Second Harmonic capture in the IPNS RCS: Transition from SH to fundamental rf operation during the acceleration cycle using CAPTURE_SPC Jeff Dooling Presented.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Measurements of adiabatic dual rf capture in the SIS 18 O. Chorniy.
Advertisements

AGS pp Status Feb. 6, 2015 RSC Meeting Haixin Huang.
Longitudinal motion: The basic synchrotron equations. What is Transition ? RF systems. Motion of low & high energy particles. Acceleration. What are Adiabatic.
Thomas Roser Muon collaboration meeting February 8-10, 2002 AGS beam intensity upgrades What has been achieved Sextupole power supply upgrades Bunch manipulation.
PSB magnetic cycle 160 MeV to 2 GeV with 2.5E13 protons per ring A. Blas 2 GeV magnetic cycle 29/04/ Requirements 1.Present performance: 1E13p from.
NOvA meeting PIP Update W. Pellico. PIP Goals and Scope (Provided in 2011 – Directorate S. H. / DOE Talk ) Goals: Specific to the issues surrounding the.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  We consider motion of particles either through a linear structure or in a circular ring USPAS, Knoxville, TN, Jan , 2014 Lecture.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  As you’ll show in homework, the synchrotron tune (longitudinal oscillations/turn) is generally
(ISS) Topics Studied at RAL G H Rees, RAL, UK. ISS Work Areas 1. Bunch train patterns for the acceleration and storage of μ ± beams. 2. A 50Hz, 1.2 MW,
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.
22/03/1999A.Blas1 Hollow bunches A. Blas, S. Hancock, S. Koscielniak, M. Lindroos, F. Pedersen, H. Schonauer  Why: to improve space charge related problems.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.
Preliminary RF and Beam Data Analysis Jeff Dooling June 26, 2007.
AAC February 4-6, 2003 Protons on Target Ioanis Kourbanis MI/Beams.
Challenges of Dual Harmonic RF Systems ISIS Synchrotron Group John Thomason.
ECE 662 – Microwave Electronics
Elias Métral, LHC Beam Commissioning Working Group meeting, 08/06/2010 /191 SINGLE-BUNCH INSTABILITY STUDIES IN THE LHC AT 3.5 TeV/c Elias Métral, N. Mounet.
Double RF system at IUCF Shaoheng Wang 06/15/04. Contents 1.Introduction of Double RF System 2.Phase modulation  Single cavity case  Double cavity case.
Part III Commissioning. Proof of Principle FFAG (POP) study The world first proton FFAG –Commissioned in March –From 50 keV to 500 keV in 1ms. –Proof.
The ISIS Dual Harmonic Upgrade The Council for the Central Laboratory of the Research Councils Andy Seville Joint Accelerator WorkshopMarch 28th, 2006.
Effect of nonlinearity on Head-Tail instability 3/18/04.
CLARA Gun Cavity Optimisation NVEC 05/06/2014 P. Goudket G. Burt, L. Cowie, J. McKenzie, B. Militsyn.
Preliminary results on simulation of fast-ion instability at 3 km LBNL damping ring 21 April 2005 Pohang Accelerator Laboratory Eun-San Kim.
Overview of Booster PIP II upgrades and plans C.Y. Tan for Proton Source group PIP II Collaboration Meeting 03 June 2014.
Observations of electrons in the Intense Pulse Neutron Source (IPNS) Rapid Cycling Synchrotron (RCS) J. C. Dooling, F. R. Brumwell, W. S. Czyz, K.C. Harkay,
KEK/ISIS/ANL LOI Amplifier/Second Harmonic RF Collaboration Meeting Tuesday, 26th of June, 2007 PAC07, Albuquerque, NM.
BEPCII Transverse Feedback System Yue Junhui Beam Instrumentation Group IHEP , Beijing.
2 nd harmonic RF perpendicular biased cavity update C.Y. Tan, W. Pellico, G. Romanov, R. Madrak, and D. Wildman 02 Apr 2014.
R.SREEDHARAN  SOLEIL main parameters  Booster and storage ring low level RF system  New digital Booster LLRF system under development  Digital LLRF.
Early Beam Injection in the Fermilab Booster & its Implementation Plan Chandra Bhat Todd’s Operation Meeting /12/2015 Chandra Bhat Abstract:
Preliminary MEIC Ion Beam Formation Scheme Jiquan Guo for the MEIC design study team Oct. 5,
Damping of Coupled-bunch Oscillations with Sub-harmonic RF Voltage? 1 H. Damerau LIU-PS Working Group Meeting 4 March 2014.
Chapter 10 Rüdiger Schmidt (CERN) – Darmstadt TU , version E 2.4 Acceleration and longitudinal phase space.
Measurements and potential improvements of the amplifier for the 10 MHz cavities G.Favia, V.Desquiens, M.Morvillo.
XI-th Collaboration MeetingJune26, ROPOSAL: BEAM TEST SCENARIO OF THE LOI IN THE ISIS SYNCHROTRON Yoshiro Irie, JAEA/KEK for the LOI/SH.
High Intensity Booster Operations William Pellico PIP II collaboration Nov. 9 th 2015.
Barrier RF Stacking Weiren Chou and Dave Wildman Fermilab, U.S.A. October 20, 2004 Presentation at the Proton Driver Session ICFA-HB2004, Bensheim, Germany,
Early Beam Injection Scheme for the Fermilab Booster: A Path for Intensity Upgrade Chandra Bhat Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory DPF2015, ANN ARBOR,
Longitudinal Painting S. Hancock p.p. G. Feldbauer.
New MI Cavity Progress and Plans 2010 Joseph E. Dey Project X Collaboration Meeting September 8, 2010.
Hybrid Fast-Ramping Synchrotron to 750 GeV/c J. Scott Berg Brookhaven National Laboratory MAP Collaboration Meeting March 5, 2012.
Outcome of beam dynamics simulations - Scenarios, requirements and expected gains s LIU-SPS Coordination meeting 26/08/2015 A. Lasheen, E. Shaposhnikova,
Longitudinal aspects on injection and acceleration for HP-PS Antoine LACHAIZE On behalf of the HP-PS design team.
ELENA RF Manipulations S. Hancock. Apart from debunching before and rebunching after cooling, the principal role of the rf is to decelerate the beam and.
Summary of ions measurements in 2015 and priorities for 2016 studies E. Shaposhnikova 3/02/2016 Based on input from H. Bartosik, T. Bohl, B. Goddard, V.
Booster High Power RF at PIP-II Era John Reid February 18, 2014.
FFAG Studies at BNL Alessandro G. Ruggiero Brookhaven National Laboratory FFAG’06 - KURRI, Osaka, Japan - November 6-10, 2006.
High Power RF Systems for 2-8 GeV Fast Cycling Synchrotron PROJECT X (ICD-2) John Reid September 11, 2009.
RF manipulations in SIS 18 and SIS 100 O. Chorniy.
Challenges of Dual Harmonic RF Systems
The ISIS Dual Harmonic Upgrade
Visit for more Learning Resources
Bocheng Jiang SSRF AP group
Alternative/complementary Possibilities
Status and prospects of VEPP-5 Injection Complex
Longitudinal beam parameters and stability
10 MHz amplifier status G. Favia
Longitudinal accumulation in triple RF systems
PSB rf manipulations PSB cavities
LHC Morning Meeting - G. Arduini
Longitudinal Dynamics & RF Capture
The LHC25ns cycle in the PS Triple splitting after 2nd injection
CEPC Injector Damping Ring
Beam dynamics requirements after LS2
Passive harmonic cavities for bunch shortening
Collective effects in the SPS and LHC (longitudinal plane)
PSB magnetic cycle 900 ms MeV to 2 GeV
Multi-Ion Injector Linac Design – Progress Summary
Pulsed electron beam cooling experiments: data & preliminary results
Cooling of C6+ ion beam with pulsed electron beam
Presentation transcript:

Second Harmonic capture in the IPNS RCS: Transition from SH to fundamental rf operation during the acceleration cycle using CAPTURE_SPC Jeff Dooling Presented at The Ninth Second Harmonic RF/Low Output-Impedance Amplifier Collaboration Meeting Argonne National Laboratory, June 14-15, 2004

Motivation Currently, we believe our ferrite will not allow second harmonic (SH) rf operation up to the maximum acceleration frequency— 5.15 MHz x 2 = MHz Most loss occurs at injection Can we run SH early in cycle using the new 3 rd cavity, switching to fundamental later and still realize a net increase in current?

Guide field, , and V rf

Frequency and energy vs. time

Bucket Area in the RCS

Fundamental and SH voltage and current profiles from Hofmann-Pedersen elliptical distributions

Maximum bucket area vs. maximum bunching factor

Capture Efficiency and Fundamental-SH phase angle, 

Goal: Full SH rf for the full acceleration cycle (the following animation includes the phase ramp)

Potential benefit

Modify CAPTURE to include  (t) * CALL CPfield( tn, evol, fnuS, omegaS, & flagrf, Nrfpoints, rf_time, rf_evol, & rf_sh_phase, Imax, secHarmPhase ) * * CALL CPfield( tn, evol, fnuS, omegaS, & flagrf, Nrfpoints, rf_time, rf_evol, & rf_sh_phase, rf_sh_ampl, Imax, & secHarmPhase, secHarmFactor ) *

Two cases CASE 1: Run SH at d=0.55 for the first 4 ms Ramp SH to 0 between 4 and 5 ms Leave V rf unchanged CASE 2: Run SH at d=0.55 for the first 4 ms Ramp SH to 0 between 4 and 5 ms Ramp V rf to 1.55*V rf between 5 and 6 ms

Ramping Vrf up after 5 ms

Second Harmonic rf early,  =0.55 ramping off between 4 and 5 ms

Second Harmonic rf early,  =0.55; ramping off between 4 and 5 ms; ramping back on in the fundamental between 5 and 6 ms (to 1.55*V rf )

Transmission efficiency and loss rate

Observations Transmission efficiency improves with SH rf even when no further rf is applied Ramping back on V rf shuts off the loss by increasing the bucket size Timing is important—implied in these simulations is the fact that the third cavity is being made to go from full SH voltage to full fundamental voltage in 2 ms. May not need to go to full 1.55*V rf in the fundamental to gain efficiency

Why does SH early improve capture efficiency when no additional rf is applied According to Chao, the limiting tune shift is, One way to look at this is to say that SH effectively moves injection to higher energy --A. W. Chao, Physics of Collective Beam Instabilities in High Energy Accelerators, Wiley, New York, 1993, p. 14.

Conclusions Third cavity, even with limited SH capability, will allow for important capture studies. Also, the 3 rd cavity may provide a modest improvement in RCS beam current limit.

Acknowledgement This work would not be possible without the dedication and hard work of the IPNS Accelerator Operations Group.