PMT Calibration R.Sawada 7/Jan/2007. Time calibration Method was talked at the previous meeting. The problems which was shown before were because I used.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

MEG 実験液体キセノンカロリメータにおけるエネルギー分解能の追究東大素粒子センター金子大輔他 MEG コラボレーション.

Advertisements

Electromagnetic shower in the AHCAL selection criteria data / MonteCarlo comparison of: handling linearity shower shapes CALICE collaboration meeting may.

2 Introduction   MiniCal test-beam studies started at the beginning of March (till March 6 we only had 17 APD’s, then 33 APD’s)   A few days were.

Adil Khan Kyungpook National university Korea-Japan Joint ScECAL Group Meeting kobe University Japan 3 rd September 2010.

EH1 (AD 1&2, IWS, OWS) PMT Jul. 30 – Aug. 20 RollingGain Calibration Summary Zhe Wang (BNL) and Qing He (Princeton) Aug. 22, 2011.

PROGRESS ON WATER PROPERTIES ON TRACKS RECONSTRUCTION Harold Yepes-Ramirez 09/11/2011.

1 Scintillating Fibre Cosmic Ray Test Results Malcolm Ellis Imperial College London Monday 29 th March 2004.

July 2001 Snowmass A New Measurement of  from KTeV Introduction The KTeV Detector  Analysis of 1997 Data Update of Previous Result Conclusions.

The TA Energy Scale Douglas Bergman Rutgers University Aspen UHECR Workshop April 2007.

Veto Wall Test Hyupwoo Lee MINERvA/Jupiter Group Meeting Oct, 24, 2007.

Ionization. Measuring Ions A beam of charged particles will ionize gas. –Particle energy E –Chamber area A An applied field will cause ions and electrons.

1 Beam e ’s from antineutrinos using the pME and LE beams David Jaffe, Pedro Ochoa December 8 th 2006  Part 1: Reminder and update  Part 2: Change in.

GLAST LAT ProjectI&T Meeting – Feb 12, 2003 W. Focke 1 EM timing analysis Warren Focke February 12, 2004.

Mass test of MPPC with a prototype of MEG II liquid xenon detector

Veto Wall Test Hyupwoo Lee MINERvA/Jupiter Group Meeting Apr, 16, 2008.

WG 1 Summary Techniques and Applications. WG1 sessions New algorithms: UV smooth, electron maps Source locations Source sizes Source fluxes (imaging spectroscopy)

K1.8 meeting Report from E05 group Toshiyuki Gogami 26 Dec 2014.

1 HBD Commissioning (II) Itzhak Tserruya HBD group meeting November 28, 2006 Progress from October 3 to November 28, 2006.

W  eν The W->eν analysis is a phi uniformity calibration, and only yields relative calibration constants. This means that all of the α’s in a given eta.

PERFORMANCE OF THE MACRO LIMITED STREAMER TUBES IN DRIFT MODE FOR MEASUREMENTS OF MUON ENERGY - Use of the MACRO limited streamer tubes in drift mode -Use.

Uni Bergen:G. Eigen, J. Zalieckas, E. van der Kraaij FZU Prague: J. Cvach, J. Kvasnicka, I. Polák CALICE meeting, Argonne, 19/03/2014.

1/41 LXe Beam Test Result CEX beam test 2004 Cryogenic Equipment Preparation Status Liquid Xenon Photon Detector Group.

14/02/2007 Paolo Walter Cattaneo 1 1.Trigger analysis 2.Muon rate 3.Q distribution 4.Baseline 5.Pulse shape 6.Z measurement 7.Att measurement OUTLINE.

IceCube: String 21 reconstruction Dmitry Chirkin, LBNL Presented by Spencer Klein LLH reconstruction algorithm Reconstruction of digital waveforms Muon.

Analysis of PSI beam test R.Sawada 09/Feb/2004 MEG collaboration R.Sawada 09/Feb/2004 MEG collaboration

26 Jan, MEG Software Status Framework for MEG MC, Unification of LargePrototype/beam test, Schedule and DC reconstruction MEG Software Group.

The Scintillator ECAL Beam Test at FNAL K. Kotera, Shinshu-u, 1st October 2009 CALICE Scintillator ECAL group; Kobe University, Kyungpook University, the.

SLAC, HiRes T-461: “FLASH” part 1 Justin Findlay.

Improvement on vertex reconstruction Motivations Many peaks in vertex distributions Further study for the

1 xCAL monitoring Yu. Guz, IHEP, Protvino I.Machikhiliyan, ITEP, Moscow.

1 Satoshi Mihara for the   e  collaboration, review meeting at PSI, Jul 2002 Photon Detector Satoshi Mihara ICEPP, Univ. of Tokyo 1.Large Prototype.

Liquid Xenon Calorimeter Analysis R.Sawada on behalf of the MEG LXe analysis group 17/Feb/2009.

Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Calibration of the COSY-TOF STT & pp Elastic Analysis Sedigheh Jowzaee IKP Group Talk 11 July 2013.

MEG Run 2008 液体キセノンガンマ線検出器東京大学素粒子物理国際研究センター西村康宏、他 MEG コラボレーション 2008 年秋季物理学会＠山形大学小白川キャンパス.

T0 offline status Alla Maevskaya for T0 team 8 March 2011 ALICE offline week.

Attenuation measurement with all 4 frozen-in SPATS strings Justin Vandenbroucke Freija Descamps IceCube Collaboration Meeting, Utrecht, Netherlands September.

Ciro Bigongiari, Salvatore Mangano Results of the optical properties of sea water with the OB system.

1 NaI calibrationneutron observation NaI calibration and neutron observation during the charge exchange experiment 1.Improving the NaI energy resolution.

1 A first look at the KEK tracker data with G4MICE Malcolm Ellis 2 nd December 2005.

1ECFA/Vienna 16/11/05D.R. Ward David Ward Compare these test beam data with Geant4 and Geant3 Monte Carlos. CALICE has tested an (incomplete) prototype.

Search for High-Mass Resonances in e + e - Jia Liu Madelyne Greene, Lana Muniz, Jane Nachtman Goal for the summer Searching for new particle Z’ --- a massive.

Comparison of different km3 designs using Antares tools Three kinds of detector geometry Incoming muons within TeV energy range Detector efficiency.

Longitudinal shower profile - CERN electron runs Valeria Bartsch University College London.

Adam Blake, June 9 th Results Quick Review Look at Some Data In Depth Look at One Anomalous Event Conclusion.

1 HBD Commissioning Itzhak Tserruya DC meeting, BNL December 13, 2006 Progress from October 3 to November 28, 2006.

A. De Caro for the ALICE TOF Offline Group (University of Salerno and INFN)

1 Ciro Bigongiari, Salvatore Mangano Results of the optical properties of sea water with the OB system.

A. Baldini PSI July 05 Overview of the experiment MEG is being built (Beam line, Magnet, LXe, DC, TC, Elect., Software) Delays in some items: O(months)

Basic Measurement of the Hamamatsu 10 inch PMT at –40 degree –40 degree Hiroko Miyamoto Dept. of Physics CHIBA University The Uniformity measurement of.

Comparison of MC and data Abelardo Moralejo Padova.

MEG 実験 2009 液体キセノン検出器の性能 II 西村康宏, 他 MEG コラボレーション東京大学素粒子物理国際研究センター第 65 回年次大会岡山大学.

PMT time offset calibration (not completed) R.Sawada 27/Dec/2007.

Software Update Takashi HACHIYA RIKEN 2012/2/10RIKEN VTX software meeting1.

Outline Description of the experimental setup Aim of this work TDC spectra analysis Tracking method steps Autocalibration Single tube resolution Summary.

Software Update Takashi HACHIYA RIKEN 2012/1/31VTX software meeting1.

9 Feb, MEG Software Status -for the coming review committee- Question from A.Blondel Our answer Schedule and Man power MEG Software Group.

1 PMT Univ. of Tokyo Yasuko HISAMATSU ICEPP, MEG Collaboration meeting Feb. 10th, 2004.

1 PMT Univ. of Tokyo Yasuko HISAMATSU ICEPP, The University of Tokyo MEG VRVS meeting Jan. 20th, 2004.

DESY BT analysis - updates - S. Uozumi Dec-12 th 2011 ScECAL meeting.

By: Daniel Coelho Matthew Szydagis Robert Svoboda Improving Electron / Gamma Separation LBNE Software Fermilab, ILFebruary 1, 2013.

Group refractive index ● Method ● Additional runs ● Wavelength distribution ● Systematics ● Results.

Feb C.Smith UVA EC energy calibration – g13 pass0 For pass0 data were cooked with CALDB calibration constants reset to nominal 10 channels / MeV.

ATLAS Tile Calorimeter Data Quality Assessment and Performance

OD Tuning: SK-IV Roger Wendell TMC Meeting

PreShower Characterisations

Analysis Test Beam Pixel TPC

on behalf of the NEMO Collaboration

Testbeam analysis on module #1

Signal studies OUTLINE 1- Signal extraction

西村美紀（東大）他 MEGIIコラボレーション日本物理学会第73回年次大会（2018年）東京理科大学（野田キャンパス）

Presentation transcript:

PMT Calibration R.Sawada 7/Jan/2007

Time calibration Method was talked at the previous meeting. The problems which was shown before were because I used PMTs in shadow from LED.

3 Distance [cm] Time [nsec]

4 Time offset and DRS channel According to Matthis, there is similar dependence in DC data. Chip:0Chip:1

5 Time offset and DRS board Crate:4Crate:5 Slot:2 There is small correlation. This was not expected because time difference due to electronics is corrected by using clock analysis. This can be variation of cable length in liquid xenon. (due to temperature co-efficient)

6 Time distribution before calibration Distance [cm] Time [nsec] Crate:4,Chip0 Crate:4,Chip1 Crate:5,Chip0 Crate:5,Chip1 Crate:5,Slot12

7 Time distribution before calibration Distance [cm] Time [nsec]

8 Result Time offset [nsec]Time offset uncertainty [nsec] One entry is one PMT This result is available in analysis and simulation. This number is uncertainty of measurement of one LED. Average is 1/sqrt(2)-1/sqrt(4) better.

Q.E. Analyzed by using a task developed by Pisa group, with my small modification.

10 PMT Nphe fit (Same as LP) Gaussian when mean of nphe > 20 Poisson x Gaussian when mean of nphe < 20 Sigma of Gaussian is obtained from pedestal events

11 gas alpha Noise Outer wall alpha Wire alpha + Top/Bottom wall alpha Qsum2 > 2500

12 liquid alpha

13 Data:MC One graph is one PMT. One point is one alpha. Gas data (1/10 statistics, full statistics analysis is still running)

14 Data:MC One graph is one PMT. One point is one alpha. Liquid data (full statistics)

15 Result Q.E. liquid Full statistics of gas is running. Q.E. in liquid Q.E. in LP or Pisa

16 Summary Time calibration was done in psec uncertainty. Result is available Speed of light observed on Inner/Outer and lateral is slightly different. Q.E. estimation using liquid data was done. Gas will be finished soon. Result will be available in 1-2 days. Uncertainty is currently fitting error of “data v.s. MC.” It looks rather small. I will check the code again. I used MC result produced by Pisa group. I will check it with my MC. (It must be same, because we are using the same MC software.) PMT calibration was almost finished. I will proceed to absorption length estimation, Q.E. estimation dependence on geometry (check of MC), reconstruction and detector calibration. ÷ 1/sqrt(2) ~ 1/sqrt(4)