MIRTM Temporal Constraints Discussion Loads in SCEDv2 Subgroup Jan. 8, 2016.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
INSULATING PRICE RESPONSIVE LOAD FROM RUC CAPACITY SHORT CHARGE Mark W. Smith J. Kay Trostle August 2008 DSWG.
Advertisements

Loads in SCED v2 Subgroup The LMP-G Journey 1. TAC Endorsement of LMP-G TAC voted to endorse “LMP-G” rather than “Full LMP” as the mechanism to enable.
©2012 | Commercial in Confidence | Proprietary to Ventyx, An ABB Company NYISO Real-time Market Presentation to ERCOT METF – April 26, 2012 Confidential.
SAWG Update to WMS February 4 th, 2015 Brandon Whittle.
ERCOT Public 1 AS Demand Curves for Real-Time Co-optimization of Energy & Ancillary Services.
April 23, 2014 DSWG Loads in SCEDv1 Load Participation in SCED v1 Overview & Refresher ERCOT Staff.
Loads in SCED Comments submitted by Luminant Energy Company, LLC.
Load Resource Inputs to the Multi-Interval Real-Time Market ERCOT is requesting input from LRs and QSEs to enable running meaningful MIRTM simulations.
ERCOT RMR Deployment and Cost Proposals By: Matt Mereness and Ino Gonzalez.
Sai Moorty ERCOT Integration Options into ERCOT systems.
Short Term Testing Mod 65_08 Modification Committee 25 th November 2010.
Price Responsive Load Next Steps – Data Collection Paul Wattles Karen Farley DSWG and RMS sub team October 16, 2012.
ERS Update for DSWG June 1, Agenda June – September 2012 Procurement XML Project Update Clearing Price discussion NPRR 451 Q & A.
ERS Procurement Methodology 09/04/2013 ERS Workshop Presented By: ERCOT Staff.
ERCOT Public 1 Multi-Interval Real-Time Market Plan for Proposed Study Process.
Storage Integration – Look Ahead SCED Issues for ETWG CAES Perspectives Brandon Whittle ETWG Storage Workshop.
Section 5.9 – added export language Each ERS Generator site must have an interconnection agreement with its TDSP prior to submitting an ERS offer and must.
WGR Ramp Rate in Nodal: “As High as Possible” Mike Grimes for QMWG Meeting 10 August 2009.
January 21, 2010 Security Constrained Economic Dispatch Resmi Surendran.
Grabbing Balancing Up Load (BUL) by the Horns December 2006.
ERCOT Demand Response Spring 2015 ERCOT Operator Seminar.
PJM©2013www.pjm.com Economic DR participation in energy market ERCOT April 14, 2014 Pete Langbein.
Economic Planning – Theory and Current Practice Dan Woodfin Director, System Planning Joint PLWG/CMWG Meeting 2/4/2011.
Loads in SCED Comments submitted by Luminant Energy Company, LLC.
Quick Start Resource – Payment for Start-Up at less than LSL Current NPRR language: ( 8) If a QSGR comes On-Line as a result of a Base Point less than.
Weather Sensitive ERS Training Presenter: Carl Raish Weather Sensitive ERS Training Workshop April 5, 2013.
1 WMS Report TO TAC January In Brief Two Working Group Reports Two Working Group Reports Two Task Force Reports Two Task Force Reports One PRR.
RCWG Update to WMS July 11, Alternatives to Address Negative Prices At its June meeting, WMS directed RCWG to bring back something to vote on. RCWG.
Congestion Management and Ramp Rate for Delivering Ancillary Services Resmi Surendran.
Updated Cost/Benefit Analysis for PRR 567 Multi-Part A/S Bidding PRS January Meeting January 19, 2006.
PJM©2013www.pjm.com Demand Side Working Group Loads in SCED Angelo Marcino Real-Time Market Operations – PJM April 14, 2014.
Final Report Weather Sensitive Emergency Response Service (WS ERS) Pilot Project Carl Raish, ERCOT Technical Advisory Committee November 7, 2013.
Appeal of PRS Action NPRR 351, Calculate and Post Projected Non-Binding LMPs for the Next 15 Minutes Floyd Trefny Texas Steel Companies.
SAWG Update to WMS April 6 th, 2015 Brandon Whittle.
GTBD Forecasting Using SCED to Produce Projections of Future LMPs Floyd J. Trefny February 17, 2011.
ERCOT Pilot Project for Fast Responding Regulation Service (FRRS) August 8, 2012 PDCWG August 9, 2012 ETWG/QMWG.
ERS Update – DSWG Presentation September 21, 2012.
Floyd Trefny, P.E. Director of Wholesale Market Design Nodal Market Tools to Manage Wind Generation January 29, 2009 Presentation to the Renewables Technology.
August 8, 2013 Loads in SCED Workshop II Load Participation in SCED NPRR 555 ERCOT Staff Presentation.
ERCOT Public 1 Overview of ERCOT Concept Paper on Real-Time Co-optimization of Energy & Ancillary Services & Multi-Interval Real-Time Market.
Programs/Products that ERCOT Does Not Presently Offer ERCOT Demand Side Working Group New DR Product Options Subgroup Jay Zarnikau Frontier Associates.
SAWG Update to WMS September 2 nd, 2015 Brandon Whittle.
“Managing the Integration of Energy Storage Technologies” Kenneth Ragsdale ERCOT.
Overview of Governing Document for Weather-Sensitive ERS Pilot Project Stakeholder Workshop Mark Patterson, ERCOT Staff March 1, 2013.
SAWG Update to WMS March 4 th, 2015 Brandon Whittle.
DSWG Update to WMS 2/9/2011. EILS Procurement Results from 1/31 Business Hours 1 HE 0900 through 1300, Monday thru Friday except ERCOT Holidays; 425 hours.
1/07/2014 QMWG – RUC and AS update QMWG – ERCOT Update ERCOT Market Analysis.
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Verifiable Costs for Nodal WMS Meeting.
© ERCOT and 2004 Fleet Deployment and Settlements WMS Meeting August 19, 2004 Ino Gonzalez ERCOT Settlements
Third Party DR Self-Deployment Loads in SCEDv2 Subgroup Sept. 18, 2015.
DSWG Update to WMS 8/10/2011. DSWG Goals #DSWG GoalDeliverable Target Date Primary Owner Team MembersStatus 1SCED Load Participation Complete analysis.
Update: 30-Minute Emergency Response Service (ERS) Pilot Project Mark Patterson, ERCOT October 7, 2013.
Proxy $G and other Loads in SCED 2 Litmus Tests Loads in SCEDv2 Subgroup Dec. 2, 2014.
Overview of FIP Issues in the RUC, Verifiable Cost, and other Nodal Market Processes November 12, 2008 VCWG Meeting.
Future Ancillary Services Cost Benefit Analysis Overview Julia Matevosyan February 1, 2016 FAS Workshop.
Multi-Interval Real-Time Market (MIRTM) Updates SAWG Sean Chang Market Analysis February 22, 2016 ERCOT Public Version
IMM alternate framework for Look-Ahead SCED November 21, 2011.
Weather-Sensitive ERS Pilot Project Proposal March 7, 2013 TAC Meeting.
Draft NPRR Weather Sensitive ERS Loads December 2012.
Reliability Must Run Resources for Summer Slide 2 RMR for Summer 2011 RMR Contracts for Mothballed Units ERCOT has signed RMR Agreements with two.
Non-Spin Deployment Resmi Surendran. RUC Awarded Ancillary Service Bring Resources On-Line if awarding REG or RRS When awarding Non-Spin – First award.
Multi-Interval Real-Time Market (MIRTM) Update to SAWG – WebEx ERCOT Staff Market Design & Analysis September 21, 2016.
ERCOT Pilot Project for Fast Responding Regulation Service (FRRS)
Pilot Project Concept 30-Minute Emergency Response Service (ERS)
Pilot Project Concept 30-Minute Emergency Response Service (ERS)
Congestion Management and Ramp Rate for Delivering Ancillary Services
Paul Wattles, Sai Moorty ERCOT Market Design & Development
penetration of wind power
Use of Technical Offer Data in Instruction Profiling / QBOA Version 2
Load Participation in SCED v1 Overview & Refresher
Presentation transcript:

MIRTM Temporal Constraints Discussion Loads in SCEDv2 Subgroup Jan. 8, 2016

Background The Multi-Interval Real-Time Market (MIRTM) would lengthen the time horizon for SCED commitment and dispatch This would open SCED to Resources that are otherwise unable to participate in the RTM, such as: – Blocky Load Resources, and/or – Resources with Temporal Constraints Jan. 8, 20162

Temporal Constraints Four values (in minutes) associated with Load Resources’ demand response: – Ramp Period (time needed from dispatch to response) – Minimum down time (minimum time of response) – Maximum down time (maximum time able to respond) – Return to Service time (time needed to be available for re-dispatch after recall) Note: terminology not set in stone Potentially these values could be established in the LRARF, but subject to modification via real- time telemetry Jan. 8, 20163

Key elements Ramp Period + Minimum Down Time must be ≤ MIRTM time horizon – For example, 30 minutes (or 6 SCED runs) This means (one-part) bid/offer price should allow the LR to recover its opportunity cost within the Minimum Down Time window LR would not be dispatched beyond its Maximum Down Time LR would not be subject to re-dispatch until Return to Service Time has elapsed Jan. 8, 20164

Key elements LR would be eligible for make-whole payment if the forecasted price that triggered the commitment failed to materialize in real-time Make-whole payment may apply only to the Minimum Down Time window – this is TBD Jan. 8, 20165

Appendix The following slides were presented to DSWG on March 9, 2015

Load Resource Inputs to the Multi-Interval Real-Time Market ERCOT is requesting input from LRs and QSEs to enable running meaningful MIRTM simulations

Background Loads in SCED v2 Subgroup seeks to simulate MIRTM behavior with participation by LRs – ‘Blocky’ LRs not capable of responding to incremental SCED base points and/or with temporal constraints – Growth in residential DR due to enabling technology (smart meters, smart thermostats, etc) LRs and QSEs are asked to submit best-estimate inputs for bid/offer prices and temporal constraints – Multiple scenarios OK Submitters will be known only to ERCOT – All data will be anonymized for simulated market runs Jan. 8, 20168

Background Under MIRTM, the real-time market would be able to commit Resources at future intervals (beyond the current 5-minute SCED) If the Resource’s bid/offer price failed to materialize in real time at their commitment interval, the Resource would be eligible for a make- whole payment One objective of this exercise is to get an idea whether uplifts associated with make-whole payments would exceed the market benefits of additional RTM competition Jan. 8, 20169

LR inputs requested Future DR Quantity (Curtailable MW expected to be available in 2018) MW And for future consideration…. Jan. 8,

Example to assist in preparing input data (1) LR’s assumptions & bid/offer parameters: DR capacity10 MW Fixed cost of curtailment$2,000 Running cost of curtailment$500 per hour Minimum curtailment duration15 minutes Maximum curtailment duration2 hours Post-recall unavailability (return-to-service time)1 hour Jan. 8,

Based on the data from slide #5: If LR wants to recover curtailment cost based on minimum curtailment duration (15 min.): – Cost = $2,000 (fixed) * $500 (hourly) = $2,625 (where 1.25 = 15-minute deployment + 1 hour return to service) – $2,625 * 4 / 10 = $1,050/MWh (where multiplying 15-minute min. duration by 4 = hourly; dividing by 10 = per MW) Example to assist in preparing input data (2) Jan. 8,

Based on the data from slide #5: If LR wants to recover curtailment cost based on maximum curtailment duration: – Cost: $2,000 (fixed) * $500 = $3,500 (where 3.0 = 2-hour deployment + 1 hour return to service) – $3,500 / 10 = $350/MWh So, this LR’s cost recovery range would be: >$350/MWh to $1,050/MWh Example to assist in preparing input data (3) Jan. 8,

Example TIME MIRTM commitment instruction Ramp period Curtailment deadline Min duration Max duration Post recall unavailability duration LOAD MW MIRTM Recall instruction LR available for next MIRTM commitment DR MW Quantity (bid/offer) Jan. 8,

Request to LRs and QSEs Please populate cells in the right-hand column on the following slide(s) Submit as many scenarios as you like To ensure apples ↔ apples, please assume the following for cost calculation (if used): – Natural gas: $3.00 per MMBtu – Diesel fuel:$2.75 per gallon Also, assume participation is energy-only – capacity in MIRTM not carrying AS responsibility Please populated tables by Fri., March 27, to and Thanks! Jan. 8,

LR inputs requested Future DR Quantity (Curtailable MW expected to be available in 2018) MW And for future consideration…. Jan. 8,