Realistic detector layout for MUCH system M.Ryzhinskiy, SPbSPU CBM Collaboration Meeting September 25-28, 2007, Dresden, Germany.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CBM Calorimeter System CBM collaboration meeting, October 2008 I.Korolko(ITEP, Moscow)
Advertisements

Proposal for a new design of LumiCal R. Ingbir, P. Ruzicka, V. Vrba October 07 Malá Skála.
1 Geometry layout studies of the RICH detector in the CBM experiment Elena Belolaptikova Dr. Claudia Hoehne Moscow State Institute of Radioengineering,
The performance of Strip-Fiber EM Calorimeter response uniformity, spatial resolution The 7th ACFA Workshop on Physics and Detector at Future Linear Collider.
The Intermediate Silicon Layers detector OUTLINE ISL inside CDFII Why the ISL? Conceptual Design Ladders and Spaceframe Rasnik Online Alignment System.
Pair Spectrometer Design Optimization Pair Spectrometer Design Optimization A. Somov, Jefferson Lab GlueX Collaboration Meeting September
ALICE HLT High Speed Tracking and Vertexing Real-Time 2010 Conference Lisboa, May 25, 2010 Sergey Gorbunov 1,2 1 Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies,
Status of calorimeter simulations Mikhail Prokudin, ITEP.
Photon reconstruction and calorimeter software Mikhail Prokudin.
STS Simulations Anna Kotynia 15 th CBM Collaboration Meeting April , 2010, GSI 1.
CBM Collaboration Meeting 1 Simulation Status V. Friese.
Linear Collider TPC R&D in Canada Bob Carnegie, Madhu Dixit, Dean Karlen, Steve Kennedy, Jean-Pierre Martin, Hans Mes, Ernie Neuheimer, Alasdair Rankin,
David Emschermann CBM Collaboration Meeting - GSI – 12/04/2010 TRD geometry in CBMroot and conclusions for detector module design David Emschermann Institut.
Ooo Performance simulation studies of a realistic model of the CBM Silicon Tracking System Silicon Tracking for CBM Reconstructed URQMD event: central.
Feasibility studies of open charm reconstruction with pile up 1. General simulations with pile up 2. Open charm reconstruction Christina Dritsa Outline:
M. Deveaux, CBM collaboration meeting, Oct. 2008, Dubna, Russia A revision of the concept of the CBM – MVD Or: Do we need an intermediate pixel.
STAR Collaboration Meeting Rene Bellwied – Wayne State University July 2004 SVT Calibration and STI tracking status An update of work since the SVT review.
Status of straw-tube tracker V.Peshekhonov, D.Peshekhonov, A.Zinchenko JINR, Dubna V.Tikhomirov P.N.Lebedev Physics Institute, Moscow Presented on the.
Experience With CBM Muon Simulation Partha Pratim Bhaduri.
A Pattern Recognition Scheme for Large Curvature Circular Tracks and Its FPGA Implementation Example Using Hash Sorter Jinyuan Wu and Z. Shi Fermi National.
1 A.Andronic 1, H.Appelshäuser 1, V.Babkin 2, P.Braun-Munzinger 1, S.Chernenko 2, D.Emschernmann 3, C.Garabatos 1, V.Golovatyuk 2, J.Hehner 1, M.Hoppe.
Track extrapolation to TOF with Kalman filter F. Pierella for the TOF-Offline Group INFN & Bologna University PPR Meeting, January 2003.
TPC PAD Optimization Yukihiro Kato (Kinki Univ.) 1.Motivation 2.Simple Monte Carlo simulation 3.PAD response 4.PAD response for two tracks 5.Summary &
S. Belogurov, ITEP, Moscow CBM Collaboration meeting, Split, CBM beam pipe and integration inside the Magnet Status report Sergey Belogurov,
MDC Simulation Yuan Ye BESIII Collaboration Meeting.
Optimization of the Silicon Tracking System (STS) layout and beam pipe configuration for the CBM experiment. Andrey Chernogorov, Sergey Belogurov, ITEP,
UTA GEM DHCAL Simulation Jae Yu * UTA DoE Site Visit Nov. 13, 2003 (*On behalf of the UTA team; A. Brandt, K. De, S. Habib, V. Kaushik, J. Li, M. Sosebee,
Dmitri Ossetski Obninsk State University Department of Applied Mathematics
Simulations and Software CBM Collaboration Meeting, GSI, 17 October 2008 Volker Friese Simulations Software Computing.
D. Dutta 13th CBM Collaboration Meeting 1 Dipanwita Dutta Much Segmentation Study: A Flexible Scheme.
CBM ECAL simulation status Prokudin Mikhail ITEP.
PNPI, R&D MUCH related activity ● Segmentation ● Simulation of the neutral background influence ● R&D of the detectors for MUCH ● Preparation to the beam.
Calorimeter in front of MUCh Mikhail Prokudin. Overview ► Geometry and acceptance ► Reconstruction procedure  Cluster finder algorithms  Preliminary.
Performance simulations with a realistic model of the CBM Silicon Tracking System Silicon tracking for CBM Number of integration components Ladders106.
RPC Design Studies Gabriel Stoicea, NIPNE-HH, Bucharest CBM Software Week GSI-Darmstadt May 10, 2004.
Status Report particle identification with the RICH detector Claudia Höhne - GSI Darmstadt, Germany general overview focus on ring radius/ Cherenkov angle.
Evgeny Kryshen (PNPI) Mikhail Ryzhinskiy (SPbSPU) Vladimir Nikulin (PNPI) Detailed geometry of MUCH detector in cbmroot Outline Motivation Realistic module.
Pad design present understanding Tel Aviv University HEP Experimental Group Ronen Ingbir Collaboration High precision design Tel-Aviv Sep.05 1.
STS simulations: Layout, digitizers, performance Radoslaw Karabowicz GSI.
STS Radiation Environment 11 th CBM Collaboration Meeting GSI, February 2008 Radoslaw Karabowicz GSI.
Track reconstruction in TRD and MUCH Andrey Lebedev Andrey Lebedev GSI, Darmstadt and LIT JINR, Dubna Gennady Ososkov Gennady Ososkov LIT JINR, Dubna.
Jonathan BouchetBerkeley School on Collective Dynamics 1 Performance of the Silicon Strip Detector of the STAR Experiment Jonathan Bouchet Subatech STAR.
Plans to study the Readout design in the forward region June 12 th 2007 Hans Wenzel  Currently: one big sensitive silicon disks: we record the Geant 4.
20/12/2011Christina Anna Dritsa1 Design of the Micro Vertex Detector of the CBM experiment: Development of a detector response model and feasibility studies.
ECAL software development Yuri Kharlov IHEP Protvino.
CA+KF Track Reconstruction in the STS S. Gorbunov and I. Kisel GSI/KIP/LIT CBM Collaboration Meeting Dresden, September 26, 2007.
Compact RICH detector Claudia Höhne, GSI Darmstadt.
HEP Tel Aviv UniversityLumical - A Future Linear Collider detector Lumical R&D progress report Ronen Ingbir.
1 LumiCal Optimization Simulations Iftach Sadeh Tel Aviv University Collaboration High precision design May 6 th 2008.
Performance and Early Results from the Muon Tracking System of Rusty Towell of Abilene Christian University for the PHENIX collaboration First Joint Meeting.
The Prototype Simulation of SDHCAL Ran.Han Gerald.Grenier Muriel.Donckt IPNL.
Ring finding efficiencies and RICH event display Semeon Lebedev GSI, Darmstadt and LIT JINR, Dubna Gennady Ososkov LIT JINR, Dubna X CBM collaboration.
Segmentation: Study of Shield & Absorber Materials Y.P.Viyogi(V.E.C.C) Arun Prakash(B.H.U)
TeV Muon Reconstruction Vladimir Palichik JINR, Dubna NEC’2007 Varna, September 10-17, 2007.
Neutron Identification with ECAL  Sergey Kiselev, ITEP Moscow, for the ECAL group  Motivation  Input info  Signal parameters  Preshower – 1 GeV/c.
Arc Lengths and Sectors Unit 6-3. Finding the length of Arcs An arc is part of the circumference of a circle, so you will use the circumference formula.
1 Update on the project - selected topics - Valeria Bartsch, Martin Postranecky, Matthew Warren, Matthew Wing University College London.
Anna Kotynia.  8 stations  fully based on micro-strip detectors Tracking detector: -low-mass detector -full azimuthal angle coverage -polar angle coverage:from.
Track Reconstruction in MUCH and TRD Andrey Lebedev 1,2 Gennady Ososkov 2 1 Gesellschaft für Schwerionenforschung, Darmstadt, Germany 2 Laboratory of Information.
Simulation and reconstruction of CLAS12 Electromagnetic Calorimeter in GSIM12 S. Stepanyan (JLAB), N. Dashyan (YerPhI) CLAS12 Detector workshop, February.
H.-G. Moser Max-Planck-Institut fuer Physik DEPFET Meeting Heidelberg Sept DEPFET Geometry for SuperBelle Sensor Geometry Pixel Pitch Constant/variable.
IPHC, Strasbourg / GSI, Darmstadt
CBM beam pipe current status
The CBM sensor digitizer
The Optimized Sensor Segmentation for the Very Forward Calorimeter
The Silicon Track Trigger (STT) at DØ
Feasibility of   γγ study with ECAL
Simulation study for Forward Calorimeter in LHC-ALICE experiment
Pre-installation Tests of the LHCb Muon Chambers
The LHCb Level 1 trigger LHC Symposium, October 27, 2001
Presentation transcript:

Realistic detector layout for MUCH system M.Ryzhinskiy, SPbSPU CBM Collaboration Meeting September 25-28, 2007, Dresden, Germany

Topics to cover Goals & problems Proposed solutions Future improvements Summary CBM Collaboration Meeting, September, 2007 Mikhail Ryzhinskiy

Ideal case: More realistic case needed: optimal parameters (channel number, granularity, …); ability to work in CBM exp.; consensus between the price and functionality. Goals dx=dy=100µ dx dy CBM Collaboration Meeting, September, 2007 Mikhail Ryzhinskiy

Hit density (HD) challenge HD max  0.8 hits/(event*cm 2 ) HD(R 1 ) = HD max /2; HD(R 2 ) = HD(R 1 )/2; ….. HD(R n ) = HD(R n-1 )/2. CBM Collaboration Meeting, September, 2007 Mikhail Ryzhinskiy

Circled regions R 1 R 2 …….. R n occupancy  0.05 CBM Collaboration Meeting, September, 2007 Mikhail Ryzhinskiy

Segmentation Station  Sectors  Pads 128 channels/sector PAD min : 0.14x0.28 cm 2  SECTOR min : 2.24x2.24 cm 2 S i pad/sec =2*S i-1 pad/sec CBM Collaboration Meeting, September, 2007 Mikhail Ryzhinskiy

Hit distribution CBM Collaboration Meeting, September, 2007 Mikhail Ryzhinskiy

Terminology Layer Stations Layer  Station  Sector  Pad CBM Collaboration Meeting, September, 2007 Mikhail Ryzhinskiy

Disadvantages & possible solution Strip-like pads (strips): width = 0.14 cm = const length i =2*length i-1 Hybrid stations: pads in central region + strips in peripheral region  9 stations CBM Collaboration Meeting, September, 2007 Mikhail Ryzhinskiy

Simple hit producer (pads) Event display by E. Kryshen CBM Collaboration Meeting, September, 2007 Mikhail Ryzhinskiy

Avalanches CBM Collaboration Meeting, September, 2007 Mikhail Ryzhinskiy

Advanced algorithm CBM Collaboration Meeting, September, 2007 Mikhail Ryzhinskiy primary electrons sec. electrons

Running a segmentation CbmMuchSegmentation* muchSegmentation = new CbmMuchSegmentation(); // Set number of layers muchSegmentation->SetNLayers(5); // Set filename where to store parameters muchSegmentation->SetDigiFileName(“much.digi.par”); // Set minimal resolution for a detector layer muchSegmentation->SetMinSigmaX(1, 400); muchSegmentation->SetMinSigmaY(1, 800); // Set rotation angle muchSegmentation->SetAngle(1, 10); // Make segmentation muchSegmentation->SegmentMuch(); CBM Collaboration Meeting, September, 2007 Mikhail Ryzhinskiy

Running the digitizer // --- MuCh digitizer CbmMuchDigitize* muchDigitize = new CbmMuchDigitize("MuchDigitize", iVerbose); muchDigitize->SetUseAvalanche(0); // Not account for avalanches muchDigitize->SetDTime(8e-2); // Set time resolution fRun->AddTask(muchDigitize); // // --- MuCh hit finder CbmMuchFindHits* muchFindHits = new CbmMuchFindHits("MuchFindHits", iVerbose); fRun->AddTask(muchFindHits); // CBM Collaboration Meeting, September, 2007 Mikhail Ryzhinskiy

Next steps Fix parameters (resolution, angles …) Consider strip-like pads (if needed) Segmentation to the simulation stage Cluster finder CBM Collaboration Meeting, September, 2007 Mikhail Ryzhinskiy

Summary Segmentation procedure is provided Simple digitizer for MuCh is provided Proposed different segmentations Advanced digitizer is developed Compatibility with new CBMROOT release CBM Collaboration Meeting, September, 2007 Mikhail Ryzhinskiy