Doris Hamill NASA Langley Research Center FISO Telecon June 5, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
McCoy School of Engineering Midwestern State University A FUTURE GOLD RUSH: CAPTURING ASTEROIDS WADE COURTNEY & TYLER THOMAS MENTOR: DR. M. SALIM AZZOUZ.
Advertisements

NASA Mission Directorates. 0 NASA's mission is to pioneer future space exploration, scientific discovery, and aeronautics research. NASA’s Mission.
The Vision for Space Exploration – Challenge & Opportunity ISS Panel Report Robert D. Cabana ISS Panel Chair March 30, 2005.
1 Review of US Human Space Flight Plans Committee Evaluation Measures and Criteria for Humans Spaceflight Options 12 August 2009.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Commercial Crew and Cargo Program Overview June 17, 2009 Doug Cooke.
Inner Guides=Text Boundary Outer Guides=Inner Boundary Asteroid Redirect Mission and Human Exploration Michele Gates Human Exploration and Operations Mission.
International Space Station: National Laboratory Development Brad Carpenter Space Operations Mission Directorate NASA Headquarters.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Commercial Crew Initiative Overview and Status to the COMSTAC Philip McAlister NASA Exploration Systems Mission.
Earth-Moon Transport Doroteo Garcia Kazuya Suzuki Patrick Zeitouni.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration The Future of Space Exploration Orion, Ares and Beyond.... AIAA / NSC / JPL Town Hall Meeting 26 April 2007.
NASA_G_O_02_09_05.ppt 1 National Goals and Objectives National Goal To advance U.S. scientific, security, and economic interests through a robust space.
Reducing the cost of sustained operations through technology infusion April 2004 Darin Skelly NASA Kennedy Space Center Transformational Spaceport & Range.
Human Exploration And Development of Space NASA and North Carolina: Building Stronger Partnerships April 24, 2002.
The Pursuit for Efficient S/C Design The Stanford Small Sat Challenge: –Learn system engineering processes –Design, build, test, and fly a CubeSat project.
1 Review of US Human Space Flight Plans Committee International and Interagency Sub-Committee.
Comprehend the Historical Benefits of Exploration Comprehend the US Strategic Plan to Explore Space Comprehend the Current Costs of Exploring Space Comprehend.
November 30, 2006 Space Telescope Science Institute Conference Scott “Doc” Horowitz Associate Administrator NASA Exploration Systems Mission Directorate.
1 Head of Russian Federal Space Agency ISS Program International Cooperation Paris, June 17, 2009.
Chapter 22- Exploring Space Lesson 1-Rocket Science
Requirements and Operations Team Industry Day Briefing 17 January, 2002.
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS & SPACE ADMINISTRATION (NASA)
Lunar Colony Design Challenge January 14, 2004 Indeed it is the nature of humanity to explore beyond our horizons. Humanity explores in order to discover,
National Aeronautics and Space Administration International Engagement & Partnerships: Building on the Past, Boldly Collaborating for the Future Goddard.
Space Exploration Vision “This cause of exploration and discovery is not an option we choose; it is a desire written in the human heart.” – President Bush.
Future Space Exploration A Summary of “The Global Exploration Roadmap”, International Space Exploration Coordination Group, August 2013 Summarized by:
The ISECG Global Exploration Roadmap Status update at Target NEO2 Workshop July 9, 2013 NASA/Kathy Laurini Human Exploration & Ops Mission Directorate.
NMP EO-1 TECHNOLOGY WORKSHOP Section 2 Meeting Objectives.
Now More Than Ever Why we should settle the solar system and what we can do about It National Space Society.
2014 Key Issues Review: Ensuring a Robust U.S. Human Spaceflight Program Congressional Visits Day Preparatory Briefing Teleconferences February 12, 19,
5/9/02 1 Spaceport Vision Team Members Organizations that contributed: Federal Government DoD DoC DoT NASA State Government NCSS Industry University Detailed.
RASC-AL 2010 Topics. TECHNOLOGY-ENABLED HUMAN MARS MISSION NASA is interested in eventual human mission to the Martian surface. Current Mars design reference.
Minimalist Mars Mission Establishing a Human Toehold on the Red Planet Executive Summary DevelopSpace MinMars Team.
03/11/021 Spaceport Vision Team Members. 03/11/022 Systems Definition Spaceport System Spaceport Stakeholder Needs High-Level Trade Study Performance.
1 On-Orbit Vehicle Assembly at the International Space Station Charles Powell University of Southern California ASTE 527.
1 15 November 2004 CCSDS Security Architecture 15 th November 2004 Toulouse.
Last Updated 1/17/02 1 Business Drivers Guiding Portal Evolution Portals Integrate web-based systems to increase productivity and reduce.
Construction of an International Space Vehicle Using the Space Station Dan Roukos ASTE 527 December 15, 2009.
The Augustine Committee Review of Human Spaceflight Plans Committee Briefing to COMSTAC October 29, 2009 Review of US Human Space Flight Plans Committee.
Intelligent Distributed Spacecraft Infrastructure Earth Science Vision Session IGARSS 2002 Toronto, CA June 25, Needs for an Intelligent Distributed.
Unit 6 Lesson 1 Explanation. In 2004, President Bush set the following goal for the NASA constellation program, “this vision… is a sustainable and affordable.
11 Space Transportation Policy and Market Risks Panel 5 – International Customers, Competitors and Partners The George Washington University Elliot School.
Human Exploration of Mars Design Reference Architecture 5
1 Earth Science Technology Office The Earth Science (ES) Vision: An intelligent Web of Sensors IGARSS 2002 Paper 02_06_08:20 Eduardo Torres-Martinez –
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Marshall Space Flight Center Launching the Future of Exploration and Science Robert Lightfoot.
SPACE TAXI Marcel Milanes December 14 th, 2010
CSRP NASA Workshop NASA’s Revised Budget. CSRP NASA Workshop NASA’s New Vision and Objectives (as of January 14, 2004)  VISION  The fundamental goal.
Recommendation to Cease NASA Crew Return Vehicle Development April 29, 2004 Amanda KellyBlake HajovskyAnthony Pittman Engineering Technical Communications.
1 The PISCES Project Don J. Pearson JSC/DM Flight Design & Dynamics Division May 2002
1 June 10, 2004 Gary L. Wentz, Jr. Deputy Manager, MSFC Office of Exploration Systems MSFC Office for Exploration Systems.
October, 2005 NASA’s Exploration Architecture. 2 A Bold Vision for Space Exploration  Complete the International Space Station  Safely fly the Space.
03/20/021 Spaceport Vision Team Members Organizations that contributed: Air Force NASA NCSS FAA Industry University Etc.
Orbital Aggregation & Space Infrastructure Systems (OASIS) Background Develop robust and cost effective concepts in support of future space commercialization.
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use FISO COLLOQUIUM, 18 June 2014 B. HUFENBACH ESA’S SPACE EXPLORATION STRATEGY.
SPACE EXPLORATION COS 8 Identify technological advances and other benefits of space exploration. Listing highlights of space exploration, including satellites,
National Aeronautics and Space Administration The Evolvable Mars Campaign in support of a Sustainable Journey to Mars The Evolvable Mars Campaign in support.
SLS Derived Vertical Habitat
The Global Exploration Roadmap Considerations on Life Support International Space Exploration Coordination Group (ISECG) Francois Spiero, CNES Co-chair,
Rob Byrd Chief Enterprise Architect Enterprise Architecture – A Citywide Service Delivery Strategy Aligning Information Technology Services to the Citizen.
Bringing Digital Technology Back to Earth ISCe2005 Presented by Ken Dozier USC Viterbi School of Engineering NASA Far West Technology Transfer Center.
National Goals and Objectives
Space Tug Propellant Options AIAA 2016-vvvv
SPACE EXPLORATION COS 8 Identify technological advances and other benefits of space exploration. Listing highlights of space exploration, including satellites,
The ISECG Global Exploration Roadmap Status update at Target NEO2 Workshop July 9, 2013 NASA/Kathy Laurini Human Exploration & Ops Mission Directorate.
Propellant Depot Bernard Kutter United Launch Alliance
h t t p : / / w w w . u s c . e d u / g o / t t c
Return to The Moon: An International Perspective
Goddard Contractor Association
© 2016 Global Market Insights, Inc. USA. All Rights Reserved Fuel Cell Market size worth $25.5bn by 2024 Low Power Wide Area Network.
Deep Space Exploration Requires the best from all of us
Presentation transcript:

Doris Hamill NASA Langley Research Center FISO Telecon June 5, 2013

Mission: Incomplete 2 Understand environment Discover civilian uses Develop enabling technology Establish engineering standards Determine safe operational practices Enable routine use science economic benefit civil space national security NASA has no plans to extend activity in near space beyond ISS. Transition NASA’s experience base in near space to self- sustaining uses. Don’t repeat post- Apollo mistake.

What is Near Space? 3 a mediuma place atmosphere, oceanlikefrontier get somewhere elsegoaldo something there NASA explorationaccording tonational security commercial NASA science reduce transit cost enable destination activity invest toimprove transportation reduce operations cost launch propulsion human presence invest ininfrastructure asteroid moon Mars ?

NASA Role in Settling Near Space 4 E NABLE P ROSPERITY C REATE W EALTH InfrastructureCapital assets General welfarePrivate profit Longer termShorter term E NABLE P ROSPERITY C REATE W EALTH InfrastructureCapital assets General welfarePrivate profit Longer termShorter term

Near-term, Value-Added Uses 5 Solving the launch cost problem will not remove all the inhibitors to self-sustaining use of near space. New, value-added function Relevant Space-faring Community Technology readiness Commercial Potential Inhibitor(s) Satellite Servicing commercial national security good strong end-to-end cost risk time value of money Debris hazard mitigation LEO NASA mixed some cost-effective removal GEO national security commercial good strong end-to-end cost risk time value of money Space situational awareness Natural hazards NASA national security good modest cost Man-made situations national security commercial fair good end-to-end cost risk time value of money On-orbit assembly and check-out all mixed good end-to-end cost risk time value of money Space qualifying new technology all good end-to-end cost risk time value of money Infrastructure

A Near Space, Multi-purpose “City” Capture ISS heritage / lessons learned ‒Modules and nodes ‒Standard components, interfaces Enable near-term, value-added uses ‒Urban efficiencies ‒Serve all space-faring communities ‒Multiple, smaller business cases: B2B 6

Keeping It Real Realistic budget profile ‒Economies of scale ‒Incremental build ‒Flexible, situational expansion ‒Ubiquitous robotics, optionally manned Pragmatic, value-added uses Exit strategy for NASA 7

The System Vision Non-degrading orbit Serviceable, maintainable, upgradeable Free space platform with the ability to expand modularly without limit Initially: high earth orbit Ultimately: Lagrange points, deep space Structural focus with infrastructure Crystal-like geometry for growth Standard interfaces for new modules Multi-purpose for NASA, national security, and commercial uses 8

What Could You Do With PISCES? RoboticHuman Depot Dilute aperture imaging observatory Tank Farm Research by humans Retail stores Fuel production and storage Radio observatoryIncineratorCrew quartersArboretum Refueling station Communications node External servicing robots HospitalGymnasium Recharging stationNavigation systemService robot lotPort of entryLounge Satellite rescueTerminalSync watchShelter Decontamination station Tug stationFactory Orbital police station Gravity spa External work vehicles Crew rescue / emergency return Robotic garageNEO watchResortMovie studio Development testing Robotic workshopSupply storeConference center Graduate studies center Space yardPower stationGraveyardArenaFamily residences Research without humans Waste management[what else?]Service vehicle lotFarm Vivarium Orbital debris mitigation Vehicle repair station [what else?] Optical observatoryWarehouseWorkshop 9

Commercial Key, Integrating Element National Security Technical capabilities in development Mission scenarios under consideration In-space robotics Autonomous rendezvous and docking In-space propulsion Ion propulsion Virtual presence Space solar power Deployable structures Inflatable structures Commercial logistics Manned lunar Manned Mars Lagrange / other staging Next generation, high-orbit assets Advanced telescopes Rapid repair / reconstitution Advanced deep space probes Commercial development of space Asteroids Affordable space NASA 10

A Modular Paradigm Thrust line for mobile spacecraft Open-ended for space structures Flat for surface structures 11 Modules Pressurized volumes Open trusses Docking portals / airlocks Utilities Nodes Nodes Mechanical connection Standard utility interfaces Shaped for architecture

Engineering for the Modular Paradigm Mission System Feasible, near term Multi-user utility Programmatically flexible High visibility, politically supportable Engineering Development Foundational architecture Envelope dimensions and capabilities Standardize interfaces Accommodate ubiquitous robotics Useful beyond / outside PISCES 12

The Engineering Challenge Develop and integrate independent elements for use across time hased xpandable eneral rchitecture for ystems sing egments No inherent limit on size An architecture that can apply to qualitatively different types of systems and missions Structures including systems, and subsystems Volumes, structures, and major subsystems that can be assembled as modular segments 13 Define / develop the modular paradigm

Why PEGASUS? Break cost/risk paradigm – Work within available resources – Greater system-level tolerance for risk Flexible: enables multiple missions – Human and robotic – Exploration and science – Orbital, deep space, and surface – Commercial, national security Robust: Reliable, affordable, long-term solution 14

PEGASUS Program Concept Harvest lessons from ISS, others Use PISCES mission set to identify needed functionalities Define architecture(s), envelopes, interfaces – Optimize for durable, system-focused approach – Growth potential including P 3 I LEO flight demo – Prototype for PISCES – Transition to commercial: business pathfinder for PISCES 15

Exit Strategy for NASA time  16 NASA PEGASUS  PISCES National Security Community Commercial Service Providers NASA Exploration NASA Science Municipality P3IP3I Commercial Users Design Develop Establish operations Operate infra- structure Design, develop, deploy, operate mission modules

Pressures on NASA Compelling, Next Generation Agency-Level Vision Compelling, Next Generation Agency-Level Vision Flexibility to Accommodate Future Resource Constraints Flexibility to Accommodate Future Resource Constraints 17 High Cost of Space Cooperate with Other Space Users Cooperate with Other Space Users Encourage Commercial Participation Encourage Commercial Participation Support New Technology Development Support New Technology Development

Compelling, Next Generation Agency-Level Vision Compelling, Next Generation Agency-Level Vision Flexibility to Accommodate Future Resource Constraints Flexibility to Accommodate Future Resource Constraints 18 High Cost of Space Cooperate with Other Space Users Cooperate with Other Space Users Encourage Commercial Participation Encourage Commercial Participation Support New Technology Development Support New Technology Development Is PISCES the Right Future for NASA?

19 Doris Hamill (757)

NASA on the Aerospace FrontierExploit to improve human wellbeing EngineeringOperations 20Enable human presence beyond earth TechnologyEngineering Explore to satisfy human curiosity ScienceTechnology

21 Notional PISCES Mission Priorities

Notional Economic Payoff 22