1 Supporting materials for RMS Follow up from April RMS presentation Expedited Switch/Customer Rescission (Retail Customer Choice Team)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Retail Market Guide Updates.  ERCOT strictly prohibits Market Participants and their employees who are participating in ERCOT activities from using their.
Advertisements

Inadvertent Gain Overview February Introduction Why we are here –Original Inadvertent Gain (IAG) Task Force (2004) Creation of Retail Market.
1.  An inadvertent issue begins upon the discovery of an Inadvertent Gain or Move-In transaction submission. Upon identification of an Inadvertent Gain.
Update to RMS April 7, RMGRR – Guidelines for Notification of Invoice Dispute  The revision will align the Retail Market Guide with current market.
1 Pre-TX Set 1.5 Data Clean Up. 2 Pre-TX SET 1.5 Data Clean-up Process In-Review - currently 12 (Original Quantity = 863) –June RMS, count 207 In-Review.
Update to RMS January 6, RMGRR – Revision to Customer Rescission Completion Timeline The revision will implement a written standard in the Retail.
Retail Sub-Committee Update Robert Connell June 14, 2002.
Retail Market Update June 5, New meter is requested for a specific customer’s location. 2.Application is filed by customer and/or the customer’s.
Role of Account Management at ERCOT PRR 672 Collaborative Analysis Presentation to RMS November 8, 2006 DRAFT ONLY.
1. ERCOT strictly prohibits Market Participants and their employees who are participating in ERCOT activities from using their participation in ERCOT.
Update to RMS March 3, RMGRR129 – Revision to Customer Rescission Completion Timeline - VOTE The revision will implement a written standard in the.
Update to RMS June 2, RMGRR131 – Guidelines for Notification of Invoice Dispute – VOTE  The revision will align the Retail Market Guide with current.
1 Transaction or Issue Clean Up. 2 Linked-Address Issue Multiple ESI IDs Linked to a Single Service Address Record Background Counts Matrix Completed.
Update to RMS May 5, RMGRR131 – Guidelines for Notification of Invoice Dispute – MOTION TO TABLE  The revision will align the Retail Market Guide.
Profiling Working Group August 2, PWG Update Report By Ernie Podraza of Reliant Energy ERCOT PWG Chair for COPS Meeting August 22, 2006.
1 RMS Update - ERCOT June 10, Supporting Reports Section.
MARS Taskforce COPS Update May 12, Execution MilestonesBaseline DateStatus Technical Architecture Complete 05/15/2009On Schedule Development Complete07/24/2009On.
Market Impact Assessment TF Final Report to RMS June 11, 2008.
MarkeTrak Phase II Task Force Update to RMS April 9, 2008.
Retail Market Subcommittee June 9, 2010 Performance Measures 1st Quarter 2010 Transaction Comparison.
RMS Update to TAC January 8, Voting Items From RMS meeting on 12/10/2008  RMGRR069: Texas SET Retail Market Guide Clean-up – Section 7: Historical.
Update to RMS September 1 st, RMGRR129 – Revision to Customer Rescission Completion Timeline Timely execution of a customer rescission after completion.
09/15/10 RMS RMS Market Reports – Recommendations Karen Farley Manager, Retail Customer Choice.
Rob Connell May 1, 2002 Retail Sub-Committee Update.
June 10, 2009 RMS PR90006, Commercial Systems Information Lifecycle Management (ILM) Hope Parrish, ERCOT.
1 Supporting materials for RMS Provided by Retail Customer Choice (RCC) team.
10/13/10 RMS RMS Market Reports – Recommendations Karen Farley Manager, Retail Customer Choice.
ESI IDs Retired in Error! RMS – August 10, 2005 Discussion.
1 RMS Update - ERCOT May 14, Supporting Reports Section.
1. ERCOT strictly prohibits Market Participants and their employees who are participating in ERCOT activities from using their participation in ERCOT.
1.  Welcome & Introductions  Antitrust Admonition  Inadvertent Gain/Loss (IGL) Overview ◦ Causes of IAS & Impacts to customer experience ◦ Prevention.
October 9, 2012 Commercial Operations Subcommittee RMS Update Kathy Scott RMS Vice Chair.
Retail Market Subcommittee Update to COPS Kathy Scott March 17,
1 RMS Update on Move-In / Move-Out Task Force November 14, 2002.
RMS/COPS Workshop VI 1 October 06, Antitrust Admonition ERCOT strictly prohibits Market Participants and their employees who are participating in.
1. ERCOT strictly prohibits Market Participants and their employees who are participating in ERCOT activities from using their participation in ERCOT.
1.  Antitrust Admonition  Welcome & Introductions  Inadvertent Gain/Loss (IGL) Overview ◦ Causes of IAS & Impacts to customer experience ◦ Prevention.
1 Transaction or Issue Clean Up. 2 Linked-Address Issue Multiple ESI IDs Linked to a Single Service Address Record Background Counts Matrix Completed.
1 Linked-Service Address Discussion Thursday - April 8, 2004 (Updated 4/12/04 to include meeting results) Airport Hilton - Austin.
1 Update on the 867_03 Contingency Plan Nancy Hetrick February 25, 2003.
1 Transaction or Issue Clean Up. 2 Customer Protection and 814_08 Issue (Phase 2 – Potentially Late 08s) Background Completed Items Next Steps.
814_20 – Substation ID updates Background and Proposed Action Plan RMS – 11/07/07.
1 Critical Retail Issues RMS Update RMS Meeting Results 2/01 RMS Formed 3/01 RMS Identified “pent-up” issues Tx Set transaction development Service Order.
1 Supporting materials for RMS Provided by Retail Customer Choice (RCC) team.
Update to RMS August 4th, RMGRR129 – Revision to Customer Rescission Completion Timeline Timely execution of a customer rescission after completion.
Issue 2007-I071 Modify Cancellation Window to Accept Cancels Closer to SMRD.
December 9, 2015 Retail Market Subcommittee Update to COPS Kathy Scott January 13,
1 TX SET Mass Transition Project RMS Update March 15, 2006.
Update to RMS December 18, Project(PR) 010_03 SCR756 Part B – High Level Timeline DRAFT:  Planning Phase: ~ (End of 2013) ◦ Business requirements.
Update to RMS June 3, Project(PR) 010_03 SCR756 Part B High Level Timeline  Planning Phase - complete  Execution/Development - complete  Testing.
Update to RMS January 10, Project(PR) 010_03 SCR756 Part B – High Level Timeline DRAFT:  Planning Phase: ~ (End of 2013) ◦ Business requirements.
Retail Market Subcommittee Update to TAC March 4, 2004.
1 Customer Objections in Complete Status (CCO Clean-up Phase 3) Background Next Steps.
MIMO Stacking Document and the current RMG are inconsistent with current logic and should be updated.
Update to RMS October 6 th, RMGRR129 – Revision to Customer Rescission Completion Timeline – REMINDER Timely execution of a customer rescission.
RMGRR058 Overview RMS Meeting – August 15, Background / Reference PUCT Substantive Rule 25.43(n)(8) Protocol Customer Billing Contact.
MMWG Performance Measures Questionnaire. Performance Measure Reporting Requirements The reporting requirements allowed the commission to obtain information.
1 Customer Objections in Complete Status (CCO Clean-up Phase 3) Background Next Steps.
Mass Transition—Timelines & Volume Limitation RMGRR116—Acquisition Transfer Non-standard Metering Future Meetings 1.
Update to RMS February 2, 2016 TX SET. Texas SET January Meeting Update Elections – Chair: Diana Rehfeldt, TNMP – Vice Chair: Kyle Patrick, NRG TMTP Changes.
1.  What is the purpose of DEVs? Data Extract Variances (DEVs) are used to synchronize the data among all Market Participants (MP)  What is a DEV? It's.
Module 1 From Bundled Utilities to Current Market Design.
1. ERCOT strictly prohibits Market Participants and their employees who are participating in ERCOT activities from using their participation in ERCOT.
1 Supporting materials for RMS Provided by Retail Customer Choice (RCC) team.
Inadvertent Switch & Customer Rescission Market Training
Pro-Active Transaction Resolution Measures
Pro-Active Transaction Resolution Measures
Usage Billing Issues.
TDTMS MarkeTrak Subtype Stats September 20, 2017.
Presentation transcript:

1 Supporting materials for RMS Follow up from April RMS presentation Expedited Switch/Customer Rescission (Retail Customer Choice Team)

2 997 Functional Acknowledgement What is it? Sent from the receiver to the sender of an.edi transaction to acknowledge receipt Per Protocol Section 19 –CR, TDSP, or ERCOT shall respond with a 997 within 24 hours of receipt of an inbound transaction –All parties must send Functional Acknowledgements (FA/997) for all EDI transactions

3 997 Functional Acknowledgement Why is it important? Failure to successfully receive and process a 997 is the first indication of missing enrollments, usage, system issues, etc Without the 997s CRs, TDSPs and/or ERCOT are missing a critical audit trail How to help? Verify that 997s produced contain the correct data elements and match the transaction received What reports can be utilized? –Missing 997 Report is posted daily

997 Functional Acknowledgement *April 2009* How are we doing? In January ERCOT had 12.6% of 997s not successfully received –January count of outgoing transactions 8,912,379 –January count of 997s not processed inbound 1,126,500 ERCOT has found a significant # of 997s received that did not have all the data elements corresponding to the outgoing transactions 4

997 Functional Acknowledgement How are we doing? In September ERCOT had.002% of 997s not successfully received –Sept count of outgoing transactions 10,207,546 –Sept count of 997s not processed inbound 22,594 5

6 IAG/IAL Customer Rescission Retail Market Guide: Customer Rescission after Completion of a Switch Transaction Only the Gaining CR may initiate the process of returning the Customer to the original CR by filing a MarkeTrak issue In order to ensure a fee is not assessed, the REP shall follow the process outlined in the MarkeTrak User’s Guide, including specific pre-determined comments stating “Customer rescission-please process this issue per P.U.C. S UBST. R (n).”

7 IAG/IAL Customer Rescission MarkeTrak Users Guide: Submitting a Rescission-based Issue Comment - “Customer rescission-please process this issue per P.U.C. S UBST. R (n).” i.This comment is required at the time of submission in order for the issue to be considered rescission-based. Also, for reporting purposes, it is important that this comment be entered exactly as shown above.

8 Customer Rescission Inadvertent/Cancel With Approval Issue Summary: Increase in Aggregate Issues Sub Type Issues Submitted 6/1/09 to 8/16/09 Issues Submitted 8/17/09 to 10/31/09 % Increase in Issues Submitted Inadvertent Losing % Inadvertent Gaining % Cancel With Approval % Total % Or 7043

9 IAG/IAL Customer Rescission CommentInadvertent LosingInadvertent Gaining Customer rescission-please process this issue per P.U.C. Subst. R (n) Comment Contains: Inadvertent Issue Summary: Total Inadvertent Issues with Comment:

10 IAG/IAL Customer Rescission Inadvertent Issue Summary: Other Comments we’ve found on Rescission Issues: ‘Customer has timely informed CR they want to cancel change of service under Customer rescission…’ ‘Cust rescinded.’ ‘…This is a customer recission MT not an IAG.’ ‘Customer rescinded switch request within 3 federal business days…’ ‘THIS IS A CUSTOMER RESCISSION!’ ‘customer rescissioni-please process this issue…’