February 19, 2009 ERCOT Follow up on questions from 2/11 discussion on proposed Expedited Switch rulemaking changes…

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Market True-Up Discussion RMS Meeting 03/13/02 Draft Only for Discussion Purposes.
Advertisements

AMS DATA WORKSHOP III TDSP UPDATE September 19,
1.  An inadvertent issue begins upon the discovery of an Inadvertent Gain or Move-In transaction submission. Upon identification of an Inadvertent Gain.
1 Pre-TX Set 1.5 Data Clean Up. 2 Pre-TX SET 1.5 Data Clean-up Process In-Review - currently 12 (Original Quantity = 863) –June RMS, count 207 In-Review.
Retail Market Update June 5, New meter is requested for a specific customer’s location. 2.Application is filed by customer and/or the customer’s.
Role of Account Management at ERCOT PRR 672 Collaborative Analysis Presentation to RMS November 8, 2006 DRAFT ONLY.
1 Update to RMS December 8, Texas SET 4.0 Change Controls
1 Transaction or Issue Clean Up. 2 Linked-Address Issue Multiple ESI IDs Linked to a Single Service Address Record Background Counts Matrix Completed.
RMS Update to TAC January 3, Goals Update ► Complete and improve SCR745, Retail Market Outage Evaluation & Resolution, implementation and reporting.
1 MIMO/Stacking (Including Tx SET Version 2.0) Post Implementation Success Report.
Profiling Working Group August 2, PWG Update Report By Ernie Podraza of Reliant Energy ERCOT PWG Chair for COPS Meeting August 22, 2006.
1 RMS Task Force on Retail Market Customer/ESI Transition October 16, 2003.
Retail Market Subcommittee Update to COPS Kathy Scott July 16,
Retail Market Subcommittee Update to TAC Kathy Scott February 27,
Retail Market Subcommittee Update to COPS Kathy Scott May 13,
RMS Update to TAC January 8, Voting Items From RMS meeting on 12/10/2008  RMGRR069: Texas SET Retail Market Guide Clean-up – Section 7: Historical.
Role of Account Management at ERCOT ERCOT – TX SET 814_20 Discussions 10/25/06.
09/15/10 RMS RMS Market Reports – Recommendations Karen Farley Manager, Retail Customer Choice.
Role of Account Management at ERCOT PRR 672 Collaborative Analysis October 2, 2006 DRAFT ONLY.
Acquisition Transfer Switch Hold Notifications Critical Care Changes AMS Meter Indicator Same Day Move Outs Same Day Switches Same Day Move In Date Change.
1 Supporting materials for RMS Recommendations for improvements from EDIM team (ESI ID Data Integrity Management team)
Texas Test Plan Team Market Testing Update to RMS October 16, 2002.
10/13/10 RMS RMS Market Reports – Recommendations Karen Farley Manager, Retail Customer Choice.
RMS Update to TAC April 7, RMS Voting Items  RMGRR032- Transaction Timing Matrix Corrections Includes updates to Appendix D to correct examples.
1 C urrent Market Release TX SET V2.0 / Solution to Stacking.
TX SET v2.1 Implementation Plan. Table of Contents A.Shut Down Procedure B.Shut Down Timeline Details C.Conference Calls D.Additional Contingencies.
Texas SET Version 3.0 Production Implementation Plan.
1 MVI/MVO Workshop June 3 – 12, 2002 Workshop Results.
Retail Market Subcommittee Update to COPS Kathy Scott March 17,
1 RMS Update on Move-In / Move-Out Task Force November 14, 2002.
MARS 867_03F ROR vs. Settlement vs. 810 Scenarios ERCOT September 2008.
1 Transaction or Issue Clean Up. 2 Linked-Address Issue Multiple ESI IDs Linked to a Single Service Address Record Background Counts Matrix Completed.
1 Linked-Service Address Discussion Thursday - April 8, 2004 (Updated 4/12/04 to include meeting results) Airport Hilton - Austin.
RMS Update to TAC October 5, RMS Activity Summary 2008 Test Flight Schedule Update on TAC directive relating to identifying issues with net metering.
1 Transaction or Issue Clean Up. 2 Customer Protection and 814_08 Issue (Phase 2 – Potentially Late 08s) Background Completed Items Next Steps.
1 Critical Retail Issues RMS Update RMS Meeting Results 2/01 RMS Formed 3/01 RMS Identified “pent-up” issues Tx Set transaction development Service Order.
1 Supporting materials for RMS Provided by Retail Customer Choice (RCC) team.
Market Metrics Working Group 2005 Accomplishments and 2006 Goals.
Distributed Renewable Generation Profile Implementation Plan.
1 TX SET Update to RMS November 12, RMGRR Activity RMGRR065 – Disconnect and Reconnect for Non-Payment Updates and Corrections – –Normal Timeline.
Acquisition Transfer Switch Hold Notifications Critical Care Changes AMS Meter Indicator Same Day Move Outs Same Day Switches Same Day Move In Date Change.
SHARYLAND TRANSITION TASKFORCE (STTF) AGENDA STTF MEETING APRIL 17,
February 10, 2010 RMS ERCOT 1/24/10 Production Issue Overview and Lessons Learned Karen Farley Manager, Retail Customer Choice.
Issue 2007-I071 Modify Cancellation Window to Accept Cancels Closer to SMRD.
Demand Response Task Force. 2 2 Outline  Overview of ERCOT’s role in the CCET Pilot  Overview of Stakeholder Process – What’s been done to date?  Questions.
1 TX SET Mass Transition Project RMS Update March 15, 2006.
1 Supporting materials for RMS Follow up from April RMS presentation Expedited Switch/Customer Rescission (Retail Customer Choice Team)
1 ERCOT Retail Release Overview. 2 How Are Changes Managed? Retail Testing Business Teams Development Teams Release Management Management of: Migration.
1DRAFT for DISCUSSION Transition From Non-IDR to IDR Load Profile and LSE 15-minute Data for AMS Market Advanced Readings and Settlements Taskforce 10/9/09.
1 Move-In Move-Out Task Force Update to RMS May 15, 2003.
TX SET Update to RMS Wednesday, May 9, Elimination of the Drop to AREP o RULEMAKING TO AMEND COMMISSION SUBSTANTIVE RULES CONSISTENT WITH §25.43,
COMET Working Group Progress Report. Purpose of Report Provide Team Updates Potential Future Voting Items Draft Competitive Meter Ownership Timeline.
Meter Read Validation History Defined as ERCOT requirement in Original RFP Was enforced for Market Opening ERCOT system design could not support both validation.
MIMO Stacking Document and the current RMG are inconsistent with current logic and should be updated.
February 25, 2009 ERCOT Follow up on questions from 2/18 meeting on proposed Expedited Switch rulemaking changes…
Mass Transition Lessons Learned. Should the FASD (First Available Switch Date) be revised for Mass Transition Projects? We need a better definition of.
1 Customer Objections in Complete Status (CCO Clean-up Phase 3) Background Next Steps.
1 TX SET Update to RMS August 13, Issues Under Review I075 – CSA-By Pass flag is being used by CRs when they do not have a CSA established I075.
Mass Transition—Timelines & Volume Limitation RMGRR116—Acquisition Transfer Non-standard Metering Future Meetings 1.
Update to RMS February 2, 2016 TX SET. Texas SET January Meeting Update Elections – Chair: Diana Rehfeldt, TNMP – Vice Chair: Kyle Patrick, NRG TMTP Changes.
1.  What is the purpose of DEVs? Data Extract Variances (DEVs) are used to synchronize the data among all Market Participants (MP)  What is a DEV? It's.
1 Market Participant Default Joint Taskforce Update and Report on Recent Customer Transition Activity Report to WMS August 17, 2005.
Multiple ESI IDs Linked to a Single Service Address Record Linked-Address Action Items.
1 Market Operations Presentation Board of Director’s Meeting August 19, 2003.
Retail Market Update November 6, Flight Time Lines Retail market has several market occurring in the second quarter Flight 0304, GISB.
Pro-Active Transaction Resolution Measures
Usage Billing Issues.
Stacking Implementation Plan
Recommendation of Texas Test Plan Team to RMS
Demand Response – ERCOT discussion items
Presentation transcript:

February 19, 2009 ERCOT Follow up on questions from 2/11 discussion on proposed Expedited Switch rulemaking changes…

2 ERCOT’s understanding of the proposed rulemaking: –Currently there are 2 types of Switch transactions: On-Cycle – ERCOT sends the First Available Switch Date (FASD) to the TDU Out-of-Cycle – ERCOT sends the FASD and the Special Read Date Requested by the Rep to the TDU –After the rule making ERCOT believes the Expedited Switch will replace the On-Cycle Switch: Expedited – ERCOT sends the FASD to the TDU. TDU returns a Scheduled Meter Read Date (SMRD) for the Switch within the 6 calendar day window. Out-of-Cycle – ERCOT sends the FASD and the Special Read Date Requested by the Rep to the TDU

3 Two or Three Types? If with proposed rulemaking the Expedited Switch replaces the On- Cycle Switch: –ERCOT believes we may have to make minor system changes. –No TX SET version change foreseen. –Cancels inside the window(s) to be managed with the MarkeTrak process. If proposed rulemaking has 3 types of switches – Off-cycle, On-cycle and Expedited: –ERCOT would work with the market to add the expedited switch processes into the stacking logic. –TX SET change would be required to accommodate the expedited switch transaction. –ERCOT believes we may have to make major system changes and facilitate a flight test with the market prior to implementation.

4 Parking Lot / Questions for follow up? What other questions would MPs like ERCOT to research to bring back to future meetings? 1.Show trans flow of priority MVI with switch 2.Show trans flow of permit pending MVI with switch 3.Review impact to ERCOT system/stacking logic if change evaluation / cancellation window for switches from 5 day to 2 day 4.Review impact to ERCOT system/stacking logic if change FASD date from EPD+3BD to EPD+1BD, EPD+2BD 5.Review impact to ERCOT system/stacking logic if change FASD to equal the 6 calendar days out (TDSP bounce back the FASD as the SMRD)

5 Scenario 1 - Priority Move In received day before a scheduled Switch –ERCOT will accept the Move In and cancel the Switch, same as standard MVI scenario Follow up #1 – Trans Flow of Priority MVI with Switch REP C is Rep of Record REP A submits Expedited Switch Saturday 02/07 Monday 02/09 Thursday 02/12 Sunday 02/15 Wednesday 02/18 Saturday 02/21 Switch FASD is calculated at 3 Business days TDSP schedules Switch within the 6 day window Switch for REP A is Scheduled for 02/17 Rep B submits priority MVI for 02/17 Switch for 2/17 will be Cancelled

6 Scenario 2 - Priority Move In received same day as scheduled Switch –ERCOT will accept the Move In. The Switch will not be cancelled on receipt of the Move In. –Switch will be cancelled upon receipt of the 814_04 on the Move In Follow up #1 – Trans Flow of Priority MVI with Switch REP C is Rep of Record REP A submits Expedited Switch Saturday 02/07 Monday 02/09 Thursday 02/12 Sunday 02/15 Wednesday 02/18 Saturday 02/21 Switch FASD is calculated at 3 Business days TDSP schedules Switch within the 6 day window Switch for REP A is Scheduled for 02/17 Rep B submits priority MVI for 02/17 Switch for 2/17 will be Cancelled upon receipt of the 814_04 on the Move In

7 Scenario 1 Permit Pending Move In received prior to Switch. –ERCOT will accept the Switch. Switch is not cancelled. Follow up #2 – Trans Flow of Permit Pending MVI w/Switch REP C is Rep of Record Rep B submits MVI requesting 2/16. TDSP responds with 814_28 PT Saturday 02/07 Monday 02/09 Thursday 02/12 Sunday 02/15 Wednesday 02/18 Saturday 02/21 Switch FASD is calculated at 3 Business days TDSP schedules Switch within the 6 day window Switch for REP A is Scheduled for 02/17 REP A submits Expedited Switch

8 Scenario 1 Cancel & Notification changed to 2 business days –ERCOT would accept the 814_08 from the CR until 2 business days prior to the Scheduled Meter Read Date of the Switch. –ERCOT would have to make system changes. Similar to MVI logic. –No TX SET version change foreseen. –Cancels inside the 2 day window to be managed with the current MarkeTrak process. Follow up #3 – Trans Flow / Impact of 5 day to 2 day for evaluation / cancellation window

9 Scenario 1 - continued Cancel & Notification changed to 2 business days –ERCOT will accept the 814_08 from the CR until 2 business days prior to the Scheduled Meter Read Date of the Switch. Follow up #3 – Trans Flow / Impact of 5 day to 2 day for evaluation / cancellation window REP C is Rep of Record Rep A submits Expedited Switch Saturday 02/07 Monday 02/09 Thursday 02/12 Sunday 02/15 Wednesday 02/18 Saturday 02/21 Switch FASD is calculated at 3 Business days TDSP schedules Switch within the 6 day window Switch for REP A is Scheduled for 02/16 REP Cancel will be accepted through 2/11 2 business day cancel window 814_06 Notification will be sent 2/12

10 Scenario 2 Cancel & Notification changed to 2 business days –TDSP determines the Switch can be worked prior to Scheduled Meter Read Date. ERCOT send 814_06 after the Switch completes in ERCOTs system Follow up #3 – Trans Flow / Impact of 5 day to 2 day for evaluation / cancellation window REP C is Rep of Record Rep A submits Expedited Switch Saturday 02/07 Monday 02/09 Thursday 02/12 Sunday 02/15 Wednesday 02/18 Saturday 02/21 Switch FASD is calculated at 3 Business days TDSP schedules Switch within the 6 day window Switch for REP A is Scheduled for 02/16 TDSP determines they can work the switch early and completes for 02/11 814_06 is not sent till after the Switch Completes in ERCOTs system or at 2 Business Prior to the SMRD of 2/16

11 Follow up #4 and #5 4.Review impact to ERCOT system/stacking logic if change FASD date from EPD+3BD to EPD+1BD, EPD+2BD 5.Review impact to ERCOT system/stacking logic if change FASD to equal the 6 calendar days out (TDSP bounce back the FASD as the SMRD) If proposed rulemaking changes the FASD timeline –ERCOT would work with the market to adjust the new FASD timeline along with other expedited switch changes into the MIMO stacking logic business rules –TX SET change would be required to accommodate the expedited switch transaction. –ERCOT believes we may have to make major system changes and facilitate a flight test with the market prior to implementation.

12 REP / TDSP Questions for follow up? What other questions were brought up for MPs to review and bring back for next time? –All MPs – review slide deck and determine impacts, gaps, questions –TDSPs asked Are REPs open to the use of estimates? How will the expected switch date of an expedited switch be communicated to the customer? –REPs asked What additional changes have to occur at the TDSP level if FASD remains at 3BD but the evaluation window shrinks from 5BD to 2BD What if the 6 th calendar day is on a non-business day? Will the TDSP go back to the last BD to determine the scheduled date?

13 Parking Lot / Questions for follow up? What other questions were brought up for MPs to review and bring back for next time? –Obviously any rulemaking changes then result in corresponding PRR, RMGRR that the market and ERCOT would need to review. Do we need another workshop?