University
Status of n-XYTER read-out chain at GSI
Example of DAQ Trigger issues for the SoLID experiment
CLAS12 Timing Calibration
Stefan Ritt Paul Scherrer Institute, Switzerland
The Trigger System Marco Grassi INFN - Pisa
The CMS Tracking Readout and Front End Driver Testing
The LHCb Front-end Electronics System Status and Future Development
Trigger operation during 2007 run
Presentation transcript:

1 Electronics Status Trigger and DAQ run successfully in RUN2006 for the first time Trigger communication to DRS boards via trigger bus Trigger firmware and DRS firmware was modified during beam time and downloaded Both DRS and trigger waveforms were read out by front-end computers (drivers and readout routines were successfully implemented) DRS and DAQ system 4 front-end computers, 1 back-end computer, MIDAS software 60 channels TC, 9 channels NaI, 864 channels DC ~600 GB in the last few days of RUN2006 MSCB Slow control system was successfully operated during beam time including MSCB high voltage system

2 Trigger

boards 14 x 48 Type LXe front face (216 PMTs) 2 boards boards 9 x 48 Type LXe lateral faces back (216 PMTs) 4 in 1 lat. (144x2 PMTs) 4 in 1 up/down (54x2 PMTs) 4 in 1 1 board Timing counters curved (640 APDs) 8 in 1 u/d stream (30x2 PMTs) 1 board 2 x 48 Type boards 9 x 48 Type boards 2 x 48 Type Drift chambers channels 2 x 48 1 x 48 Type1 1 x Auxiliary devices 16 (9) channels Trigger System Structure

4 ARGUS monitor (scalers) Rate of individual channels (independent of trigger)

5 Trigger scheme for TC A L (mV) A R (mV) A L > 50 mV && A R > 50 mV excluded && A L +A R > 200 mV excluded  trigger selection independent of z  50 mV threshold ~ 100  150 mV at PMT output

6 Trigger Waveforms Trigger window …

7 Efficiency study events associated with the trigger signal ss low intensity (slit = 10%) high intensity (slit = 100%) ss “unbiased” events (out of trigger window and with 10 mV threshold)

8 Efficiency profile (all PMTs) Unbiased (10mV) Trigger (50mV & 200mV) N pe Landau peak for e+ Secondary particles rescaled by R pulse  T  = N T /N U  almost full efficiency at Landau peak (~6MeV, ~500pe) Interpolation by erf function

9 Trigger Conclusions Trigger system was completed and installed last summer (both Hardware and Firmware) Successfully linked to DRS & DAQ online Monitor tools developed Properly worked during December run TC event selection WFD for PMTs Proved to be ~100% efficient for energy losses in the Landau peak Very low noise (RMS~0.4 mV)

10 DAQ System

11 DAQ Cluster 6 crates DRS Hit registers Trigger 3 crates 20 MHz clock start stop sync Trigger signal Event number Trigger type Trigg er Bus y Ancillary system  E5 area ‘cave’ PC (Linux) Front-End PCs Run start Run stop Trigger config PC (Linux) Gigabit Ethernet On-line farm PC (Linux) storage PC (Linux) Event builder

12 Offline Cluster 5 x 4 CPUs SunFire X TB disk storage Planned in ’07: 64 CPU TB disk lcmeg05 lcmeg04 lcmeg03 lcmeg02 lcmeg01

13 Correlation DRS vs. Trigger waveform Signal height of DRS waveform (10:1) – Trigger waveform (2.5:1)

14 Crosstalk removal Reduction of (coherent) noise band cross talk by averaging “empty” channels and subtracting signal channels: Noise level: 0.5 mV → 0.32 mV Baseline fluctuation (100 ns): 0.27 mV → 0.07 mV Reduction of (coherent) noise band cross talk by averaging “empty” channels and subtracting signal channels: Noise level: 0.5 mV → 0.32 mV Baseline fluctuation (100 ns): 0.27 mV → 0.07 mV

15 Overall Data Rate Now had 2.8 MB events (50% DC + TC, no LXe) and could run at ~10 Hz Full detector estimates: 9 MB/event, 5 Hz, 650 TB/year Zero suppression (50% on LXe, 80% on DC) ADC/TDC values for non-signal-like events Partial waveform readout (reduced window size) 3 rd level trigger in online cluster Applying all this techniques: 100 Hz “ADC rate” 6 Hz “Waveform rate” 100Hz30 TB/year DRS firmware 500 ns 200 ns Integral if no pile-up

16 DRS3 status All channels are currently equipped with DRS2, ran reasonably well during beam time DRS2 shows temperature dependence which should be fixed with DRS3 chip (improved amplitude accuracy) 50 Prototypes DRS3 have been delivered Test board PCB is in production Test chip until March ’07 Mass production in summer ’07 if tests ok Replace DRS2 by DRS3 in 2007/08 shutdown

17 Slow Control

18 MSCB slow control overview Cluster Switch 8 Ethernet “Submasters” 4+ SCS-2000 units each with up to 64 I/O HV system with 1054 channels 8 Ethernet “Submasters” 4+ SCS-2000 units each with up to 64 I/O HV system with 1054 channels

19 BTS slow control

20 Long term BTS levels

21 HV system 900 channels for LXe calorimeter Designed and built at PSI 24-bit ADCs for high accuracy (20mV) Once micro controller per five channels Read out every 4 seconds 60 channels TC + 64 channels APD Run stably in last beam time Redesign of MSCB protocol resulted in increased readout speed (4 sec. for all channels, 0.5 sec. for last modified)

22 Future Plan Fine-tune trigger firmware as detectors come online Increase DAQ speed to 100 Hz until next beam time Data reduction (Tokyo Workshop end of March ’07) 3 rd level trigger Improve front-end code and DRS firmware Replace DRS2 by DRS3 If tests of DRS3 are successful, replace towards end ’07 If DRS3 is not working, redesign required (+0.5 y) Finances All electronics bought Spare PSI funds for DRS3 allocated Funding of extension of offline cluster secured (PSI part)