ITALY CFS OBJECTIVE1 2000-2006 Criteria and allocation mechanism of the performance reserve: the Italian proposal Paola De Cesare Ministry of the Treasury,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EMPL Committee 15 July 2010 The ESF Committee Opinion on the future of the ESF and the 23/24 June conference Thomas Bender Employment, Social Affairs and.
Advertisements

Planning and use of funding instruments
The Implementation Structure DG AGRI, October 2005
Samuele Dossi DG for Regional Policy - Evaluation
EU-Regional Policy and Cohesion Structural Funds and Accession 1 ANNUAL MEETING OF ISPA PARTNERS 2003 FROM ISPA TO COHESION AND STRUCTURAL FUNDS BRUSSELS,
Bruno Dente, Politecnico di Milano Aalborg, INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY FOR TERRITORIAL DEVELOPMENT.
Regional Policy The future of EU funding - proposals from the Commission Guy Flament European Commission, DG REGIO Cardiff, 19 April 2013.
OECD World Forum “Statistics, Knowledge and Policy”, Palermo, November
Cyprus Project Management Society
European Social Fund Evaluation in Italy Stefano Volpi Roma, 03 maggio 2011 Isfol Esf Evaluation Unit Human Resources Policies Evaluation Area Rome, Corso.
OECD WORKSHOP ON COMPETITIVE CITIES AND CLIMATE CHANGE: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES International Energy Agency, Paris - 30 November 2007 Ivana Capozza,
How can Parliamentarians contribute to a Positive Investment Climate? by Rainer Geiger Senior Regional Advisor, OECD 3rd Global Conference of Parliamentarians.
Strengthening the Performance of Cohesion Policy through Performance Reserve and Ex-Ante Conditionality Sabina De Luca Italian Ministry of Economic Development.
The Italian Institutional Design for Administrative Simplification HIGH LEVEL REGIONAL SEMINAR ON “STRATEGIES, TOOLS AND CAPACITIES FOR ADMINISTRATIVE.
European Social Fund Key elements of the Commission proposal for the future ESF Franz Pointner, DG Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion.
EUROPEAN COHESION POLICY AT A GLANCE Introduction to the EU Structural Funds Ctibor Kostal Sergej Muravjov.
Regional Policy Managing Authorities of the ETC programmes Annual Meeting W Piskorz, Head of Unit Competence Centre Inclusive Growth, Urban and.
EU-Regional Policy and Cohesion Structural Funds and Accession 1 SPP BUILDING IMPLEMENTATION CAPACITY Training seminar on evaluation Prague February.
Preparation of Bulgaria for future use of EU Structural Instruments Lyubomir Datzov Deputy Minister of Finance.
Riga – Latvia, 4 & 5 December 2006
0 Kestutis Rekerta Strategic Planning Division, Government Office of Lithuania World Bank Workshop, Bratislava, September 6, 2006 STRATEGIC PLANNING IN.
Regional Policy EU Cohesion Policy 2014 – Regional Policy Why change? Cohesion Policy has been changing already for a long time! ✦ EU has been changing:
M. Reimeris, The Ministry of Finance of Lithuania (Managing Authority)
The Issues of Budgetary Reform Unit 3. PFM Reform – Change Management Module 3.2. Preparing and managing a reform programme.
EMFF Operational Programme EMFF programme: 6 main elements 1. Ex-ante conditionalities 2. Ex-ante evaluation 3. SWOT analysis & needs analysis.
EU Cohesion Policy 2014 – 2020 Measures, tools, methods for supporting cross-border cooperation prepared used for adoption and implementation of joint.
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION Innovation and the Structural Funds, Antwerp, 16 January 2007 Veronica Gaffey Innovative Actions Unit.
Reformed Partnership and Multi-Level Governance Ana Maria Dobre Political Administrator General Council Secretariat
European Union Public Policy Professor John Wilton Lecture 10 Regions and the E.U. public policy process.
Regulatory requirements in the current programming period Funchal, 18 November 2010.
Ministry of the Environment and Territory Directorate for Development and Environmental Research Ministry of Economy and Finance Department for Development.
1 DG Enterprise & Industry European Commission Conference on Better Regulation: Practical Steps Forward Reykjavík 6 June 2006 OVERVIEW OF THE BETTER REGULATION.
Fiscal Policy Audit – National Audit Office of Finland Hannu Rajamäki Director for Performance Audit NAO of Finland.
Institutional structures for Structural Funds assistance Ministry of Finance September 10, 2003.
Unilob – Artur Nowicki Istitutional Support System for Business Support Organisations in Poland Example of National Services Network for SMEs Artur Nowicki.
Regional Policy EU Cohesion Policy 2014 – 2020 Proposals from the European Commission.
111 Synthesis of Questionnaires. Thematic concentration  Most of the new member states support the suggested principle while maintaining the element.
Regional policy European Commission EN Update on IPA Component III - environment Brussels, 28 November 2008 Erich Unterwurzacher REGIO.I4 – IPA/ISPA.
EU COMMON STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK FUNDS IN ENGLAND INITIAL PROPOSALS FROM HMG 21 NOVEMBER 2012.
Paulius Baniūnas Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Lithuania EU Structural Support Management Department Monitoring and Analysis Division SYSTEM OF.
1 EUROPEAN FUNDS IN HALF-TIME NEW CHALLENGES Jack Engwegen Head of the Czech Unit European Commission, Directorate General for Regional Policy Prague,
MINISTRY OF ECONOMY Department of Economic Strategy Supporting innovative SMEs in Poland Warsaw, 26 November 2002 by Elżbieta Wolman, Economic Strategy.
TEN-T Executive Agency and Project Management Anna LIVIERATOU-TOLL TEN-T Executive Agency Senior Programme and Policy Coordinator European Economic and.
Information Overview SF: Planning & Programming Workshops for EC Delegation Patrick Colgan & Ján Krištín PROGRAMMING PROCEDURES in Support of Regional.
Jela Tvrdonova, The EU priorities:  Use the Leader approach for introducing innovation in the thematic axis  better governance at the local level.
Results orientation: audit perspective Jiri Plecity, Head of Unit H1, Relations with Control Authorities, Legal Procedures, Audit of Direct Management.
04/2007 THE EUROPEAN ENVIRONMENT POLICY & ITS INSTRUMENTS OF IMPLEMENTATION Preparation & Draft of environmental projects THE EUROPEAN ENVIRONMENT POLICY.
The EU Water Initiative and the EU ACP Facility New Instruments to promote sustainable development of water resources and affordable access Antonio Garcia-Fragio.
Open Days ROMA, July The Evaluation of CSF The architecture of the evaluation Laura Tagle.
Croatia: Result orientation within the process of preparation of programming documents V4+ Croatia and Slovenia Expert Level Conference Budapest,
1 STRATEGIC PLANNING AND BUDGET PRIORITISATION IN CROATIA Francois-Roger Cazala, Rimantas Veckys SIGMA - Lithuanian Ministry of Finance.
Leader Axis Rural Development Policy by Jean-Michel Courades AGRI-F3.
TAIEX-REGIO Workshop on Applying the Partnership Principle in the European Structural and Investment Funds Bratislava, 20/05/2016 Involvement of Partners.
ROUND TABLE “Exchanging Experience in Absorption of the European Funds: Perspectives for Bulgaria and Poland” 1 April 2011, Sofia Tomislav Donchev Minister.
Rural Development experiences of Hungary
Structural Funds Programming Predeal, Romania
NSRF and National Development Planning in Greece
M. Reimeris, The Ministry of Finance of Lithuania (Managing Authority)
Steering Policy and Steering Systems
Kari Kiesiläinen Heikki Liljeroos
ESF ASSISTANCE TO LITHUANIA’S OBJECTIVE 1 AND EQUAL PROGRAMS
Prioritised Action Frameworks for financing Natura 2000
EU Funding in Western Balkan Countries
Purpose of the presentation
ESF IMPLEMENTATION IN MALTA
ESF IMPLEMENTATION IN CYPRUS
State of play of negotiations MFF, Regulations
EU rural development policy
EU Funds Audit – Recent developments in Structural Funds
Environment in Cohesion Policy framework for
Presentation transcript:

ITALY CFS OBJECTIVE Criteria and allocation mechanism of the performance reserve: the Italian proposal Paola De Cesare Ministry of the Treasury, the Budget and Economic Planning Rome

MAIN FEATURES OF THE PERFORMANCE RESERVE 10% OF COMMITMENT APPROPRIATION 4% E.U. RESERVE 6% NATIONAL RESERVE 4% reserve6% reserve Criteria - effectiveness - management - financial implementation Criteria - istitutional enhancement - integration - concentration

4% RESERVE : THE ITALIAN VERSUS THE COMMISSION PROPOSAL PERFORMANCE ASSESSED ON A UNIQUE STANDARD DEFINED ON THE BASIS OF GUIDELINES PERFORMANCE ASSESSED ON A UNIQUE STANDARD DEFINED ON THE BASIS OF GUIDELINES INDICATORS DEFINED TO BE MORE COHERENT WITH ITALIAN CSF PROGRAMME SUCCESSFUL IF 7 OUT OF 8 INDICATORS ARE SATISFIED ALLOCATION IN PROPORTION TO INITIAL BUDGETARY APPROPRIATION SECOND-DEGREE COMPETITION RULE

PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT: FOR ISTITUTIONAL ENHANCEMENT ON A UNIQUE STANDARD FOR INTEGRATION AND CONCENTRATION ON INTERNAL AVERAGE OF COMPETING PROGRAMS PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT: FOR ISTITUTIONAL ENHANCEMENT ON A UNIQUE STANDARD FOR INTEGRATION AND CONCENTRATION ON INTERNAL AVERAGE OF COMPETING PROGRAMS INDICATORS PROXIES FOR: PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REFORMS AND PROCEDURES SEMPLIFICATION STRUCTURAL REFORMS IN SELECTED SECTORS QUALITY OF PLANNING INDICATORS PROXIES FOR: PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REFORMS AND PROCEDURES SEMPLIFICATION STRUCTURAL REFORMS IN SELECTED SECTORS QUALITY OF PLANNING SUCCESS MEASURED AGAINST EACH INDICATOR ANY TARGET ATTAINED GIVES ACCESS TO A PORTION OF RESERVE ALLOCATION IN PROPORTION TO INITIAL BUDGETARY APPROPRIATION SECOND-DEGREE COMPETITION RULE 6% RESERVE: A FLEXIBLE INSTRUMENT TO ENHANCE QUALITY OF ADMINISTRATION AND MANAGEMENT

6% RESERVE: INDICATORS A FEW EXAMPLES PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REFORM Implementation of internal audit unit for management One - stop shop for enterprises ADMINISTRACTIVE AND ORGANIZATION INNOVATIONS Implementation of evaluation units Implementation of I.S. strategy for P.A. STUCTURAL REFORM IN SELECTED SECTORS Implementation of integrated water resorce systems Implementation of Regional Environmental Agencies

6% RESERVE: INDICATORS A FEW EXAMPLES INTEGRATION Implementation of integrated territorial projects for regional OP Implementation of negotiated agreements between central and regional administration for national OP

WHERE ARE WE NOW ? WE HAVE: Agreed upon the performance reserve system Identified and quantifien performance indicators WE ARE: Testing and verrifying the system (indicators, monitoring and evaluation process)

WE WILL: discuss final results with institutional partners submit final proposal to first meeting of CSF Monitoring Committee set - up monitorig system and tecnical group