SAFETEA-LU Section 1201 Real-Time System Management Information 23 CFR Part 511 AASHTO SSOM Task Force on Systems Operations Performance Measures 9 April.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overview What is the National ITS Architecture? User Services
Advertisements

The Americans with Disabilities Act Will McClure California Division Office.
MAP-21 Performance Management Framework August 8, 2013 Sherry Riklin Bob Tuccillo Angela Dluger The Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21)
The Rocky Mountain Pavement Preservation Partnership Lloyd R. Neeley, P.E. Utah Department of Transportation RMPPP Vice-Chair.
National Bridge Inspection Standards (NBIS)
1 Consensus Systems Technologies ITS New Mexico Annual Meeting Nov 5, 2011 ITS Systems Engineering Consulting.
Title Subtitle Meeting Date Office of Transportation Performance Management MAP-21 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century Performance Management.
Operations / ITS Provisions in SAFETEA-LU What’s in There and What’s Not Jeff Lindley Operations / ITS Discipline Meeting August 16, 2005.
Worker Visibility Rule Hari Kalla MUTCD Team Leader Office of Transportation Operations Federal Highway Administration.
Freight Traveler Information Clearinghouse Mississippi Valley Freight Coalition -Ravi Pavuluri.
Urban landbuilding facilitiestransportation networkssystems technology National and Regional ITS Architectures Bart Cima, IBI Group February 26, 2007.
Weather and Winter Mobility Program Overview U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Paul Pisano Weather & Winter Mobility Coordinator.
Environmental Justice: Policies, Guidance, and Answers to Frequently Asked Questions FTA Region VII Civil Rights Training.
Transportation Management Plan Overview. TMP Overview2 Is that the impression people have?
Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users SAFETEA-LU Key Highway Safety Provisions Elizabeth Alicandri FHWA.
Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users SAFETEA-LU Key Safety Provisions Federal Highway Administration.
Traffic Incident Management – a Strategic Focus Inspector Peter Baird National Adviser: Policy and Legislation: Road Policing.
1 SAFETEA: Transportation System Management, Operations and ITS Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator, Office of Operations Federal Highway Administration.
What is ITS ? Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) means electronics, communications, or information processing used singly or in combination: to enhance.
2015 FTIP/FSTIP Workshop Transportation Conformity Wade Hobbs FHWA CADO January 15, 2014.
1 ITS America Palm Springs, CA June 6, 2007 SunGuide SM Software – Florida's ITS Software ITS America Palm Springs, CA June 6, 2007 Trey Tillander, P.E.
SAFETEA-LU Implementation ITS & Operations ITS America 2006 Annual Meeting and Exposition Pennsylvania Convention Center Philadelphia, Pennsylvania May.
FHWA Perspective on Risk and Other Highlights. GROW AMERICA Proposal Administration’s Proposal 6 Years in length $317 billion for highways and bridges.
FHWA Office of Operations Research and Development and American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) AASHTO National Connected.
Overview of the Work Zone Safety and Mobility Rule Module 1.
Board on Atmospheric Sciences and Climate Transportation Research Board Where the Weather Meets the Road: A Research Agenda for Improving Road Weather.
1 Road Weather Management Performance Metrics Development: An Update Chris Cluett, Leon Osborne, Arthur Handman, Jeff Jenq ITS America 2007 Annual Meeting.
Performance Based Federal-Aid Programs Pete Rahn, Chair, AASHTO Standing Committee on Performance Management Director, Missouri DOT February 23,2009 AASHTO.
Dixie Regional ITS Architecture Project Summary July 31, 2006.
Transportation Management Plan Overview. TMP Overview2 Is that the impression people have?
WORK ZONE SAFETY & MOBILITY Meeting the Federal Rule Jim Allen Safety Implementation Engineer ATSSA Illinois Chapter Meeting.
Briefing on the Washington Metropolitan Area Transportation Operations Coordination (MATOC) Program Presentation to the Transportation Planning Board Michael.
1 Maryland Transportation Operations Summit Regional Coordination & Communication Richard W Steeg, PE Regional Operations Director Northern Region May.
California Department of Transportation Transportation Management Systems (TMS) and their role in addressing congestion Discussion Materials Lake Arrowhead.
1 Briefing on Draft Safety Element for the 2007 CLRP Michael J. Farrell Andrew J. Meese, AICP COG/TPB Staff TPB Technical Committee November 2, 2007 Item.
US DOT Planning for Operations Initiative – An Update AASHTO SCOH Annual Meeting June 14-17, 2009 Manchester, NH Rick Backlund – FHWA Office of Operations.
1 Update on the Washington Metropolitan Area Transportation Operations Coordination (MATOC) Program Ronald F. Kirby Transportation Planning Board February.
ITS Standards Program Strategic Plan Summary June 16, 2009 Blake Christie Principal Engineer, Noblis for Steve Sill Project Manager, ITS Standards Program.
SAFETEA-LU Operations, ITS, and Freight Provisions Jeffrey A. Lindley Office of Operations Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation.
T3 Webinar RWIS Stakeholder Engagement T3 Webinars are brought to you by the ITS Professional Capacity Building Program (ITS PCB) at the U.S. Department.
Southeast Michigan Council of Governments. Working Together to Improve Regional Operations through Traffic Incident Management Working Together to Improve.
Title Subtitle Meeting Date Office of Transportation Performance Management MAP-21 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century Performance Measure Update.
MATOC Trial Phase Dec 2008 to Jun 2009 Presentation to the Transportation Planning Board Richard W. Steeg, PE Chair MATOC Steering Committee VDOT Regional.
Title Subtitle Meeting Date Office of Transportation Performance Management T3 Webinar Traffic Incident Management (TIM) Performance Measures June 12,
Fig 1. Sample SHSPs and signing of the SAFETEA-LU Legislation supporting EMS’s SHSP role, August 10, 2005 Strategic Highway Safety Plans: Where is EMS?
SAFETEA-LU Operations, ITS, and Freight Provisions Jeffrey F. Paniati Office of Operations Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation.
1 Using Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Technologies and Strategies to Better Manage Congestion Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator of.
SCOH – Spring ‘07 Administration of Federal-aid Projects by Local Public Agencies AASHTO Spring Meeting Phoenix, AZ May 4, King W. Gee Associate.
SAFETEA-LU System Management and Operations Key Provisions Jeff Lindley Office of Operations Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation.
1 Federal Highway Administration, USDOT The Final Rule on Work Zone Safety and Mobility Updates to 23 CFR Section 630, Subpart J Presented by Tracy Scriba,
Draft 2008 Congestion Management Process (CMP) Technical Report Andrew J. Meese COG/TPB Staff TPB Technical Committee June 6, 2008 Item # 8.
Context and Priorities April 9,  Why FHWA Focuses on Improving Operations  FHWA Operations Program Areas  Key Current Program Priorities.
Integrating State and Local Safety Data 1 Roadway Safety Data Program.
Innovative Approaches to Real-Time System Management Information Kevin Korth Traffic Operations Engineer FHWA California Division May 21, 2014.
U.S. Department of Transportation Planning Certification Review National Capital Region Transportation Management Area TPB Tech Committee Briefing March.
Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator for Operations Federal Highway Administration US Department of Transportation Congestion Initiative Update I-95.
A National Unified Goal for Traffic Incident Management (TIM): What is it, and why is it needed? ITS PCB T3 Webinar September 11, 2008.
Integrated Corridor Management Initiative ITS JPO Lead: Mike Freitas Technical Lead: John Harding, Office of Transportation Management.
1 Briefing on the Congestion Management Process (CMP) Andrew J. Meese, AICP Melanie Wellman COG/TPB Staff Travel Management Subcommittee November 27, 2007.
Integrated Corridor Management Initiative Dale Thompson Transportation Specialist Office of Operations R&D May 4, 2005.
1 Clarus Clarus Nationwide Surface Transportation Weather Observing & Forecasting System Paul Pisano Team Leader Road Weather Management Office of Transportation.
Update on ADA Issues Brooke Struve, PE Design Program Manager Federal Highway Administration AASHTO Subcommittee on Design Annual Meeting—July 13-17, 2008.
HANDOUT 2017 FSTIP Development Workshop Federal Statewide Transportation Improvement Program Requirements Wade Hobbs Federal Highway Administration California.
Federal Regional ITS Architecture Requirements 1 T3 Session Federal Requirements for Regional ITS Architectures.
Title Subtitle Meeting Date Office of Transportation Performance Management MAP-21 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century An Update on Implementation.
0 Freight Activities: Year in Review Dec. 12 th 2015.
Data Impacts of Transportation Reauthorization: Data Community’s Plans and Strategies Pat Hu Chair, TRB National Transportation Data Requirements and Programs.
Support for the AASHTO Committee on Planning (COP) and its Subcommittees in Responding to the AASHTO Strategic Plan Prepared for NCHRP 8-36, TASK 138.
Jack Stickel Alaska Dept of Transportation & Public Facilities
Transportation Performance Management Resources you can Use Susanna Reck FHWA Office of Transportation Performance Management June 2019 Outline: What.
Presentation transcript:

SAFETEA-LU Section 1201 Real-Time System Management Information 23 CFR Part 511 AASHTO SSOM Task Force on Systems Operations Performance Measures 9 April 2013 Bob Rupert, FHWA,

2 U.S. Department of Transportation Background – Legislation SAFETEA-LU, Subtitle B, §1201 □ Real-Time System Management Information Program  Establish a real-time system management information program in all States  Monitor traffic & travel conditions of the major highways  Share information to address congestion problems and facilitate traveler information.  Codified by Final Rule as Part 511 of Title 23 of United States Code of Federal Regulations □ 23 CFR Part 511

3 U.S. Department of Transportation Provisions of 23 CFR Part 511 (1 of 2)  Two-stage implementation □ All Interstates within 4 years (November 2014) □ Other metropolitan “Routes of Significance” as identified by States in collaboration with local agencies within 6 years (November 2016)  Information to be made available □ Construction lane and road closures □ Road- or lane-blocking traffic incidents □ Hazardous conditions & road or lane closures due to adverse weather □ Travel times (in Metropolitan areas)  “Metropolitan” = greater than 1 million MSA □ New additions with 2010 Census: Salt Lake City, Raleigh

4 U.S. Department of Transportation Provisions of 23 CFR Part 511 (2 of 2)  Regional ITS Architecture Update □ Regional architectures to be reviewed & updated as appropriate to ensure addressing RTSMIP provisions  Timeliness (age) of information □ Construction & Incident information within 20 minutes / within 10 minutes in Metro areas □ Adverse weather conditions within 20 minutes □ Travel times within 10 minutes  Quality measures □ Accuracy of 85% □ Availability of 90%

5 U.S. Department of Transportation Metro Areas Over 1 Million D.C. 52 metro areas as of 2010 Census

6 U.S. Department of Transportation Clarifications / Expansion of Information  Not Required by the Regulations □ No requirement for dissemination to general public, or the use of specific technologies or specific applications □ No method identified or discussed for measuring accuracy or other quality metrics ▪Flexibility to use methods appropriate to systems & processes used to acquire information & data □ No specific (i.e., new) enforcement actions ▪Usual Federal oversight, stewardship actions

7 U.S. Department of Transportation Data Exchange Formats  Not included in 23 CFR 511 regulations  Section 1201(b) provides that: □ USDOT to establish data exchange formats to ensure that the data provided by highway & transit monitoring systems can readily be exchanged across jurisdictional boundaries, facilitating nationwide availability of information.  Further, 1201(c)(2) notes that Regional ITS Architectures: □ Shall incorporate the data exchange formats to ensure that the data provided by highway and transit monitoring systems may readily be exchanged with State & local governments and may be made available to the traveling public.

8 U.S. Department of Transportation Data Exchange Formats  Initial list of potential standards published in 2007  Effort underway, using a system engineering approach to develop a Data Exchange Format Specification (DXFS) and companion Guidance document □ Walk-throughs with stakeholders  Center-to-Center communications □ Traffic Management Data Dictionary (TMDD), v3  Completed to date: □ Concept of Operations □ System Requirements Specification □ System Design Description

9 U.S. Department of Transportation Data Exchange Formats  The User Needs are organized around the four areas described in 23 CFR 511, with an additional area to address transit related information that is not directly covered by the Rule: □ Travel Time □ Incident Information □ Construction Information □ Weather Information □ Transit information  Guidance will include traceability among needs, architecture flows, requirements, standards, etc. □ Audience is system designer / developer

10 U.S. Department of Transportation Data Exchange Formats  Guidance and Data Exchange Format Specification will be completed by fall 2013 □ Dependent on completion of TMDD v3.03  Concept of Operations, System Requirements Specification, and System Design Description can be provided □ In final Draft

11 U.S. Department of Transportation Real-Time System Information Management Program Web site: Bob Rupert