Teacher Leader Endorsement Programme Designing Professional Development Session 1 – Introduction to Instructional Rounds Facilitator: Rebeka Matthews Sousa.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Advertisements

Supporting the Art & Science of Teaching Supporting the Art & Science of Teaching Robert J. Marzano.
MEMORIAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
1 Lodi Unified School District Monitoring and Accountability A District Program Improvement Update Board of Education Study Session August 19, 2008.
PSESD Teacher Principal Evaluation Project Regional Implementation Grants October 25, pm.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP: CLASSROOM WALKTHROUGHS
Developing and Supporting Highly Effective Teachers in Every Classroom Leaders of Learning Implementation Norman Public Schools Date.
“Charting the Course Together” Implementing the Common Core State Standards -Mathematics- Middle School Leadership Teams February 6, 2014.
Kyrene Professional Growth Plan
Differentiated Supervision
Dates: Thursday, Nov. 21 Time: 5:00 pm to 8:00 pm Location: Victor Scott School Aspiring for Teacher Leadership.
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Goal Setting in Educator Evaluation.
TEACHER KEYS EFFECTIVENESS SYSTEM (TKES). WHY TKES? HOUSE BILL 244 Passed during 2013 legislative session Mandates use of single, state-wide evaluation.
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
Our Leadership Journey Cynthia Cuellar Astrid Fossum Janis Freckman Connie Laughlin.
Southern Regional Education Board HSTW An Integrated and Embedded Approach to Professional Development and School Improvement Using the Six-Step Process.
Teacher Performance Evaluation and Professional Growth (T-PEPG) Model Module 1: Model Overview 1.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 1: Content and Structure Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
Math Liaison Meeting September 2014 Presenter: Simi Minhas, Math Achievement Coach Network 204.
Mathematics Teacher Leader Session 1: The National Mathematics Strategy & Modelling Exemplary Teaching 1.
Leading Change Through Differentiated PD Approaches and Structures University-District partnerships for Strengthening Instructional Leadership In Mathematics.
PILOT REQUIREMENTS FOR EACH DISTRICT: Select a minimum of 10% of schools to participate. A minimum of 1 school MUST meet the minimum participant requirements.
Principal Update Review of August 12 th Professional Development Day, Preview of upcoming Professional Development for K-2 Teachers.
Reading and Writing National Standards workshop phase 2 Term
Leading Change Through a Walk-Through Protocol
Assistant Principal Meeting August 28, :00am to 12:00pm.
40 Performance Indicators. I: Teaching for Learning ST 1: Curriculum BE A: Aligned, Reviewed and Monitored.
Linking professional development and research for mathematics teaching.
Mathematics Professional Development Senior School Teachers Session 1: Teaching Through Problem Solving 1.
Math Study Group Meeting #1 September 16, 2014 Facilitator: Simi Minhas Math Achievement Coach, Network 204.
Educator Growth and Professional Development. Objectives for this session The SLT will…  Have a thorough understanding of High Quality Standard 5: Educator.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
Teacher Leader Endorsement Programme Modeling Exemplary Mathematics Teaching Session 2 Facilitator: Rebeka Matthews Sousa Mathematics Specialist Teacher,
NEASCNEASC Standards Committees Kick-off Today’s Topic: Overview of the NEASC Game Plan and instructions for today’s work.
Summer Academy Planning and Teaching Mathematics Through Problem Solving Day 1 Facilitator: Rebeka Matthews Sousa Mathematics Specialist Teacher, Ministry.
Michigan School Improvement Conversation Starter Kit II.
Mathematics Teacher Leader Session 2: Modelling Exemplary Teaching – Teaching Through Problem Solving 1.
The Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 6: Reflecting and Planning for Next Year December 2013.
Assessment Design. Four Professional Learning Modules 1.Unpacking the AC achievement standards 2.Validity and reliability of assessments 3. Confirming.
Teacher Leader Endorsement Programme Modeling Exemplary Mathematics Teaching Session 3 Facilitator: Rebeka Matthews Sousa Mathematics Specialist Teacher,
Coaches Survey: Mining the Data May 8, 2006 PA High School Coaching Initiative.
BISD Update Teacher & Principal Evaluation Update Board of Directors October 27,
Data Analysis Processes: Cause and Effect Linking Data Analysis Processes to Teacher Evaluation Name of School.
1 NH PACE Tier 2 Leadership PLC Session 1 September 28, 2015.
Student Learning Objectives (SLO) Resources for Science 1.
A Signature Tool of The Institute for Learning
Instructional Leadership Planning with Indicators of Quality Instruction.
Lead Teach Learn PLC Fundamental III: Climate and Engagement.
CFN 609 Principals’ Meeting December 6, 2012 Providing Effective Feedback Domain 1: Planning and Preparation Component 1e: Designing Coherent Instruction.
Ipod Project Initial Overview Training February 15, :30-5:30 PM (SEA #11 – 309 – Academic) Lenoir County Public Schools.
Goal Setting in Educator Evaluation Sept. 11 th,
Teacher Leader Endorsement Programme Modeling Exemplary Mathematics Teaching Session 8 – Mathematical Standards and Practices Facilitator: Rebeka Matthews.
Teacher Leader Endorsement Programme Modeling Exemplary Mathematics Teaching Session 4 Facilitator: Rebeka Matthews Sousa Mathematics Specialist Teacher,
Instructional Leadership: Monitoring Insights, Patterns, & Trends.
Teacher Leader Endorsement Programme Modeling Exemplary Mathematics Teaching Session 6 – Differentiating Instruction Facilitator: Rebeka Matthews Sousa.
Teacher Leader Endorsement Programme Modeling Exemplary Mathematics Teaching Session 7 – Formative Assessment & Mathematical Standards and Practices Facilitator:
Lead Teach Learn PLC Fundamental I: Core Curriculum & Instruction Session 2.
Mid-year Professional Conversations 1. JESA Preparation Process 2 Learn—Engage with the content as a participant and surface questions/hot spots. Internalize—Identify.
Teacher Leader Endorsement Programme Modeling Exemplary Mathematics Teaching Session 1 Facilitator: Rebeka Matthews Sousa Mathematics Specialist Teacher,
Middle Mathematics Teacher Endorsement Programme Planning and Teaching Mathematics Through Problem Solving Session 3 Facilitator: Rebeka Matthews Sousa.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
Learning Management System
Avon Grove School District October 2009
Teacher and Leader Quality Education Support and Improvement
Exploring The Power of C!
Adapt – Adopt Module 7 Activity Overview Approximate Time: ___ minutes
Exploring The Power of C!
Colorado Department of Education
Presentation transcript:

Teacher Leader Endorsement Programme Designing Professional Development Session 1 – Introduction to Instructional Rounds Facilitator: Rebeka Matthews Sousa Mathematics Specialist Teacher, Ministry of Education 1

Give one example from your own lesson (or from a lesson you have seen) that speaks to the standard for mathematical practice that you chose from the bowl. Share with a partner. 2 ENGAGE - Give One!

Place your statement card under one of the following signs: 3 ENGAGE – Agree/Disagree!

 Teaching through problem solving is partially evident to fully operational in 100% of classrooms observed as measured by the standard for TTPS rubric. (Strategy I)  100% of teachers are using at least one quality task in every lesson (Strategy III)  Increase the percentage of P5, M2 and S1 students achieving In-depth or Sophisticated in the three components of the Problem Solving Rubric (including Mathematical Knowledge, Strategic Knowledge and Communication) by 10% each year. 4 Systemic Mathematics Goals

During this module, Teachers will:  Lead and conduct instructional rounds at their schools to gain insight on the mathematics programme at their school.  Gather teacher data on their needs for professional learning and development  Design professional learning communities or professional development sessions based on the needs of the teachers aligned with school improvement plans and the National Mathematics Strategy.  Share with colleagues professional development opportunities  Model exemplary teaching in their own mathematics lessons Expectations for this module 5

During this module, Teachers must successfully complete the following assignments:  Reading (Instructional Rounds and Professional Development);  Conduct Instructional Rounds with Principal and give supporting information for SIP;  Distribute, collect and analyze teacher needs survey;  Create Professional Development programme for school;  Execute a minimum of two PD sessions and receive feedback from teachers on implementation  Share with PD experiences with colleagues in the course;  Model exemplary teaching regularly (minimum of two visits using Danielson framework) Expectations for this module 6

During this session, Teachers will:  Understand the purpose of PD  Understand the purpose and structure of Instructional Rounds  Set Instructional rounds dates  Complete survey of Teacher Needs prior to giving to teachers in their building Key Understandings 7

 Collect school data on the Mathematics Programme through Instructional Rounds  Identify teacher needs based on inventory survey  Create PD Programme 8 Designing Professional Development

 The purpose of instructional rounds is to learn about the mathematics programme and the actions we need to take to improve mathematics outcomes.  “The primary purpose is for observing teachers to compare their own instructional practices with those of the teachers they observe” (Marzano, 2011) Continuing reading article 9 Instructional Rounds

Problem of Practice Observation of Practice Observation Debrief Next Level of Work 10 Structure of the Instructional Rounds Process

Standard for Teaching Through Problem Solving

Standard for High Quality Tasks

Next session date: Wed. Feb. 24, 4-6 pm  How to design PD based on teacher survey  Assignments: (due by the next session)  Reading (Instructional Rounds & Professional Development)  Teacher Support Inventory  Set Instructional Rounds date  Set lesson visit date 13 What’s next?