TRAC T IER 1/M ULTI -P HASE A PPLICATION Presented by KYOVA & the Lawrence County Community Action Organization PID: 75923.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
KEVIN B. PAGE VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF RAIL AND PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION VIRGINIAS RAILROADS A STAKEHOLDER IN TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT.
Advertisements

Beltline Highway ITS – Ramp Metering Project ODOT Planners Meeting April 25, 2012.
TRAC Request: Maintain Tier II Status Maintain $5 million for further investigation / Use toward ODOT portion TRAC Request: Maintain Tier II Status Maintain.
City of Omak Central Avenue Bridge Replacement Project Prepared by Highlands Associates Photos by FlyBy Photos.
From – A Report of the Connecticut Regional Institute for the 21 st Century by Michael Gallis & Associates, 1999 (known as the “Gallis Report”) Knowledge.
TRE ANNUAL MEETING Grant Levi, NDDOT Director November 26,
Department of Industrial Engineering1 Economic Evaluation of the Impact of Waterways on the Port of Cincinnati-Tristate Heather Nachtmann, Ph.D. River.
Gilbert Road Light Rail Extension Transportation Project Advancement Agreement City Council Study Session December 4, 2014.
1 6-Year Transportation Improvement Program ( ) Kit Baker, Chair ( Citizen’s Transportation Advisory Committee ) Desiree’ Winkler, P.E. ( Transportation.
Dulles Corridor Metrorail Project 23-mile new Metrorail line branching off the Orange Line after East Falls Church 11 new stations 5 in Phase 1: East Falls.
1 Trade Corridor Improvement Fund March 5, 2008 Southern California Consensus Group.
1 Corey W. Hill Chief of Public Transportation May 20, 2008 May 20, 2008.
“Does Moving from A to Z Matter?” Thoughts on Freight Corridors in the Southeast.
South Coast Rail Project February 28, 2014 Stoughton Town Hall.
Proposition 1B and the Strategic Growth Plan Randell Iwasaki California Department of Transportation.
DETERMINATION OF FREIGHT CORRIDORS FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA Texas A&M University Civil Engineering Department CVEN April 28, 2003 ADHARA CASTELBLANCO.
Huntsville :: the big picture the convergence of aviation, transit and highway modes.
ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN RAILROADS Chicago Area Rail Infrastructure 16,000 acres, twice the area of O’Hare 78 yards, including 21 intermodal (rail-truck)
COLORADO PERSPECTIVE Cathy Shull Board of Directors Ports-to-Plains Alliance.
1 Welcome! West Valley-Taylorsville Transit Corridor Draft Environmental Impact Statement Public Open House/Hearing July 19, 2006.
1 1 CRTPA Board Meeting 09/20/2010. CSX Corporation (NYSE: CSX) CSX Transportation – serves every major population and industrial center east of the Mississippi;
SAFETEA-LU Highlights Roger Petzold Office of Interstate and Border Planning Federal Highway Administration Transportation Border Working Group Nov. 9,
Distribution Guided by State Law Surface Transportation Program (STP) Surface Transportation Program (STP) Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality Improvement.
From Planning to Pouring: The Evolution of Safe Routes to School Julie Walcoff, Ohio DOT, Columbus, OH Alex Smith, Columbus Public Health, Columbus, OH.
TRACECA PROJECT EVALUATION
Regional Transportation Investments: Alaskan Way Viaduct / Seawall Port of Seattle Commission Meeting March 28, 2006 Item No. xx Supp. Meeting.
A Case Study of Promoting Metropolitan Freight Collaboration: The Twin Cities Experience Performance Management Framework Minnesota Department of Transportation.
Presentation to ***(group) on ***(date) 1.  Cities - 11  Highway districts – 3  Ada and Canyon Counties  School districts – 2  Valley Regional Transit.
Talking Freight Promoting Economic Revitalization through Enhanced Freight Transportation Eric G. Madden Deputy Secretary for Aviation and Rail Freight.
California’s Strategic Growth Plan Ken De Crescenzo Federal Liaison California Department of Transportation.
Special STP Application Cycle for SFY 2016 Projects ICC and Executive Committee Meetings September 2015.
OPEN HOUSE #4 JUNE AGENDA OPEN HOUSE 6:00 PM  Review materials  Ask questions  Provide feedback  Sign up for list  Fill out comment.
1 Patriot’s Crossing  PROVIDES MOST REGIONAL CONGESTION RELIEF  UNIQUELY POSITIONED TO SUPPORT REGIONAL ECONOMIC GROWTH  IMPROVING TOTAL REGIONAL CONNECTIVITY.
Regional Goods Movement Study for the San Francisco Bay Area presented by Michael J. Fischer Cambridge Systematics, Inc. November 12, 2004 Agenda Item.
Southern Bridge Project Brown County Executive
Introduction Session 01 Matakuliah: S0753 – Teknik Jalan Raya Tahun: 2009.
Tom Norton, Executive Director Colorado Department of Transportation American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials September 9, 2003.
1 AGENDA OPEN HOUSE 6:00 PM  Review materials  Ask questions  Provide feedback  Sign up for list  Fill out comment cards PRESENTATION 6:30 PM.
Transportation Investment Act of 2010 AASHTO/MTAP Conference December 6-9, 2010 Savannah, Georgia Steve Kish, Transit Program Manager Georgia Department.
Regional Transportation Investments: Alaskan Way Viaduct / Seawall Port of Seattle Commission Policy and Staff Briefing March 14, 2006 Item No. xx Supp.
SAFETEA-LU System Management and Operations Key Provisions Jeff Lindley Office of Operations Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation.
Project Overview I – 70 Dedicated Truck Lanes Update: 3/19/2008 For FHWA Talking Freight Webinar Keith J. Bucklew Indiana Dept. of Transportation.
I-95 Access Study Fredericksburg Area Project Status Update February 12, 2010.
C OMMITTEE FOR A DELAIDE R OADS Adelaide’s Missing North-South Link.
Overview Presentation Fall 2015 Gainesville-Haymarket Extension Study.
Traffic Management System Status Update February, 2008.
Bicycle Advisory Board September 2, 2015 Freight Master Plan.
Think Globally, Act Locally August 19, Introduction Why freight is important to central Ohio Global implications and impacts Highway system challenges.
STA US-30 Presentation for TRAC – October 13, 2015
© 2014 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved. North Country Access Improvements Stakeholder Advisory Committee Meeting No. 9 January 19, 2016.
1 Planning Andrea Stevenson. 2 What’s the Big Deal About Ohio’s Transportation System? Ohio is within a single day’s drive (600 miles) of 60% of the United.
SAFETEA-LU System Management and Operations Provisions Jeff Lindley Director of the Office of Transportation Management Office of Operations Federal Highway.
Company LOGO Georgia Truck Lane Needs Identification Study Talking Freight Seminar March 19, 2008 Matthew Fowler, P.T.P Assistant State Planning Administrator.
N EW O HIO R IVER B RIDGE JEF-Wellsburg Bridge – PID#79353 New Ohio River Bridge Steubenville Weirton Map Data © 2015 Google Steubenville, OH - Weirton,
© 2014 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved. North Country Access Improvements Stakeholder Advisory Committee Meeting No. 6 October 6, 2015.
MED SR 18 Corridor Project MED PID October 13, 2015.
Ohio Department of Transportation John R. Kasich, Governor Jerry Wray, Director 2015-D08-02 HAM-Elmore to Central Parkway Connector.
Objective Transportation Assets Strategic Intermodal/International Points Next Steps & Discussion Critical Issues for Ohio.
TIF 9 (Trinity River Vision) Expansion and Updated Project and Financing Plans Jay Chapa, Director Housing and Economic Development.
1. 2 February Alliance Workshop St. Louis Regonal Freightway Alliance Needs Analysis and Freight Development Committee Terminal Rail Association.
1 TIF 9 (Trinity River Vision) Expanded and Updated Project and Financing Plans December 8, 2009 Presented to the City Council Jay Chapa Housing & Economic.
Railroad.
Regional Roads Committee
21st Century Transportation Committee Finance Subcommittee
Progress Report Implementing the Interregional Transportation Strategic Plan May 22, 2003 in Sacramento Brian Smith, Deputy Director, Planning and.
Draft Transportation Element September 6, 2017
Draft OKI Prioritization Process
Status Report on Rochester’s DMC Transportation Plan
Southern Bridge Project Brown County Executive
Chicago to Council Bluffs-Omaha
Presentation transcript:

TRAC T IER 1/M ULTI -P HASE A PPLICATION Presented by KYOVA & the Lawrence County Community Action Organization PID: 75923

KYOVA MPO RECOMMENDATIONS  Supports and promotes the Chesapeake Bypass project as the PRIMARY MPO Major Investment Project in Lawrence County, Ohio.  Recommends that the Chesapeake Bypass project be placed on the Tier 1 TRAC for the balance of right of way acquisition and construction.  Affirms project is consistent with priorities of the 2040 KYOVA Metropolitan Transportation Plan, the TIP and the U.S. 52/S.R. 7 Corridor Safety Plan.

S ITE O VERVIEW

P RESENTATION F OCUS Bigger Picture Discretionary Factors for project consideration:  Local Commitment and Participation  Rating system factors related to Definition and Functionality as part of the Tri-State Metro Transportation System  Economic and Intermodal implications of the project based upon recent investments in the metro area benefited by this project.

L OCAL C OMMITMENT & P ARTICIPATION  To Date:  $3.5 million paid as local match to project as part of Southeast Ohio Plan via a SIB loan using 75% of MPO funding allocation for ten years with final payment in  PROPOSED NEW matching plan:  Up to $10 million SIB loan (pending underwriting) using 10- year commitments from:  KYOVA with 75% of future MPO funding  Lawrence County  Townships of Union, Rome, Fayette & Windsor  Lawrence County Port Authority  LEDC and Other Civic Organizations

KYOVA C OMMITMENT Resolution # “…KYOVA Interstate Planning Commission strongly supports the Chesapeake Bypass Phase 2 through providing the affordable sub-allocated funds in Lawrence County, Ohio for the Ohio Department of Transportation TRAC funding to promote regionalism and improve the efficiency of the transportation system in southeastern Ohio.”

R ATED A S L OCAL B YPASS

C ONE OF B ENEFIT AS R ATED

D EFINITION & F UNCTIONALITY

R ECENT E VENTS I MPACTING THE P ROJECT  Growth in overall vehicular traffic:  Growth of MSA to projected 375,000 in  Residential growth in eastern Lawrence County.  Growth in freight:  Future completion of S.R. 823 (Southern Ohio Veterans Memorial Highway) in Scioto County to open north-south corridor to trucks.  Opening of the Public River Port at The Point.  Opening of container port at Pritchard.  Growth with Fed Ex Ground (The Point) and Fed Ex Air (Airport) regional hubs.  Recent and planned upgrades of I-64 to 6 & 8 lanes.  The opening up of the Rogersville Shale for production.

Tri-State Metro Multi-Modal Transportation System

T HE P OINT I NDUSTRIAL P ARK & T HE P UBLIC P ORT OF S OUTH P OINT

TRAC T IER 1 A PPLICATION KYOVA Interstate Planning Commission Michele P. Craig, Executive Director

TRAC Tier 1/Multi-Phase Application Presented by the Ohio Department of Transportation – District 9 PID: 75923

Purpose & Need Serves to safely & efficiently facilitate the current and future travel patterns in Rome and Union townships, as well as the villages of Chesapeake and Proctorville, Ohio. Reduces congestion & improves safety while saving time & energy. Supports the expected commercial, industrial & residential growth of the area. Provides inter, multi-modal connectivity via freeway, airport, water port, railroad & transit facilities. Identified as a macro corridor project in ODOT’s Southeast Ohio Plan. This is believed to be the final project on the Southeast Ohio Plan that has not received construction funding from TRAC. Ohio Department of Transportation – District 9 Chesapeake Bypass

Project Description Chesapeake Bypass The total Chesapeake Bypass project is a multi-phase project to relocate S.R. 7 around Chesapeake and Proctorville, Ohio and includes the construction of…. Phase 1A – 0.6 miles of S.R. 607 connecting the 31 st Street Bridge to S.R COMPLETED 2002 Phase 1B – 3.6 miles of super-two, limited access highway from S.R. 775 to east side of Proctorville. COMPLETED 2005 Phase 2 – 5.2-mile, super-two (with climbing lanes), limited access highway from U.S. 52 to S.R CURRENTLY IN DESIGN & EARLY ROW ACQUISITION Ohio Department of Transportation – District 9 Chesapeake Bypass

Site Overview

Ohio Department of Transportation – District 9 Chesapeake Bypass

Phase 2 – Project Status Preliminary Engineering – 100% Complete 2001 (Funded) Environmental Document – Re-evaluation under way: ~90% Complete (Estimated 3/2016) (Funded) Stream/Wetland Mitigation – 100% Complete (Funded) Detailed Design – 70% Complete (Funded) Early Acquisition of Parcels – Began in 2012 (Funded) ROW Plans – Complete in March 2014 (Funded) Remaining R/W Acquisition million Ready for Construction – Summer 2017

Transportation Benefits Reduces congestion, improves safety Prior to construction of Phases 1A & 1B, approximately 21,000 vehicles per day were using this route, which has the capacity of 12,000 vehicles. Significant congestion and a high number of accidents due to residential driveways. Completes a Super 2 bypass of Chesapeake and Proctorville areas, allowing through traffic to stay off local routes Super 2 with truck climbing lanes is the smallest project feasible to construct Phase 2 Reduces time, saves energy Route will allow for uninterrupted travel & connect on both ends to existing freeway facilities. Reduces fuel consumption by avoiding starts/stops at signals & signs on existing route. Provides inter-modal and multi-modal connectivity The Point Intermodal Transfer Facility Irene Road Park & Ride and Transit Connection Tri-State Airport: Commercial, Passenger & Cargo Pritchard Intermodal Facility Ohio Department of Transportation – District 9 Chesapeake Bypass

Investment Factors Congressional earmarks Former Congressman Ted Strickland & Congressman Charles Wilson have designated approximately $4.5 million toward the Chesapeake Bypass project. MPO commitments KYOVA has committed to 10 years of STP funding, representing approximately 70% of its total annual allocation for Ohio. This represents approximately $3.5 million dollars. TIF Districts Local (county) government has agreed to designate 50% of revenues. Other key investments…. The Point Intermodal Transfer Facility at nearby South Point, Ohio Other state & local revenue sources generated by a TIF. Ohio Department of Transportation – District 9 Chesapeake Bypass

Economic Growth & Development Land-use plan under way County developing land-use planning & restrictions around key interchanges; implementation part of the TIF districts. KYOVA, local government working to upgrade overall land-use planning. Land redevelopment anticipated Higher density commercial, industrial & retail growth at interchanges. Residential growth along existing S.R. 7. Redevelopment efforts under way in Chesapeake with public utility upgrades, cleanup and beautification programs. Ohio Department of Transportation – District 9 Chesapeake Bypass

Economic Growth & Development Business access improved Removes several traffic restrictions, thereby shortening travel time, saving fuel & reducing air emissions. Provides motorists with safe, efficient, unobstructed flow to employment centers. Eliminates logistical constrictions on commercial traffic, whereby the existing facility hampers industrial & commercial development. Provides access to industrial & commercial development points, as well as to rail, air & water hubs. Investment, employment opportunities provided The Point Intermodal Transfer Facility Ohio Department of Transportation – District 9 Chesapeake Bypass

TRAC Funding Requests 2015 TRAC Application Right of Way/Utilities:$ million Construction: $96 million Total: $ million Total: $ million Ohio Department of Transportation – District 9 Chesapeake Bypass