A project of the Toxic-Free Legacy Coalition: Breast Cancer Fund, Healthy Building Network, People For Puget Sound, Washington Physicians for Social Responsibility,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RN No Harm Environmental Health September 21, 2005 Alexandria, Virginia.
Advertisements

PBDEs: Update on Current Issues NAHMMA Tacoma, Washington September 22, 2005.
Protecting Kids from Toxic Chemicals: Health Voices Advocate for Change Tricia Smith Learning Disabilities Association of America.
By: Brian Oldakowski Shane DeStefano Jeff Schmidt & Dustin Schneider
Health Concerns and Electronics Products – Why Green Procurement? Presented to H2E – May 14, 2004 by Ted Smith Silicon Valley Toxics Coalition/ Computer.
Assembly Member Brian Kavanagh Environmental Conservation Committee Member NYS Assembly District 74.
PBT Initiative and PCBs Spokane River Regional Toxics Task Force Holly Davies, Ph.D. April 24 th, 2013.
Advances in Chemical Policy Reform in Oregon: Advances in Chemical Policy Reform in Oregon: Renee Hackenmiller-Paradis, PhD, MPH Program.
States Chemicals Policy Reform: Moving Forward Ken Zarker, Co-Chair NPPR P2 Policy and Integration Workgroup Washington State Department of Ecology
The Path Forward: Green Chemistry and Chemicals Policy Reform Ken Zarker, Manager Pollution Prevention & Regulatory Assistance Section
What is Bioaccumulation?
1 Collaborative on Health and the Environment NAHMMA's 2005 Conference September 18-23, 2005 Tacoma, Washington Elise Miller, M.Ed. Institute for Children’s.
Environmental Health Issues and Priorities in the Pacific Northwest Robert Duff Director Office of Environmental Health Assessments Washington State Department.
Presented By: By: By: Web Address: Topic Number: Topic Number: Date: Date:
Health Concerns and Electronics Products Presented to CleanMed – April 2004 by Ted Smith Silicon Valley Toxics Coalition/ Computer TakeBack Campaign
TOXIC POLLUTION Poisoning our World. We are poisoning each other  Every time we put herbicides on our lawns, fill our tanks with gasoline, buy pressure.
Pollution and Human Health
The Environment and Human Health
INTRODUCING DETERGENT FREE CLEANING CLEANING WITHOUT Synthetic CHEMICALS.
1. Pthalates 2. Bisphenol A 3. Perfluorochemicals 4. Polybrominated diphenyl ethers.
Washington Toxics Reduction Strategy PPRC Roundtable October 24, 2012 Holly Davies, PhD Washington State Department of Ecology.
(c) McGraw Hill Ryerson Effect of Bioaccumulation on Ecosystems Amphibians (like frogs) live on both land and in the water.  They are also sensitive.
2.3 Effect of Bioaccumulation on Ecosystems  Amphibians are valuable indicators of environmental health because they’re sensitive to chemical changes.
Effects of Bioaccumulation on Ecosystems
Common practices to keep your kids safer
Chapter 8: Environmental Health and Toxicology
Bioaccumulation & Biomagnification of Toxicants Pat Ellsworth, ITEP Robert K. Hall U.S. EPA Region IX & Sherry Glick U.S. EPA U.S. EPA Office of Pesticide.
A project of the Toxic-Free Legacy Coalition: Breast Cancer Fund, Healthy Building Network, People For Puget Sound, Washington Physicians for Social Responsibility,
Small Steps to Improve Children’s Environmental Health in your Early Childhood Program Common practices to keep your kids safer Margo Young, Hester Paul.
A growing number of diseases in children from rural and urban areas are linked to unsafe, degraded environments. However, many health care providers are.
Washington State’s Chemical Action Plans Washington State’s Chemical Action Plans Janice Adair Washington State Department of Ecology Robert Duff Washington.
Examining Bioaccumulation & Biomagnification: Implications for Ecosystems and Human Health.
A project of the Toxic-Free Legacy Coalition: Breast Cancer Fund, Healthy Building Network, People For Puget Sound, Washington Physicians for Social Responsibility,
(c) McGraw Hill Ryerson 2007 Chapter 2 Energy Flow & Nutrient Cycles 2.3 Effects of Bioaccumulation on Ecosystems p Words to Know: Bioaccumulationkeystone.
Standard 16. Environmental Health The registered nurse practices in an environmentally safe and healthy manner.
The Landscape of State Chemicals Regulation Joel A. Tickner, ScD Lowell Center for Sustainable Production University of Massachusetts Lowell
On the EPR Front Sheila Davis Silicon Valley Toxics Coalition August 2004.
Childproofing for Environmental Health Presentation to Best Start Resource Centre, Annual Conference 2006 January 17, 2006 Kathleen Cooper Senior Researcher.
Phasing Out PFOS and PBDEs: Voluntary and Regulatory Steps Kenneth Moss Chemical Control Division Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, EPA HQ October.
Pesticides SNC1D. Pest Pests are living organisms that are not wanted around us. Examples of pests include unwanted dandelions growing in the lawn; rodents.
Reducing Toxic Threats Ken Zarker Washington State Department of Ecology May 11, Keeping toxics out of our bodies, homes, and offices –Persistent.
2.3 Effect of Bioaccumulation on Ecosystems
Moving past one-at-a-time chemical “de-selection”.
Kathleen A. Curtis, LPN Policy Director, Clean New York
Environmental Hazards and Human Health, Part 1. CHEMICAL HAZARDS A hazardous chemical can harm humans or other animals because it may: –Be flammable –Be.
Our Stake in Promoting Healthy Environments Where Children Live, Learn and Play Maryann Suero, PhD US Environmental Protection Agency Region 5 (IL, IN,
What are PCB’s PCB’s are polychlorinated biphenyls, which are a group of manufactured organic chemicals. Contains 209 individual chlorinated chemicals.
Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs)
Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs) Mel Jordan & Taylor Park.
Water Quality APES Ch. 14. Heavy Metals  Lead:  Rarely found naturally in drinking water  Contaminates through lead containing pipes, solder, & brass.
Environmentally Preferable Approaches for Meeting Furniture Fire Safety Standards Mark Buczek Supresta American Fire Safety Council Furniture Flame Retardancy.
State Responses to BFRs Towards an Integrated Chemicals Policy Ken Geiser University of Massachusetts Lowell.
New Framework for EPA’s Chemical Management Program Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics Wendy Cleland-Hamnett, Director.
2.3 Effect of Bioaccumulation on Ecosystems  Amphibians are valuable indicators of environmental health because they’re sensitive to chemical changes.
Healthy Children for the Next Generations Engaging Policymakers in Children’s Environmental Health Presentation to the NB Commission on Hydraulic Fracturing.
Topic 22: Environmental Hazards and Human Health, Part 1.
NAHMMA Conference - PBT Rule September 22, Developing a PBT Regulation in Washington State Mike Gallagher, Washington State Dept. of Ecology 20 th.
2.3 Effect of Bioaccumulation on Ecosystems
TEST WEDNESDAY Toxicology PoisonStudy of Study of toxic (harmful) substances on organisms, including their nature, effects, detection, methods of treatment,
2.3 - Effect of Bioaccumulation on Ecosystems Amphibians (ie. frogs) live both on land and in water. They are sensitive to chemicals changes in the environment,
Design for the Environment Program Overview April 6 th, 2005.
Chemicals Policy, Politics and Public Health
Managing Hazardous Wastes
AP Environmental Science
Bioaccumulation.
2.3 Effect of Bioaccumulation on Ecosystems
BIOACCUMULATION.
2.3 Effect of Bioaccumulation on Ecosystems
2.3 Effect of Bioaccumulation on Ecosystems
Effect of Bioaccumulation on Ecosystems
Presentation transcript:

A project of the Toxic-Free Legacy Coalition: Breast Cancer Fund, Healthy Building Network, People For Puget Sound, Washington Physicians for Social Responsibility, Washington State Nurses Association, Washington Toxics Coalition, WashPIRG, and more than 40 other organizations working together to eliminate persistent toxic chemicals in Washington State. A Study of Toxic Chemicals in Washingtonians

The Toxic-Free Legacy Coalition and more than 40 other organizations in Washington State working together to eliminate persistent toxic chemicals

Study Participants Pam Tazioli Sen. Bill Finkbeiner Karen Bowman, RN Rev. Ann Holmes Redding Sen. Lisa Brown Laurie Valeriano Dr. Patricia Dawson Denis Hayes Allyson Schrier Deb Abrahamson

Chemicals Tested Phthalates PBDEs Heavy metals - lead, arsenic, and mercury PFCs (perfluorinated compounds) Pesticides DDT & PCBs

Phthalates

PBDEs

Heavy Metals

PFCs

Pesticides

DDT/PCBs

Toxic pollution in the people of Washington is widespread and unavoidable Participants had from 26 to 39 toxic chemicals What We Found

Toxic Chemicals Found

PFOA Exposure

Presence of Pesticides

Phthalates - DEHP Exposure

PCB Exposures

PBDE (Toxic Flame Retardant) Levels

Mercury Levels

Cause for Concern? At or near harmful levels Multiple exposures Timing of exposure We know enough to act

The System is Broken Data Gap Safety Gap Technology Gap Responsibility Gap

Data Gap Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) of 1976 Encourage and require industry to develop adequate data on the health and environmental effects of chemicals.

Data Gap: Few of Highest Volume Chemicals Tested 7% Full Set of Basic Toxicity Tests

Safety Gap: For EPA to Act Prove it! Weigh Costs/Benefits Action

Technology Gap

Companies Moving Forward Kaiser Permanente: reducing reliance on carcinogens, reproductive toxicants Herman Miller: zero hazardous waste, emissions by 2020; using safer materials Dell: phased out PBDEs, chemical use policy Cascadian Farm: now leading processor The Body Shop: eliminating phthalates

Current State Action Washington’s PBT Program –Limited number of chemicals –Lengthy process to develop Chemical Action Plans –Phase outs or bans require legislative action –No process to assess chemicals prior to release into the marketplace and our environment

What’s going wrong? Washington state - highest rates of breast cancer Childhood brain cancer on the rise 17% of school-aged children have learning disabilities

Costs of Environmental Diseases from “Economic Costs of Diseases and Disabilities Attributable to Environmental Contaminants in Washington State” July 2005 by Kate Davies, Antioch University Childhood Diseases Best Estimate - Proportion of Disease Attributable to Environmental Contaminants Asthma Cancer Lead Exposure Birth Defects Neurobehavioral Disorders 30% 5% 100% 2.5% 10%

Costs of Environmental Diseases in 2004 dollars, see Kate Davies’ study online at Conclusions from the WA state economic study… $1.9 billion = annual cost of these 5 childhood diseases attributable to environmental contaminants If adult and childhood costs are combined, total = $2.7 billion annually this accounts for almost 5% of total health expenditures in Washington state

A Better Way for Washington A Three-pronged Approach Close Data Gaps: Require companies to come clean with the facts about the chemicals they use; Close Safety Gap: Prohibit harmful chemicals in products and manufacturing; and, Close Technology Gap: Invest in research and assistance for businesses to switch to the safest chemicals. Responsibility Gap: We all must accept an ethical duty to future generations

Learn more from our web site link Complete report online and in pdf format Participant profiles Toxic Chemicals: how you’re exposed & health effects Safer Alternatives for Food and Consumer Products Ways to Take Action

We Can Do It—Together!