Mars Sample Return Discussions As presented on February 23, 2010

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Location of Partners and customers Who are our customers? MSSL Centre for Process engineering European Space Agency JOANNEUM RESEARCH Swedish Research.
Advertisements

Concept Overview for 2 mt Case “2 mt case”: integrated payloads of no more than 2 mt can be landed on the surface of Mars; extension of current Mars EDL.
6 th International Planetary Probe Workshop, Atlanta, Georgia Short Course on Extreme Environments Technologies 06/ Preliminary - For Discussion.
Mars Telecommunications Relay CubeSat Constellation David Spencer Space System Design Laboratory Georgia Institute of Technology November 20, 2014.
VI. Descent and Terminal Guidance for Pinpoint Landing and Hazard Avoidance Session Chair: Dr. Sam W. Thurman.
The ExoMars Program Marcello Coradini Head, Exploration Office and Coordinator Solar System Missions ESA NOTE ADDED BY JPL WEBMASTER: This document was.
Polar Highly Elliptical / Molniya Orbit Science (PHEMOS) Mission Phase 0/A Studies Mid-Term Review Meetings January 12-14th, 2011.
PRE-DECISIONAL DRAFT; For planning and discussion purposes only 1 1 March 4-5, 2008 Evolution of Lunar to Planetary Landing A.Miguel San Martin Mars Science.
CURIOSITY: Big Mars Rover for Big Mars Science! Artist’s Concept. NASA/JPL-Caltech.
Inner Guides=Text Boundary Outer Guides=Inner Boundary Asteroid Redirect Mission and Human Exploration Michele Gates Human Exploration and Operations Mission.
1 16 June 2011, Lisbon (P) MEPAG J. L. Vago, Michael Meyer, and iJSWG Team 2018 Joint Rover Objectives NOTE ADDED BY JPL WEBMASTER: This content has not.
Mars EDL CubeSat Mission Jekan Thanga 1, Jim Bell 1 Space and Terrestrial Robotic Exploration Laboratory School of Earth and Space Exploration (SESE) Arizona.
Minimalist Human Mars Mission Surface infrastructure discussion July 26 th, 2008.
Technology Enabling the Exploration of Mars Brooke Tuttle ITMG – PowerPoint Presentation 11/18/2008.
Autonomous Landing Hazard Avoidance Technology (ALHAT) Page 1 March 2008 Go for Lunar Landing Real-Time Imaging Technology for the Return to the Moon Dr.
Mars Exploration By Jacob Stinar. Water on Mars.
Navigation Systems for Lunar Landing Ian J. Gravseth Ball Aerospace and Technologies Corp. March 5 th, 2007 Ian J. Gravseth Ball Aerospace and Technologies.
LSU 10/09/2007System Design1 Project Management Unit #2.
Emerging Capabilities for the Next Mars Orbiter
Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology National Aeronautics and Space Administration National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
Titan Mariner Spacecraft Study Titan Team! IPPW-5 June 24, 2007.
© Lavochkin Association, 2013 Ganymede Lander mission overview.
Filling Mars Human Exploration Strategic Knowledge Gaps with Next Generation Meteorological Instrumentation. S. Rafkin, Southwest Research Institute
Mars 2020 Project Matt Wallace Deputy Project Manager August 3, 2015.
Overview of the MELOS-1, Mars exploration program in Japan MEPAG meeting 2014 Hirdy Miyamoto (U of Tokyo) on behalf of Takehiko Satoh (MELOS-1 working.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California Mars Exploration Directorate.
Bits and Pieces. Spacecraft Systems Propulsion –Already discussed Communications Science instruments Power.
Mars Exploration Rover MER Surface Lifetime Presented at Landing Site Selection Workshop #3 March 26-28, 2002 J. Matijevic 3/28/02.
Mars Exploration Rovers (MER) Entry, Descent, Landing, and Deployment.
Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology August 4, 2015 Austin Nicholas Landing Site Considerations Related to the Potential Sample.
IMARS History and Phase II Overview Presented to MEPAG 13 May 2014 L. May, NASA HQ NOTE ADDED BY JPL WEBMASTER: This content has not been approved or adopted.
Planetary Protection 1 Planetary Protection Considerations for Mars Sample Return C. Conley, NASA PPO G. Kminek, ESA PPO 4 August, 2010.
Mars in the Planetary Decadal Survey Steve Squyres Cornell University Chairman, Planetary Science Decadal Survey Steve Squyres Cornell University Chairman,
STRATEGIES FOR MARS NETWORK MISSIONS VIA AN ALTERNATIVE ENTRY, DESCENT, AND LANDING ARCHITECTURE 10 TH INTERNATIONAL PLANETARY PROBE WORKSHOP June,
RASC-AL 2010 Topics. TECHNOLOGY-ENABLED HUMAN MARS MISSION NASA is interested in eventual human mission to the Martian surface. Current Mars design reference.
Mars Exploration Program Response to: Vision and Voyages for Planetary Science in the Decade Michael Meyer MEPAG June 2011 Lead Scientist, Mars.
Minimalist Mars Mission Establishing a Human Toehold on the Red Planet Executive Summary DevelopSpace MinMars Team.
Mars Today 1 An immediate and inexpensive program for manned Mars visitation.
MATT Report Feb. 20, Philip Christensen (Chair) Lars Borg (ND-SAG Co-Chair) Wendy Calvin (MSO SAG Chair) Mike Carr Dave Des Marais (ND-SAG Co-Chair)
NASA/Air Force Cost Model presented by Keith Smith Science Applications International Corporation 2002 SCEA National Conference June
 The Multi-Tier Mission Architecture and a Different Approach to Entry, Descent and Landing Jeremy Straub Department of Computer Science University of.
PREDECISIONAL FOR PLANNING AND DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY 1 Humans to the Martian System Preliminary Summary of Strategic Knowledge Gaps P-SAG (jointly sponsored.
PROPOSED 2018 Joint Rover Mission Plans for Proposed 2018 NASA & ESA Joint Rover Mission Landing Site Selection Matt Golombek Mars Exploration Program.
Kelley Case Concept Design Methods Chief JPL Innovation Foundry Caltech Space Challenge March 24, 2013.
Human Exploration of Mars Design Reference Architecture 5
Goals for this Meeting: Day 1 Day 2 Update the community on progress in the exploration of Mars, including NASA and the European Space Agency (missions.
Science investigations in the framework of expedition to Europa
Review of Past and Proposed Mars EDL Systems. Past and Proposed Mars EDL Systems MinMars Mars entry body design is derived from JPL Austere Mars entry.
Enabling Capabilities A Robotic Field Geologist Access to a site mapped from orbit Long life, mobility, capability to explore a local region Remote sensing.
SRR and PDR Charter & Review Team Linda Pacini (GSFC) Review Chair.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration February 27, 2013 Defining Potential HEOMD Instruments for Mars 2020 A Work in Progress... NOTE ADDED BY.
Approved For Public Release © The Aerospace Corporation 2009 June 17, 2009 Initial Summary of Human Rated Delta IV Heavy Study Briefing to the Review of.
Rover and Instrument Capabilities Life in the Atacama 2004 Science & Technology Workshop Michael Wagner, James Teza, Stuart Heys Robotics Institute, Carnegie.
Robotics and Autonomy Test Facility - Hardware Verification needs Elie Allouis HRAF Workshop – 28/02/2012.
Mars Exploration Rover Mission Thread-like features on Mars: Mystery Solved Opportunity - March 2004.
MEPAG: Action Items, Forward Planning Jack Mustard, MEPAG Chair MRO HiRISE / U. Arizona / JPL / NASA NOTE ADDED BY JPL WEBMASTER: This document was prepared.
V - 1 V. System Technology for Large Space Telescopes Session Chair: Juan A. Roman.
Pre-decisional – for Planning and Discussion Purposes Only 1 Technology Planning for Future Mars Missions Samad Hayati Manager, Mars Technology Program.
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use FISO COLLOQUIUM, 18 June 2014 B. HUFENBACH ESA’S SPACE EXPLORATION STRATEGY.
AAE 450 Spring 2010 AAE 450 2/11/2010 Kathy Brumbaugh Chris Spreen
Scarab Autonomous Traverse Carnegie Mellon December 2007 David Wettergreen.
EDGE™ Preliminary Project Plan P09102 – METEOR Stage Separation System JJ Guerrette (ME)
Session Chair: Dr. Sam W. Thurman
Planetary Lander PDR Team Name
Mars 2020 Rover Mission The Mars 2020 mission addresses high-priority science goals for Mars exploration, including key questions about the potential for.
The Akon Europa Penetrator
Mars Sustainability Workshop Kennedy Space Center February 8, 2018
Curious about Curiosity?
Autonomous Operations in Space
Title (do not change font or font size for any of the chart elements)
Presentation transcript:

Mars Sample Return Discussions As presented on February 23, 2010 *Mars Sample Return is conceptual in nature and is subject to NASA approval. This approval would not be granted until NASA completes the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process.

Functional Steps Required to Return a Scientifically Selected Sample to Earth * Launch from Earth/Land on Mars Select Samples Acquire/Cache Samples Sample Canisters On Mars Surface * Sample Caching Rover (MAX-C) ** * Launch Samples to Mars Orbit Retrieve/Package Samples on Mars Mars Sample Return Lander Orbiting Sample (OS) in Mars Orbit * ** * Capture and Isolate Sample Container Return to Earth Land on Earth Orbiting Sample (OS) On Earth Mars Sample Return Orbiter * Retrieve/Quarantine and Preserve Samples on Earth Assess Hazards Sample Science **Note: Launch sequence of MSR-L/MSR-L can be switched: launching MSR-O first can provide telecom relay support for EDL/surface operation/MAV launch Mars Returned Sample Handling (MRSH) Facility Sample Science *Artist’s Rendering

Multi-Element Architecture for Returning Samples from Mars Is a Resilient Approach * Mars Sample Return Lander * Mars Returned Sample Handling * Mars Sample Return Orbiter * MAX-C (Caching Rover) * Science robustness Allows robust duration for collection of high quality samples Technical robustness Keeps landed mass requirements in family with MSL Entry/Descent/Landing (EDL) capability Spreads technical challenges across multiple elements Programmatic robustness Involves mission concepts with sizes similar to our implementation experience Incremental progress with samples in safe, scientifically intact states: improved program resiliency Spreads budget needs and reduces peak year program budget demand Leverages and retains EDL technical know-how *Artist’s Rendering

Mars Astrobiological Explorer-Cacher (MAX-C) rover MAX-C rover will perform in situ exploration of Mars and acquire/cache dual sets of scientifically selected samples Team X conducted Decadal Survey Mars Panel study in Jan’10: added dual cache Key mission concept features Cruise/EDL system derived from MSL, launched on Atlas V 531 class vehicle. Land in ~10 km radius landing ellipse, up to -1 km altitude, within +25 to -15 degrees latitude. 43% mass margin carried on MAX-C rover (adopting many MSL parts), landing platform, and hardware where specific modifications would be made to the MSL EDL system. Major Rover Attributes Science Capability Remote and contact science: Color stereo imaging, macro/micro-scale mineralogy/composition, micro-scale organic detection/characterization, micro-scale imaging Coring and caching rock samples for future return Payload Mass ~15 kg instruments ~60 kg including corer/abrader, dual cache, mast, arm Traverse Capability 20 km (design capability) Surface Lifetime 500 Sols (design life) Instrument/Sensing Mast Quad UHF Helix High Gain Antenna Low Gain Antenna 2.2m Ultraflex Solar Array Sampling/Science Arm Hazard Cameras SHEC “Sample Cache” * * Artist’s Renderings

Current 2018 Mission Concept Implementation Approach Team X study concept included: Landing platform (pallet): ‘proof-of-concept’ by Team X; with further refinements by dedicated design team Scaling of MSL aeroshell diameter (from 4.5 m to 4.7 m) to accommodate 2 rovers Preserve MSL shape, L/D Same thermal protection system Same parachute Descent stage architecture/design based on MSL Same MSL engines, avionics, radar, algorithms, etc Mechanical structure updated to accommodate rovers/platform geometry/loads Incorporates terrain-relative descent navigation capability Land MAX-C and ExoMars rovers together attached to a landing platform MAX-C and ExoMars rovers perform in situ science exploration: assessing potential joint experiments MAX-C will cache scientifically selected samples for future return * * MSL Cruise/EDL and Skycrane system lands Rovers on platform * * * * Sample Canisters On Mars Surface MAX-C Rover Rovers post-landing w/ example egress aids * Artist’s Renderings * Artist’s Renderings

Mars Sample Return Orbiter Concept MSR Orbiter will Rendezvous with Orbiting Sample (OS) container in 500km orbit. Capture, transfer and package OS into Earth Entry Vehicle (EEV) Perform “break-the-chain” of contact with Mars Return to Earth Release EEV for entry Divert into a non-return trajectory If Before MSR Lander Monitor critical events of EDL and MAV launch Provide telecomm relay for lander and rover Key mission concept features Over twice the propellant needed by typical Mars orbiters. Uses bi-prop systems flown on previous Mars missions UHF Electra relay system for surface relay Orbiter mass quite dependent on specific launch and return years. Designed to envelop opportunities in early-mid 2020s. EEV 50 kg Orbiter Rendezvous systems 20 Systems Capture/Sample Transfer 40 Avionics Power 130 Structures/Mechanisms 330 Cabling Telecom 30 Propulsion 170 Thermal Misc. Contingency 100 TOTAL Orbiter Systems Mass 940 kg Propellant 2280 kg TOTAL (43% margins) 3270 kg Alternate Design: Separate prop stage that separates after Trans Earth Injection Team-X Design: No “staging” required * * * Artist’s Renderings

MSR Orbiter: Sample Capture/Earth Entry Vehicle (EEV) * * Orbiting Sample (OS) container Capture Basket concept testing on NASA C-9 zero-g aircraft Strawman EEV design 0.9m diameter, 60° sphere-cone blunt body Self-righting configuration No parachute required Hard landing on heatshield structure, with crushable material surrounding OS Capitalizes on design heritage Extensive aero-thermal testing and analysis Wind tunnel tests verified self-righting Detection and rendezvous systems OS released into a 500km circular orbit by the MAV Optical detection from as far as 10,000km. Autonomous operation for last tens of meters Capture System Capture basket concept designed Prototype demonstrated on NASA zero-g aircraft campaign. * Artist’s Renderings

Mars Sample Return Lander Concept MSR Lander will Land a pallet with Mars Ascent Vehicle (MAV) and fetch rover Upon safe landing, the fetch rover will egress and retrieve MAX-C sample cache Traverse distance up to ~14 km Sample cache transferred by robotic arm on pallet from fetch rover to MAV MAV will launch sample container into stable Martian orbit Key mission concept features MSR lander pallet delivered to the surface via the Skycrane EDL approach Supports and protects MAV in thermal igloo and minimizes thermal cycle depths 1 Earth year life Lander WEB * Ultraflex Solar Array Lander arm MAV Egress Ramps UHF Bio-Thermal Barrier Fetch Rover * Fetch Rover *Artist’s concept

Mars Returned Sample Handling Element Mars Returned Sample Handling element includes: ground recovery operations; Sample Receiving Facility (SRF) and sample curation facility The SRF will Contain samples as if potentially hazardous, equivalent to biosafety level-4 (BSL-4). Keep samples isolated from Earth- sourced contaminants Provide capability to conduct biohazard test protocol as a prerequisite to release of samples from containment. Could serve as a sample curation facility after hazard assessment. Industry studies performed to scope facility and processes (2003) 3 architectural firms, with experience in biosafety, semi-conductor and food industries. Current costs estimates and scope based on studies and comparison to existing BSL-4 facilities. Artist’s concept of an SRF

Sample Acquisition and Encapsulation Target Science Requirements* Acquire~ 20 rock cores with dimension approximately 1 cm wide by 5 cm long Store and seal samples in individual tubes Provide capability to reject a sample after acquisition Measure the sample volume or mass with 50% accuracy Current Capabilities/State of the Art Two flight-like corers developed by Honeybee Robotics: Mini Corer (for ’03/‘05 MSR) CAT (for MSL) in 2006. MSL flight drill developed and tested Examples of acceptable samples *Consistent with MEPAG Next Decade Science Analysis Group (ND-SAG)

Mars Ascent vehicle (MAV) All figures are artist’s concepts Target Requirements Launches 5kg Orbiting Sample (OS) into 500+/-100 km orbit, +/-0.2deg Ability to launch from +/- 30o latitudes Continuous telemetry for critical event coverage during ascent. Survive relevant environment for Earth-Mars Transit, EDL, and Mars surface environment for up to one Earth year on Mars Current Capabilities/State of the Art NASA has not launched a rocket from a planetary surface autonomously before. MAV components are available, but are not developed for long-term storage in relevant environments (including thermal cycling) or for EDL g-loads. Mass estimate assessment ~300 kg Payload Fairing Orbiting Sample (OS) Avionics Compartment Star 13A SRM 2.5 m Stretched Star 17A SRM TVC Actuators * LMA 2002 study

Back Planetary Protection CV Bottom OS CV Top Target Requirement MSR is a Restricted Earth Return mission Goal of <10-6 chance of inadvertent release of an unsterilized >0.2 micron Mars particle. Current Capabilities/State of the Art Probabilistic Risk Analysis (PRA) approach was developed to assess the overall probability of meeting the goal Preliminary design of the EEV was completed and a test article developed. Performed component and system tests A brazing technique was developed to TRL 3 for containment assurance and breaking the chain of contact with Mars A leak detection concept was developed to TRL 3 Sealed CV

Other Key Challenges Round trip planetary protection (MAX-C) Round Trip PP Round trip planetary protection (MAX-C) Objective: Avoid false positive life detection Approach: Clean assembly, bio-barrier, analytical tool to compute overall probability of contamination Mobility capability (MAX-C and MSR fetch rover) Objectives: Increase average rover speed and develop lighter/smaller motor controller Approach: Use FPGAs as co-processors and develop distributed motor control Terrain-relative descent navigation (MAX-C and MSR lander) Objective: Improved landing robustness Approach: Use terrain-relative navigation approach for avoiding landing hazards. Leverage NASA ALHAT project Rendezvous and sample capture (MSR orbiter) Objective: Locate, track, rendezvous, and capture OS in Mars orbit Approach: Update system design, develop testbeds, and perform tests. Leverage Orbital Express capability 50 cm rover move timeline Safe Landing Sample Capture

Summary Strong scientific impetus for sample return Next major step in understanding Mars and the Solar System Engineering readiness for sample return Past investments have developed key capabilities critical to sample return Key remaining technical challenges/development are identified Resilient multi-flight-element approach Science robustness Allows proper sample selection/acquisition Technical robustness Spreads technical challenges across multiple elements Keeps landed mass requirements in family with MSL EDL capability Programmatic robustness Involves concepts similar to our existing implementation experience Scientifically intact samples on/around Mars that provides program resiliency Spreads budget needs over ~1.5 decade Approach amenable to international partnership Multi-element MSR should not be viewed as an “isolated (flagship) mission” but as a cohesive campaign that builds on the past decade of Mars exploration