Megan Garrett. Rudolph Ivanovich Abel a citizen of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics a Colonel in the Soviet government’s espionage agency, K.G.B.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Judicial Branch Chapter 8.
Advertisements

Christina Ascolillo.  Who was involved: Ernesto Miranda and the State of Arizona.  When:  Where: Phoenix, Arizona  Why: Arrested and charged.
Teaching American History: Moot Courts and Constitutional Concepts.
The American Legal System
UNDERSTANDING THE CONSTITUTION
The federal Court System Jobs of the Court. 1.Civil Disputes -Court settle disputes (arguments) The court uses the law to make a decision Cases deal with.
Bell Starter Key Terms Key Terms Circuit Jurisdiction
The Anatomy of a Criminal Case Government – Libertyville HS.
Miranda Rights 5th Amendment
POP QUIZ How did the Courts increase the political power of people in urban areas and those accused of a crime? GIVE AN EXAMPLE.
A writ of habeas corpus is a legal request directed to a detaining authority It demands that a prisoner be taken before a court, and that the detaining.
The Judicial Branch. Court Systems & Jurisdictions.
Ch8 The Judicial Branch 8-2 How Courts Are Organized.
Types of Courts American Government. Standing  In order for a case to be heard in our legal system, the plaintiff must have standing to sue  This means.
Chapter 8 & Supreme Court Cases
U.S. District Courts and U.S. Courts of Appeals
The Judicial Branch Learning Objectives
15.3 The American Legal System
The Bill of Rights Amendments Two through Ten. The Second Amendment The Second Amendment gives people the right to bear arms (weapons) and the right to.
RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED. I. OVERVIEW A. Due Process: The government, in whatever it does, must act fairly and follow established rules. 1.5 th Amendment:
The Federal Court System
Mapp v Ohio By: Gavin Koonts 10/27/13 Block 2. Mapp v Ohio  Dollree Mapp v State of Ohio  Argued: March 29, 1961  Decided: June 19, 1961.
Chapter 15.3 The American Legal System. Legal Protections in the U.S. Constitution  American colonists owed their rights to legal principles developed.
Section 1&2 I can explain the Federal Court system.
Judicial Branch Judicial Branch.
The Federal Court System According to the Constitution, Congress has the power to create inferior courts (all federal courts, other than the Supreme Court.)
The Court System. The US Federal Court System The Current Supreme Court The court has final authority on cases involving the constitution, acts of Congress,
The Federal Court System …and Justice For All. The Adversarial System Courts settle civil disputes between private parties, a private party and the government,
Rights of Criminal Defendants Are the due process rights and the procedural guarantees provided by the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, and Eighth Amendments.
Amendment Six: News Article And Explanation Paul Collopy.
Law and Your Rights 7.1. “Equal Justice Under Law”  Carved over entrance of Supreme Court Building All US citizens equal and guaranteed equal protection.
 What is the exclusionary rule  Explain stop and frisk  What is the plain view doctrine  What did Miranda v Arizona require police to do  What happens.
What does it all mean?! The 4th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution guarantees freedom from unreasonable search and seizure. This means that law enforcement.
The Judicial Branch Unit 5. Court Systems & Jurisdictions.
Unit 4 Lesson 8: Miranda v. Arizona
How have the decisions of the Supreme Court protected people accused of crimes? What rights are accused people guaranteed? Landmark Supreme Court Cases.
Chapter 7: The Judicial Branch. “The Federal Court System & How Federal Courts Are Organized”
Due Process Amendments What is due process? Due process, for the people of the United States, refers to how laws are enforced why laws are.
The Warren Court ( ). Wordsplash Create one sentence per term using some clue words from below. DUE PROCESS Lawlegal principles No citizen may.
READ AND TAKE NOTES 1.Recap of The Constitution 2.The Bill of Rights.
Legal Studies * Mr. Marinello ARRESTS AND WARRANTS.
The Criminal Justice System. Arrest Procedure The Arrest: To arrest a person the police must have probable cause. (reason to believe that criminal activity.
Chapter 8 The Judicial Branch. Federal Courts 3rd branch of government 3rd branch of government use the law to settle disputes between individuals & to.
Land Mark Supreme Court Cases Assignment
The Court System Chapter 5. Courts  Trial Courts- two parties Plaintiff- in civil trial is the person bringing the legal action Prosecutor- in criminal.
The Judicial Branch (part 1) Chapter 8. Role and Equal Treatment The Judicial Branch – Federal Courts ▫Use the law to settle civil disputes and to decide.
Judicial Branch Basics and “Due Process”. Basic Structure of the Judicial Branch Supreme Court (original and appellate jurisdiction) 13 Circuit Courts.
The Supreme Court and Lower Courts Chapter 3 Section3.
4 th, 5 th,6 th, 8 th, and 14 th Amendments (Due Process) Due Process of Law – This clause in the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments is there to prevent the.
Article III: The Judicial Branch Chapters: 11,12
The Judicial Branch. United States Supreme Court The top of the federal court system.
The Judiciary How the national and state court systems work along with a brief look at due process…..
LECTURE 4: THE CONSTITUTION AND DUE PROCESS. The Constitution and Due Process The US Constitution set out how US laws are passed and enforced. – The legislative.
Warm-up List 5 types of laws and give an example of each.
Miranda v. Arizona.
organization and jurisdiction of the federal court system
Mapp v. Ohio (1961) 367 U.S. 643.
By Maura Hertig, Ryan Hornickel, and Mia Lerner
The Federal Court System
By Michael Cleary Period 8 10/3/13 College Business Law Mr. Como
Judicial Branch Lindquist.
Judicial Branch.
15.3 The American Legal System
The Court System.
Judicial Branch.
Government Notes The Judicial Branch.
The Judicial Branch (Last of the Three).
The Judicial Branch.
Chapter 8 The Judicial Branch.
Constitutional Rights: Protections and Limitations
Presentation transcript:

Megan Garrett

Rudolph Ivanovich Abel a citizen of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics a Colonel in the Soviet government’s espionage agency, K.G.B. entered the United States illegally turned into the F.B.I. by Reino Hayhanen in May of 1957 arrested on June 21, 1957 by I.N.S. BACKGROUND OF RUDOLPH ABEL (PLANTIFF)

tried for illegal immigration as well as espionage convicted and sentenced for both in the Eastern U.S. District Court of New York appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit the court arrived at the same conclusion during the appeal FOLLOWING ABEL’S ARREST

James B. Donovan American citizen former insurance lawyer defended Abel through the three trials offered to the court the possibility of an exchange with the Soviet Union if they were to capture an American spy ABEL’S LAWYER

The United States more accurately, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the United States Immigration and Naturalization Services DEFENDANT

When appealed to the Supreme Court and was granted the petition for certiorari, though there was no reason as to why the case was accepted. the argument was limited to two questions: whether the Fourth and Fifth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States are violated by a search and seizure of evidence without a search warrant in the case of an illegal alien accused of espionage whether the Fourth and Fifth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution are violated when articles are seized unrelated to the I.N.S. warrant and are introduced as evidence for espionage CASE

On March 28, 1960, the court held in favor of the United States in the case Abel v. United States with a final vote of 5-4. denied Abel’s claim that the F.B.I. used the I.N.S.’s administrative warrant for illegitimate purposes the departments had every valid reason to cooperate in the situation, thus there was no evidence of unlawful action in the case the Court upheld the lower courts’ belief that the evidence was obtained solely for the purpose of Abel’s deportation, not to prosecute him for any other crime also upheld that the searches that produced the evidence were proper searches for the Government to have made and were not in violation of Abel’s Fourth and Fifth Amendment rights MAJORITY DECISION

pointed out that the F.B.I. was the driving force of the arrest and had plenty of time to get a search warrant also stated that the F.B.I. had directly violated Abel’s Fourth Amendment protections through the arrest procedures said this case opens up law enforcement agencies to where they are no longer under judicial control DISSENTING OPINION

during the height of the Cold War many were mad an American was defending a Soviet spy James Donovan used Abel to negotiate made an exchange for : Francis Gary Powers, a downed U-2 pilot Yale student, Frederic L. Pryor Donovan was one of the only people who truly gained an understanding of Abel throughout the cases and worked honestly to make sure he was treated fairly The public hated Abel, so they were appalled that Donovan was audacious enough to take it to the Supreme Court POLITICAL IMPACT

I disagree with the Supreme Court’s majority decision in the case I believe that Rudolph Abel’s Fourth Amendment Constitutional rights were violated when the F.B.I. and I.N.S. searched his belongings and obtained his property without the proper warrants and approval completely eliminated the judicial branch from the process by ignoring the need for proper warrants MY OPINION

Movie released in 2015 starring Tom Hanks, Mark Rylance, Alan Alda, Amy Ryan, Austin Stowell Based off of a novel by James Donovan called Strangers on a Bridge describes the case and the entire situation, including the prisoner exchange Clip of Movie: BRIDGE OF SPIES

MOVIE-PHOTO COMPARISONS

Court Listener. Court Listener. October 13, ivanovich-abel-also-known-/ (accessed November 25, 2015). Google Scholar. Abel v. United States, 362 US Supreme Court March 28, el+v.+United+States&hl=en&as_sdt=6,47&as_vis=1 (accessed November 25, 2015). Graphiq, Inc. Abel, Alias Mark, Alias Collins, Alias Goldfus, v. United States. July Mark-Alias-Collins-Alias-Goldfus-v-United-States (accessed November 25, 2015). History vs. Hollywood. History vs. Hollywood (accessed November 25, 2015). WORKS CITED