ECOG-ACRIN Imaging Research Associate Education Symposium November 12, 2015.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tips to a Successful Monitoring Visit
Advertisements

Controversies in Adjuvant Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer Parag Sanghvi M.D. Tasha McDonald M.D. Department of Radiation Medicine OHSU.
Research Protocol ACRIN 6678 Learning About PET/CT Scans: Can PET/CT scans provide helpful information for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer?
Consent for Research Study A study for patients newly diagnosed with advanced glioblastoma (brain cancer): Learning whether a PET scan with F-fluoromisonidazole.
Consent for Research Study A Study for Women with Advanced Cervical Cancer: Learning whether an MRI scan with an investigative contrast agent (called.
DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF A LUNG NODULE PROGRAM Tamra Kelly, BS RRT-NPS, Gary B. Mertens, RCP, CPFT, Jenifer Beasley, RRT, Departments of Cancer.
Pediatric Proton Therapy in the United States: Patterns of Care 2013 Danny Indelicato, MD Andrew Chang, MD.
PET after Chemotherapy in Rhabdomyosarcoma Connective Tissue Oncology Society November 19, 2005 Michelle L. Klem, Leonard H. Wexler, Ravinder Grewal, Heiko.
AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY March 23, OUR MISSION To foster the ongoing development of widely acceptable consistent imaging.
ACRIN 6657/CALGB Consent for Research Study Contrast-Enhanced Breast MRI and MRS: A Correlative Science Studies to Characterize Tumor Response in.
CALGB Informational Session June 22, 2007 David Hurd, MD Interim Chair Data Audit Committee.
Consent for Research Study A study for patients with a diagnosis of liver cancer who are on the waiting list for a liver transplant Comparison of advanced.
ACRIN Research Associates Educational Session Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Research Associates Committee Joyce Neading, RHIT, CTR Program Director,
ACRIN 6671/GOG 0233 Consent for Research Study A study for Women with Advanced Cervical Cancer: Learning whether a PET/CT scan using an imaging agent called.
ACRIN 6678 Site Training ACRIN 6678 FDG-PET/CT as a Predictive Marker of Tumor Response and Patient Outcome: Prospective Validation in Non-small Cell Lung.
ODAC SCHERING-PLOUGH RESEARCH INSTITUTE 1 Temozolomide Oncology Drug Advisory Committee March 13, 2003 Craig L. Tendler, M.D. Vice President, Oncology.
SARC015: Phase II study of R1507 in wild-type GIST Margaret von Mehren, Fox Chase Cancer Center Katie Janeway, Dana Farber Cancer Institute.
Long Term Follow Up of Subjects in Gene Transfer Clinical Trials Philippe Bishop, MD FDA/CBER Division of Clinical Trial Design and Analysis Oncology Branch.
RTOG1106: Randomized Phase IIR Trial of Personalized Adaptive Radiotherapy Based on Mid-treatment FDG-PET in Locally Advanced NSCLC P.I.: Feng-Ming (Spring)
ACRIN 6685 Overview ACRIN 6685 A Multi-center Trial of FDG-PET/CT Staging of Head and Neck Cancer and its Impact on the N0 Neck Surgical Treatment in Head.
ACRIN CV Committee Imaging Procedures Scott Akers, MD, PhD, Radiologist Walter Witschey, PhD, Physicist Dena Flamini, RT (R) (MR), (M) Imaging Analyst,
Imaging Core Laboratory Fall Meeting, 2011 Imaging Challenges for ACRIN sites Compliance and set-up Anthony M. Levering Assistant Director, Core lab.
A Phase II Trial of Perifosine in Patients with Chemo-Insensitive Sarcomas Study Update – November 2008 Dejka Araujo, MD MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston,
Involved Field Radiotherapy versus No Further Treatment in Patients with Clinical Stages IA/IIA Hodgkin Lymphoma and a “Negative” PET Scan After 3 Cycles.
Consent for Research Study A study for patients diagnosed with locally advanced breast cancer Learning if the imaging agent, [ 18 F] fluorothymidine (FLT),
Measuring the Feasibility and Cost of PRO-CTCAE Implementation in Trials Presentation to NCI Stakeholders Based on work of the PRO-CTCAE Task 8 (Feasibility)
Phase II Trial of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Sporadic and Neurofibromatosis Type 1 Associated High Grade Unresectable Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath.
SARC006: Phase II Trial of Chemotherapy in Sporadic and Neurofibromatosis Type 1 Associated High Grade Unresectable Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumors.
SARC: Participation and Protocol / Concept Review Robert Maki, MD PhD Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center.
Cancer Centers In Clinical Trials Sandrine Marreaud Head of Medical Department.
Consent for Research Study A study using 18 F-Fluoride for prostate cancer patients currently enrolled in Dr. Febbo’s “Genomic Guided Therapy” study A.
Phase II Trial of Chemotherapy in Sporadic and Neurofibromatosis Type 1 Associated High Grade Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumors Brigitte Widemann,
Phase 2 study of the mTOR inhibitor RAD001 (everolimus) in combination with bevacizumab (avastin) in patients with sporadic and neurofibromatosis type.
Consent for Research Study A study for patients newly diagnosed with advanced glioblastoma (brain cancer): Learning whether a PET scan with F-fluoromisonidazole.
Accelerated hemithoracic radiation followed by extrapleural pneumonectomy for malignant pleural mesothelioma Marc de Perrot, Ronald Feld, Natasha B Leighl,
Getting a study done at Jefferson:. Startup Activities: Image courtesy of CITI Program Clinical Research Coordinator course.
Enrollment and Monitoring Procedures for NCI Supported Clinical Trials Barry Anderson, MD, PhD Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program National Cancer Institute.
S1400 Study Logistics Training Slides
SNDA Letrozole (Femara®) Indication: First-line therapy in post- menopausal women with advanced breast cancer. Prior approval: Second-line therapy.
French Guidelines (SOR): Any Impact Since 1995? BN Bui Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux FSG CETOS 2005.
Radiation Therapy Trials - Quality Assurance:  patient safety  adherence to protocol constraints  uniformity of patient treatments  efficient review.
PROJECT AIM BACKGROUNDRESULTS/OUTCOMES LESSONS LEARNED NEXT STEPS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS A Quality Verification Tool to Assure Complete Pre- Treatment Electronic.
Linking Electronic Health Records Across Institutions to Understand Why Women Seek Care at Multiple Sites for Breast Cancer Caroline A. Thompson, PhD,
11 Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Clinical Trials Administration Sharon Hartson Stine, Director Group Administrator.
Patterns of care and comparative effectiveness of endocrine therapy for premenopausal women with early breast cancer A multi-institution cohort study February.
CTTI PROJECT Emory University, Quality Assurance and Review Center (QARC) and Washington University in St. Louis.
ACOSOG Sarcoma Committee Chair: Peter W.T. Pisters, MD Vice Chairs: Edward Cheng, MD (Orthopedic Oncology) Robert Maki, MD, PhD (Medical Oncology) Brian.
Brain imaging prior to lung cancer resection
Savage KJ et al. Proc ASH 2015;Abstract 579.
Study Feasibility and Start-up
How to Navigate the NCTN and Participate in Imaging Research
Developing a Comprehensive Site Selection Process for a Cancer Network in a Resource-Limited Settings in Sub-Saharan Africa Meg Wirth AMC Operations &
A New Model for Imaging and Radiation Therapy Quality Assurance in the National Clinical Trials Network of the National Cancer Institute  Thomas J. FitzGerald,
BREAST CANCER ONCOLOGY NAVIGATION SERVICE
Coordination (benign lesions)
NICE Guidance – Service delivery for patients with Sarcomas
KEYNOTE-087: Pembrolizumab in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma New Findings in Hematology: Independent Conference Coverage.
Response to chemotherapy
Audit Update LUNG-MAP Rose Ermete, Rn, bsn, ocn, ccrp
S1400 Lung Master Protocol SWOG Spring meeting May 01, 2015
S1400 Study Logistics Training Slides
Learning About PET/CT Scans:
Updates in Hodgkin Lymphoma
Figure 3 Risk-adapted and response-adapted
SWAG SSG Sarcoma Cancer Meeting
Getting a Study Done at Jefferson:
Protocol Summary National Wilms Tumor Study Group (NWTS)
Pathway for patients with suspected HPB Cancer Inter Provider Transfer
Role for XRT in treatment of early stage Follicular lymphoma?
SBRT trial QA IROC GHG meeting at ESTRO May, 2017
Presentation transcript:

ECOG-ACRIN Imaging Research Associate Education Symposium November 12, 2015

Presentation Objectives The Role of Standard of Care Imaging in Research Trials IROC’s Role for NCTN in managing SOC imaging IROC’s organization and services Case examples from the COG Challenges and Opportunities

IROC’s Structure American College of Radiology Clinical Research Center in Philadelphia is the Grantee for the IROC Grant Sub-awards to: IROC Rhode Island PI: T.J. FitzGerald IROC Houston PI: D. Followill IROC Ohio PI: M.V. Knopp IROC Philadelphia (RT) PI: J. Galvin IROC Philadelphia (Imaging) PI: M. Rosen IROC St. Louis PI: J. Michalski IROC Executive Committee Co-Directors: D. Followill, Houston (RT) and M.V. Knopp, Ohio (Imaging) IROC Admin: King/O’Meara/Laurie

IROC’s Mission Provide integrated radiation oncology and diagnostic imaging quality control programs in support of the NCI’s NCTN Network thereby assuring high quality data for clinical trials designed to improve the clinical outcomes for cancer patients worldwide

IROC’s Core Services 1.Site Qualification (FQs, ongoing QA (OSLD, visits), proton approval, resources) 2.Trial Design Support/Assistance (Key contact QA centers, protocol review, templates) 3.Credentialing (Tiered system to minimize institution effort) 4.Data Management (Data collection, pre-review, post-review for analysis) 5.Case Review (Pre-, on-, post-treatment reviews, facilitate review logistics)

NCTN GroupRadiation OncologyImaging AllianceRhode IslandOhio COGRhode Island ECOG-ACRINRhode IslandPhiladelphia (DI) NRG OncologyPhiladelphia (RT)Philadelphia (DI) SWOGRhode IslandOhio Key Contact QA Centers IROC Houston is the key contact center for all RT credentialing questions.

Case Review Diagnostic Imaging Central Reviews – Confirm eligibility and staging – Confirm response – Confirm progression/relapse – Correlate patterns of failure – Can be performed in real-time to direct patient treatment or retrospective to confirm local patient management and reporting – Can be performed on-site or remotely using secure VPN connections RT Reviews – Interventional reviews (pre-treatment or early on-treatment) to assure that patient’s treatment plan is per protocol requirements. Possible to modify planning to protocol compliance – Post treatment reviews performed to confirm patient’s treatment was delivered per protocol. RT details from this review are transferred for protocol analysis.

1733 enrollments AHOD0031: Chemotherapy With or Without Additional Chemotherapy and/or Radiation Therapy in Treating Children With Newly Diagnosed Hodgkin's Disease

AHOD1331: A Randomized Phase III Study of Brentuximab Vedotin (SGN-35, IND #117117) for Newly Diagnosed High-Risk Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma (cHL) in Children and Adolescents

14.4 Central Review of Imaging Studies Central review of images will be performed to confirm institutional reporting Real-time central review Real time central review to assess response for all patients will be done after the second cycle of chemotherapy and at the completion of chemotherapy for patients who had PET positive disease at the end of 2 cycles of chemotherapy. Copies of all imaging studies at baseline and after 2 cycles of chemotherapy should be submitted (chest radiograph, CT with contrast, FDG-PET imaging) as detailed below. Institutional imaging reports and the AHOD1331 Staging and Response Worksheet should be submitted with these scans. In instances in which the central imaging review assessment of disease status differs from that of the institution, a web-based conference will be organized by IROC RI (QARC) to expedite resolution of any discrepancies in interpretation of the imaging data. Subjects found to not meet study eligibility staging criteria at the time of central review for early response assessment (after 2 cycles of chemotherapy) will be deemed ineligible. Institutions will be notified and required to remove patient from protocol therapy, and the patient will be considered off study. As a reminder, institutions may seek input from IROC prior to study enrollment if there are questions regarding study eligibility based on imaging measurements regarding LMA or bulk.

Packer RJ, Gajjar A, Vezina G, Rorke-Adams L, Burger PC, et al. Phase III Study of Craniospinal Radiation Therapy Followed by Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Newly Diagnosed Average-Risk Medulloblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 2006: ; DOI: /JCO A9961: Pediatric Medulloblastoma

AHEP0731: Treatment of Children with All Stages of Hepatoblastoma

ARST0332: Risk-Based Treatment for Pediatric Non- Rhabdomyosarcoma Soft Tissue Sarcomas (NRSTS) 16.6 Submission of Imaging Studies for Central Review Requirements for All Patients Central review to assess baseline tumor characteristics will be performed on all patients. Studies to be submitted within 5 days of study enrollment include:  Primary site CT or MRI scan obtained at study enrollment prior to tumor resection. If no preresection scan was obtained, this requirement is waived. If multiple imaging studies were obtained prior to protocol enrollment, the imaging study showing the largest tumor diameter and the study performed closest to the time of enrollment should be submitted.  Patients with metastases: All imaging studies that identify metastases at study enrollment Requirements for Treatment Arm D Patients Central review to assess tumor response by diagnostic imaging will be performed on patients enrolled on Treatment Arm D. Studies to be submitted for these patients include:  Primary site CT or MRI scan obtained at study enrollment (as in Section ); baseline scans must be obtained within 3 weeks of study entry and before initiation of therapy.  Primary site CT or MRI scan obtained at Week 13 prior to definitive tumor resection (required)  Patients with metastases: All imaging studies that identified metastases at study enrollment and the same scans obtained at Week 13 (required)  FDG scan obtained at study enrollment and at Week 13 prior to definitive tumor resection (optional) The same imaging modality (CT or MRI) must be used at both

ARST0332: Risk-Based Treatment for Pediatric Non- Rhabdomyosarcoma Soft Tissue Sarcomas (NRSTS)

Challenges and Opportunities TRIAD – Access to TRIAD is controlled by User roles on the Site’s roster Different Paradigm when the research staff are medical oncology based. New Roster being developed with RT and Imaging facilities identified. Will be able to link participating Imaging and/or RT facilities to patient enrollments rather than have all Imaging personnel on Site’s Group Roster. Who are the Imaging personnel we want to engage? Facility Inventories – what information should we obtain for imaging facilities participating in studies with SOC imaging only.