Business Case NPRR 351 Floyd Trefny Amtec Consulting Brenda Crockett Champion Energy Services.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Achieving Price-Responsive Demand in New England Henry Yoshimura Director, Demand Resource Strategy ISO New England National Town Meeting on Demand Response.
Advertisements

INSULATING PRICE RESPONSIVE LOAD FROM RUC CAPACITY SHORT CHARGE Mark W. Smith J. Kay Trostle August 2008 DSWG.
JANUARY 14-15, 2014 | NEPOOL MARKETS COMMITTEE Matthew Brewster MARKET DEVELOPMENT | Conceptual design.
Time-of-Use and Critical Peak Pricing
Ancillary Services and SCED Jeff Gilbertson Market Analyst Congestion Management Working Group 9/4/2013.
Unresolved Issues in NPRR 555 Texas Steel Companies July 9, 2013.
Ramping and CMSC (Congestion Management Settlement Credit) payments.
NARUC-FERC Demand Response Collaborative Meeting NARUC Fall Meeting Anaheim, CA T. Graham Edwards President & CEO November 11, 2007.
MISO’s Midwest Market Initiative APEX Ron McNamara October 31, 2005.
Solutions to California’s Energy Crisis: Real-Time Pricing by Frank Wolak Chairman, Market Surveillance Committee March 17, 2001.
September 15, 2006 Mending the Fractured Value Chain Through Functional Use of Demand Response.
Smart Storage Space and Water Heaters Resources for Grid Management, Renewable Integration, and Conservation Paul Steffes Steffes Corporation
North American Electricity Markets APEX Paris, France October 15-16, 2007 Kenneth Laughlin, PJM.
Demand Response in MISO Markets NASUCA Panel on DR November 12, 2012.
ERCOT Public 1 AS Demand Curves for Real-Time Co-optimization of Energy & Ancillary Services.
Floyd Trefny Director of Product Development Future of Demand Response In ERCOT A Presentation to the Workshop – September 15, 2006 Project Number
© 2013 McNees Wallace & Nurick LLC October 17, 2013 Robert A. Weishaar, Jr. ON SITE ENERGY – INTERPLAY WITH PJM DEMAND RESPONSE PROGRAMS Harrisburg, PA.
Measurement, Verification, and Forecasting Protocols for Demand Response Resources: Chuck Goldman Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Demand Resources: Challenges and New Initiatives for ISO New England Henry Yoshimura, ISO New England NEW DEMAND RESPONSE PRODUCTS IN ELECTRICITY MARKETS.
MISUG Meeting Materials ERCOT 10/16/ Agenda 10/16/ Antitrust AdmonitionJ. Lavas 9:30 a.m. 2.Introduction/Agenda OverviewJ. Lavas 9:35 a.m.
Welcome New York Independent System Operator. (Pre-NYISO) Regulated Market Physical contracts Regulated industry Cost Based System Two Party Deals Bundled.
Demand Response in Midwest ISO Markets February 17, 2008.
Retail Smart Grid Trends Paul Wattles Senior Analyst, Market Design & Development UT Energy Week: “How Smart Grids Enable Consumers” Feb. 18, 2015.
Overview of the North American and Canadian Markets 2008 APEX Conference in Sydney, Australia October 13, 2008 Hung-po Chao Director, Market Strategy and.
Retail Competition: Managing a Difficult Transition David L. O’Connor Commissioner Massachusetts Division of Energy Resources (DOER) Presentation to National.
COMMUNICATIONS AND SETTLEMENTS WORKING GROUP (CSWG) April 2015 Update to COPS.
1 New England Demand Response Resources: Present Observations and Future Challenges Henry Yoshimura Demand Resources Department ISO New England, Inc. Holyoke,
FERC’s Role in Demand Response David Kathan ABA Teleconference December 14, 2005.
Storage Integration – Look Ahead SCED Issues for ETWG CAES Perspectives Brandon Whittle ETWG Storage Workshop.
1 Welcome to Load Participation Orientation Elev MenWomen Phones Info Presentation and other Load Participation information will be posted at:
Demand Response: Keeping the Power Flowing in Southwest Connecticut Presented by: Henry Yoshimura Manager, Demand Response ISO New England September 30,
“Demand Response: Completing the Link Between Wholesale and Retail Pricing” Paul Crumrine Director, Regulatory Strategies & Services Institute for Regulatory.
Demand Response Workshop September 15, Definitions are important Demand response –“Changes in electricity usage by end-use customers from their.
Linking the Wholesale and Retail Markets through Dynamic Retail Pricing Presented by: Henry Yoshimura Manager, Demand Response ISO New England September.
Section 5.9 – added export language Each ERS Generator site must have an interconnection agreement with its TDSP prior to submitting an ERS offer and must.
Grabbing Balancing Up Load (BUL) by the Horns December 2006.
PJM©2013www.pjm.com Economic DR participation in energy market ERCOT April 14, 2014 Pete Langbein.
ISO Comparison – CAISO Alex Lee (ERCOT)
1 Reliability Deployment Task Force (RDTF Meeting) December 20 th 2011 December 20, 2011.
PJM© Demand Response in PJM 2009 NASUCA Mid-Year Meeting June 30, 2009 Boston, MA Panel: Price Responsive Demand – A Long-Term Bargain.
Load Participation in Real-Time Market: LMP Minus G.
DR issues in California discussed last year in March Historical DR in California: some background issues –Twenty years of programs/tariffs I/C and AC cycling.
Emergency Demand Response Concept Overview and Examples Presented to: ERCOT December 3, 2004 Presented by: Neenan Associates.
Appeal of PRS Action NPRR 351, Calculate and Post Projected Non-Binding LMPs for the Next 15 Minutes Floyd Trefny Texas Steel Companies.
GTBD Forecasting Using SCED to Produce Projections of Future LMPs Floyd J. Trefny February 17, 2011.
Advanced Metering Rule Christine Wright Public Utility Commission of Texas June 6, 2007 Retail Market Workshop COMET WG Meeting.
Floyd Trefny, P.E. Director of Wholesale Market Design Nodal Market Tools to Manage Wind Generation January 29, 2009 Presentation to the Renewables Technology.
©2003 PJM North American Markets Status APEx Seoul, Korea October 29-31, 2006 Kenneth W. Laughlin.
Demand Response
ERCOT MARKET EDUCATION Retail 101. Advanced Meter Technology.
Programs/Products that ERCOT Does Not Presently Offer ERCOT Demand Side Working Group New DR Product Options Subgroup Jay Zarnikau Frontier Associates.
SAWG Update to WMS September 2 nd, 2015 Brandon Whittle.
“Managing the Integration of Energy Storage Technologies” Kenneth Ragsdale ERCOT.
Planning for Texas’ Energy Future Select Committee on Electric Generation Capacity and Environmental Effects Bob Kahn President & CEO February 6, 2008.
AMIT/DSWG Workshop ERCOT Demand Side Working Group Meeting September 30, 2011 Jay Zarnikau, Frontier Associates.
DSWG Update to WMS 8/10/2011. DSWG Goals #DSWG GoalDeliverable Target Date Primary Owner Team MembersStatus 1SCED Load Participation Complete analysis.
Proposal for Consideration Regarding Holistic Solution to Congestion Irresolvable in SCED Issue:How do you identify when constraint is irresolvable Proposal:Adopt.
IMM alternate framework for Look-Ahead SCED November 21, 2011.
BGE Smart Grid Initiative Stakeholder Meeting September 17, 2009 Wayne Harbaugh, Vice President, Pricing and Regulatory Services.
Texas Nodal Program ERCOT Readiness & Transition (ERT) Supplemental Information TPTF January 12, 2009 Kevin Frankeny.
TAC Rejection of NPRR Mitigated Offer Caps for RMR Units
Calculation of BGS-CIEP Hourly Energy Price Component Using PJM Hourly Data for the PSE&G Transmission Zone.
Alternative Approach for Loads in SCED v.2
Load Participation in Real-Time Market: Loads in SCED version 2
Reflecting Losses in DR within ERCOT August 22, 2012
The Future of Demand Response in New England
Calculation of BGS-CIEP Hourly Energy Price Component Using PJM Hourly Data for the PSE&G Transmission Zone.
Market Design in New England
Wholesale Electricity Costs
Calculation of BGS-CIEP Hourly Energy Price Component Using PJM Hourly Data for the PSE&G Transmission Zone.
Presentation transcript:

Business Case NPRR 351 Floyd Trefny Amtec Consulting Brenda Crockett Champion Energy Services

Business Case – NPRR 351 Supported by PUC Commission In open meeting, Commissioner Anderson, indicated NPRR351 was very important to improve the ability of loads, both large and small, to respond to market prices as part of the overall plan for Resource and Reserve Adequacy and Shortage pricing market design. Referring directly to NPRR 351, he stated that, “if they do not get advanced notice, it’s harder to respond,” noting that this NPRR or something similar must be in place and urged ERCOT and ERCOT stakeholders to move forward.

Business Case – NPRR 351 Mitigates Unfair Retail Settlement Issue Load Consumption is averaged over a 15-fifteen minute Settlement Interval, yet SCED establishes prices every five minutes. Example: SCED produces a price of $45 in the first five minutes and then jumps to $3,000 in the following two SCED intervals, the kWh consumed by loads during the first five minutes is charged the average price over the whole 15 minutes, which in this example is $2,015. The load would pay ERCOT for the kWh consumed in the first five minutes at $2,015 even though the price displayed from SCED for that time was only $45. Given the size of a very large company’s Load or very large Retail Electric Provider’s (REP’s), the Entity could be charged as much as $75,000 for consumption in the Settlement Interval even though the load or REP reduced its consumption to zero as soon as it saw the $3,000 prices from SCED. The 15 minutes projection of prices could eliminate or at least significantly reduce this unfair effect on loads.

Business Case – NPRR 351 Significant Tool for Managing Capacity Shortages ERCOT had over 25 hours of generation deficiency greater than 50 MW from 1/1/2011 to 8/29/2011. During these events, significant amounts of Load reductions occurred because Real-Time Market (RTM) prices also increased to scarcity levels. The capacity shortage placed a significant strain on the entire ERCOT grid and through the actions (acknowledged by the ERCOT CEO) of loads responding to prices many much more serious events would have occurred. Actions of the few loads that respond to prices reduces the costs that all loads must pay in times of shortages and often resolves reliability problem.

Business Case – NPRR 351 Look Ahead SCED ERCOT is moving ahead with a “Look Ahead” SCED project. The design also produces non-binding prices for each five minutes forward for 1 to 2 hours Implementing look ahead RT dispatch now with non- binding price projections as part of the first phase of the project will provide ERCOT with valuable experience and potentially reduce total capital costs in long term Provides opportunity to learn and test concepts that will be used in future phases of the project for Load Resources in SCED, future Outages integration, and SCED Unit Commitment  May prove to be one of its most valuable benefits of moving forward now

Business Case – NPRR 351 Facilitates the Retail Market Retail Electric Providers are integrating “advanced metering” capabilities into the products they will offer consumers. These products will provide reduced costs to consumers who reduce their demand when prices are expected to be higher than a threshold. These types of products provide protection from high market prices to the REP as well as all other loads on the system. By using the projected prices from ERCOT’s system, retail consumers would have enough notice to take actions prior to actually setting prices for the entire market. Such market response is a hallmark of an energy only market design and must be encouraged

Business Case – NPRR 351 Integral part of New Retail Products Helps REPs create Time of Use (TOU) products that can give residential customer the opportunity to take advantage of Real- Time LMP prices while reducing risk of price spikes Based on recent beta testing of various retail products, Champion Energy Services has found the timeliness of messaging is critical to the process. In the current environment, Load Zone 15 minute settlement prices are already in effect before REPs are notified TOU products cannot be effective if the information needed for the consumer to make informed decisions is not easily attainable. By providing timely price projections, the market could benefit by potentially lowering costs to the consumer and achieving the goals of reduced demand on the system

Discussion