Welcome to QualityCore ® Professional Development.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Silicon Valley Math Initiative Professional Development Series
Advertisements

A Guide to Implementation
Understanding By Design: Integration of CTE and Core Content Curriculum Michael S. Gullett.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
WELCOME – RIG 2 - Session 1 September, 2012 OESD 114 RIG 2 - Session 1.
Understanding the EPC Rating rubrics
5 Pillars of Mathematics Training #1: Mathematical Discourse Dawn Perks Grayling B. Williams.
Grade 12 Subject Specific Ministry Training Sessions
Translating Standards Into Curriculum: The Lead Standards Approach.
Using Rigorous & Relevant Standard Based Assessments to Evaluate Student Learning Kharma Banks Torrieann Dooley David Cox Road Elementary Drew Polly UNC.
HANCOCK CENTRAL SCHOOL INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP TEAM SEPTEMBER 14, 2012.
1. What is it we want our students to learn?
“Charting the Course Together” Implementing the Common Core State Standards -Mathematics- Middle School Leadership Teams February 6, 2014.
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
OCTOBER ED DIRECTOR PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT 10/1/14 POWERFUL & PURPOSEFUL FEEDBACK.
Looking at Student work to Improve Learning
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
STRATEGIES FOR ONLINE LEARNING IN A GLOBAL NETWORK UNIVERSITY INTED 2013 Annette Smith, Kristopher Moore, Erica Osher Reifer New York University.
Discourse. Student Discourse How would you define student discourse? “IS considered student discourse” “IS NOT considered student discourse”
Welcome! Sign in and find your name tent
Section 1 Systems of Professional Learning Module 5 Grades K–5: Focus on Sustaining Change.
School Based Inquiry Teams Getting Started. Introductions Overview Purpose.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 1.
Analyzing National Board Standards Workshop #3 CERRA National Board Candidate Support Workshop Toolkit WS
Before you are seated, please look inside the back of your nametag for a slip of colored paper. Please seat yourself at the table bearing a sheet of paper.
Citywide Instructional Expectations, Teacher Teams and the QR—Implications for Mary Barton SATIF CFN 204 May 17, 2013.
Introduction to Working Portfolios Educator Effectiveness System Training.
Mathematics Professional Development Senior School Teachers Session 1: Teaching Through Problem Solving 1.
Common Core Math Summit Success Beyond the Test. Schedule of Events 9:00 Welcome 9:15 What is College Ready? 10:00 Understanding the Common Core 10:45.
Introduction to the Smarter Balanced Digital Library
Copyright © 2008, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative, and Intel Teach Program are trademarks of.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
DVC Essay #2. The Essay  Read the following six California Standards for Teachers.  Discuss each standard and the elements that follow them  Choose.
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Units Module Focus.
Getting Started MT Training Intel®Teach Getting Started.
ISLLC Standard #2 Supporting Teacher Learning Name Workshop Facilitator.
Collaborative Academic Conversations
Copyright © 2008, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative, and Intel Teach Program are trademarks of.
Standard 1: Teachers demonstrate leadership s. Element a: Teachers lead in their classrooms. What does Globally Competitive mean in your classroom? How.
Literacy Coaching: An Essential “Piece” of the Puzzle.
1. 2 Objectives: Review the Characteristics of Effective Instruction and make connections to our professional development efforts. Begin to think about.
Module 1 Peer Coaching on Paper Peer Coach Training.
Office of Service Quality
Peer Coaching Program Monica Gardelli Franco
Literacy Design Collaborative (LDC) – A Teacher Tool for Implementing the CCSS AGENDA October 4 th and 5 th 2012 Outcomes: Self- reflections on how the.
Examining Student Work (using the Tuning Protocol) Jacque Melin – GVSU
Understanding by Design Stage 3: Designing Instruction Summer UBD Workshop, Day 3 August 14, 2014.
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
Issues in Teaching EDU Session 1 The Conceptual Understanding of What You are Teaching.
Making an Excellent School More Excellent: Weston High School’s 21st Century Learning Expectations and Goals
Standard One: Engaging & Supporting All Students in Learning
February 8, 2017.
Data Review Team Time Fall 2013.
New Goal Clarity Coach Training October 27, 2017
Seeing Is Believing: Successful Co-Teaching for English Learners
Math Leadership Network
Component 4 Effective and Reflective Practitioner
Analyze Student Work Sample 2 Instructional Next Steps
Collaborative Leadership
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
california Standards for the Teaching Profession
LESSON DESIGN WORKSHOP
Welcome to fame community of practice Module 1
GROWING ALL STUDENTS THROUGH HIGH-QUALITY ASSIGNMENTS
Welcome to the overview session for the Iowa Core Curriculum
Professional Learning
Connecticut Core Standards for Mathematics
Report on SEC Data Analysis
Pati Kravetz Associate Director for Experiential Learning and Student Employment Main title: 40 pt. Arial Presenter Name: 16 pt. Arial Presenters Title:
Presentation transcript:

Welcome to QualityCore ® Professional Development

Module 10: Looking at Student Work (LASW)

Day 4, LASW1–2 Chalk Talk Reflecting on your personal action plan from our last workshop, add to the posters: One thing you’ve implemented that is going well. One thing you need help or support with. You may also make additional comments on others’ ideas.

Day 4, LASW1–3 Introductions Introduce yourself: Name, school, and course(s) you teach. Share one thing you have added to the posters during the Chalk Talk.

Day 4, LASW1–4 Establishing Norms Reflect on these questions: What norms or rules of conduct will allow each of us the opportunity to grow personally and professionally? How can we work together as an effective group?

Day 4, LASW1–5 Essential Question What does a rigorous and relevant high school classroom look, feel, and sound like?

Day 4, LASW1–6 Agenda and Goals Looking at Student Work (LASW) ~Participants will analyze student work for instructional implications Introduction to Scaffolding ~Participants will use strategies to encourage greater access to content while maintaining rigor Instructional Planning and Modifying Instruction ~Participants will modify instruction to incorporate QualityCore into their classrooms

Day 4, LASW1–7 Essential Question How can looking at student work help us understand what students know and improve our instruction?

Day 4, LASW1–8 Looking at Student Work Reflection Quick Write: What is the purpose of Looking at Student Work (LASW)?

Day 4, LASW1–9 An Aligned Instructional System ACT Course Standards Assessments Instruction Student Work

Day 4, LASW1–10 Benefits of LASW Looking at student work helps educators to: Learn about the effectiveness of their instruction. Better understand students’ learning. Develop more effective curricula. Find ways to help students do better work. Blythe, Allen, & Powell (2007) Looking Together at Student Work

Day 4, LASW1–11 Using Student Work in Instruction

Day 4, LASW1–12 Template to Examine Student Work The QualityCore process has the following goals: Determining the degree to which student work meets the criteria of high-quality work. Fostering collaboration among colleagues and reflection on the instructional process. Promoting consistency in evaluating student work.

Day 4, LASW1–13 Template to Examine Student Work The 5-steps in the process require educators to: Discuss/Evaluate the assignment’s place and purpose. Reach consensus on the attributes of high-quality work connected to the assignment. Sort student work. Examine student work. Focus on student work that does not meet high- quality criteria.

Day 4, LASW1–14 LASW In your small groups, prepare to present your results from the LASW process. Did most student meet expectations? What patterns or misconceptions did you notice? In general, what are the instructional implications? Identify general ways that the assignment could be modified for reteaching or differentiation.

Day 4, LASW1– Assessment/Exit Slip Respond to the following prompts: 3 things I learned from this session. 2 questions/issues that still remain for me. 1 next step for me.