Proton Driver Resources & Schedule (R&D Plan) Rich Stanek May 10, 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overview of SMTF RF Systems Brian Chase. Overview Scope of RF Systems RF & LLRF Collaboration LLRF Specifications for SMTF Progress So Far Status of progress.
Advertisements

Final Design of a CW Radio-Frequency Quadrupole (RFQ) for the Project X Injector Experiment (PXIE)* Abstract: The Project X Injector Experiment (PXIE)
Superconducting Spoke Resonator Cavities and Cryomodules
SRF Cryomodule Assembly Facility Plans Tug Arkan AAC, May 10-12, 2005.
Cost, Schedule & Funding Closeout Jan Joint DOE/NSF CD2/3a Review 1 DOE/NSF Review of the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Project SC 6/7 Cost, Schedule.
RF Unit Test Facility at NML & CM1 Test Plan Bob Kephart Fermilab IWLC-10 October 20, 2010.
Question 27: Outline the key steps for industrialization of machine components and the likely remaining vulnerabilities in achieving them. Achieving industrialization.
RF Cavity / Coupling Coil Module
An SRF Single Cavity Horizontal Test Facility Tom Peterson, Fermilab May 10, 2005.
US Cavities Status and Plan Mark Champion 01 October 2009.
Linac Front-End R&D --- Systems Integration and Meson Lab Setup
Project X RD&D Plan Conventional Facilities (Civil Construction) Russ Alber AAC Meeting February 3, 2009.
Discussion on Studies at Test Stands Roger Ruber Uppsala University.
Test Stands Roger Ruber Uppsala University ESS TAC4 16 Feb
Global Design Effort U.S. ILC Cost Translation R. Stanek, et al. Vic Kuchler 1/26/07.
Activities of Superconducting RF Accelerators at Nanjing University Sun An Proton Linear Accelerator Institute Institute of Energy Sciences, Nanjing University.
Executive Session Director’s CD-3b Review of the MicroBooNE Project January 18, 2012 Dean Hoffer.
January LEReC Review 12 – 13 January 2015 Low Energy RHIC electron Cooling Kerry Mirabella Cost, Schedule, Personnel.
1 Albrecht Wagner DESY and the ILC DESY today DESY strategy and funding DESY and the ILC Funding from the European Union KEK/DESY Collaboration.
HLRF DRAFT Global Design Effort 1 Defining EDR* Work Packages [Engineering Design Report] Ray Larsen SLAC ILC Division for HLRF Team DRAFT April.
M. Ross, N. Walker, A. Yamamoto ILC Cost Review, (updated for TB) and Cost Drivers  Future R & D ILC Cost Review (M. Ross,
F Project X Overview Dave McGinnis October 12, 2007.
1 The Design & Value Costs SRF Technology The XFEL as a Prototype Japan as a Host International Linear Collider Status Mike Harrison.
Fermilab High Intensity Neutrino Source R&D Program - Mission, Status, Plans, and Support Needs - For AD Department Heads March 2007 Bob Webber.
F February 27, 2006 Fermilab Budget Briefing 1 Fermilab Budget Overview International Linear Collider FY05 - FY08 Bob Kephart February 27, 2006.
HINS Front-End R&D --- Status and Plans Bob Webber Fermilab Accelerator Advisory Committee August 7, 2007 Update of May 10 th – 12 th, 2006 AAC Presentation.
1 ILC Internal Cost Review Major Points from External Reviewers T. Elioff, J. Marx, V. Soergel, M. Yoshioka, and A. Yamamoto, (C. Wyss, absent) To be presented.
Harry Carter – LCFOA Meeting 5/1/06 1 LCFOA Technical Briefings: Cryomodules H. Carter Fermilab Technical Division.
PROTON LINAC FOR INDIAN SNS Vinod Bharadwaj, SLAC (reporting for the Indian SNS Design Team)
Ding Sun and David Wildman Fermilab Accelerator Advisory Committee
Project X Injector Experiment (PXIE) Sergei Nagaitsev Dec 19, 2011.
Americas Main Linac Cavity and Cryomodule WBS X.9 Resource Proposal.
Global design effort DOE meeting 8/10/06 Global design effort Americas 1 FY07 DOE ILC Budget recommendations G. Dugan ILC-GDE/Cornell University GDE Americas.
Jan 12, 2005G.W.Foster - Proton Driver General Meeting Proton Driver General Meeting Kick-off Presentation G. W. Foster PD General Weekly Meeting Jan 12,
Overview and Status of the Fermilab High Intensity Neutrino Source R&D Program Giorgio Apollinari for Bob Webber.
Welcome and Presentation of Charge Steve Holmes Accelerator Advisory Committee ( May 10-12, 2005.
ILC Test Facility at New Muon Lab (NML) S. Nagaitsev Fermilab April 16, 2007.
Brenna Flaugher Sept. 24 th Lehman Review1 Run IIB Silicon Upgrade: Cost and Schedule Lehman Review Sept. 24, 2002 Brenna Flaugher Run IIB Silicon Project.
Industrial Participation & SRF Infrastructure at Fermilab Phil Pfund with input from Harry Carter, Rich Stanek, Mike Foley, Dan Olis, and others.
Comparison of Fermilab Proton Driver to Suggested Energy Amplifier Linac Bob Webber April 13, 2007.
Power Upgrade Project SNS September 21-22, TBM Cost Estimate Cost Estimate Schedule Approach Tom Mann October 27, 2005.
June 3, 2004G.W.Foster - Proton Driver Proton Driver Project Development, Tactics & Strategy G. W. Foster Fermilab User’s Meeting June 3, 2004.
F DOE Annual Program Review High Intensity Neutrino Source R&D in the Meson Detector Building Bob Webber & Giorgio Apollinari September 26, 2007.
High Intensity Neutrino Source Program Overview for CD Controls Management Meeting Bob Webber October 6, 2006.
Project X RD&D Plan 325 MHz Linac including High Intensity Neutrino Source (HINS) Program Bob Webber AAC Meeting February 3, 2009.
Proton Driver Status Bob Kephart Proton Driver Physics Workshop Oct 6, 2004.
The categories for ILC budget planning are: R&D – work done in laboratories to develop and verify subsystem components. This supports the cost reduction.
NML - RF Unit Test Facility Jerry Leibfritz Fermilab.
Eric Prebys, Fermilab Program Director, LARP July 10, 2012.
1 Comments concerning DESY and TESLA Albrecht Wagner Comments for the 5th meeting of the ITRP at Caltech 28 June 2004 DESY and the LC What could DESY contribute.
SRF Collaboration Shekhar Mishra Fermilab. Overview Charge: Does the laboratory make effective use of collaboration and existing SRF capabilities at other.
Project X High Power 325 MHz RF Distribution and Control Alfred Moretti, Nov 12, 2007 Project X Workshop.
ILCTA_NML Progress at Fermilab Jerry Leibfritz August 16, 2007.
Chapter Editor: John Weisend TDR Chapter 6 Cryogenic System, Vacuum System & Test Stands.
Fermilab-India Agreements and Collaboration Shekhar Mishra Project-X, International Collaboration Coodinator Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Batavia,
High Intensity Neutrino Source HINS Linac Front-End R&D --- Systems Integration, Beam Diagnostics Needs, and Meson Lab Setup Bob Webber.
SRF Infrastructure at FNAL Planning, Organization, Cost & Schedule R. Stanek February 14, 2007.
Requirements for Efficient CW SRF Cryomodules
Uppsala Commitment to ESS and FREIA Planning
Progress and Issues with VTS Upgrade
Evolving an ILC focused SCRF Facility from the XFEL Infrastructure
EDR HLRF Work Packages Draft Summary
BE/RF-IS Contribution to LIU C. Rossi and M. Paoluzzi
ESS RF Development at Uppsala University
High Intensity Neutrino Source R&D Overview
ADS Accelerator Program in China
ILC Cryogenics -- Technical Design Report Planning
MEIC Cost Estimate Overview
Preliminary Project Execution Plan
SNS-PPU upgrades the existing accelerator structure
Presentation transcript:

Proton Driver Resources & Schedule (R&D Plan) Rich Stanek May 10, 2005

Fermilab May , 2005 Rich Stanek - Accelerator Advisory Committee2 Outline Introduction Summary of the PD Cost Estimate A Preliminary Look at the PD Schedule Cost & Schedule Drivers Labor Resources Conclusions

Fermilab May , 2005 Rich Stanek - Accelerator Advisory Committee3 Introduction Proton Driver is still in the early stages of the project planning process. Initial estimates of the project cost & schedule have been made in order to establish a range of values for these parameters. These estimates are based on assumptions regarding the success of the R&D work plan and the available infrastructure that will be in place Superconducting Module Test Facility plays an essential role in the execution of a Proton Driver Project (SMTF = HPTF+CAF) In fact, all four SCRF projects (PD, SMTF, ILC and FNPL) are fundamentally interconnected such that an obvious synergy exists between them. The goal is to utilize our resources in the most efficient and cost effective way in order to make progress on all fronts

Fermilab May , 2005 Rich Stanek - Accelerator Advisory Committee4 Introduction (cont’d) The Proton Driver work is divided into two phases –R&D Phase (now until start of the project) –Proton Driver Project R&D Phase is designed to prepare the PD Project for a fast start. It will test all critical components (up to and including building prototypes) and establish a sound technical basis for the project Proton Driver Project is expected to last approximately five years assuming the required infrastructure and facilities are available at the start of the project (either here or at collaborating institutions)

Fermilab May , 2005 Rich Stanek - Accelerator Advisory Committee5 Proton Driver R&D Plan The R&D stage of the Proton Driver involves –Procuring, setting up and testing the series of Front End components (325 MHz) in the Meson Detector Building to establish a sound technical basis for the final design –Establishing the technical feasibility and reliability of the ferrite vector modulators and the distribution system for rf power from a single klystron –Designing, fabricating and testing prototype spoke resonators and elliptical cavities in cryomodules in order to verify the proposed operating parameters and the expected heat loads for the main Linac as well as to validate the fabrication process and the assembly fixtures ALL of these goals are critical steps in the process of building the Proton Driver ALL of these goals involve SMTF (either through the fabrication or testing facilities)

Fermilab May , 2005 Rich Stanek - Accelerator Advisory Committee6 R&D Goals The short term goal is to have a working 325 MHz rf system and parts of the Front End (ion source, LEBT, RFQ) operating in the Meson Detector Building (MDB) by Qtr 3 of FY06 In parallel, we want to build and test a single spoke resonator cavity/cryomodule and a Beta =.81 elliptical cryomodule (collaboration with ANL and MSU) As additional Front End prototypes are completed they will be tested in MDB with the long term goal of successful beam acceleration up to 110 MeV

Fermilab May , 2005 Rich Stanek - Accelerator Advisory Committee7 Director’s Review A Director’s Preliminary Technical Review of the Proton Driver was held at Fermilab on March 15-17, The combined purpose was to review the accelerator design concept of the Proton Driver and comment on the relative cost difference of the two technical options. The closeout report can be found at: DR Proton Driver March-2005.doc “The Committee did not review these cost estimates in detail; however, we find that, based on comparison with similar projects elsewhere, the cost estimates seem to be in a reasonable range. The Proton Driver team should be commended for making a serious attempt to estimate the costs at this early stage.” Recommendations: –Continue detailed development of project plan, schedules, and estimates as planned –Consider developing and preparing a formal Proton Driver R&D Plan with an associated schedule and cost estimate –Work with the Proton Plan team to develop an optimized program for the Plan. Consider developing and preparing a formal Main Injector Upgrade Project with an associated TDR, detailed cost and schedule

Fermilab May , 2005 Rich Stanek - Accelerator Advisory Committee8 PD Preliminary Cost Estimate (All costs in 2004 K$) Linac Project M&S* 229,779 Project SWF 89,118 Project Subtotal 318,897 G&A # (16.05% M&S & 30.35% Labor) 63,927 Project (incl. G&A) 382,824 Contingency (30%) 114,847 Total Cost 497,670 * Davis Bacon labor shows up as M&S # G&A rate will be lower on large POs

Fermilab May , 2005 Rich Stanek - Accelerator Advisory Committee9 PD Cost Drivers Cost Drivers are the Cryomodules, Civil Construction and Cryogenics Total = $319M (without G&A and contingency)

Fermilab May , 2005 Rich Stanek - Accelerator Advisory Committee10 PD Preliminary Schedule Technically Limited Proton Driver Schedule Part of R&D Plan (SMTF involvement) Assumed Project start (FY08)

Fermilab May , 2005 Rich Stanek - Accelerator Advisory Committee11 Cost/Schedule Assumptions Cost & Schedule are consistent –Both the cost and schedule will be more fully developed as the Resource Loaded Schedule is completed As is typical in large projects, some money is available early to allow purchase of long lead time items (CD3a) Adequate infrastructure exists (assembly and testing lines) at the start of the project to sustain the required CM production rates –Gradual ramp up in production rate from 1/month to 2/month –Note: The cost to initially set up the fabrication and testing facilities for CM assembly is assumed to be part of SMTF (not included in PD cost estimate) Cavities are available from vendors at a rate that is matched eventually to producing 2 cryomodules/month The R&D effort on Front End components and rf distribution is successful in verifying technical parameters of the PD design –PD will adopt existing designs whenever possible (JPARC, SNS, TTF…)

Fermilab May , 2005 Rich Stanek - Accelerator Advisory Committee12 PD Schedule Drivers PD Schedule is driven by –Production of cryomodules Acquiring cavities Processing and conditioning cavities and couplers Testing cavities (vertical and horizontal) String Assembly Cryomodule Assembly => Adequate and proven production infrastructure is essential in order to eliminate bottlenecks and allow maximum production rates (CAF) –Validate the design for the Front End and rf power distribution No exact counterpart with respect to some critical operating parameters => Test components and operating parameters with beam (HPTF) –Purchasing, installing & commissioning the cryoplant Long lead times and limited vendors Uncertainty in commissioning time => Pre-project action (design & early procurement) are required

Fermilab May , 2005 Rich Stanek - Accelerator Advisory Committee13 PD R&D Estimate (SMTF Proposal) Funds required to accomplish the R&D Plan for the Proton Driver are substantial ($16M in M&S in the SMTF proposal over 5 years) + the effort required to set up the CM fabrication infrastructure Completing all of this activity (on this time frame) would put the Proton Driver in an excellent position for a fast start to the project This level of funding is currently not supported in next year’s projected budgets and so some work will be delayed in order to concentrate on critical path items As R&D efforts for the PD roll off, the Proton Driver Project will ramp up. SMTF labor will be captured “on project” or shifted to other SCRF work The push to SCRF technology will involve a considerable commitment on the part of the Lab and the HEP community

Fermilab May , 2005 Rich Stanek - Accelerator Advisory Committee14 Labor Resources Accelerator, Particle Physics and Technical Divisions and the Facility Engineering Services Section are all actively engaged in Proton Driver work Approximate current labor resources AD => rf power, cryo, controls, utilities, beam transport/injection (~6 FTE) PPD => physics case, help on CM drawings (~7 FTE) TD => project mgm’t, spoke resonator and cavity/CM production, and front end systems (~10 FTE + subset of people working on Beta = 1 CM) FESS => all aspects of civil construction and layouts (~4 FTE) Total FTE/yr ~ 29 This will need to ramp up substantially as the Proton Driver moves closer to a project start date

Fermilab May , 2005 Rich Stanek - Accelerator Advisory Committee15 Conclusions Proton Driver is still in the early stages of the project planning process. An R&D Plan exists that addresses the outstanding technical issues and prepares the project for a fast start The present PD cost estimate establishes a reasonable range of values for the cost of a SC Linac at Fermilab and the initial schedule indicates a five year project is technically feasible provided adequate infrastructure is available at the beginning of the project Substantial investment must be made now, to develop the necessary infrastructure that will be used in construction of the Proton Driver (and other SCRF projects)