CLAS12 CalCom Activity: a progress report V. Burkert, D. Carman, R. De Vita, D. Weygand CLAS12 meeting, June 14 th 2012.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Status of the MICE SciFi Simulation Edward McKigney Imperial College London.
Advertisements

MICE: The International Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment Diagnostic Systems Tracker Cherenkov Detector Time of Flight Counters Calorimeter Terry Hart.
Forward Detectors and Measurement of Proton-Antiproton Collision Rates by Zachary Einzig, Mentor Michele Gallinaro INTRODUCTION THE DETECTORS EXPERIMENTAL.
The Time-of-Flight system of the PAMELA experiment: in-flight performances. Rita Carbone INFN and University of Napoli RICAP ’07, Rome,
Cosmic Rays Data Analysis with CMS-ECAL Mattia Fumagalli (Università di Milano Bicocca) CIAO!
N. Anfimov (JINR) on behalf of the ECAL0 team.  Introduction  Installation and commissioning  Calibration  Data taking  Preliminary result  Plans.
CLAS12 CalCom Activity: a progress report V. Burkert, D. Carman, R. De Vita, D. Weygand CLAS12 meeting, February 22 nd 2012.
The Transverse detector is made of an array of 256 scintillating fibers coupled to Avalanche PhotoDiodes (APD). The small size of the fibers (5X5mm) results.
CLAS12 CalCom Activity CLAS Collaboration Meeting, March 6 th 2014.
CLAS12 CalCom Status Update CLAS Collaboration Meeting November 14, 2014.
The PEPPo e - & e + polarization measurements E. Fanchini On behalf of the PEPPo collaboration POSIPOL 2012 Zeuthen 4-6 September E. Fanchini -Posipol.
Oct C. Smith - PCAL/EC Commissioning 1 PCAL/EC Commissioning Document
STAR Analysis Meeting, BNL, Dec 2004 Alexandre A. P. Suaide University of Sao Paulo Slide 1 BEMC software and calibration L3 display 200 GeV February.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 EC / PCAL ENERGY CALIBRATION Cole Smith UVA PCAL EC Outline Why 2 calorimeters? Requirements Using.
Status of the NO ν A Near Detector Prototype Timothy Kutnink Iowa State University For the NOvA Collaboration.
Scintillation hodoscope with SiPM readout for the CLAS detector S. Stepanyan (JLAB) IEEE conference, Dresden, October 21, 2008.
The Commissioning of the CLAS12 Detector V. Burkert, D. Carman, R. De Vita, D. Weygand CLAS12 workshop, June 21 st 2011.
The calibration and alignment of the LHCb RICH system Antonis Papanestis STFC - RAL for the LHCb Collaboration.
Event Reconstruction in SiD02 with a Dual Readout Calorimeter Detector Geometry EM Calibration Cerenkov/Scintillator Correction Jet Reconstruction Performance.
Calibration of the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter with first LHC data
A search for deeply-bound kaonic nuclear states in (in-flight K -, N) reaction Hiroaki Ohnishi RIKEN.
Plan for 2009 CALICE beam test with ScECAL + AHCAL + TCMT Jan-28 th CALICE TB Satoru Uozumi (Kobe)
Dec.11, 2008 ECL parallel session, Super B1 Results of the run with the new electronics A.Kuzmin, Yu.Usov, V.Shebalin, B.Shwartz 1.New electronics configuration.
1 G9a -FROST. 2 Experiments FROST New generation of CLAS photoproduction experiments with FROzen Spin Polarized Target (FROST) E02-112: γp→KY (K + Λ,
Latifa Elouadrhiri Jefferson Lab Hall B 12 GeV Upgrade Drift Chamber Review Jefferson Lab March 6- 8, 2007 CLAS12 Drift Chambers Simulation and Event Reconstruction.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page Hall B:User Software Contributions Gerard Gilfoyle University of Richmond 12 GeV Upgrade Software Review.
All Experimenters MeetingDmitri Denisov Week of July 7 to July 15 Summary  Delivered luminosity and operating efficiency u Delivered: 1.4pb -1 u Recorded:
Transversity Readiness and Timeline Xiaodong Jiang, March 17th, This document specifies the overall readiness for Hall A experiments E06-010/E
2007 Run Update for STAR Jeff Landgraf For the STAR collaboration.
FSC Status and Plans Pavel Semenov IHEP, Protvino on behalf of the IHEP PANDA group PANDA Russia workshop, ITEP 27 April 2010.
PERFORMANCE OF THE PHENIX SOUTH MUON ARM Kenneth F. Read Oak Ridge National Lab & University of Tennessee for the PHENIX Collaboration Quark Matter 2002.
Forward Carriage Commissioning CLAS Collaboration Meeting 6/19/2015CLAS12 CalCom Status Update1 ECAL PCAL FTOF Panel 1A FTOF Panel 1B Detector Status PMT.
5-9 June 2006Erika Garutti - CALOR CALICE scintillator HCAL commissioning experience and test beam program Erika Garutti On behalf of the CALICE.
(s)T3B Update – Calibration and Temperature Corrections AHCAL meeting– December 13 th 2011 – Hamburg Christian Soldner Max-Planck-Institute for Physics.
STAR Collaboration Meeting, BNL – march 2003 Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 1 EMC Update Update on EMC –Hardware installed and current.
STAR Analysis Meeting, BNL – oct 2002 Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 1 EMC update Status of EMC analysis –Calibration –Transverse.
ScECAL Beam FNAL Short summary & Introduction to analysis S. Uozumi Nov ScECAL meeting.
2000/9/23 JPS meeting in Niigata1 Measurement of single gamma and  0 with PHENIX EMCal (I) H.Torii Kyoto Univ./RIKEN for the PHENIX Collaboration. Sep/23/2000,
MICE CM39 St Catherine’s, Oxford, 26 June 2014 Paul Soler Instrumentation Global Commissioning Plan.
FIRST RESULTS OF THE SILICON STRIP DETECTOR at STAR Jörg Reinnarth, Jonathan Bouchet, Lilian Martin, Jerome Baudot and the SSD teams in Nantes and Strasbourg.
2014 CalCom Activity Plan based on last year’s work and open discussion: Periodic meetings with detector groups to discuss algorithms, discuss software.
LHCf Detectors Sampling Calorimeter W 44 r.l, 1.6λ I Scintilator x 16 Layers Position Detector Scifi x 4 (Arm#1) Scilicon Tracker x 4(Arm#2) Detector size.
CLAS12 – CND PARAMETERDESIGN VALUE Detector typeBarrel of scintillators Angular coverage40 o to 120 o Number of radial layers3 Number of azimuthal segments48.
NUMI NUMI/MINOS Status J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting.
LHC Symposium 2003 Fermilab 01/05/2003 Ph. Schwemling, LPNHE-Paris for the ATLAS collaboration Electromagnetic Calorimetry and Electron/Photon performance.
1 Methods of PSD energy calibration. 2 Dependence of energy resolution on many factors Constant term is essential only for energy measurement of single.
Simulation and reconstruction of CLAS12 Electromagnetic Calorimeter in GSIM12 S. Stepanyan (JLAB), N. Dashyan (YerPhI) CLAS12 Detector workshop, February.
Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility Page 1 CLAS12 Workshop Jefferson Lab February 23, 2016 Time-of-Flight Software Status Jerry Gilfoyle, Evgeny.
Latifa Elouadrhiri Jefferson Lab
J. Musser for the MINOS Collatoration 2002 FNAL Users Meeting
Commissioning and Calibration Strategies for Micromegas Vertex Tracker
CLAS12 Commissioning with Cosmincs
Particle detection and reconstruction at the LHC (IV)
Preparation for CERN test beam
CLAS12 Calibration and Commissioning (CALCOM)
Stress tests for CLAS12 software
CLAS12 Ready for Science Answers to the Homework Questions & Summary/Path Forward Latifa Elouadrhiri Jefferson Lab CLAS12 Ready for Science Review.
Commissioning of the ALICE HLT, TPC and PHOS systems
CMS Preshower: Startup procedures: Reconstruction & calibration
Overview of CLAS12 Calibration
FORWARD CARRIAGE UPDATE – March-July 2015
CLAS12 First Experiment Workshop Report
Chris Smith California Institute of Technology EPS Conference 2003
Preparation of the CLAS12 First Experiment Status and Time-Line
Commissioning of the ALICE-PHOS trigger
Geant4 in HARP V.Ivanchenko For the HARP Collaboration
Steve Magill Steve Kuhlmann ANL/SLAC Motivation
Status of the cross section analysis in e! e
Inclusive p0 Production in Polarized pp Collisions using the STAR Endcap Calorimeter Jason C. Webb, Valparaiso University, for the STAR Collaboration Outline.
Presentation transcript:

CLAS12 CalCom Activity: a progress report V. Burkert, D. Carman, R. De Vita, D. Weygand CLAS12 meeting, June 14 th 2012

Outline Survey of detector commissioning plans Review of detector commissioning plans and meetings with detector groups First draft of commissioning document Preparation of commissioning timeline Service tasks and manpower Ongoing commissioning activities Future plans: – Review of commissioning-in-beam plans – General CALCOM meeting in October

1. Collect Information: Survey CLAS12 subsystems: Instrumentation: Beamline, Moller polarimeter, Magnets Detectors:FTOF, CTOF, EC-PCAL, DC, SVT, MM, HTCC, LTCC, CND, FT, RICH Online:Electronics, DAQ, Trigger, Slow Controls, Database, Reconstruction/Monitoring Information Template: Structure: list of foreseen tasks according to the three commissioning phases (quality assurance and system checkout, commissioning without beam and commissioning with beam) Items: for each of the planned tasks, provide information on goals, technique and equipment, manpower and time needs, DAQ & Trigger configuration, software and computing resources, dependencies, information to be saved in the database, repetition frequency System Contact Persons: Main:should act as a liaison between the committee and detector/system group to collect and provide requested information Software: should be the link between the system group and the CLAS12 software group

Survey Status  Request to fill information templates was sent out to contact persons in April 2011  Present status:  feedback from all subsystems and 100% of the templates were returned: this includes base equipment (EC-PCAL, FTOF, LTCC, DC, HTCC, SVT, CTOF, beamline, slow-controls, DAQ&Trigger) and non base- equipment (MM, CND, FT)  Review of last templates will be completed shortly and feedback will be sent back to contact persons

2. Review Information Collected information was reviewed in two steps 1.Review of Information Template: The information templates were reviewed by the CalCom committee to check all necessary information was available and level of detail was consistent with expectations 2.Focus Meetings on each Detector System Meeting between the CalCom committee and the Detector Group (hardware and software experts) were organized to discuss the commissioning plan: - Status and readiness - Necessary steps for its finalization - Critical items - Time and resources needed - Status of calibration and reconstruction software development - Software requirements and computing resources - Manpower Meetings on EC-PCal, DC, FTOF, CTOF, CND, SVT, MM, LTCC already organized Meetings on HTCC, FT, beamline planned for June-July

3. CLAS12 Commissioning plan Introduction: explain general strategy 3.Commissioning with beam: -Test of individual systems and of full spectrometer -Beam condition and detector configuration -Test reactions for efficiency and resolution measurements List of subsystems and contact persons Subsystem templates Summaries of: 1.Quality assurance and system checkout procedures 2.Commissioning without beam Timeline Document available at

Commissioning with Beam (1) 1.BEAMLINE COMMISSIONING: Should occur before the end of 1QFY15 Will include test of all the instrumentation, optimization of beam transport and measurement of beam parameters, calibration of beam monitors 2.CLAS12 CHECKOUT WITH BEAM Should occur in 3QFY15 Few (?) GeV beam on thin target (Carbon/CH2) Central Detector checkout with beam: -Checkout of CND and CTOF in self-triggering mode, measurement of rates and occupancies at different beam intensities and solenoid fields, full detector calibrations -Checkout of SVT and MM with CND/CTOF trigger or Forward Detector trigger, low intensity run with solenoid off, measurement of rates and occupancies at different beam intensities and solenoid fields, full detector calibrations Forward Detector checkout with beam: -Checkout of EC-PCAL, FTOF, LTCC and HTCC with EC-PCAL trigger, measurement of rates and occupancies at different beam intensities and torus fields, full detector calibrations -Checkout of DC with EC-PCAL/HTCC trigger, low intensity run with magnets off, measurement of rates and occupancies at different beam intensities and magnetic fields, full detector calibrations -Checkout of FT in self-triggering mode, low beam intensity run, measurement of rates and occupancies at different beam intensities and solenoid fields, full detector calibrations Checkout of DAQ/TRIGGER/SLOW CONTROLS as part of the process

Commissioning with Beam (2) 3.CLAS12 CALIBRATION AND PERFORMANCE TEST Final part of commissioning Full event reconstruction and fine tuning of detector calibration Should provide all data for full detector calibration and determination of acceptance, efficiency and resolutions Data recorded at different beam intensity and magnetic field configuration to check performance dependence Few GeV and 11 GeV beam on LH2 target with EC-Pcal + HTCC trigger Extraction of first physics observables (mass spectra, cross sections, asymmetries) and comparison with expected detector performances and world data: -ep→e’X, ep→e’p, ep→e’π + π - : check acceptance and efficiency, determine fiducial regions and resolution from elastic and missing mass peaks, test helicity signal and reporting scheme -ep→e’K + Y: check PID capabilities -ep→e’π 0 p, ep→e’π + n: check of neutral detection efficiency and resolution - ep→e’p, ep→e’π 0 p (e - or π 0 in FT): check of FT efficiency and resolution Test of additional trigger configurations

Commissioning with Beam (3) OPEN QUESTIONS: Is this plan complete? What should be the exact sequence of operations? What is the optimal beam energy for the initial phase of commissioning? What are the first reactions we should look at? How can we optimize the process?

Timeline Preliminary timeline for the CLAS12 commissioning: starts from CLAS12 detector installation in Hall B includes checkout, commissioning without beam and with beam PRELIMINARY

Manpower and Service Work ✱ As part of the survey and review process, we have asked all detector groups to provide a list of tasks for which additional manpower is needed ✱ List of service task for each detector group is available on the CalCom wiki page at ✱ Information includes:  description of detector system  list of tasks with details on duration and level of expertise  contact person and present list of contributors  web site ✱ Requests from PCAL, DC, FTOF, SVT but no new manpower identified yet. ✱ Mechanism for to identify collaborators via service work committee and new SOS policy is being discussed

Upcoming meetings Periodic meetings with detector group will continue to monitor progresses and update commissioning plan First general CALCOM meeting in the Fall of 2012 In conjunction with CLAS/CLAS12 Collaboration meeting (?) Presentation from all detector groups on progresses Presentation of calibration procedures and algorithms General discussion

Monitoring Progresses…

FTOF Calibration & Commissioning Panel-1a : 23 counters/sector,  panel-1 ≈ 5 to 35 o L = 32 – 375 cm, 5 cm (t) x 15 cm (w) Panel-1b : 62 counters/sector,  panel-1 ≈ 5 to 35 o L = 18 – 408 cm, 6 cm (t) x 6 cm (w) Panel-2 : 5 counters/sector,  panel-1 ≈ 35 to 45 o L = 370 – 430 cm, 5 cm (t) x 22 cm (w) (all counters with double-sided readout) Calibration & Commissioning Detailed time resolution studies of gain- matched counters all counters studied in cosmic ray test stands Cosmic ray test stand benchmarks re-verified after installation in Hall B. Final calibration datasets taken with electron beam data (incl. B-field checks) Panel-1b data

EC/PCAL Energy Calibration Requirements Energy / cluster reconstruction in frontend trigger required for e- ID. Uniform trigger response requires gain and attenuation corrections. EC/PCAL relative geometry. Calibration procedure must obtain these constants and load them into CTP and flash ADC firmware. EC and PCAL calibrations must be consistent. Calibration using MIP ONLINE Cosmic muon trigger. Simple hit reconstruction (Dalitz). Localized, uniform energy loss. Complete calibration in hours. OFFLINE Physics data (pions p>0.6 GeV). Monitor PMT gains using E/p. Cross-check muon calibration. Currently the existing EC software used for 15 years in CLAS6 is being tested on new PCAL modules in cosmic test setup. e-e- π PCAL EC

EC/PCAL CALCOM Requirements Acceptable calibration at startup Hit / cluster reconstruction in trigger requires substantial control of both energy and geometry calibration already on Day 1. Calibration procedure must provide gain and attenuation constants and relative alignment of EC/PCAL modules. Constants must be accessible to trigger firmware. Calibrations of EC and PCAL must be consistent Sum of electron energy from each module must agree with forward tracker momentum (E / p = constant). Spatial and energy reconstruction of photons must produce correct invariant mass. Online monitoring of calibration constants Continuous gain monitoring essential to maintain uniform trigger response under changing luminosity and relative backgrounds in PCAL and EC.

EC / PCAL Energy Calibration Uses MIPs EM shower: Energy deposition non- uniform function of position and depth. Difficult to define calibration benchmark. Minimum ionizing muon: Uniform and localizable energy deposition profile (dE/dx ~ 2 MeV / cm in scintillator). μ e-e- Online Cosmic Calibration Provides gain and attenuation constants needed for e- trigger. Hardware gain matching of PMTs. No sophisticated hit reconstruction – simple Dalitz test. Muon tomography can provide relative alignment of modules. Requires hours to obtain adequate statistics. Offline Calibration Uses physics data: MIP pions (p > 0.6 GeV). Run-by-run monitoring of PMT gains using E/P or MIP. Cross-check of cosmic muon calibration. Extrapolation of MIP calibrationd to 10+ GeV e- E / P vs. x,y position Muon energy vs. x,y position

CalCom: Future Activity Complete the series of meetings with the detector groups and schedule second series General CalCom meeting with all detector groups in Fall 2012 Define run conditions for initial data taking upon completion of the CLAS12 installation (beam energy, trigger, reaction channel for first analyses and full detector calibration) Define a detailed time schedule for the CLAS12 commissioning CalCom wiki page:

Commissioning with Beam (3) OPEN QUESTIONS: Is this plan complete? What should be the exact sequence of operations? What is the optimal beam energy for the initial phase of commissioning? What are the first reactions we should look at? How can we optimize the process?