Ford Pinto: A Fiery Controversy BE1200 Team 8 | Quiz 7.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ethics in Engineering Concepts and Cases The Ohio State University
Advertisements

Michael Davis Article PowerPoint Lecture Prepared by Christy Moore
Engineering Ethics. Engineering is a profession Team Exercise #1 In 1 minute, list as many professions as you can.
Introduction to Engineering Ethics – 2 Engineering Ethics Agenda Review Ethics I Introduce resources for ethical decisions in engineering References Challenger.
Additional Arduino Control & Ethics 1. Objectives  Outline engineering ethics  Emphasize importance of project documentation  Discuss Servo Function.
Engineering Disaster: Ford Pinto Explosions Walter Crickmer, Philip Peters II, Ben Pitzer, Presented to: Dr. Reddy EE 481 March 19, 2014.
Lecture: Ethics for High School Presented By: Craig Titus Teaching Engineering Ethics in the High School Classroom Presented by: 1 Craig Titus Head Teaching.
Forces of Change Don H. Hansen Health Care Services Partner
Bus 303 Group N. "You don't want to talk about the Pinto," said a Ford official. "Leave that one in the cemetery." When people talk about how bad American.
Bus 303 Group N. Summary Cost Benefit Analysis Ethical Issues Change Alternatives Recommendation.
Introduction To Some of the Worst Engineering Failures EML3004C – Fall 2002.
PROFESSIONALISM AND ETHICS IN ENGINEERING INTRODUCTION TO ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY, 7 TH ED. BY POND AND RANKINEN 1.
Three Ethical Case Studies
Joint Engineers Conference Making Ethical Decisions in Engineering Stephen Smith, P.E.
Organisational Culture Refers to the “context” – the organisational environment Determines the the type of communication that will take place.
16 Chapter Consumer Protection Pressures to Promote Consumer Interests
Engineering Ethics.
ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALISM AND ETHICS EGN 4034 FALL TERM 2008 DR. G.HASKINS.
Ethical and Legal Response to Change in the Workforce.
Business Crisis and Continuity Management (BCCM) Class Session 17
Class 11_1 Today: Engineering ethics: a short discussion followed by case study group work Handout: Engineering code of ethics (our technical drawing work.
Ford Motor Company in the 1970s The Pinto Problem Cost Benefit Analysis Ethical Issues Change Alternatives Recommendation.
Ethical Behaviour. Ethical Behaviour and Social Responsibility Planning ahead—study questions: 1.What is ethical behaviour? 2.How do ethical dilemmas.
Chapter 6: Engineering Ethics
1 Recipe for Disaster: Engineering without Ethics Dr. C. Dianne Martin Professor, Computer Science The George Washington University
Engineering Ethics  What are Ethics?. Engineering Ethics  How are Ethics relevant to the engineering discipline? As a Professional Engineer, I dedicate.
Professionalism and Ethics. Engineering Profession  Engineering is... “the profession in which a knowledge of the mathematical and natural sciences gained.
Successful managers have Traits of the head - initiative, co- operativeness, flexibility, and coolness under pressure. At the expense of traits of the.
ENGINEERING PROFESSIONALISM AND ETHICS EGN 4034 FALL TERM 2007 DR. CLAYTON J. CLARK II.
Ethics. What is the basis for moral criticism? A well thought-out code of ethics All engineering societies have promulgated a version of a code of ethics.
Devin Rose, Sarah Yee, Nick Cowen Team 8 Quiz #8 GM Ignition switch malfunction.
Chapter 5 Dr. Bahaa Al-Sheikh & Eng. Mohammed Al-Sumady Intoduction to Engineering Engineering Ethics.
Ethics and Engineering Presented By: Jeff Smith Greg Thurston Allen Taylor.
The Ford Pinto Chase Cheviron and Aliya Sultaninkarim.
HU151: Industrial Safety Prof. Dr. Abdelsamie Moet Fall 2012/13 Pharos University in Alexandria Faculty of Engineering Lecture 1: Course Outline.
Ethics Presentation Group 16: Biometrics April 6th, 2015.
Group 7 Ethics Presentation Group Members: Adam Burky Maxx Chancey John Dixon Chris Martinez Alex Pingley.
Professional Ethics Lecture – 2 b 5th Sep 2012 Center for Advanced Studies in Engineering Shahid Iqbal.
Ford Pinto and utilitarian ethics
Utilitarianism Ethics Dr. Jason M. Chang. Consequentialism Locates morality entirely in the consequences An action is morally right if it generates the.
5-1 CHAPTER 5 Engineering Ethics © 2011 Cengage Learning Engineering. All Rights Reserved.
Chrysler/Jeep Recall By: Cassondra Beck, Michelle Castillo, Brok Haines, and Brian Reed.
Why do “they” require ethics for accredited undergraduate engineering programs? 2 (a) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering.
Engineering Ethics ELEC 422, Spring 2006 (kudos to Drs. Peeples and Jerse for portions of this presentation)
Utah Driver Education and Training Strategies for Managing Risk with Vehicle and Highway Designs Part I Source: FHWA.
Engineering Ethics. Engineering Ethics ( I ) Wael. A. Moustafa MA.Sc., P.Eng. May 11, 2011 Mechanical Engineering Department Umm Al-Qura University.
Introduction To Ethics
Engineering Ethics Cory Hoi Dylan Stryker Chris Sanson Paul Goyette.
Toyota Accelerator Pedal Recall Tyler Knott Alan Sana George Cornwell.
 Societal and global impact of engineering solutions  Codes of ethics in engineering  Risk-taking in engineering.
Ethics Please read Code of Ethics by week of Feb. 29 (lab). SLO # 6 professional and ethical responsibility.
1 of of 23 What if… An industry markets a product as "safe", but it’s the leading cause of preventable death in the United States?
Was Ford to Blame in the Pinto Case Michael Agriesti.
Ethical Decision Making. Daniels College Mission.
1 The Nature of Ethics Ethics is generally concerned with rules or guidelines for morals and/or socially approved conduct Ethical standards generally apply.
Social Responsibility and Ethics Chapter 6 Section 2.
By Kelly Warden December  Opened in 1967 along I-35 W  Bridge goes over the Mississippi River in Minneapolis, Minnesota  Minnesota’s 5 th busiest.
Dr. Elizabeth Hoppe Lewis University June Overview of Ethics Deontology (ethics based on duty or obligation) Immanuel Kant ( ) Focus on.
Bus 303 Group N. "You don't want to talk about the Pinto," said a Ford official. "Leave that one in the cemetery." When people talk about how bad American.
Introduction To Some of the Worst Engineering Failures
Engineering Ethics.
Developing Next Generation Leaders through Applied Know-How
Anna Kozhemyakov PBRL425-F1WW (F16)
Engineering Ethics and Sustainability
Recitation 4 Intro Engineering Pro Tips
Academic Honesty and Plagiarism
Recitation 4 Intro Engineering Pro Tips
Code of Engineering Ethics
Academic Honesty and Plagiarism
Professional Responsibility and Ethics
Presentation transcript:

Ford Pinto: A Fiery Controversy BE1200 Team 8 | Quiz 7

Is it ethically permissible to put a dollar value on human life? In a business environment like the automotive industry where profits matter over everything else. Should the engineering community find it morally permissible to employ such strategies as Cost-benefit analysis when weighing a decision between profits and public safety? During the early 1970’s the very profitable Ford Pinto was the largest selling subcompact car in America. It also was a time where the automotive industry saw more safety improvements to cars than any other period in history. Despite industry trends towards safety, crashes involving the Pinto frequently caused its gas tank to rupture. By conservative estimates these crashes had caused 500 burn deaths to people who would not have been seriously injured if the car had not burst into flames. Ford spent millions to lobby against stricter government safety standards even though they already possessed the technology to improve the gas tank design. After pressure from Ford the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration reported their cost value of a human life. Using this new formula Ford conducted its own internal cost-benefit analysis, which placed a dollar value on human life, and decided it wasn’t profitable to make the changes to the fuel tank design.

Since the behind-the-axle design model provided more trunk space and could be utilized in a hatchback or wagon models, Ford decided to build the Pinto with this design even though it was not considered as safe. Ford engineers had discovered in pre-production crash tests that rear-end collisions would rupture the Pinto’s fuel system extremely easy. Fighting strong competition from Volkswagen, and the fact that assembly line machinery was already tooled when the defect was discovered. Ford Motor Company rushed the Pinto into production anyway. Finally in 1977 new models incorporated a few minor alterations necessary to meet new federal standards that Ford had managed to hold off for eight years. BEHIND-THE-AXLE DESIGN PROPOSED SAFER LOCATION

The players Arjay Miller President of the Ford Motor Company in the mid-1960’s Involved in an accident in which his Continental burst into flames upon impact In 1965, recounted his incident to the U.S. Senate, and passionately called for better control over fuel-fed fires in auto accidents Robert McNamara President of Ford Motor Company in 1960 who eventually became the Secretary of Defense. Champion of cost/benefit analysis Because of his strong business background, he held cost/benefit analysis higher than anything else, even human life. J.C. Echold Director of Automotive Safety (essentially an anti-safety lobbyist) Wrote a memorandum to the Department of Transportation that in effect says that even though a fix exists for $11 per car, it is still acceptable for 360 people to die or get injured by fire each year. Turns out neither of these facts are true. A bladder that cost $5.08 was developed by Goodyear was tested by Ford two times before the memo was ever sent. The bladder was shown to be effective.

The ethical issues Cost/Benefit analysis out of business realm For pure business decisions that have no effect on human life, the cost/benefit analysis is an effective tool Applying the cost/benefit to issues in which human life is involved is an ethical dilemma  must put a value on human life. The auto industry didn’t want to be so brazen as to come up with a figure themselves, so they pressured the NHTSA to decide on a figure. Lobbying the government Because of Robert McNamara’s influence on government, Ford had gotten federal regulators to agree to talk auto safety in terms of cost/benefit analysis. J.C. Echold used this mindset to lobby the government to agree that human lives aren’t worth saving for a few dollars per car.

Section III – Protagonists’ actions compared to NPSE Code of Ethics The Whiz Kids, Group of US Army Air Force veterans that produced two presidents and six vice- presidents for Ford Motor and ended decades of unprofitable business for the Ford Motor Company and became “one of the most celebrated success stories in all of American business.” 1 Robert McNamara, Ford Motor Co. President, 1960 – Secretary of Defense for the United States advocate of Cost-Benefit Analysis accessed December 1, Arjay Miller, Ford Motor Co. President, 1963 – Member of the Board of Directors Lee Iacocca, Ford Motor Co. President, – Developer of the Ford Mustang and later President of Chrysler

Where did Ford Executives act unethically? 1.Hold paramount the safety, health, and welfare of the public Ford engineers estimated that technical improvements to the fuel system would cost about $11 per vehicle (or 0.55% of the sale price of $2000). Benefits – 180 burn deaths at $200,000 per death – 180 serious burn injuries at $67,000 per injury – 2, 100 burned vehicles at $700 per vehicle Total Benefit -- $49.5 Million Costs – 11 million cars at $11 per car – 1.5 million light trucks at $11 per truck Total Costs -- $137.5 Million $88 Million Dollars made the decision 50 lawsuits were filed against Ford between 1971 and In one case a jury awarded the plaintiff $125 million in punitive damages against Ford (Award was reduced by judge to $3.5 Million). 2 Moral Issues in Business, 8 th ed. Shaw & Barry (pp83-86). Does this represent a flaw in logic as well as ethics? Was the unethical choice truly a cost savings? Ford has always rejected that the Pinto was unsafe when compared with other cars of its type Ford consistently stated that the Pinto consistently exceeded government standards They neglected to state that the company lobbied heavily with success to delay adoption of new crash standards These associated lobbying costs are also outside the scope of the Cost-Benefit Analysis justifying the decisions made by Ford

3. Issue public statements only in an objective and truthful manner While truthfulness is debatable, Ford statements failed to meet an objective and truthful condition Ford executives acted under the Cost-Benefit Analysis to preserve the best interests of their company – objectivity and full disclosure were the antithesis of these interests 4. Act for each employer or client as faithful agents or trustees Would a stronger lobby by Ford engineers toward fixing the fuel tank issues have been more faithful to their employers in the long run? 5. Avoid deceptive acts While Ford motor was never held criminally liable, the Pinto Fuel Tank problems have become a poster-child for corporations valuing profits over public safety. The car buying public and press saw Ford actions as untrustworthy. 6. Conduct themselves honorably, responsibly, ethically, and lawfully so as to enhance the honor, reputation, and usefulness of the profession The Pinto became a national joke, mocked by comedians and parodied in movies which did little to enhance Ford Motor’s reputation 3” Pinto Madness” Mother Jones 2(8) (Sept/Oct 1977) by Mark Dowie