This presentation was supported by Cooperative Agreement Numbers U48-DP001909, U48-DP001946, U48-DP001924, U48-DP001934, U48-DP001938(03), U48-DP001944,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Quality Improvement: Lessons for Workers Compensation Quality of Care Linda Rudolph, MD, MPH Medi-Cal Managed Care Division CA Department of Health Services.
Advertisements

The Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network: CHC Survey Subgroup.
CPCRN and NCI Priorities Jon F. Kerner, Ph.D. Deputy Director DCCPS.
Lessons Learned from Implementing My Own Health Report Catherine Rohweder, DrPH Jennifer Leeman, DrPH, MDiv Alexis Moore, MPH UNC Chapel Hill and the MOHR.
CPCRN Presentation Template CDC Site Visit September 24, 2013 Building Capacity to Employ Evidence-based Approaches Nationally Cam Escoffery, PhD, MPH,
The Greater Cleveland Cancer Prevention Research Collaborating Center Sue Flocke, PhD Case Western Reserve University October 29, 2014 This presentation.
UPenn Prevention Research Center’s CPCRN Collaborating Center University of Pennsylvania (UPenn) Prevention Research Center is a new PRC, Principal.
Hello from the South Carolina Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network (SC-CPCRN II)! “Multi-Level, Community-Clinical Cancer Prevention and Control.
FQHC Workgroup Participating Centers Emory University Texas A&M University of Texas, Houston* University of Washington* University of Colorado University.
Building on the Measurement of CFIR Constructs in FQHCs: Where Do We Go From Here? Maria Fernandez, PhD on behalf of the CPCRN FQHC WG Investigators CPCRN.
Appalachian Center for Cancer Education, Screening, and Support (ACCESS) Robin Vanderpool, DrPH, CHES University of Kentucky College of Public Health October.
GDHI. Origins of GDHI  Innovation is crucial in addressing current and future healthcare challenges  But, it takes too long at present for new ideas.
Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network A national network of academic, public health, and community partners who work together to reduce the burden.
Factors Influencing Implementation of Evidence-based Cancer Prevention and Control Practices in FQHCs: A Qualitative Study CPCRN FQHC Qualitative Inquiry.
® Introduction Mental Health Predictors of Pain and Function in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain Olivia D. Lara, K. Ashok Kumar MD FRCS Sandra Burge,
Proposed Cross-center Project Survey of Federally Qualified Health Centers Vicky Taylor & Vicki Young.
ARC NW Alliance for Reducing Cancer Northwest Boston November, 2007.
HPV Workgroup Update Chapel Hill October 20, 2010 Jennifer Allen, Roshan Bastani, Vicky Taylor.
FQHC Workgroup Overview Partner FQHCs, state, regional & national associations Advance dissemination and implementation of cancer prevention and control.
Designing Survey Instrument to Evaluate Implementation of Complex Health Interventions: Lessons Learned Eunice Chong Adrienne Alayli-Goebbels Lori Webel-Edgar.
1 The Prevention Research Centers Program: The Case for Networks Eduardo Simoes, MD, MSc, MPH Program Director Prevention Research Centers National Center.
Julie C. Lowery, PhD, MHSA, Associate Director, CCMR; Co-Implementation Research Coordinator, Diabetes QUERI Laura Damschroder, MS, MPH, Co- Implementation.
Colorectal Cancer Control Program Workgroup Emory University – Co-chair Harvard University University of CA Los Angeles – Co-chair University of CO University.
Focus Group conducted at the National Association of Community Health Center (NACHC) Conference Preliminary Findings Oct 5th, 2011 FQHC Qualitative Inquiry.
Filling evidence gaps Karen Glanz, PhD, MPH Emory University Glorian Sorensen, PhD, MPH Harvard University Dana-Farber Cancer Institute.
Integrating evidence-based practice into state and national cancer control programs Karen Glanz, PhD, MPH Emory University Cathy Melvin, PhD, MPH University.
Emerging Issues in Cancer Control Roshan Bastani PhD & Vicky Taylor MD, MPH.
ACCELERATING CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH Engaging Hospitals in Research: Implementation Science Jose Azar, MD Medical Director,
1 The EBA Work Group: Development of a conceptual framework to guide use of evidence based cancer control interventions Debbie Pfeiffer, MA; Washington.
2011 CRCCP Grantee Survey of Program Implementation CRCCP Cross Center Workgroup.
This presentation was supported by Cooperative Agreement Numbers U48-DP001909, U48-DP001946, U48-DP001924, U48-DP001934, U48-DP001938(03), U48-DP001944,
Research Utilization in Nursing Chapter 21
Increasing Hepatitis B Screening Among Korean Church Attendees Roshan Bastani, PhDPrincipal Investigator Roshan Bastani, PhDPrincipal Investigator Vicky.
ACS MapPlace – Health Profile and Community Resources Mapping Project Carolina Casares, MD MPH Kenneth Portier, PhD.
Seattle CPCRN Site. Seattle Focus Areas Racial/ethnic minority groups that are over- represented (American Indians and Asian Americans) or rapidly growing.
1 Implementation of the BETTER 2 program Nicolette Sopcak, Carolina Aguilar, Kris Aubrey-Bassler, Richard Cullen, Melanie Heatherington, Donna Manca CPHA.
CRCCP Workgroup Update: Grantee Survey Early Findings & Next Steps CPCRN Steering Committee Meeting March 22, 2012.
A Nationally Endorsed Framework for Measuring and Reporting Culturally Competent Care Nicole W. McElveen, MPH Senior Project Manager,
1 Overview of CPCRN and Recent Accomplishments Kurt M. Ribisl, PhD University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill CPCRN Coordinating Center CPCRN Dialogue.
Colorectal Cancer Control Program (CRCCP) Workgroup Peggy Hannon, Cam Escoffery, & Annette Maxwell, Co-chairs October 20, 2010.
Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network A national network of academic, public health, and community partners who work together to reduce the burden.
Health Promotion as a Quality issue
University of Iowa Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network Sue Curry, Ph.D., Principal Investigator This presentation was supported by Cooperative.
This presentation was supported by Cooperative Agreement Numbers U48-DP001909, U48-DP001946, U48-DP001924, U48-DP001934, U48-DP001938(03), U48-DP001944,
Assessing local public health capacity and performance in diabetes prevention and control Deborah Porterfield, MD MPH University of North Carolina-Chapel.
Copyright 2012 Delmar, a part of Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. Chapter 9 Improving Quality in Health Care Organizations.
AAU Undergraduate STEM Education Initiative Tobin Smith AAU Vice President for Policy ISSUES Workshop January 30, 2014.
Massachusetts Cancer Prevention Community Research Network (MCPCRN) CPCRN Boston Meeting November 1-2, 2007.
Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network (CPCRN) Case Studies of Local and National Partnerships Putting Evidence into Practice CDC Cancer Partners.
Keys To Success Stephen Taplin MD, MPH Deputy Associate Director, Healthcare Delivery Research Program Division of Cancer Control & Population Sciences,
Results of a Practice Enhancement Opportunity Assessment of FQHCs in South Carolina Practice Enhancement Opportunity Assessment Team Heather M. Brandt,
Decision Support Aids for Patient/Providers Cathy Melvin Maria Fernandez Jennifer Allen.
Cancer Prevention and Control Research Network This presentation was supported by Cooperative Agreement Number DP SIP from the Centers for.
This presentation was supported by Cooperative Agreement Numbers U48-DP001909, U48-DP001946, U48-DP001924, U48-DP001934, U48-DP001938(03), U48-DP001944,
Massachusetts Cancer Prevention Community Research Network (MCPCRN) CPCRN Atlanta Meeting October 15-16, 2009.
INTRODUCING THE PSBA-GTO ACT FOR YOUTH CENTER OF EXCELLENCE IN CONSULTATION WITH HEALTHY TEEN NETWORK Planning for Evidence-Based Programming.
I removed the quit attempt variable from the adjusted model. I removed the quit attempt variable from the adjusted model.e Sarah Kowitt, MPH 1 ; Tanha.
Julie C. Lowery, PhD, MHSA Associate Director, VA CCMR; Co-Implementation Research Coordinator, VA Diabetes QUERI HSR&D Center for Clinical Management.
D&I Session: Measurement CPCRN Spring Meeting May 24-25, 2016 Chicago, IL This presentation was supported by Cooperative Agreement Number INSERT YOUR CENTER'S.
Community Implementation Workgroup
Implementation Science: Theories & Models
Identifying Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for Sustainment of Evidence-Based Substance Abuse and Mental Health Programs Sapna J. Mendon, Lawrence.
the National Diabetes Prevention Program in the Community
Laura J. Damschroder, VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System
Evaluation of a Spiritually-based Intervention to Increase Colorectal Cancer Knowledge and Screening Among Church-attending African Americans and Whites.
Daniela B. Friedman, University of South Carolina
Capacity Building Training and Technical Assistance Workgroup
Cancer Screening Programs Workgroup
CRCCP Update & Next Steps
Assessing Self-Reporting Statuses of Mother’s and Child’s Weights
Presentation transcript:

This presentation was supported by Cooperative Agreement Numbers U48-DP001909, U48-DP001946, U48-DP001924, U48-DP001934, U48-DP001938(03), U48-DP001944, U48-DP001936, U48-DP , U48–DP001911, & U48-DP from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The findings and conclusions in this presentation are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Shin-Ping Tu, MD, MPH; Maria Fernandez, PhD, Vicki Young, PhD on behalf of the CPCRN FQHC Workgroup Investigators Emory UniversityUniversity of California Los Angeles University of ColoradoUniversity of South Carolina University of Texas HoustonUniversity of Washington Washington University at St. Louis Denver, CO Oct 3 rd, 2013 The CPCRN FQHC Workgroup Survey Results: Implementation of Evidence-Based Approaches (EBAs) for Promoting CRC Screening

EBAs for Promoting CRC Screening in the FQHC Survey CHC Main Survey: Provider Reminders Patient Reminders One-on-one Education Provider Assessment & Feedback Clinic Characteristics Survey: One-on-one Education Reducing Structural Barriers Patient Reminders Provider Assessment & Feedback Patient Navigators Provider Reminders

Assessment of EBA implementation Level 1: Yes, we have implemented this strategy fully and systematically across the clinic. Level 2: Yes, we have implemented this strategy, but it is inconsistently implemented across the clinic. Level 3: Yes, we are at an early stage of implementing this strategy at the clinic. Planning: No, but we are planning to implement this strategy in the future. No plan: No, and we have no plans to do so.

Levels of Implementation of EBAs for Promoting CRC Screening—Main Survey Missing Frequencies: 20

Levels of Implementation of EBAs for Promoting CRC Screening—Clinic Survey

Organizational Factors Assessed in CHC Main Survey General Factors Practice Adaptive Reserve Inner Setting: –Structural Characteristics—Resources –Culture- innovation, flexibility, & reflexivity, –Culture- stress & effort –Network & Communication (using PAR items) –Leadership (using PAR items) Outer Setting: –Patient needs & resources (Patient- centeredness) Process: –Executing –Reflecting & Evaluating –Engagement Individual Characteristics: –Knowledge & Beliefs—Openness EBA-specific Factors EBA Characteristics : –Relative advantage –Complexity Inner Setting: –Compatibility –Implementation climate –Goals and feedback –Learning climate (using PAR items) –Structural characteristics—resources Process: –Engaging Champions Individual Characteristics –Knowledge and Beliefs—Appeal

Organizational Factors Assessed in Clinic Characteristics Survey EBA-Specific Factors –Tension for change –Organizational Incentives and Rewards –Goals and Feedback Outer Setting: External policies and incentives

Preliminary Results from Multi-level Analysis (Main Survey)

Provider Reminders: Predictors of Implementation Predictors of Provider Reminders Implementation Odds Ratio* P-value Practice Adaptive Reserve Patient-centeredness Structural Characteristics--Resources Communication Culture--Innovation & Flexibility Leadership Reflection & Evaluation *Associated with higher levels of provider reminder implementation Adjusted for education, which is significantly correlated to the outcome Number of respondents =296

Provider Reminders: EBI-Specific Predictors of Implementation EBI (Provider Reminders) -Specific FactorsOdds Ratio* P-value Compatibility (between EBA & clinic) Relative advantage *Associated with higher levels of provider reminder implementation Adjusted for education Number of respondents =296

Patient Reminder: Predictors of Implementation Predictors of Patient Reminders ImplementationOdds Ratio*P-value Knowledge & Beliefs Patient-centeredness Organizational Resources Communication Reflection & Evaluation *Aassociated with higher levels of provider reminder implementation Adjusted for education Number of respondents =296

One-on-One Education: Predictors of Implementation Predictors of One-on-one Education Implementation Odds Ratio* P-value Practice Adaptive Reserve5.17<.0001 Patient-centeredness8.22<.0001 Structural Characteristics--Resources Communication3.78<.0001 Culture--Reflexivity Culture--Effort Culture--Stress0.22<.0001 Leadership3.29<.0001 Reflection & Evaluation4.32<.0001 *Odds ratio over 1 means associated with higher levels of provider reminder implementation Adjusted for education Number of respondents =296

Provider Assessment & Feedback: General Predictors Predictors of One-on-one Education Implementation Odds Ratio* P-value Practice Adaptive Reserve Patient-centeredness Structural Characteristics--Resources 3.95<.0001 Communication 2.54<.0001 Culture--Reflexivity Culture--Effort Leadership 2.45<.0001 Reflection & Evaluation 3.14<.0001 *Odds ratio over 1 means associated with higher levels of provider reminder implementation Adjusted for education Number of respondents =296

Significance This study is among the first to examine determinants from the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) on implementation of evidence based cancer control interventions.