Zoltán Scherübl BME Nanophysics Seminar - Lecture

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The role of the isovector monopole state in Coulomb mixing. N.Auerbach TAU and MSU.
Advertisements

Anderson localization: from single particle to many body problems.
Biexciton-Exciton Cascades in Graphene Quantum Dots CAP 2014, Sudbury Isil Ozfidan I.Ozfidan, M. Korkusinski,A.D.Guclu,J.McGuire and P.Hawrylak, PRB89,
Spectroscopy at the Particle Threshold H. Lenske 1.
Josepson Current in Four-Terminal Superconductor/Exciton- Condensate/Superconductor System S. Peotta, M. Gibertini, F. Dolcini, F. Taddei, M. Polini, L.
Correlations in quantum dots: How far can analytics go? ♥ Slava Kashcheyevs Amnon Aharony Ora Entin-Wohlman Phys.Rev.B 73, (2006) PhD seminar on.
QUANTUM TRANSPORT IN THE TUNNELING AND COTUNNELING REGIMENS Javier F. Nossa M.
L2:Non-equilibrium theory: Keldish formalism
On the formulation of a functional theory for pairing with particle number restoration Guillaume Hupin GANIL, Caen FRANCE Collaborators : M. Bender (CENBG)
Non-equilibrium physics Non-equilibrium physics in one dimension Igor Gornyi Москва Сентябрь 2012 Karlsruhe Institute of Technology.
Adiabatic Quantum Computation with Noisy Qubits Mohammad Amin D-Wave Systems Inc., Vancouver, Canada.
Superconducting transport  Superconducting model Hamiltonians:  Nambu formalism  Current through a N/S junction  Supercurrent in an atomic contact.
LPS Quantum computing lunchtime seminar Friday Oct. 22, 1999.
Chaos and interactions in nano-size metallic grains: the competition between superconductivity and ferromagnetism Yoram Alhassid (Yale) Introduction Universal.
Quantum charge fluctuation in a superconducting grain Manuel Houzet SPSMS, CEA Grenoble In collaboration with L. Glazman (University of Minnesota) D. Pesin.
14. April 2003 Quantum Mechanics on the Large Scale Banff, Alberta 1 Relaxation and Decoherence in Quantum Impurity Models: From Weak to Strong Tunneling.
EEE539 Solid State Electronics 5. Phonons – Thermal Properties Issues that are addressed in this chapter include:  Phonon heat capacity with explanation.
Coulomb Blockade and Non-Fermi-Liquid Behavior in a Double-Dot Device Avraham Schiller Racah Institute of Physics Eran Lebanon (Rutgers University) Special.
“Quantum computation with quantum dots and terahertz cavity quantum electrodynamics” Sherwin, et al. Phys. Rev A. 60, 3508 (1999) Norm Moulton LPS.
Renormalised Perturbation Theory ● Motivation ● Illustration with the Anderson impurity model ● Ways of calculating the renormalised parameters ● Range.
UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME Xiangning Luo EE 698A Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Notre Dame Superconducting Devices for Quantum Computation.
Non equilibrium noise as a probe of the Kondo effect in mesoscopic wires Eran Lebanon Rutgers University with Piers Coleman arXiv: cond-mat/ DOE.
 -decay theory. The decay rate Fermi’s Golden Rule density of final states (b) transition (decay) rate (c) transition matrix element (a) Turn off any.
Exotic Kondo Effects and T K Enhancement in Mesoscopic Systems.
Topological Superconductivity in One Dimension and Quasi-One Dimension Bertrand I. Halperin Harvard University Conference on Topological Insulators and.
Field theoretical methods in transport theory  F. Flores  A. Levy Yeyati  J.C. Cuevas.
Electron Entanglement via interactions in a quantum dot Gladys León 1, Otto Rendon 2, Horacio Pastawski 3, Ernesto Medina 1 1 Centro de Física, Instituto.
Superconducting Qubits Kyle Garton Physics C191 Fall 2009.
Dressed state amplification by a superconducting qubit E. Il‘ichev, Outline Introduction: Qubit-resonator system Parametric amplification Quantum amplifier.
From Kondo and Spin Glasses to Heavy Fermions, Hidden Order and Quantum Phase Transitions A Series of Ten Lectures at XVI Training Course on Strongly Correlated.
Density Matrix Density Operator State of a system at time t:
Transport properties: conductance and thermopower
Three-dimensional quantum transport simulation of ultra-small FinFETs H. Takeda and N. Mori Osaka University.
Nanostructures Research Group CENTER FOR SOLID STATE ELECTRONICS RESEARCH Time-Dependent Perturbation Theory David K. Ferry and Dragica Vasileska Arizona.
Taklimat UniMAP Universiti Malaysia Perlis WAFER FABRICATION Hasnizah Aris, 2008 Lecture 2 Semiconductor Basic.
Norhayati Soin 06 KEEE 4426 WEEK 3/2 13/01/2006 KEEE 4426 VLSI WEEK 3 CHAPTER 1 MOS Capacitors (PART 2) CHAPTER 1.
Chap. 41: Conduction of electricity in solids Hyun-Woo Lee.
T. K. T. Nguyen, M. N. Kiselev, and V. E. Kravtsov The Abdus Salam ICTP, Trieste, Italy Effect of magnetic field on thermoelectric coefficients of a single.
Supercurrent through carbon-nanotube-based quantum dots Tomáš Novotný Department of Condensed Matter Physics, MFF UK In collaboration with: K. Flensberg,
Quantum entanglement and Quantum state Tomography Zoltán Scherübl Nanophysics Seminar – Lecture BUTE.
L4 ECE-ENGR 4243/ FJain 1 Derivation of current-voltage relation in 1-D wires/nanotubes (pp A) Ballistic, quasi-ballistic transport—elastic.
Single-molecule-mediated heat current between an electronic and a bosonic bath In Collaboration with: Avi Schiller, The Hebrew University Natan Andrei,
Two Level Systems and Kondo-like traps as possible sources of decoherence in superconducting qubits Lara Faoro and Lev Ioffe Rutgers University (USA)
Noise and decoherence in the Josephson Charge Qubits Oleg Astafiev, Yuri Pashkin, Tsuyoshi Yamamoto, Yasunobu Nakamura, Jaw-Shen Tsai RIKEN Frontier Research.
Computational Solid State Physics 計算物性学特論 第10回 10. Transport properties II: Ballistic transport.
Entanglement for two qubits interacting with a thermal field Mikhail Mastyugin The XXII International Workshop High Energy Physics and Quantum Field Theory.
Adiabatic Quantum Computation with Noisy Qubits M.H.S. Amin D-Wave Systems Inc., Vancouver, Canada.
1 of xx Coulomb-Blockade Oscillations in Semiconductor Nanostructures (Part I & II) PHYS 503: Physics Seminar Fall 2008 Deepak Rajput Graduate Research.
Scattering Rates for Confined Carriers Dragica Vasileska Professor Arizona State University.
Sid Nb device fabrication Superconducting Nb thin film evaporation Evaporate pure Nb to GaAs wafer and test its superconductivity (T c ~9.25k ) Tc~2.5K.
Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET)
Nikolai Kopnin Theory Group Dynamics of Superfluid 3 He and Superconductors.
Charge pumping in mesoscopic systems coupled to a superconducting lead
Time Dependent Perturbation Theory
Chapter 4 Two-Level Systems, Spin. Two-level systems Let us start with the simplest non-trivial state space, with only two dimensions Despite its simplicity,
Subharmonic gap Structures
NTNU, April 2013 with collaborators: Salman A. Silotri (NCTU), Chung-Hou Chung (NCTU, NCTS) Sung Po Chao Helical edge states transport through a quantum.
Raman Effect The Scattering of electromagnetic radiation by matter with a change of frequency.
From fractionalized topological insulators to fractionalized Majoranas
Vivek Sinha (09MS 066) Amit Kumar (09 MS 086)
Open quantum systems.
RESONANT TUNNELING IN CARBON NANOTUBE QUANTUM DOTS
Lecture 2:
Conductance of nanosystems with interaction
Coulomb Blockade and Single Electron Transistor
Mario Palma.
Chapter 4 Two-Level Systems.
Full Current Statistics in Multiterminal Mesoscopic Conductors
Dynamical mean field theory: In practice
Tony Leggett Department of Physics
Presentation transcript:

Zoltán Scherübl 24.10.2013 BME Nanophysics Seminar - Lecture Superconductivity, Nanowires, Quantum Dots, Cooper-pairs, Majoranna-fermions alias 3 more JCs Zoltán Scherübl 24.10.2013 BME Nanophysics Seminar - Lecture

The Hamiltonian: 𝐻 𝑑𝑑𝑜𝑡 = 𝛼=𝐿,𝑅 𝜀 𝛼 𝜎 𝑑 𝛼𝜎 + 𝑑 𝛼𝜎 + 𝑈 𝛼 𝑛 𝛼↑ 𝑛 𝛼↓ +𝑈 𝜎,𝜎′ 𝑛 𝐿𝜎 𝑛 𝑅𝜎′ 𝐻 𝜂 = 𝑘𝜎 𝜀 𝜂𝑘 𝑐 η𝑘σ + 𝑐 η𝑘σ − 𝛿 𝜂,𝑆 ∆ 𝑘 𝑐 𝜂−𝑘↓ 𝑐 𝜂𝑘↑ +ℎ.𝑐. 𝐻 𝑡𝑢𝑛𝑛,𝑁 = 𝛼𝑘𝜎 𝑉 𝑁𝛼 𝑐 𝛼𝑘𝜎 + 𝑑 𝛼𝜎 +ℎ.𝑐. Constant DOS assumed: ρη Tunnel-couplings: ∆∈𝑅,∆>0 Γ 𝑁𝛼 =2𝜋 𝜌 𝛼 𝑉 𝑁𝛼 2 𝜇 𝑆 =0 𝐻 𝑡𝑢𝑛𝑛,𝑆 = 𝛼𝑘𝜎 𝑉 𝑆𝛼 𝑐 𝑆𝑘𝜎 + 𝑑 𝛼𝜎 +ℎ.𝑐. Γ 𝑆𝛼 =2𝜋 𝜌 𝑆 𝑉 𝑆𝛼 2 Δ→∞ limit: no quasiparticles 𝐻 𝑒𝑓𝑓 = 𝐻 𝑑𝑑𝑜𝑡 − 𝛼=𝐿,𝑅 Γ 𝑆𝛼 2 𝑑 𝛼↑ + 𝑑 𝛼↓ + +ℎ.𝑐. + Γ 𝑆𝐿 Γ 𝑆𝑅 2 𝑑 𝑅↑ + 𝑑 𝐿↓ + − 𝑑 𝑅↓ + 𝑑 𝐿↑ + +ℎ.𝑐. Uα→∞ limit: 0 or 1 e / dot, local Andreev process is forbidden 9 basis states: | 0 | 𝑇0 = 1 2 𝑑 𝑅↑ + 𝑑 𝐿↓ + + 𝑑 𝑅↓ + 𝑑 𝐿↑ + | 0 | 𝛼𝜎 = 𝑑 𝛼𝜎 + | 0 | 𝑆 = 1 2 𝑑 𝑅↑ + 𝑑 𝐿↓ + − 𝑑 𝑅↓ + 𝑑 𝐿↑ + | 0 | 𝑇𝜎 = 𝑑 𝑅𝜎 + 𝑑 𝐿𝜎 + | 0

In this limit only |0> and |S> are coupled: Andreev-excitations: excitation of DQD w/o coupling to normal leads: Calculation of current (master-equation): Normal leads are integrated out → reduced density-matrix → first order tunneling process → reduced density matrix is diagonal Master-equation: Fermi’s golden rule transition rate Occupation probability Zeroth order spectral function: delta-peaks at Andreev-excitaion energies Broadening due to ΓN: second order → not discussed Current:

Results: Triplett-blockade: Asymmetric current in bias voltage Cooper-pairs can split to the dots, and tunnel into the normal leads Reverse: if the dot is occupied with triplett electrons, the current is blocked Differential conductance:

Andreev excitation energy splitting: Non degenerate dot levels (Δε≠0) Although left-right symmetry is broken, IL = IR In first order only CAR is allowed

Coupling two dots: Energy shifts due to SC in (1,1) regime: Second order term are equal → neglected Fourth order: Two processes lowers the S energy: 1. Exchange: electron tunnel to the other dot, and backwards ((0,2) intermediate state) 2. CAR: 2 electron tunnel from the dots to SC, and backwards ((0,0) intermediate state) Bi =0 → Analyitic solution: At 3D, ballistic SC: At 3D: diffusive SC: slighty better prefactor: but ξ0 → Problem: summing for different paths with different factor Prefactor → ~Å interaction length

In 1D single channel, ballistic SC: Interaction length: 1. Exchange: Since U is large, exchange is neglected Effect of SOI: w/o B only 1 of 4 (1,1) state couples to S Effect of B&SOI: 2 split off states have finite CAR (T+,T-) 1 state has no CAR (T0) 1 state has CAR amplitude (S) Operation: Initialization: adiabatic sweep from (0,0) to (1,1) Tuning the dot levels or tunnel couplings Avoid decoherence due to charge noise: far from Readout : sweep from (1,1) to (0,0) – triplett blockade Up to now: Coupling 2 single-spin qubit (δES acts as a 2-qubit gate) Non-local S-T qubit Coupling S-T qubits (Fig. 2(b))

Hamiltonian of 1 S-T qubit (coupled to SC): Cooper-pair box: finite charging energy (EC), fix electron number (N) 2 S-T qubit coulped to a long ( >> ξ0 ) CPB: capacitive coupling |00> is not part of S-T qubit base, but: Numbers: → → VAB saturates with EC for fixed γ,δ Large VAB with small δ requires large γ (few channel NW high quality interface)

Majorana bound state suppress LAR in favor of CAR

Majorana Hamiltonian: Excitation energy: E Level width: ΓM << EM needed for suppression of LAR Unitary scattering matrix: Basis: propagating electrones and holes in leads Assumptions: no cross-coupling, energy dependence neglected 2 MBSs Low excitation energy, weak coupling: Off-diag of S: only off-diag element: only CAR (or normal tunneling) with probability Probability of LAR:

Probability of e1 → e2 and e1 → h2 equal → CAR cannot be detected in the current → noise: Assumption: equally baised leads, low temperature ( ), weak coupling ( ) → Shot-noise dominates → transfered charge from Fano-factor ( ) Some nice formulas: Zero-frequency noise power: Low energy weak coupling limit: Total noise: → Cooper-pair transfer Separate leads: → suppression of LAR The positive cross-correlation is maximal, since (here =) Note: high voltage regime: (time is not enough for correlations to develop)

Exactly solvable model: 2D TI, with SC and 2 magnet 𝑚= 𝑚 0 ,0,0 − 𝑙 1 <𝑥<0 𝑚 0 𝑠𝑖𝑛𝜑, 𝑚 0 𝑠𝑖𝑛𝜑,0 𝑙 0 <𝑥< 𝑙 0 + 𝑙 2 0 ∆ 𝑥 = ∆ 0 0<𝑥< 𝑙 0 0 Fermi level within the gap: Decay length in SC: in magnet: For only bound state is MBS For and