Highlights on rare charged kaon decays Mauro Raggi On behalf of the NA48/2 Collaboration Cambridge, CERN, Chicago, Dubna, Edinburgh, Ferrara, Firenze,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sabino Meola Charged kaon group meeting 12 October 2006 Status of analysis.
Advertisements

Sabino Meola Charged kaon group meeting 14 December 2006 Status of analysis.
Recent Results on Radiative Kaon decays from NA48 and NA48/2. Silvia Goy López (for the NA48 and NA48/2 collaborations) Universitá degli Studi di Torino.
Investigations of Semileptonic Kaon Decays at the NA48 Еxperiment Milena Dyulendarova (University of Sofia “St. Kliment Ohridski”) for NA48 Collaboration.
KLOE GM Capri May 2003 K charged status report DE/Dx development vs PiD (next talk by E.De Lucia) →K e3 studies: initial design of efficiency measurement.
Status of the  ee analysis Mauro Raggi, LNF INFN 29 th August 2013 NA48/2 rare decay session NA62 Collaboration meeting Liverpool.
14 Sept 2004 D.Dedovich Tau041 Measurement of Tau hadronic branching ratios in DELPHI experiment at LEP Dima Dedovich (Dubna) DELPHI Collaboration E.Phys.J.
Anne Dabrowski Northwestern University Collaboration Meeting 22 nd February 2005 Update Kmu3 Branching Ratio measurement A. Dabrowski, February
Measurement of the absolute BR(K  +  -  + ) : an update Patrizia de Simone KLOE Kaon meeting – 21 May 2009.
A. Dabrowski, June Ratio(ke3/pipi0) 1 Final Results Γ(Ke3)/ Γ(pipi0) Anne Dabrowski Northwestern University NA48/2 Collaboration Meeting 08 June.
July 2001 Snowmass A New Measurement of  from KTeV Introduction The KTeV Detector  Analysis of 1997 Data Update of Previous Result Conclusions.
J. Whitmore BEACH 2004 June 30, 2004 KTeV Results: K L    ( =e, , ) BEACH 2004 June 30, 2004 Julie Whitmore, Fermilab l Physics Motivation - Direct.
Recent results on kaon rare decays from the NA48/2 experiment High Energy Physics in the LHC Era December , Valparaiso – Chile Massimiliano Fiorini.
Particle Identification in the NA48 Experiment Using Neural Networks L. Litov University of Sofia.
Measurement of the Branching fraction B( B  D* l ) C. Borean, G. Della Ricca G. De Nardo, D. Monorchio M. Rotondo Riunione Gruppo I – Napoli 19 Dicembre.
25/07/2002G.Unal, ICHEP02 Amsterdam1 Final measurement of  ’/  by NA48 Direct CP violation in neutral kaon decays History of the  ’/  measurement by.
Irakli Chakaberia Final Examination April 28, 2014.
Rare B  baryon decays Jana Thayer University of Rochester CLEO Collaboration EPS 2003 July 19, 2003 Motivation Baryon production in B decays Semileptonic.
NA48-2 new results on Charged Semileptonic decays Anne Dabrowski Northwestern University Kaon 2005 Workshop 14 June 2005.
Ke2/Kmu2 and LFV tests Crimea2008 Yalta 27/09/08 – 04/10/08 Andrey Zinchenko JINR, Dubna On behalf of NA62 Collaboration: Bern, Birmingham, CERN, Dubna,
CP violation measurements with the ATLAS detector E. Kneringer – University of Innsbruck on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration BEACH2012, Wichita, USA “Determination.
October 28, 2003V.Kekelidze 1 Experiment NA48/2 A Precision Measurement of Charged Kaon Decay Parameters (CERN/SPSC ) Status Report (SPSC )
E. De LuciaNeutral and Charged Kaon Meeting – 7 May 2007 Updates on BR(K +  π + π 0 ) E. De Lucia.
K charged meeting 10/11/03 K tracking efficiency & geometrical acceptance :  K (p K,  K )  We use the tag in the handle emisphere to have in the signal.
July 19th, 2003EPS HEP Aachen R. Fantechi Tests of Chiral Perturbation Theory in K S rare decays at NA48 Riccardo Fantechi INFN - Sezione di Pisa.
Anne Dabrowski 26 February Semileptonic Analysis from Low Intensity Run Anne Dabrowski Northwestern University NA48 Collaboration Meeting 26 February.
Status of A g measurement in NA48/2 DA  NE 2004 Luca Fiorini Scuola Normale Superiore and INFN Pisa on behalf of NA48/2 collaboration: Cambridge, CERN,
Recent CP violation measurements at CERN-NA48 experiment For the NA48 and NA48/2 collaborations: Cagliari, Cambridge, CERN, Chicago, Dubna, Edinburgh,
EXPERIMENT INR/IHEP Protvino-Moscow, Russia Viacheslav Duk INR RAS QUARKS 2006 Rare Kaon Decays
Measurement of Vus. Recent NA48 results on semileptonic and rare Kaon decays Leandar Litov, CERN On behalf of the NA48 Collaboration.
Highlights on rare kaon decays from NA48/2 Monica Pepe INFN Perugia on behalf of the NA48/2 Collaboration Cambridge, CERN, Chicago, Dubna, Edinburgh, Ferrara,
Study of exclusive radiative B decays with LHCb Galina Pakhlova, (ITEP, Moscow) for LHCb collaboration Advanced Study Institute “Physics at LHC”, LHC Praha-2003,
CHARM MIXING and lifetimes on behalf of the BaBar Collaboration XXXVIIth Rencontres de Moriond  March 11th, 2002 at Search for lifetime differences in.
Sabino Meola Kloe meeting 10 March 2005 Status of analysis.
Lukens - 1 Fermilab Seminar – July, 2011 Observation of the  b 0 Patrick T. Lukens Fermilab for the CDF Collaboration July 2011.
Barbara Sciascia July,29 th - LNF 1 Barbara Sciascia K  semileptonic decays Charged Kaon Meeting July, 29 th - LNF Single photon efficiency in KPM events.
Magnetized hadronic calorimeter and muon veto for the K +   +  experiment L. DiLella, May 25, 2004 Purpose:  Provide pion – muon separation (muon veto)
New precise measurements of radiative charged kaon and hyperon decays Ermanno Imbergamo University of Perugia and INFN on behalf of the NA48/2 Collaboration.
Status of the hadronic cross section (small angle) Federico Nguyen February 22 nd 2005  the 2002 data sample and available MC sets  trigger efficiency.
JPS 2003 in Sendai Measurement of spectral function in the decay 1. Motivation ~ Muon Anomalous Magnetic Moment ~ 2. Event selection 3. mass.
Precision measurements of Charged Kaon radiative decays in NA48/2 WIN'11 23rd International Workshop on WEAK INTERACTIONS AND NEUTRINOS Cape Town, South.
Preliminary Measurement of the Ke3 Form Factor f + (t) M. Antonelli, M. Dreucci, C. Gatti Introduction: Form Factor Parametrization Fitting Function and.
 0 life time analysis updates, preliminary results from Primex experiment 08/13/2007 I.Larin, Hall-B meeting.
4/12/05 -Xiaojian Zhang, 1 UIUC paper review Introduction to Bc Event selection The blind analysis The final result The systematic error.
A High Statistics Study of the Decay M. Fujikawa for the Belle Collaboration Outline 1.Introduction 2.Experiment Belle detector 3.Analysis Event selection.
06/2006I.Larin PrimEx Collaboration meeting  0 analysis.
D. LeoneNovosibirsk, , 2006Pion Form KLOE Debora Leone (IEKP – Universität Karlsruhe) for the KLOE collaboration International Workshop.
Rare and Radiative Kaon Decays from the NA48/2 Experiment Vladimir Kekelidze (JINR, Dubna) ‏ on behalf of the NA48/2 Collaboration: Cambridge, CERN, Chicago,
4 July 2006Alan Norton, QCD Montpellier1 Search for direct CP Violation in charged K decays QCD Montpellier, July 2006 Alan Norton, CERN On behalf of the.
Study of Ke4 decays at NA48 and  PT tests On behalf of the NA48/2 collaboration Mauro Piccini (INFN - sezione di Perugia) HADRON 2011 Munich June 17,
Belle General meeting Measurement of spectral function in the decay 1. Motivation 2. Event selection 3. mass spectrum (unfolding) 4. Evaluation.
Paolo Massarotti Kaon meeting March 2007  ±  X    X  Time measurement use neutral vertex only in order to obtain a completely independent.
M. Martemianov, ITEP, October 2003 Analysis of ratio BR(K     0 )/BR(K    ) M. Martemianov V. Kulikov Motivation Selection and cuts Trigger efficiency.
Measurement of the Muon Charge Ratio in Cosmic Ray Events with the CMS Experiment at the LHC S. Marcellini, INFN Bologna – Italy on behalf of the CMS collaboration.
ChPT tests at NA62 Mauro Raggi, Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati On behalf of the NA62 collaboration X Th quark confinement and hadron spectrum Tum campus,
EXPERIMENTS INR/IHEP Protvino-Moscow, Russia Viacheslav Duk INR RAS BEACH 2006 Highlights on Rare Charged Kaon Decays ISTRA+ & KEK.
Status of the measurement of K L lifetime - Data sample (old): ~ 440 pb -1 ( ) - MC sample: ~125 pb -1 ( mk0 stream ) Selection: standard tag (|
Monica Pepe INFN Perugia on behalf of the NA48/2 Collaboration (Cambridge, CERN, Chicago, Dubna, Edimburgh, Ferrara, Firenze, Mainz, Northwestern, Perugia,
Biagio Di Micco  mass measurement   mass measurement blessing of the final result Biagio Di Micco.
K+e+γ using OKA detector
Marco Incagli – INFN Pisa
Observation of a “cusp” in the decay K±  p±pp
First observation of K+ → p+p0e+e-
Osaka University RCNP Toshinao Tsunemi
p0 life time analysis: general method, updates and preliminary result
° status report analysis details: overview; “where we are”; plans: before finalizing result.. I.Larin 02/13/2009.
A New Measurement of |Vus| from KTeV
Measurement of DE and INT in K±→±0g with NA48/2
° status report analysis details: overview; “where we are”; plans: before finalizing result.. I.Larin 02/13/2009.
Presentation transcript:

Highlights on rare charged kaon decays Mauro Raggi On behalf of the NA48/2 Collaboration Cambridge, CERN, Chicago, Dubna, Edinburgh, Ferrara, Firenze, Mainz, Northwestern, Perugia, Pisa, Saclay, Siegen, Torino, Vienna BEACH 2006 Lancaster, 2-9 July 2006

Highlights on rare charged kaon decays Mauro Raggi – Beach Outline NA48/2 experiment The decay K ± →      –formalism –experimental status NA48/2 measurement K ± →      NA48/2 measurement K e4 00 BR and form factors Other rare K charged decays in NA48/2 NEW

Highlights on rare charged kaon decays Mauro Raggi – Beach NA48/2 detector Spectrometer - 4 Drift Chambers (DCH) - Magnet LKr EM calorimeter

Highlights on rare charged kaon decays Mauro Raggi – Beach NA48/2 beam line

Highlights on rare charged kaon decays Mauro Raggi – Beach NA48/2 data taking periods SS0 SS1SS2SS3 50 days during summer 2003 SS4SS5SS6SS7SS8 ~ 60 days during summer of 2004

Highlights on rare charged kaon decays Mauro Raggi – Beach NA48/2 RARE DECAYS: 1. K ± →     

Highlights on rare charged kaon decays Mauro Raggi – Beach Gamma production mechanism IB DE IBINT DE Inner Bremsstrahlung(IB): (2.75±0.15)·10 -4 PDG (2005) (55<T *  <90 MeV) Direct Emission (DE): (4.4±0.8)·10 -6 PDG (2005) (55<T *  <90 MeV) Interference (INT): not yet measured DEIB

Highlights on rare charged kaon decays Mauro Raggi – Beach K→  amplitudes Two type of contributions: –Electric (J=l±1) dipole (E 1 ) –Magnetic (J=l) dipole (M 1 ) –Electric contributions are dominated by the Inner Bremsstrahlung (E IB ) term Thanks to Low’s theorem IB contribution can be related to the non radiative decay  ±   using QED corrections. DE shows up only at order O(p 4 ) in CHPT Is generated by both E and M contributions: –Magnetic contributions are dominated by chiral anomaly –Electric contributions come from L 4 CHPT lagrangian and loops L 2 Present experimental results seem to suggest a M dominated DE

Highlights on rare charged kaon decays Mauro Raggi – Beach General expression for decay rate  ± depends on 2 variables (W e     that can be reduced to only one integrating over T *    leading to the above formula  where W is a Lorentz invariant variable. The above formula shows the 3 contributions separately: IB, DE, INT. The INT may arise only between the electrical contribution of DE and the IB term. If the INT term near 0 the electrical contributions in the DE term has to be very small. With this parametrization the ratio data/MC(IB) has the form 1+  W 2 +  W 4 P * K =4-momentum of the K ± P *  =4-momentum of the  ± P *  =4-momentum of the radiative  IB DE IBINT DE

Highlights on rare charged kaon decays Mauro Raggi – Beach W distributions for IB, DE, INT The distributions of IB and DE have very different shapes. The distributions are not in scale (IB/DE) ~ 60 because otherwise you can hardly see them but the IB one!

Highlights on rare charged kaon decays Mauro Raggi – Beach Experimental results for DE and INT All the measurements have been performed in the T *  region MeV to avoid  ±     BG All of them are assuming the Interference term to be = 0 BNL E787 KEK E470 Interference measurements:

Highlights on rare charged kaon decays Mauro Raggi – Beach What’s new in NA48/2 measurement  In flight Kaon decays  Both K + and K - in the beam (possibility to check the CP violation)  Very high statistics (220K      candidates of which 124K used in the fit )  Enlarged T *  region in the low energy part (0<T *  <80 MeV)  Negligible background contribution < 1% of the DE component  Good W resolution mainly in the high statistic region  More bins in the fit to enhance sensitivity to INT  Order ‰  mistagging probability for IB, DE and INT

Highlights on rare charged kaon decays Mauro Raggi – Beach Enlarging T *  region T *   T *   DE  T *   INT  Standard region Use the standard region 55<T *  <90 MeV is a safe choice for BG rejection (K3  n) Unfortunately the region below 55 MeV is the most interesting for DE and INT measurement This measurement will be performed in the region 0<T *  <80 MeV to improve statistics and fit stability.

Highlights on rare charged kaon decays Mauro Raggi – Beach Reconstruction strategy Z V (CHA) 11 33 22 Z V (2-3) Z V (1-3) Z V (NEU) LKr We can get two independent determination of the K decay vertex: - The charged vertex Z V (CHA) using the K and  flight directions (spectrometer) - The neutral vertex Z V (NEU) imposing  0 mass to gamma couples (LKr) For the neutral vertex we have 3 values: Z V (12), Z V (23), Z V (13) but only one of those is the correct one. We evaluate the kaon mass for all of them and then choose the vertex giving the best kaon mass. Once the neutral vertex has been chosen we also know what the radiated  is.

Highlights on rare charged kaon decays Mauro Raggi – Beach  ± →  ±    selection Track Selection # tracks = 1. P  > 10 GeV E over P < 0.85 No muon veto hits 0 MeV < T *  < 80 MeV Gamma selection N  = 3. (well separated in time LKr clusters) Minimum  energy > 3 GeV (>5 for the fit) Gamma tagging optimization CHA and NEU vertex compatibility Only one compatible NEU vertex BG rejection cuts COG < 2 cm Overlapping  cuts |M K -M KPDG | < 10 MeV 200K events

Highlights on rare charged kaon decays Mauro Raggi – Beach Main BG sources Physical BG rejection: –For     we can relay on the cut in T *  < 80 MeV, M K and COG, cuts –For       we have released the T *  cut, but we can anyway reach required rejection (kaon mass cut (missing  ) and overlapping  cut (fused  )) Accidental BG rejection (      e             –Clean beam, very good time, space, and mass resolutions. DecayBRBackground mechanism ±→±→ (21.13±0.14)%+1 accidental or hadronic extra cluster ±→±±→± (1.76±0.04)%-1 missing or 2 overlapped gammas  ± →   e  (4.87±0.06)% +1 accidental  and e misidentified as a   ± →     (3.27±0.06)% +1 accidental  and  misidentified as a   ± →   e   (2.66±0.2)·10 −4 e misidentified as a   ± →      (2.4±0.85)·10 −5  misidentified as a 

Highlights on rare charged kaon decays Mauro Raggi – Beach Fused  rejection:overlapping  cut Split 1 out of the 3 clusters in two  of energies:  1 =xE CL  2 =(1-x)E CL now we got 4  s and we star reconstructing the event as a  ±    . Evaluate the Z V (x) pairing the gammas and extract x imposing that: Zv(   1 )= Zv(  0 2 ) same K decay vertex: the 2  0 came from the same K! Zv(  0 2 ) Zv(   1 ) Put x back in the Zv(  0 2 ) to get the real Z V (neu) If the |Zv(CHA)-ZV(neu)|<400 cm the  are really fused and so we discard the event Fused gamma events are very dangerous BG source: - M K, and COG cut automatically satisfied! - Releasing the T *  cut they can give sizable contribution NA48 calorimeter is very good to reject them: - very high granularity (2x2 cm) cells - very good resolution in vertex Z coordinate Multi step algorithm looped over clusters:

Highlights on rare charged kaon decays Mauro Raggi – Beach K  →       K  →      BG rejection performance Source%IB%DE ±± ~1·10 -4 ~0.61·10 -2 Accidental<0.5·10 -4 ~0.3·10 -2 Total BG is less than 1% with respect to the expected DE contribution even in the range 0<T *  <80 MeV All physical BG can be explained in terms of the  ±     events only. Very small contribution from accidentals neglected Selected region 220K events Thanks to the overlapping gamma cut and to MK and COG resolutions, the BG coming from       is under control.

Highlights on rare charged kaon decays Mauro Raggi – Beach ■ DE ▼IB The mistagged  events: a self BG The mistagged gamma events behave like BG because they can induce fake shapes in the W distribution. In fact due to the slope of IB W distribution they tend to populate the region of high W simulating DE events. The mistagging probability has been evaluated in MC as a function of the mistagging cut to be 1.2‰ at 400 cm The rejection of mistagged events has 2 steps: 1. Compatibility of charged and neutral vertices (2.5% mistagging) 2. Distance between best and second best neutral vertices > xx cm Mistagging probabilities for IB and DE events are very similar.

Highlights on rare charged kaon decays Mauro Raggi – Beach Data MC comparison Data MC for E  (W<0.5) W(Data)/W (IB MC ) Fitting region IB dominated region The IB dominated part of the data W spectrum is very well reproduced by MC The radiated  energy (for the IB part of the spectrum) is very well reproduced E  min cut

Highlights on rare charged kaon decays Mauro Raggi – Beach Fitting algorithm To get the fractions of IB(  ), DE(  ), INT(  ), from data we use an extended maximum likelihood approach: The fit has been performed in 14 bins, between , with a minimum  energy of 5 GeV, using a data sample of 124K events. To get the fractions of DE and INT the raw parameter are corrected for different acceptances

Highlights on rare charged kaon decays Mauro Raggi – Beach Systematic uncertainties EffectSyst. DESyst. INT Energy scale Fitting procedure LVL1 trigger±0.17±0.43 Mistagging_±0.2 LVL2 Trigger±0.17±0.52 Resolutions difference<0.05<0.1 LKr non linearity<0.05 BG contributions<0.05 TOTAL±0.25±0.73 Systematic effects dominated by the trigger! Many systematic checks have been performed using both data and Monte-Carlo Learning from experience both LVL1 and LV2 triggers have been modified in We are confident that both systematics will be reduced in 2004 data set.

Highlights on rare charged kaon decays Mauro Raggi – Beach Fit results First measurement: in the region 0<T *  <80 MeV and of the DE term with free INT term. First evidence of a non zero INT term The error on the results is still dominated by statistics and we could profit of SS0 and 2004 data to reduce statistical uncertainties. Preliminary Unfortunately parameters are highly correlated

Highlights on rare charged kaon decays Mauro Raggi – Beach INT=0 fit: just for comparison Just for comparison with what other experiments did we have also extracted the fraction of DE, with the INT term fixed to 0 in the region MeV. A likelihood fit using IB & DE MC only has been performed in the region 0<T *  <80 MeV. Extrapolating to the region using MC we get: The analysis of fit residuals shows a bad  2 Description in term of IB+DE only is unable to reproduce W data spectrum.

Highlights on rare charged kaon decays Mauro Raggi – Beach NA48/2 RARE DECAYS: 2. K ± →     e ±  00 e4 

Highlights on rare charged kaon decays Mauro Raggi – Beach Introduction to K e4 00 Form factors are good constraint for CHPT Lagrangian Low energies  pairs can be used for scattering length measurements as in K e4 C Also K e4 00 is expected to have a CUSP Best measurement by E470 based on 216 events –BR(K e4 00 )= (2.29 ± 0.33)·10 -5 –Attempt to fit form factor F

Highlights on rare charged kaon decays Mauro Raggi – Beach Measurement technique for BR The Kaon flux has been measured using K ± →  ±      For the BR(K ± →  ±      new result from KLOE has been used: BR(K ± →  ±     )=1.763±0.013±0.022

Highlights on rare charged kaon decays Mauro Raggi – Beach Event selection  ≥ 4 good  clusters in LKr  ≥ 1 good track with E/p ≥ 0.95  2 good  0 with similar Z V vertex position (Neutral vertex)  shower width cut to distinguish e and   Use the K for momentum from KABES to evaluate momentum assuming P T =0  The Kaon mass can be evaluated

Highlights on rare charged kaon decays Mauro Raggi – Beach BG estimates 9642 events with the following BG: 260±94 from K ± →        ± 2 accidental BG form K e3 (  ) 1.K ± →       →same final state of signal IF  misidentified as an e - E over P and shower width cut to identify hadronic showers from EM ones - Elliptic cut in the P T and M K (  ±     ) plane to identify  ±     decays 2.K ± →e ±  0 (  )  → plus an accidental  Quite clean sample BG less than 3%

Highlights on rare charged kaon decays Mauro Raggi – Beach Final result BR Preliminary The statistical error can be further reduced using the 2004 data set (28K events) Using only the SS123 part of the 2003 data (9642 events) the Branching Ratio of the K e4 00 decay has been measured: The result has been crosschecked using also Ke3 as normalization channel leading to consistent result.

Highlights on rare charged kaon decays Mauro Raggi – Beach The K e4 00 form factors In this case we have only 1 form factor F (2 identical  0 ): The fit has been performed using both 2003 and 2004 data (~38K events) No sensitivity to f e reached → f e set to 0. Under this assumption we get: Those values are consistent with the ones measured by NA48/2 in K e4 C See detailed talk by B. Bloch-Devaux at QCD 2006 conference.

Highlights on rare charged kaon decays Mauro Raggi – Beach K ± →  ±  and other NA48/2 rare decays Decay# Ev. NA48/2# EventsBR K ± →  ±  2000 (SS123)31 (E787) BR (100<P<180) =(6.0±1.5 sta ±0.7 sys )10 − 7 K±→±e±e±K±→±e±e± 4000(SS123)10K (E787)(2.88±0.13)·10 -7 K±→±±K±→±± 402 PDG ’05(8.1±1.4) ·10 -8 Low m  spectrum limited in the main trigger by a trigger cut around 200 MeV/c 2 K ± →  ±  Maybe we can look in the lower region using minimum bias triggers and 2004 dataset

Highlights on rare charged kaon decays Mauro Raggi – Beach Conclusions NA48/2 has performed the first measurement of the DE and INT terms in the region 0<T *  <80 MeV for the decay K ± →  ±  0  : The results seem to indicate the presence of a negative, non vanishing, interference and therefore a non negligible contribution of E terms to the DE. A new measurement of the BR and form factor parameters for the K e4 00 decays has also been performed: Both results can be further improved using SS0 and 2004 statistics Much more to come in other rare decays Preliminary

Highlights on rare charged kaon decays Mauro Raggi – Beach Backup slides

Highlights on rare charged kaon decays Mauro Raggi – Beach L1 trigger NT-PEAK 4 cm Y view X view X OR Y > 2 view

Highlights on rare charged kaon decays Mauro Raggi – Beach Aim to reject K ± →  ±  0 events and get  ±  0  0. It’s based on the online computation of Mfake: Mfake ~ M K for K ± →  ±  0 events in fact m  2 –MM 2 ~ 0. Only events with M FAKE < 475 MeV, are collected by the trigger MBX1TR-P LVL2 trigger